Studiens syfte var att få bidra med en ökad kunskap om och förståelse för hur nu unga vuxna, biologiska barn, upplever att ha föräldrar som har haft familjehemsuppdrag och vilken betydelse det haft för dem. Syftet var också att undersöka om dessa barn haft behov av stöd samt vilket stöd de fått. I studien genomfördes fem kvalitativa intervjuer med unga vuxna som har vuxit upp med föräldrar som haft familjehemsuppdrag. Studiens resultat analyserades med Schultz Jørgensens familjeplansteori. Resultat och tolkningar visade att biologiska barn upplever sig delaktiga i familjehemsuppdraget och beskriver relationen till sina fostersyskon som syskon och vän. Biologiska barn beskriver att de hade lättare att skapa relationer till de yngre fostersyskonen än till de som är tonåringar eller jämngamla. Resultatet visade att informanterna upplever fler fördelar än nackdelar med att ha fostersyskon. De biologiska barnen beskriver också att de kände att de saknade möjligheten till stöd från socialtjänsten. / The purpose of the study was to help create a greater knowledge and understanding for now young adult biological children's experiences of having had parents being foster care parents and the meaning of it. The purpose was also to examine if these children had need of and what kind of aid they got. This study was based of five qualitative interviews with now young adults that’s been growing up with parents that were foster parents. The result in the study was analysed with Schultz Jørgensens familyplanetheory. Results and interpretations showed that biological children experience a participation in the foster care process and describes the relation to the foster children as that of a sibling and friend. Biological children describe that they have an easier time creating relations to younger foster siblings than to teenagers and children in the same age. The results showed that the informants experience more positive feelings than negative feelings with having foster siblings. The biological children also describe that they felt a loss of opportunities of aid from the social services.

The purpose with this study is to find out the experience of growing up in a family where the biological parents, has taken the assignment as family child caregiver’s. We have taken the help from the following question formulations to immerse ourselves in the subject. How do the biological children experience their relationship to their parents? How do the biological children experience their relationship to the children who are placed in their home? How do the biological children experience their participation in the family home? How do the biological children experience the need for support from outside the family? We have used a qualitative research method and interviewed six respondents with help from a semi-structured interview guide to get the respondents unique experiences told. In this way the respondents own perspective is presented in a phenomenological way, without coloring their stories with our own naive theories. We have processed the material with help from topics that affect our question formulation. Sibling relationship, relations to parents, participation and support from social welfare and also the family home assignment. The results from the interviews are introduced with help from the Attachment theory, KASAM, Systems theory, literature and research in the subject. Our conclusions are that the biological children have had a participation in the decisions concerning the family home. We have also established that the biological children in our study rarely had to take responsibility for the children placed in their home. The result also shows that the biological children experience varying relationships to the children placed in their home. Some respondents describe it as a sibling relationship while some describes their relationship to the placed children more like a friendly relationship. Our respondents experiences to their parents are good with some exceptions during some particular troublesome periods in their growth. Everyone told us that they could talk to their parents about most of the things regarding the family home but they also said that they felt the need of a person outside the family to talk to, like some support from the social services.

Denna uppsats handlar om biologiska barn och hur deras delaktighet, utifrån barnkonventionen och begreppet ”barnets bästa”, beaktas av yrkesprofessionella som handhar ärendet när deras familj åtagit sig uppdrag att vara familjehem. Syftet med vår studie är att undersöka hur socialtjänsten beaktar biologiska barns bästa vid en familjehemsplacering, utifrån biologiska barns delaktighet. Ett steg till att undersöka deras delaktighet är att ta reda på om det finns rutiner för hur yrkesprofessionella inom familjehemsvård i deras arbete gör biologiska barn i familjehem delaktiga under en familjehemsplacering. Genom en kvalitativ metod som metodval har vi med hjälp av en semistruktuerad intervju genomfört intervjuer med fyra familjehemssekreterare inom familjehemsvård på socialtjänsten samt fyra externa familjehemsutredare på uppdrag av socialtjänsten. Urvalsgruppen arbetar inom och på uppdrag av olika kommuner i Sverige och har olika års erfarenhet inom yrket. Tidigare forskning både internationellt och nationellt har bland annat studerat om placerade barns upplevelser i familjehem samt familjen som helhet i familjehem. När det gäller biologiska barn i familjehem visar det sig att det är ett ytterst begränsat forskningsområde. Resultat i studien visar att trots de yrkesverksammas olika bakgrund så beskriver majoriteten av urvalsgruppen att biologiska barns delaktighet inte har en direkt given plats i processen då rutiner för det saknas och föräldrarna förväntas förmedla vidare information till sina barn. Samtliga i urvalsgruppen ger en beskrivning av att biologiska barns delaktighet i en familjehemsplacering bör förstärkas. Det finns behov av att lyfta och tillämpa biologiska barns rätt till delaktighet vid en familjehemsplacering. Resultatet visar på att frågan är angelägen att få besvarad och behöver undersökas närmare med ytterligare forskningsstudier. / This essay is about biological children and how their participation, based on the Convention on the Rights of the Child and the concept of "the best interests of the child", is considered by professionals who handle the case when their family has undertaken the task of being a foster family. The purpose of this study is to investigate whether there are routines for how professionals in foster care units in their work make biological children in foster families involved during a family home placement. The study intends to make visible how the participation of biological children is considered at all stages of a foster care placement, i.e., from the beginning, during the time and at the end. Through a qualitative method as a method choice, we have, with the help of a semi-structured interview, conducted interviews with four foster care secretaries in family home care at the social services and four external foster care investigators on behalf of the social services. The selection group works within and on behalf of various municipalities in Sweden and has different years of experience in the profession. Previous research both internationally and nationally has, among other things, studied the experiences of placing children in foster families and the family in family homes. Regarding biological children in family homes, however, research shows that it is an extremely limited area of ​​research. Results in the study show that despite the professionals' different backgrounds, most of the sample group describes that biological children's participation does not have a directly given place in the process as routines for it are lacking and parents are expected to pass on given information to their children. A description from everyone in the selection group shows that biological children's participation in a family home placement should be strengthened. It summarizes the need to raise and apply biological children's right to participation in a family home placement. The results show that the question is important to get answered and need to be investigated further. Further research is needed to examine biological children's experience of participation and its significance.

