The purpose of this study was to determine if cardiac nutrition education can affect dietary patterns of subjects participating in Cardiac Rehabilitation. Surveys, a pretest given prior to the first cardiac class and a second identical test, administered following cardiac rehabilitation classes, were conducted. Fifty-five randomly selected participants from the outpatient Cardiac Rehabilitation Program were initially given the posttest. Thirty-three of the 55 surveys were returned. Cardiac health classes offered by various health professionals included cardiac nutrition education, group nutrition classes, guest lectures on nutrition, and cooking demonstrations. The tests were compared to measure changes in diet and were analyzed for both surveys. Paired t-tests were used for analysis along with frequency, percentage and group statistics. The majority of the respondents demonstrated a statistically significant healthy increase in dietary changes after having participated in the classes.

Background: Blood flow restriction training (BFRT) is an effective way of training that enables training with low external load while receiving similar effects to high load training. The lack of knowledge of BFRT for people with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) or heart failure (HF) led to the making of this scoping review.  Objective: This scoping review aims to map the existing knowledge, effects, safety, and feasibility of BFRT for people with COPD or heart failure HF. Method: The review followed PRISMAs structure for scoping review. Selection involved title and abstract screening, followed by full text analysis and peer-review by both authors.  Results: A wide variety of study designs was included in this scoping review. Of 11 included studies all were original intervention studies-, whereof 8/11 studies were focused on HF. A large majority of participants were male. Training methods used in intervention studies varied from exercises like leg extensions, leg press and cycling, all while using vascular blood flow restriction. All studies followed different training protocols. The reported outcomes indicated promising improvements like increased functional exercise capacity, muscle strength, reduced symptom burden, and several positive physiological changes for both people with COPD and HF. Some concerns remain regarding the safety of BFRT, but no serious adverse events were reported directly linked to BFRT.  Conclusion: With many reported improvements, BFRT could be a safe and feasible alternative rehabilitation method for people with COPD or HF. Furthermore, with minimal reported adverse events, the method appears safe for both groups. Despite this, the included studies all had small sample sizes, so more high-quality studies with larger sample sizes are needed to give a better understanding on BFRTs effects on both short- and long term. Better studies including females are also needed.

No description available.

No description available.

No description available.

No description available.

Patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI) are at high risk for reinfarction and death, with the highest rate of death and reinfarction occurring within 30 days of AMI. Therapies that have been shown to reduce these risks (secondary prevention) continue to be underutilized. Nurse practitioners are well positioned to provide secondary prevention during and following hospitalization. The purpose of this pilot study was to examine the feasibility, acceptability, and preliminary effects of an NP delivered secondary prevention intervention. The specific objectives were: 1) to describe NP activities when delivering the secondary prevention intervention; 2) to evaluate the effect of the NP intervention on the rate of implementation of evidence-based secondary prevention treatment strategies and the patients’ achievement of secondary prevention target goals; and, 3) to examine the relationship between the NP activities delivering the intervention and secondary prevention goal achievement by patients. A prospective cohort design was used, in which patients’ achievement of target goals were compared between patients who received secondary prevention care from an NP and those who received usual care. The sample of convenience consisted of 65 patients with AMI. Data on practice activities and implementation of secondary prevention by the NP were collected before discharge from hospital and one week, two weeks, six weeks and 3 months after discharge. Data on patients’ achievement of goals were obtained before discharge from hospital and 3 months after discharge from both groups. This study’s results provide preliminary evidence that an NP delivered secondary prevention intervention, beginning prior to discharge and continuing for three months post myocardial infarction, significantly improves the implementation and uptake of guideline based secondary prevention treatments and risk factor reduction strategies. NP-led interventions such as this warrant replication. The unique contribution of the NP with this patient population is the training and skills needed to deliver all aspects of secondary prevention, including pharmacological and nonpharmacological therapies, without the immediate availability of a physician.

Patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI) are at high risk for reinfarction and death, with the highest rate of death and reinfarction occurring within 30 days of AMI. Therapies that have been shown to reduce these risks (secondary prevention) continue to be underutilized. Nurse practitioners are well positioned to provide secondary prevention during and following hospitalization. The purpose of this pilot study was to examine the feasibility, acceptability, and preliminary effects of an NP delivered secondary prevention intervention. The specific objectives were: 1) to describe NP activities when delivering the secondary prevention intervention; 2) to evaluate the effect of the NP intervention on the rate of implementation of evidence-based secondary prevention treatment strategies and the patients’ achievement of secondary prevention target goals; and, 3) to examine the relationship between the NP activities delivering the intervention and secondary prevention goal achievement by patients. A prospective cohort design was used, in which patients’ achievement of target goals were compared between patients who received secondary prevention care from an NP and those who received usual care. The sample of convenience consisted of 65 patients with AMI. Data on practice activities and implementation of secondary prevention by the NP were collected before discharge from hospital and one week, two weeks, six weeks and 3 months after discharge. Data on patients’ achievement of goals were obtained before discharge from hospital and 3 months after discharge from both groups. This study’s results provide preliminary evidence that an NP delivered secondary prevention intervention, beginning prior to discharge and continuing for three months post myocardial infarction, significantly improves the implementation and uptake of guideline based secondary prevention treatments and risk factor reduction strategies. NP-led interventions such as this warrant replication. The unique contribution of the NP with this patient population is the training and skills needed to deliver all aspects of secondary prevention, including pharmacological and nonpharmacological therapies, without the immediate availability of a physician.

This study determined whether a pre-operative cardiac “pre-habilitation” (Prehab) program improves the health of elective coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) surgery patients to a greater extent than standard care (StanC). Seventeen elective CABG patients were randomized to StanC (n= 9) or Prehab (n= 8) at Baseline and were followed at 1-2 weeks pre-operatively (Preop) and Three months post-operatively. Functional walking ability was assessed using the 6-Minute Walk Test (6MWT) and 5-meter Gait Speed Test. Baseline data was not different between groups. Patients in StanC did not improve 6MWT scores; whereas Prehab patients improved 6MWT distance by 35% and 39% at Preop and Three months post-operatively, respectively (p<0.05). Gait speed scores were 25% and 27% lower in Prehab patients at Preop and Three months post-operatively, respectively, as compared to StanC (p<0.05). These data suggest that Prehab is an attractive intervention for enhancing functional walking ability before and after elective CABG surgery.

Background: Even though specific agents for the treatment of patients with pulmonary hypertension (PH) are available, in PH patients, physical capacity and quality of life (QoL) are often restricted and survival is reduced. Objectives: This study prospectively investigated the long-term effects of respiratory and exercise training in patients with severe chronic PH regarding safety, time to clinical worsening and survival. Methods: Fifty-eight consecutive patients with severe PH on stable disease-targeted medication received exercise and respiratory training in hospital for 3 weeks and continued at home. They were prospectively followed for 24 ± 12 months. Primary endpoints were time to clinical worsening and survival. Adverse events and changes in the 6-min walking test, QoL, WHO functional class and gas exchange were secondary endpoints and were evaluated at baseline and at weeks 3 and 15. Results: All patients tolerated the exercise training well without severe adverse events. In week 15, 6-min walking test results were significantly improved compared to baseline (by 84 ± 49 m, p < 0.001), as well as QoL scores, WHO functional class (from 2.9 ± 0.5 to 2.6 ± 0.6, p < 0.01), peak oxygen consumption (from 12.5 ± 3.0 to 14.6 ± 3.9 ml/min/kg, p < 0.001), heart rate at rest (from 75 ± 12 to 61 ± 18 beats/min, p < 0.001) and maximal workload (from 65 ± 21 to 80 ± 25 W, p < 0.001). Survival at 1 and 2 years was 100 and 95%, respectively. Fifteen events occurred during the follow-up. Conclusion: This study indicates that exercise and respiratory training as add-on to medical treatment may improve exercise capacity and QoL, and that they have a good long-term safety in the described setting. / Dieser Beitrag ist mit Zustimmung des Rechteinhabers aufgrund einer (DFG-geförderten) Allianz- bzw. Nationallizenz frei zugänglich.