Spelling suggestions: "subject:"biblical hebrew"" "subject:"biblical nebrew""
11 |
Paragraphs as episodes : distinguishing paragraphs in Biblical Hebrew narrative text on the basis of linguistic devicesYoo, Chang Keol 03 1900 (has links)
Thesis (MA (Ancient Studies))--Stellenbosch University, 2008. / The aim of this study is to determine inter-subjective, verifiable criteria according to
which paragraphs can be distinguished in BH narrative texts. Distinguishing these units
plays an important role in the understanding and processing of written texts.
Corpus studies in text-linguistics and empirical studies in psycholinguistic studies have
established that narrative is not only characterized by a string of sentences, but has a
multi-dimensional or hierarchical structure, which can be broken down into units. These
units are regarded as episodes, which are cognitively and structurally relevant. An
episode is defined as a memory block. Semantically, it is defined as a thematically
unified entity, the surface boundaries of which are marked linguistically.
On the one hand, text production studies have established that authors employ
segmentation markers or devices at the beginning of each episode in order to warn
the reader that a new episode is impending. On the other hand, studies in text
comprehension have also concluded that readers understand these devices of textual
segmentation.
On the basis of the above investigations, this study established a set of criteria for
identifying episodes. The criteria included several segmentation devices such as
overspecified referential expressions, temporal expressions, and shifts in space that
mark the boundaries of episodes, as well as devices that signal thematic continuity
in narrative episodes of BH. The value and validity of these criteria were then
tested in the light of a specific corpus of texts, viz. 1 Sam 1-6. The text was
analyzed and episodes have been distinguished by means of the above-mentioned
set of criteria. These episodes were then compared to the paragraph distinctions (i.e.
the graphic representations of episodes), which are made in a representative number
of commentaries and translations.
The investigation confirmed that many of the paragraph distinctions in commentaries
and translations are justifiable. However, it was also found that the paragraph
distinctions of exegetes and translators often differ. This finding confirmed the
necessity (and need) of inter-subjectively verifiable, and well-founded, criteria for
distinguishing paragraphs in BH narratives. This exploratory study established the value
of the model used, but also indicated that further investigation is needed to refine
various aspects of the model.
|
12 |
Uma introdução geral à poesia hebraica bíblica / A general introduction to the Biblical Hebrew poetryEdson Magalhães Nunes Júnior 28 November 2012 (has links)
Ao lidar com uma parte considerável da Bíblia Hebraica, o leitor precisa estar a par do que é Poesia Hebraica Bíblica, suas características, peculiaridades e nuances a fim de entender e apreciar o texto. Mas como os Hebreus não deixaram nenhum manual de poética, o debate sobre a poesia da Bíblia Hebraica envolve desde sua presença no texto até suas características gerais e específicas. No presente trabalho, apresenta-se uma breve discussão sobre a Poesia Hebraica Bíblica no cenário acadêmico atual. Também são expostas as características dessa poesia, com ênfase no paralelismo. / When dealing with most part of the Hebrew Bible, the reader must be aware of what is biblical Hebrew poetry, its characteristics, peculiarities and details in order to understand and appreciate the text. Since there isn\'t a Hebrew manual of poetics, the debate about the biblical Hebrew poetry comprises from its presence in the text to its general and specific characteristics. The following research presents a brief discussion about Hebrew Bible in the current academic scenario, as the characteristics of this kind of poetry with an emphasis in parallelism.
|
13 |
Uma introdução geral à poesia hebraica bíblica / A general introduction to the Biblical Hebrew poetryNunes Júnior, Edson Magalhães 28 November 2012 (has links)
Ao lidar com uma parte considerável da Bíblia Hebraica, o leitor precisa estar a par do que é Poesia Hebraica Bíblica, suas características, peculiaridades e nuances a fim de entender e apreciar o texto. Mas como os Hebreus não deixaram nenhum manual de poética, o debate sobre a poesia da Bíblia Hebraica envolve desde sua presença no texto até suas características gerais e específicas. No presente trabalho, apresenta-se uma breve discussão sobre a Poesia Hebraica Bíblica no cenário acadêmico atual. Também são expostas as características dessa poesia, com ênfase no paralelismo. / When dealing with most part of the Hebrew Bible, the reader must be aware of what is biblical Hebrew poetry, its characteristics, peculiarities and details in order to understand and appreciate the text. Since there isn\'t a Hebrew manual of poetics, the debate about the biblical Hebrew poetry comprises from its presence in the text to its general and specific characteristics. The following research presents a brief discussion about Hebrew Bible in the current academic scenario, as the characteristics of this kind of poetry with an emphasis in parallelism.
