Made available in DSpace on 2014-12-17T15:36:32Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 ExpeditoSNJ.pdf: 2182833 bytes, checksum: 1d14b6b7f5a8b99dccd3ec09fd418133 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2007-12-07 / Coordena??o de Aperfei?oamento de Pessoal de N?vel Superior / In this study, two circadian related centres, the suprachiasmatic nucleus (SCN) and the intergeniculate leaflet (IGL) were evaluated in respect to their cytoarchitecture, retinal afferents and chemical content of major cells and axon terminals with a tract tracer and immunohistochemical techniques in the rock cavy (Kerodon rupestris), a Brazilian caviidae rodent species. The rock cavy SCN is innervated in its ventral portion by terminals from the predominantly contralateral retina. It also contains neurophisin and vasoactive intestinal polypeptide immunoreactive cell bodies and neuropeptide Y and enkephalin immunopositive fibres and terminals and is marked by intense GFAP immunoreactivity. The IGL receives a predominantly contralateral retinal projection, contains neuropeptide Y and nitric oxide synthase producing neurons and enkephalin immunopositive terminals and is characterized by dense GFAP immunoreactivity. This is the first report examining the neural circadian system in a crepuscular rodent species for which circadian properties have been described. The results are discussed comparing with what has been described for other species and in the context of the functional significance of these centres / O sistema de temporiza??o circadiana compreende um conjunto de estruturas neurais diferenciadas, que incluem um marcapasso central, o qual produz ritmicidade na aus?ncia de est?mulos externos; vias de entrada, incluindo as afer?ncias retininas, que permitem a sincroniza??o dos ritmos aos ciclos ambientais; e vias de sa?da, que conectam o marca-passo aos efetores comportamentais. Entre os componentes centrais do sistema de temporiza??o circadiana de mam?feros, destaca-se o n?cleo supraquiasm?tico (NSQ) do hipot?lamo, at? o presente o ?nico marca-passo circadiano formalmente comprovado, e o folheto intergeniculado (FIG) do complexo geniculado lateral do t?lamo, que atua como modulador do marca-passo. Neste estudo, estes dois centros foram avaliados com rela??o a sua citoarquitetura, padr?o de inerva??o retiniana e conte?do neuroqu?mico de c?lulas e terminais ax?nicos, usando um tra?ador neural e t?cnicas imuno-histoqu?micas no moc? (Kerodon rupestris), um roedor nativo do Nordeste Brasileiro, cuja atividade locomotora exibe um padr?o circadiano predominantemente crepuscular. O NSQ do moc? ? inervado em sua por??o ventrolateral por terminais da retina predominantemente contralateral. O NSQ ? dotado de neur?nios contendo neurofisina (NPH) e polipept?deo intestinal vasoativo (VIP) e as prote?nas ligantes de c?lcio calbindina (CB) e cal-retinina (CR), terminais imunorreativos a neuropept?deo Y (NPY) e encefalina (ENK) e ? tamb?m marcado por imunorreatividade ? prote?na ac?dica fibrilar glial (GFAP). O FIG recebe uma proje??o retiniana predominantemente contralateral, cont?m neur?nios produtores de NPY, CB e CR, terminais positivos para ENK e ? marcado por imunorreatividade a GFAP. Este ? o primeiro trabalho a examinar o sistema de temporiza??o circadiana (STC) numa esp?cie de roedor crepuscular, para o qual as propriedades formais dos ritmos circadianos tenham sido descritas. Os resultados s?o comparados com resultados previamente descritos em outras esp?cies diurnas e noturnas e discutidos no seu contexto funcional

No description available.

Corynebacterium diphtheriae, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Ricinus communis, Shigella dysentariae, and Vibrio cholerae produce AB toxins which share the same basic structural characteristics: a catalytic A subunit attached to a cell-binding B subunit. All AB toxins have cytosolic targets despite an initial extracellular location. AB toxins use different methods to reach the cytosol and have different effects on the target cell. Broad-spectrum inhibitors against these toxins are therefore hard to develop because they use different surface receptors, entry mechanisms, enzyme activities, and cytosolic targets. We have found that grape seed extract provides resistance to five different AB toxins: diphtheria toxin (DT), P. aeruginosa exotoxin A (ETA), ricin, Shiga toxin, and cholera toxin (CT). To identify individual compounds in grape seed extract that are capable of inhibiting the activities of these AB toxins, we screened twenty common phenolic compounds of grape seed extract for anti-toxin properties. Three compounds inhibited DT, four inhibited ETA, one inhibited ricin, and twelve inhibited CT. Additional studies were performed to determine the mechanism of inhibition against CT. Two compounds inhibited CT binding to the cell surface and even stripped bound CT off the plasma membrane of a target cell. Two other compounds inhibited the enzymatic activity of CT. We have thus identified individual toxin inhibitors from grape seed extract and some of their mechanisms of inhibition against CT. This work will help to formulate a defined mixture of phenolic compounds that could potentially be used as a therapeutic against a broad range of AB toxins.