Syftet med den här studien är att belysa idag vuxna biologiska barns erfarenheter och upplevelser av att ha vuxit upp i familjehem samt bidra med kunskap och förståelse kring huruvida samhälleliga stödfunktioner stod i proportion till upplevda behov. Studien utgår från en kvalitativ ansats vars empiri inhämtats genom semistrukturerade intervjuer. Sammantaget har vi intervjuat åtta informanter. Empirin bearbetades enligt tillvägagångssätten i tematisk analys och utmynnade i ett antal teman och underteman vars innehåll analyserades i förhållande till teorierna Tvetydighet i familjegränser och tvetydig förlust (originaltitel på engelska; Theory of family boundary ambiguity and ambiguous loss) och Nya barndomssociologin samt till tidigare forskning kring ämnet biologiska barn i familjehem. Studien visar att biologiska barn i familjehems upplevelser och erfarenheter behöver förstås utifrån varje individs unika berättelse, vilka har bestått av såväl fördelar som utmaningar. Det utmärkande i resultatet är dock de viktiga och varaktiga relationerna som samtliga informanter utvecklade till några av de familjehemsplacerade barnen. Separationer och risk för separationer från familjehemsplacerade barn skapade känslor av oro, rädsla och stress som några av informanterna, till följd av bristande stöd från vuxna, inte hade tillräcklig möjlighet att bearbeta och förstå. De biologiska barnens tillgång till delaktighet, inkludering och information i frågor gällande de placerade barnen och familjehemsuppdraget, framstår som grundläggande komponenter för att uppdraget ska upplevas som mer eller mindre positivt eller utmanande. Resultatet av studien visar även på betydelsen av att de vuxna har kunskap om de biologiska barnens potentiella behov samt att de på ett flexibelt och lyhört sätt kan förhålla sig till dessa. Stödet behöver således utformas så att det står i proportion till det unika barnets behov. / The purpose of this study is to provide knowledge on today's adult biological children's experiences of having grown up in foster homes and contribute with knowledge and understanding about whether societal support functions were in proportion to perceived needs. The study is based on a qualitative approach whose empirical evidence is obtained through semi-structured interviews. In total, we have interviewed eight informants. The empirical work was processed according to the approach of thematic analysis and resulted in a number of themes and sub-themes whose content was analyzed in relation to the theories Theory of family boundary ambiguity and ambiguous loss as well as the New sociology of childhood and to previous research on the subject of biological children in foster homes. The study shows that biological children in foster care's experiences need to be understood based on each individual's unique story, which has consisted of both benefits and challenges. The distinguishing feature of the result is the important and lasting relationships that all informants developed with some of the children placed in foster homes. Separations and risk of separations from children placed in foster homes created feelings of anxiety, fear and stress that some of the informants, as a result of a lack of support from adults, did not have sufficient opportunity to process and understand. The biological children’s access to participation, inclusion and information in matters concerning the foster children and the foster home assignment appear to be fundamental components for the assignment to be perceived as more or less positive or challenging. The results of the study also show the importance of the adults having knowledge of the biological children's potential needs and that they can relate to them in a flexible and responsive way. The support thus needs to be designed so that it is proportionate to the unique child's needs.