|
14 |
Prolegomena to a Greek-Hebrew & Hebrew-Greek index to AquilaReider, Joseph, January 1916 (has links)
Thesis (Ph. D.)--Dropsie College for Hebrew and Cognate Learning, 1913. / Published also in the Jewish Quarterly Review, new series, vol. 4, no. 3, 1914, p. 321-356; vol. 4, no. 4, 1914, p. 577-620; vol. 7, no. 3, 1917, p. 287-366.
|
15 |
The semantic potential of 'al in Genesis, Psalms, and ChroniclesMena, Andrea K. 12 1900 (has links)
Thesis (MA)--Stellenbosch University, 2012. / ENGLISH ABSTRACT: This thesis offers a description of the semantic potential of the Biblical Hebrew lexeme '7l! in
Genesis, Psalms, and Chronicles according to a cognitive linguistic perspective. This specific
linguistic approach offers a theoretical framework of how humans cognitively organize
lexical meaning, which is advantageous for highly polysemous lexemes, such as '7lJ. The need
for this study arises because existing Biblical Hebrew resources do not utilize such a
framework as is evidenced by their lists of translation equivalents, rather than full
descriptions of meanings, and their lack of a clearly defined semantic model underlying their
lexical treatment. However, they do provide a starting point that can be built upon with a
cognitive linguistic based methodology. Such a methodology is found in Tyler and Evans
(2007) case study of over, a frequent English translation of '7lJ. Tyler and Evans (2007)
present how to determine the most prototypical semantic sense (i.e., the Proto-Scene) and
how to distinguish between other distinct semantic senses, all of which represent the lexeme's
semantic potential. This thesis heuristically utilizes this methodology while strongly
considering three other factors. First, the syntactic frame surrounding '7l! is evaluated to assess
how syntactic information, specifically verbal valency, contributes to the preposition's
semantic value. Second, the frequency of each semantic category is assessed to determine
possible insight into prototypicality within the defined corpus. Third, a radial structure is
proposed to represent the semantic relationships between the prototypical and nonprototypical
categories. This type of organization illustrates a clearly defined semantic model
underlying the lexical treatment.
This study first describes the Proto-Scene, which involves one entity over or upon another.
Then, fifteen other distinct semantic categories of '7l! are presented within a radial structure
(i.e. The Vertical Cluster: More, Superior, and Control; Contingent Locative;
Accompaniment, In, To, Oppositional, For, Frontal, Causal, Norm, Focus of Attention,
Instrumental, and Psalms Titles). Finally, the various senses for the morphologically complex
lexemes are proposed. These include '7l!1;1 (i.e. From Upon, Away From, Above, and
Contingent Locative) and '7l!=? (i.e. As Concerning). / AFRIKAANSE OPSOMMING: Hierdie tesis heskryf die semantiese potensiaal van die Byhelse Hehreeuse lekseem ?~ in
Genesis, Psalms en Kronieke vanuit die perspektief van kognitiewe taalkunde. Hierdie
taalkundige model hied 'n teoretiese raamwerk van hoe mense leksikale hetekenis kognitief
organiseer. So 'n teoretiese raamwerk is haie geskik vir die heskrywing van 'n polisemiese
lekseem soos ?~. Die hehoefte aan 'n meer toereikende teoretiese raamwerk hlyk uit die
manier waarop hestaande Byhels-Hehreeuse hulphronne die lekseem heskryf, hyvoorheeld,
hulle hied weinig meer as lyste van vertalingsekwiwalente. Hulle hied, nietemin, 'n
heginpunt waarop voortgehou kan word met hehulp van 'n kognitiewe taalkundige model. So
'n metodologie word gevind in Tyler en Evans (2007) se gevallestudie van "over", 'n
gehruiklike Engelse ekwiwalent vir?~. Tyler en Evans dui aan hoe om die mees prototipiese
semantiese hetekenis ( d.i. die "proto-toneel" of "proto-scene") vas te stel, asook hoe om
tussen die ander semantiese nuanses ("senses") te onderskei. AI hierdie nuanses
verteenwoordig die lekseem se semantiese potensiaal. Hierdie tesis maak op 'n heuristiese
wyse gehruik van hierdie metodologie. Terselfde tyd neem dit drie ander faktore in
aanmerking: Eerstens, word die sintaktiese raamwerk waarin ?~ voorkom, vasgestel ten einde
te hepaal hoe sintaktiese informasie, veral werkwoordelike valensie, hydra tot die semantiese
potensiaal van die voorsetsel. Tweedens, word die frekwensie van elke semantiese kategorie
hepaal om tot moontlike insigte rakende prototipiese gehruike hinne die vasgestelde korpus te
kom. Derdens, word 'n sg. "radial structure" voorgestel om die semantiese verhoudings
tussen die prototipiese en nie-prototipiese kategoriee te illustreer.
