Orientador: Antonio Miguel / Tese (doutorado) - Universidade Estadual de Campinas, Faculdade de Educação / Made available in DSpace on 2018-08-03T15:31:45Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 Gomes_MariaLauraMagalhaes_D.pdf: 12578971 bytes, checksum: 42b253232c2d1e16537b7afbe47ac88f (MD5) Previous issue date: 2003 / Resumo: Este trabalho focaliza as visões sobre a educação matemática dos quatro autores do Iluminismo francês cujo nome figura em seu título. Os quatro capítulos centrais são constituídos por estudos sobre as idéias de Diderot, d' Alembert, Condillac e Condorcet nos quais se procura ressaltar, para cada pensador, o aspecto mais notável em relação à educação matemática. Em Diderot, esse aspecto se encontra no sentido político da educação matemática; d' Alembert se distingue por sua consideração da epistemologia da Matemática como a base da educação matemática. Em Condillac, destaca-se a valorização da educação matemática no plano cognitivo geral; em Condorcet, as concepções e propostas para a educação matemática na instrução pública. Os capítulos inicial e final apresentam, respectivamente, o quadro da educação matemática na França do século XVllI, antes da Revolução, e o contexto da mesma educação no período pós-iluminista, da morte de Condorcet à Restauração / Abstract: This thesis is focused on elucidating visions on Mathematical Education of four Eighteenth Century French Enlightenrnent authors, namely, Diderot, d' Alembert, Condillac and Condorcet. These philosophers main views on Mathematical Education, as perceived, are here organised in four exc1usively dedicated chapters, each of them selecting and approaching the core themes and arguments of each author. Accordingly, Diderot's main ideas on the topic are aimed at the political meaning of Mathematical Education, whereas to d' Alembert, the central aspect to be underlined is the Mathematical Epistemology. As for Condillac, the priority is given to the evolving cognitive frameworks. Finally, it is believed that Condorcet' s ultimate emphasis is on public education. The thesis initial and final chapters characterise the Mathematical Education contexts in France, respectively, in the Eighteenth Century before the French Revolution and in the Post-Enlightenrnent phase, from Condorcet's death to the French Restoration / Doutorado / Doutor em Educação

Dans le contexte d'une remise en question de la mission des institutions publiques d'enseignement, il y a lieu de se poser à nouveau les grandes questions touchant les finalités de l'éducation. À cette fin, nous jugeons primordial de nous intéresser à la justification du projet d'école moderne qui est actuellement remis en cause. Dans le présent mémoire, nous nous proposons d'approfondir deux philosophies qui ont profondément marqué les différentes doctrines modernes de l'éducation. Nous aborderons d'abord la philosophie de Jean-Jacques Rousseau. Sa conception de l'idéal éducatif peut être qualifiée d'éthique et elle tire sa substance d'une anthropologie sous-jacente dont nous allons récapituler les principaux moments. Dans un second temps, nous nous tournerons vers la philosophie du marquis de Condorcet, qui développe, quant à elle une conception plutôt politique de l'instruction, faisant fond sur une définition "républicaine" de la destinée humaine. Nous verrons que même si ces deux auteurs partagent une réflexion qui pose la Raison comme principe supérieur permettant de juger de la validité de tout acte éducatif, des différences sensibles dans leur interprétation de ce principe ont mené à des conceptions de l'éducation contrastées, voire opposées. Pourtant, ces deux conceptions représentent ensemble les deux pôles de l'horizon de la pratique éducative moderne, horizon dans lequel peut être contextualisée la crise actuelle de l'éducation, mais aussi dans lequel peuvent aussi être retrouvées les ressources pour une rénovation de l'idéal et des pratiques contemporaines d'éducation. C'est au travail de clarification de ces fins dernières que ce mémoire aimerait contribuer.

