Since Convention on the Rights of the Child of the United Nations are released, children's best interests becomes the highest principle for every state having legal system to deal with children's affairs. So we can say that the first serious mission of the subject of modern parent and tot's relation is protecting minor children's interests, then keeping the marriage and family peace and stable identity relations and etc. is the next. And in order to reach the above-mentioned purpose, the numerous countries have begun to examine their law of the marriage and family, even some advanced countries have abolished the differentiation between legitimate and illegitimate children too, in order to reach the demand for this two equalization. Now people of our country and mainland China ( what follows we call them two sides) contact with each other frequently, and then the extramarital sexual intercourse of people of two sides becomes numerous, and the quantity of the legitimate children also increases year by year. Base this, the announcement of the Equal Principle between legitimate and illegitimate children in mainland China marriage law has a deep meaning, but when we review our country, we find that our law about children's affairs has no response for the above-mentioned things. Even now our law about children's affairs still maintain the differentiation of legitimate and illegitimate children and also especially discriminate against the children of the mainland China in "The ordinance of people's relationship between Taiwan and mainland China ". So this thesis's aim is checking the legal system related to legitimate and illegitimate children of two sides by the standard namely with the children's best interests and look over them to find they observe the standard namely with the children's best interests or not. By the way, this thesis will try to find the reason and the cause that helping legal system about legitimate and illegitimate children stand out ,and try to find the real way to make legitimate children equal with illegitimate children in the modern status which has varied family type and varied pattern of both sexes getting along with each other. To this end, the thesis want to set up a new ¡§legitimate children presumption¡¨system to adapt to the above-mentioned purpose, and doesn't make children unequal just because their parents aren't husband and wife , and our law ¡]or mainland China's law¡^about children's affairs will juxtapose advanced countries.

I have written an essay about children's best interests in relation to sleep. As a starting point, I have used two stories and the dilemmas from my working life. The first story depicts asituation where I go against the guardians’ interests that their child should not sleep by lettingher fall asleep anyway when she is unable to stay awake. In the second, a situation is portrayed with a child who does not show any need for sleep but who I still received instructions to get to sleep. The purpose of this essay is to explore the term child's best interests and what it means in relation to children's sleep. The questions I have started fromare: How can the wording of the child's best be interpreted in relation to the sleep problems at preschool? Why is there so little trust in educators' professional opinions about sleep? Howcan I find the balance between my own experiential knowledge and what the family claims istheir best? This essay is divided into three different parts. A deep dive into the term the child's best interests and what it means to me as a preschool teacher seen from the perspective of laws and preschool governing documents. A scientific part where I explain the biological effects of sleep through research and scientific articles. Finally, there is a theoretical part where I start from Aristotle's concept of knowledge and Dreyfus & Dreyfus' theory of the acquisition of practical knowledge. Through these theories of practical knowledge, I land in proximityethical reasoning and its significance for my professional role. The term child's best interests according to laws and governing documents leaves no room for interpretation for me as a preschool teacher during the time I am responsible for the child inquestion. How collaboration between preschool and home should take place, however, isunspoken even if the goal of collaboration is clear. Research has reported that night sleep is disturbed by midday naps due the total sleep per day is constant. However, it has also shownthat sleep is important for learning and memory. Furthermore, I have emphasized the importance of good sleep hygiene as there has been no research that has shown that difficulty sleeping in the evening is due to loss of midday naps. The practical knowledge together with the proximity ethics is about being able to interpret a child's need for sleep and determine the balance between teaching and care.

Syftet med studien är att utifrån fem fäders berättelser undersöka effekten av rättstillämpning vid tvist om vårdnad, boende och umgänge. Genom detta har fäders situation utifrån rådande normers påverkan i socialtjänstens och rättsväsendets agerande synliggjorts. Vi kommer att följa fem fädernas berättelser om hur deras vårdnadstvist ser ut och hur de upplever bemötande, agerande och rättstillämpning från professionella aktörer. Enligt fäderna sker detta på ett icke tillfredsställande sätt då utredningarna ofta får dem att framstå som otillräckliga föräldrar och i vissa fall även farliga för sina barn. Studien är uppbyggd av semistrukturerade intervjuer med fäder vilka samtliga varit i tvist i tingsrätt och/eller hovrätt gällande barnets vårdnad, boende eller umgänge. Med innehållsanalys, socialkonstruktivism och en rättssociologisk ansats lyfts faktorer vilka kan påverka synen på rättstillämpning och rättssäkerhet utifrån bland annat normföreställningar. Dessa faktorer speglas ur fädernas berättelser. Studiens resultat visar att normföreställningar enligt informanterna kan påverka myndigheternas bemötande och bedömning. Studiens slutsats är att i det fall fädernas berättelser speglar verkligheten talar det för att det kan finnas brister i rättstillämpningen vid utredning och bedömning i fråga om vårdnad, boende och umgänge.