Hierdie studie heskryf, eerstens, die proto-toneel, wat een entiteit bo-oor of op 'n ander
hehels. Daama word vyftien ander afsonderlike semantiese kategoriee van ?~ hinne 'n "radial
structure" voorgestel ( d.i. die Vertikale Groep: Meer, Superior en Beheer; "Contingent"
Lokatief; Begeleiding, In, Na, Teenoor, Vir, Voor, Oorsaaklik, Norm, Fokus van Aandag,
Instrumenteel, en Psalmopskrifte ). Laastens, word voorstelle gemaak in verhand met die
verskeie hetekenisse van die morphologies-komplekse lekseme ?~~ (d.i. Weg van ho-op,
Weg van, Bo, en "Contingent" Lokatief) en ?~:p (d.i. Met Betrekking Tot).
|
16 |
Leserlenkung in der Bibel : die Informationsgliederung in poetischen hebräischen Bibeltexten und ihren deutschen ÜbersetzungenLepre, Stefanie January 2007 (has links)
Teilw. zugl.: Tübingen, Univ., Diss., 2004
|
17 |
Shemot be-mishkali mem tehilit ve-tav tehilit be-ketav-yad P'armah A shel ha-Mishnah be-hashiva'ah le-Mikra ule-masorot aherot shel ha-Mishnah / A description of nominal patterns (with prefixes 'mem' and 'tav) in Mishnaic Hebrew according to the pradition of the Parma 'A' manuscript in comparison with Biblical Hebrew and othermanuscripts of the MishnaAmrosi, Yosi, Amroussi, Yossi 11 1900 (has links)
Text in Hebrew with English Summary / This research describes nominal patterns with prefixes m and t as appearing in Parma
A in comparison with other traditions viz. Kaufinan, Paris and Y emenite manuscripts.
This research has 3 aims:
1. To describe all relevant evidence in Parma A
2. To compare evidence with data in other traditions, including the Bible and
Mishnaic Hebrew and Aramaic sources
3. To elaborate on those unique forms in manuscripts which represent genuine
Mishnaic Hebrew / Classics and Modern European Languages / D. Litt et Phil. (Semitic Languages)
|
18 |
A cognitive semantic assessment of עִם and אֵת's semantic potentialLyle, Kristopher Aaron 03 1900 (has links)
Thesis (MA)--Stellenbosch University, 2012. / ENGLISH ABSTRACT: This thesis provides a critical assessment of the semantic potential of two Biblical Hebrew
lexemes: עִם and אֵת . Previous lexical inquiries of the target lexemes provide the impetus for
the current research; this is because the linguistic frameworks assumed by these studies are
outmatched in the amount of explanatory power accompanying more recent theoretical
developments, primarily evidenced within Cognitive linguistics (and semantics). As its
methodological framework, the current study then appropriates these new advances and
demonstrates a semantic potential of the target lexemes that can be determined through
criteria offered by Tyler and Evans (2003). This criteria specifically aids in the task of
semantic demarcation as well as identifying the primary sense, from which the remaining
network of senses are derived. Furthermore, not only is an attempt made at representing the
range of עִם and אֵת 's semantic potential, but a proposal for the development of these senses is
offered as well. This is done primarily through an implementation of the theory of
grammaticalization, as posited by Heine et al. (1991). The identified semantic networks are
then analyzed from two different perspectives of lexical inquiry: 1) as a monosemy-polysemy
cline, and 2) from both a semasiological and onomasiological point of departure (the latter
method of onomasiology represents a unique contribution to the assessment of עִם and אֵת
since most Biblical Hebrew lexical inquiries are limited to being a semasiological endeavor).