Democracy seems to be in crisis and scholars have started to consider the possibility that “the only game in town” might be rigged. This book theorizes the crisis of democracy from a structural point of view, arguing that liberal representative governments suffer from systemic corruption, a form of political decay that should be understood as the oligarchization of society, and proposes an anti-oligarchic institutional solution based on a radical interpretation of republican constitutional thought. If one agrees that the minimal normative expectation of liberal democracies is that governments should advance the welfare of the majority within constitutional safeguards, increasing income inequality and the relative immiseration of the majority of citizens would be in itself a deviation from good rule, a sign of corruption. As a way to understand how we could revert the current patterns of political corruption, the book provides an in-depth analysis of the institutional, procedural, and normative innovations to protect political liberty proposed by Niccolò Machiavelli, Nicolas de Condorcet, Rosa Luxemburg, and Hannah Arendt. Because their ideas to institutionalize popular power have consistently been misunderstood, instrumentalized, demonized, or neglected, part of what this project wants to accomplish is to offer a serious engagement with their proposals through a plebeian interpretative lens that renders them as part of the same intellectual tradition. In this way, the book assembles a “B side” of constitutional thought composed of the apparent misfits in a tradition that has been dominated by the impulse to suppress conflict instead of harnessing its liberty-producing properties. As a way to effectively deal with systemic corruption and oligarchic domination, the book proposes to follow this plebeian constitutionalism and instituionalize popular collective power. A proposed plebeian branch would be autonomous and aimed not at achieving self-government or direct democracy, but rather at an effort to both judge and censor elites who rule. The plebeian branch would consist of two institutions: a decentralized network of radically inclusive local assemblies, empowered to initiate and veto legislation as well as to exercise periodic constituent power, and a delegate, surveillance office able to enforce decisions and impeach public officials. The establishment of primary assemblies at the local level would not only allow ordinary people to push back against oligarchic domination through the political system but also inaugurate an institutional conception of the people as the many assembled locally: a political collective agent operating as a network of political judgment in permanent flow. The people as network would be a political subject with as many brains as assemblies, in which collective learning, reaction against domination, and social change would occur organically and independently from representative government and political parties.

[EN] Abstract: Craftivism is an artistic-social movement that, through handcraft and generally with a social approach, aims to transform something already used for a better end, through creativity, in an individual or collective way. This investigation tries to understand the repercussion of the craftivist actions, and of its DIY ethic (Do-It-Yourself). The present PhD bases its deductions on the analysis of different local and international projects, dividing the theoretical body in two principal sections completed by an annexe with cards, which illustrate and gather the most important characteristics of every mentioned example. It tries to be a space to think about the efficiency on reclaiming crafts, emphasizing its transforming capacity. These pages will consider if knitting is a feminist act and/or reinforces stereotypes of femininity, if it's an apolitical form of consumerism, if it's possible to engage in knitting (or another type of crafts) as a political activity, and how can be an effective mode of social action-transformation and community building. In addition, my own participation in some projects has allowed to better outline the movement operating, to determine the principal threads that tie its intentions, to be impregnated with the spirit of (re)claiming the domestic arts and the public space, and finally to compose and put in all the pieces of this fabric that you have in your hands, which every reader has to interpret and internalize, and (probably) would celebrate the crafts in a mindful way. / [ES] Resumen: El craftivismo es un movimiento artístico-social que, a través de la/las artesanía/s y con un enfoque generalmente social, busca transformar algo ya usado para un fin mejor, a través de la creatividad, ya sea de forma individual o colectiva. Esta investigación intenta comprender la repercusión de las acciones craftivistas, y de su ética DIY (Do-It-Yourself), "hazlo tú mismo/a". La presente Tesis Doctoral basa sus deducciones en el análisis de diferentes proyectos locales e internacionales, dividiendo el cuerpo teórico