The investigation uses the Pentateuch as its data-set and reveals a representation of (at least)
eleven distinct senses in עִם 's semantic network as well as אֵת 's. Even though each lexeme's
semantic potential is comprised of primarily the same senses, these eleven distinct senses are
not completely synonymous and represent different meanings. Significantly, it is determined
that 1) both target lexemes share the same primary sense (i.e., proto-scene), 2) both indicate
the same core senses and consequently, 3) the target lexemes may rightly be considered as
near synonyms. / AFRIKAANSE OPSOMMING:Hierdie tesis bied 'n kritiese evaluering van die semantiese potensiaal van twee Bybelse
Hebreeus lekseme: עִם en אֵת . Gebreke in bestaande navorsing ten opsigte van hierdie twee
lekseme het die impuls verskaf vir hierdie projek. Onlangse ontwikkelinge in teoretiese
taalkunde, in besonder kognitiewe taalkunde (en semantiek), het aangetoon dat die modelle in
terme waarvan die bestaande beskrywing van die lekseme gedoen is, agterhaal is. Hierdie
studie gebruik die perspektiewe wat kognitiewe semantiek bied om die semantiese potensiaal
van hierdie twee Bybels-Hebreeuse lekseme te beskryf. Kriteria wat deur Tyler en Evans
(2003) geformuleer is in hulle beskrywing van ‘n aantal Engelse voorsetsels, word as
metodologiese vertrekpunt gebruik. Hierdie kriteria is veral nuttig in die semantiese
afbakening, asook die identifisering van die primêre betekenis van die lekseme. Lg. bied die
basis in terme waarvan die res van netwerk van betekenisonderskeidings beskryf word. In die
studie word nie net die gepoog om die verskillende betekenisse van die lekseme te beskryf
nie, maar daar word ook gepoog om aan te dui hoe die verskillende onderskeidings ontwikkel
het. Dit word primêr gedoen in terme van die grammatikaliseringsteorie van Heine et al
(1991). Die semantiese netwerke wat geïdentifiseer is, word vanuit twee verskillende
perspektiewe van leksikale ondersoek gedoen: 1) die mono-polisemiese klien (“cline”) en 2)
‘n semasiologiese en onomasiologiese vertrekpunt. Laasgenoemde benadering tot
onomasiologie verteenwoordig ‘n unieke bydrae tot die beskrywing van עִם en אֵת aangesien
die meeste bestaande Bybels-Hebreeuse beskrywings van die lekseme semasiologies van aard
is.
Hierdie ondersoek is beperk tot die gebruik van עִם en אֵת in die Pentateug. Ten minste 11
verskillende betekenisseonderskeidings word vir beide lekseme geïdentifiseer. Alhoewel
beide lekseme se semantiese potensiaal in baie opsigte dieselfde is, is dit nie presies identies
nie. Wat wel merkwaardig is, is 1) dat beide lekseme dieselfde basiese betekenis (dit is die sg.
“proto-scene”) het, 2) dat beide dieselfde kernbetekenisonderskeidings het en dat gevolglik 3)
hulle as naby-sinonieme bestempel kan word.
|
19 |
Towards a discourse-pragmatic description of left-dislocation in biblical HebrewWestbury, Joshua Ryan 12 1900 (has links)
Thesis (MA (Biblical Languages))--University of Stellenbosch, 2010. / ENGLISH ABSTRACT: This is an exploratory investigation into the discourse-pragmatic function(s) of the so-called
Left-Dislocation construction in Biblical Hebrew. This inquiry is a part of a larger investigation
into the nature and function of word order variation in Biblical Hebrew. In light of past research
on Biblical Hebrew word-order variation, specifically concerning Left-Dislocation constructions,
it is concluded that a re-analysis of Left-Dislocation constructions in Biblical Hebrew is called
for. Advancements within the fields of cognitive-functional linguistics and discourse-pragmatics
(information-structure) have afforded numerous avenues towards a more comprehensive
cognitive-oriented frame of reference for ascertaining the functions of Biblical Hebrew word order variation.
The discourse-pragmatic and cognitive-functional notion of information-structure serves as the
basis for the theoretical framework employed in the present investigation. Information-structure
is principally concerned with the question as to why grammars of natural language offer speakers
a variety of morphosyntactic and prosodic options for expressing the same propositional content.