en dos pilares fundamentales, completados por un anexo con fichas, que ilustran y recogen las características más importantes de cada ejemplo citado. Pretende ser un espacio para reflexionar sobre la efectividad al reclamar las artesanías, enfatizando su capacidad transformadora. En sus páginas se considera hasta qué punto el tejer se trata de un acto feminista y/o refuerza estereotipos de feminidad, si es una forma apolítica de consumismo, si resulta posible empoderarse con el tejer (u otro tipo de artesanía) como actividad política, y si resulta un modo eficaz de acción-transformación social y de construcción comunitaria. Además, la propia participación en algunos proyectos ha permitido perfilar mejor el propio funcionamiento del movimiento, determinar los hilos principales que ligan sus propósitos, impregnarse del espíritu de reclamo de las artes domésticas y del espacio público, y finalmente componer y encajar todas las piezas de este tejido que tenéis en las manos, que cada lector/a ha de interpretar e interiorizar, y (quizás) incluso pueda celebrar las artesanías de una manera consciente. / [CAT] Resum: El craftivisme és un moviment artístic-social que, a través de la/les artesania/es i amb un enfocament generalment social, busca transformar quelcom ja usat per a una fi millor, a través de la creativitat, ja siga de forma individual o col·lectiva. Aquesta investigació intenta comprendre la repercussió de les accions craftivistes, i de la seva ètica DIY (Do-It-Yourself), "fes-ho tu mateix/a". La present Tesi Doctoral basa les seves deduccions en l'anàlisi de diferents projectes locals i internacionals, dividint el cos teòric en dos pilars fonamentals, completats per un annex amb fitxes, que il·lustren i recullen els trets més importants de cada exemple citat. Pretén ser un espai per reflexionar sobre l'efectivitat en reclamar les artesanies, emfatitzant la seva capacitat transformadora. En les seves pàgines es considera fins a quin punt el teixir es tracta d'un acte feminista i/o reforça estereotips de feminitat, si és una forma apolítica de consumisme, si resulta possible empoderar-se amb el teixir (o altre tipus d'artesania) com a activitat política, i si resulta un mode eficaç d'acció-transformació social i de construcció comunitària. A més, la pròpia participació en alguns projectes ha permés perfilar millor el propi funcionament del moviment, determinar els fils principals que lliguen els seus propòsits, impregnar-se de l'esperit de reclam de les arts domèstiques i de l'espai públic, i finalment composar i encaixar totes les peces d'aquest teixit que teniu a les mans, que cada lector/a haurà d'interpretar i interioritzar, i (potser) fins i tot puga celebrar les artesanies d'una manera conscient. / Rodríguez Tortajada, A. (2016). El Craftivisme com a mecanisme integrador de transformació social. Entreteixint des de la individualitat a la col·lectivitat, de l'artesania a l'activisme post-media [Tesis doctoral no publicada]. Universitat Politècnica de València. https://doi.org/10.4995/Thesis/10251/62590 / TESIS

Ce mémoire étudie comment Condorcet, Hegel, Durkheim, Parsons, Bourdieu et Passeron conçoivent les fonctions respectives de la famille et de l’école en matière d’éducation. Depuis la Révolution française, les idées modernes sur ce partage ont beaucoup évoluées. C’est à titre de témoins éminents de cette évolution que ces auteurs sont interrogés. Toutes héritières des principes issus du siècle des Lumières, les conceptions étudiées varient selon le rapport à l’ordre social et selon l’intention qui les guide ; le bonheur universel qui fait autorité sur la liberté de l’individu en formation devient de moins en moins abstrait. En tant que finalité, cet idéal se fait supplanter, presque, par la question du bonheur individuel, pourtant soumise aujourd’hui à l’exigence de la réussite scolaire. La responsabilité individuelle s’en trouve accrue, puisque, depuis que les structures sociales inégalitaires ont été sévèrement critiquées, l’ordre social ne doit plus reposer sur des déterminations de classe. / This study examines how Condorcet, Hegel, Durkheim, Parsons, Bourdieu and Passeron perceive the roles of both the family and the school with regard to upbringing. Since the French Revolution, these perceptions have greatly evolved. We refer to these authors since they clearly represent the context of this evolution. Although these perceptions have inherited principles originating from the Enlightenment, they vary according to the relationship with society and the intentions by which they are guided. Universal happiness, which has an impact on the freedom of the growing individual, becomes less and less abstract. In the end, this ideal is almost surpassed by the freedom of personal happiness, which still depends today on success in school, as it is a generally accepted requirement. The responsibility of each individual is amplified, because, ever since unequal social structures have been highly criticized, social order shall no longer be based upon class determination.