Since the Left-Dislocation construction is a universal syntactic phenomenon, typological
information regarding the form and function of Left-Dislocation constructions across languages
served as a critical source of insight into the prototypical formal features and functional domains
of the construction within Biblical Hebrew. The insights garnered from cross-linguistic data
informed the parameters employed in the construction and construal of a random data-set of one
hundred cases of Left-Dislocation drawn from the narrative portions of the Hebrew Bible
stretching from Genesis to 2 Chronicles.
The investigation of our data-set, within the confines of a discourse-pragmatic framework,
reveals that Left-Dislocation constructions in Biblical Hebrew are principally employed to
facilitate the topic-promotion of identifiable but inactive discourse-referents. These referents
could be the primary or secondary topics of the sentences in which they are used. / AFRIKAANSE OPSOMMING: Hierdie studie is 'n verkennende ondersoek na die diskoerspragmatiese funksie(s) van
sogenaamde linksverskuiwing ('Left-Dislocation') konstruksies in Bybelse Hebreeus. Hierdie
vraagstelling vorm deel van 'n meer omvattende ondersoek na die aard en funksie van
woordorde-variasies in Bybelse Hebreeus. Na aanleiding van 'n uitvoerige literatuurstudie oor
die funksie(s) van woordorde-variasies in Bybelse Hebreeus, veral met betrekking tot
linksverskuiwingskonstruksies, is tot die gevolgtrekking gekom dat 'n heranalise van
linksverskuiwingskonstruksies in Bybelse Hebreeus nodig is. Vooruitgang op die gebiede van
kognitiewe-funksionele taalkunde, en tekspragmatiek (informasiestruktuur) het dit moontlik
gemaak om 'n meer omvattende kognitief-georiënteerde verwysingsraamwerk vir die bepaling
van die funksie(s) van Bybels-Hebreeuse woordorde-variasies te formuleer.
Die diskoerspragmatiese en kognitiewe-funksionele opvatting van informasiestruktuur dien as
die basis vir die teoretiese raamwerk wat in die huidige ondersoek gebruik is.
Informasiestruktuur is hoofsaaklik gemoeid met die vraag waarom die grammatika van
natuurlike taal aan sprekers 'n verskeidenheid van morfosintaktiese en prosodiese opsies bied vir
die uitdrukking van dieselfde proposisionele inhoud.
Aangesien die linksverskuiwingskonstruksie 'n universele sintaktiese verskynsel is, is
taaltipologiese inligting oor die vorm en funksie van die linksverskuiwingskonstruksie gebruik
om insig te kry in die prototipiese formele eienskappe en funksies van die konstruksie in Bybelse
Hebreeus.
Aan die hand van bg. taaltipologiese insigte is parameters geformuleer aan die hand waarvan 'n
ewekansige monster voorbeelde van linksverskuiwing uit verhalende tekste uit Genesis tot 2
Kronieke ondersoek is. Daar is bevind dat linksverskuiwing in Bybelse Hebreeus hoofsaaklik
aangewend word om identifiseerbare, maar onaktiewe diskoersreferente te promoveer as topieks.
Hierdie referente mag primêre of sekondêre topieks wees.
|
20 |
Learning biblical hebrew vocabulary : insights from second language vocabulary acquisitionThompson, Jeremy Paul 12 1900 (has links)
Thesis (DPhil)--Stellenbosch University, 2011. / ENGLISH ABSTRACT: Though Biblical Hebrew (=BH) is no longer a spoken language, students continue to learn it for the
purpose of reading, or at least interacting at a deeper level, with the text of the Hebrew Bible. This
suggests that BH shares with any modern language learning course the goal of learning to read. One
important part of learning to read is the acquisition of an adequate number of vocabulary items. The
purpose of this study is to determine which insights from Second Language Vocabulary Acquisition
(=SLVA) research and related fields hold the most promise for a new — and possibly more effective
— approach to learning BH vocabulary, to evaluate currently existing BH instructional materials in
light of these insights, to develop a new approach based on these insights, and to test aspects of the
new approach empirically.
Researchers in SLVA have uncovered a number of helpful insights concerning how vocabulary and
vocabulary learning should be defined as well as concerning how vocabulary is best learned. On the
other hand, BH instructional materials reflect little to no influence from these insights. These
materials have continued to define vocabulary narrowly as individual words and continued to
conceive of vocabulary learning primarily as pairing form and meaning in contrast to the much more
sophisticated definitions found in the SLVA literature. For example, SLVA researchers consider items
beyond the word level, such as idioms, to be vocabulary (Moon 1997; Lewis 1993, 1997). BH
instructional materials have also failed to include a significant number of beneficial Vocabulary
Learning Strategies (=VLSs), while including some VLSs that are either intrinsically problematic or
problematic in the ways they are employed. For example, the strategy of learning semantically related
items together is common in BH instructional materials, though it has been shown to be problematic
in a considerable number of experimental studies (e.g. Nation 2000; Finkbeiner & Nicol 2003;
Papathanasiou 2009).
Since SLVA research has yet to influence BH instructional materials, a new approach to BH
vocabulary learning is warranted. This new approach is based on sound theory concerning what
vocabulary is and what it means to learn it, while offering learners as many helpful strategies for
learning lexical items as possible. To justify this new approach, a set of experimental studies was run
including one longitudinal case study and three larger-scale experiments. This testing was partial in
nature since it was only possible to test one variable at a time. The testing revealed a number of
important areas for future research into BH vocabulary learning. / AFRIKAANSE OPSOMMING: Alhoewel Bybelse Hebreeus (=BH) nie meer gepraat word nie, hou studente aan om dit aan te leer vir
die doel om te lees, of ten minste om op ‘n dieper vlak met die oorspronklike teks van die Hebreeuse Bybel om te gaan. Dit impliseer dat die aanleer van BH net soos met die aanleer van moderne tale, ten doel het om die taal te kan lees. Een belangrike aspek van om te leer lees, is om die woordeskat aan
te leer wat vir hierdie doel nodig is. Die doel van hierdie studie is om vas te stel watter insigte, verkry
uit Tweede Taal Woordeskat-Aanleer (=TTWA) navorsing en ander verwante studievelde, die meeste
belofte inhou vir ‘n nuwe – en moontlik meer effektiewe – benadering tot die leer van BH
woordeskat; om huidige BH leermateriaal te evalueer, in lig van hierdie insigte; om ‘n nuwe
benadering te ontwikkel gebaseer op hierdie insigte; en om aspekte van die nuwe benadering empiries toets. Navorsers in TTWA het al heelwat insig verkry in hoe woordeskat en die aanleer van woordeskat
gedefineer behoort te word, sowel as aangaande die mees effektiewe maniere waarop woordeskat
aangeleer kan word. Dit lyk egter of beskikbare BH leermanier niks of baie min by hierdie insigte
baatgevind het. Hierdie materiaal handhaaf tipies ‘n baie nou definisie van wat woordeskat is, te
wete, individuele woorde. Dit beskou dus die aanleer van woordeskat as die aanleer van hoofsaaklik
woordpare met verskillende vorme en betekenisse, in plaas daarvan om die meer gesofistikeerde
definisies te gebruik wat in TTWA literatuur gevind word. TTWA navorsers beskou, byvoorbeelde
idiome, wat uit meer as een woord kan bestaan, ook as woordskat-eenhede (Moon 1997; Lewis 1993,
1997). BH leermateriaal gebruik selde van die groot getal beskikbare nuttige Woordeskat Leer-
Strategieë (=WLS). Daar word eerder dikwels strategieë gebruik wat volgens TTWA navorsing nie
baie effektief is nie.’n Goeie voorbeeld in hierdie verband is die strategie om semanties-verwante
items saam te leer. Empiriese navorsing het aangetoon dat hierdie strategie sonder twyfel problematies
kan wees (bv. Nation 2000; Finkbeiner & Nicol 2003; Papathanasiou 2009).
Aangesien TTWA feitelik nog geen beduidende invloed op BH leermateriaal gehad het, is ‘n nuwe
benadering tot die aanleer van BH woordeskat waarin TTWA insigte verreken word, geregverdig.
Hierdie nuwe benadering is gebaseer op ‘n deeglik begrondige teoriese model aangaande wat
woordeskat is, en wat dit beteken om dit te leer. Verder kan geput word uit die skat van nuttige
strategieë wat al in TTWS geïdentifiseer is om sodoende aan BH leerder strategieë te bied wat
hulleself al bewys het. Om die nuwe benadering empiries te begrond, is ‘n reeks eksperimentele
studies geloods. Nie alle aspekte van die nuwe model kon sistematies getoets word nie. Die grondslag
vir verdere navorsing is egter gelê.
|
Page generated in 0.0595 seconds