La vaccination muqueuse est un moyen efficace de lutter contre les pathogènes qui utilisent les muqueuses comme porte d’entrée. Cependant, la vaccination muqueuse avec des antigènes non réplicatifs nécessite l’utilisation d’adjuvants. Les molécules de la famille de la toxine du choléra, l’entérotoxine thermolabile d’E.coli (LT), la toxine du choléra (CT) ainsi que le mutant LT-R192G et les sous-unités B non toxiques de ces toxines (LTB et CTB) ont été montrées augmenter les réponses immunitaires contre des antigènes coadministrés par voie muqueuse. Cependant leur mécanisme d’action est complexe et reste encore mal connu et des différences entre molécules entières et sous-unités B ont été rapportées ainsi que, pour une même molécule, des différences selon le modèle utilisé. Dans ce travail, nous avons étudié les effets de ces cinq molécules sur les réponses anticorps ainsi que sur les lymphocytes T CD4 dans un modèle murin d’immunisation intrarectale avec des pseudoparticules virales de rotavirus (VLP-2/6). Chez les souris non immunisées, nous avons montré que ces molécules, à l’exception de la CTB, diminuent in vitro les lymphocytes T régulateurs naturels CD4+CD25+Foxp3+, probablement par un mécanisme d’apoptose. Chez les souris immunisées, toutes les molécules étudiées induisent une même réponse anticorps sérique et fécale spécifique des VLP-2/6, qu’il s’agisse des molécules entières connues pour leur fort pouvoir adjuvant ou des sous-unités B qui, elles, ont été rapportées avoir un plus faible effet adjuvant voire un effet tolérogène dans certaines études. Concernant la réponse T CD4, les réponses spécifiques de l’antigène et de l’adjuvant ont été analysées. Des différences importantes ont été mises en évidence entre ces molécules. Notamment, seules les molécules entières (LT, LT-R192G et CT) induisent la production d’IL-2 et l’activation de lymphocytes T CD4+CD25+Foxp3- mémoires spécifiques de l’antigène tout en permettant la mise en place d’une régulation médiée par des lymphocytes T régulateurs CD4+CD25+Foxp3+ (boucle d’autorégulation), qui pourraient jouer un rôle majeur lors d’une réponse secondaire, afin d’éviter les réactions inflammatoires délétères. Malgré ces différences, toutes les molécules étudiées induisent la production d’IL-17, suggérant le rôle majeur de cette cytokine dans l’effet adjuvant.L’influence de la voie d’administration sur ces effets est en cours d’étude grâce à la comparaison avec la voie intranasale / Mucosal immunization is an important goal of vaccine development to protect against pathogens that use mucosa as portals of entry. However, the use of non-replicating antigens requires the addition of adjuvants.Cholera-like enterotoxins, cholera toxin (CT) from Vibrio cholerae and the heat-labile enterotoxin (LT) from toxinogenic strains of E. coli, as well as the mutant LR-192G and their B subunits (CTB and LTB) have been shown to increase immune responses against unrelated co-administered antigens by mucosal routes. However, their mechanism of action is very complex and not completely understood and differences exist between holotoxins and B subunits and within molecules, differences exist between the models used.In this work, we have studied the effects of these five molecules on antibody responses and on CD4+ T cell responses in a murine model of intrarectal immunization using rotavirus-like particles (2/6-VLP). In non-immunized mice, we have shown that all molecules, except CTB, decreased CD4+CD25+Foxp3+ natural regulatory T cells, probably by induction of apoptosis.In immunized mice, all molecules induced similar VLP-2/6 specific systemic and fecal antibody responses, teither he holotoxins, which are well known for their strong adjuvanticity or their B subunits with a less strong adjuvanticity but with also a tolerogenic effect in some studies.Regarding the CD4+ T cell response, antigen- and adjuvant- specific responses have been analysed. Important differences have been highlighted between the molecules. Among others things, only whole toxins (LT, LT-R192G and CT) trigger IL-2 production and activation of antigen specific memory CD4+CD25+Foxp3- T cells and at the same time antigen specific CD4+CD25+Foxp3+ regulatory T cells are activated which may control the effector response (Feedback loop regulation) and avoid deleterious inflammation. In spite of these differences, all studied molecules triggered IL-17 production, suggesting the major role of this cytokine in adjuvanticity. We are currently comparing the intrarectal and intranasl routes in order to evaluate the role played by the route of immunisation in different effects of these molecules

Made available in DSpace on 2014-12-17T15:36:35Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 SebastiaoFS.pdf: 2551917 bytes, checksum: 3538250a323b39c32585d41d316bcb6a (MD5) Previous issue date: 2009-09-08 / Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Cient?fico e Tecnol?gico / The primary and accessory optic systems comprise two set of retinorecipient neural clusters. In this study, these visual related centers in the rock cavy were evaluated by using the retinal innervations pattern and Nissl staining cytoarchigtecture. After unilateral intraocular injection of cholera toxin B subunit and immunohistochemical reaction of coronal and sagittal sections from the diencephalon and midbrain region of rock cavy. Three subcortical centres of primary visual system were identified, superior colliculus, lateral geniculate complex and pretectal complex. The lateral geniculate complex is formed by a series of nuclei receiving direct visual information from the retina, dorsal lateral geniculate nucleus, intergeniculate leaflet and ventral lateral geniculate nucleus. The pretectal complex is formed by series of pretectal nuclei, medial pretectal nucleus, olivary pretectal nucleus, posterior pretectal nucleus, nucleus of the optic tract and anterior pretectal nucleus. In the accessory optic system, retinal terminals were observed in the dorsal terminal, lateral terminal and medial terminal nuclei as well as in the interstitial nucleus of the superior fasciculus, posterior fibres. All retinorecipient nuclei received bilateral input, with a contralateral predominance. This is the first study of this nature in the rock cavy and the results are compared with the data obtained for other species. The investigation represents a contribution to the knowledge regarding the organization of visual optic systems in relation to the biology of species. / Os sistemas visual prim?rio e ?ptico acess?rio compreendem dois conjuntos de grupamentos neurais, que recebem proje??o direta da retina. Nesse estudo, estes dois sistemas foram avaliados com rela??o a citoarquitetura e padr?o de inerva??o retiniana, usando como tra?ador neural anter?grado, a subunidade B da toxina col?rica revelada por imunoistoqu?mica para detectar este tra?ador em terminais sobre grupamentos neuronais (alvos) no enc?falo do moc? (Kerodon rupestris), um roedor nativo do Nordeste Brasileiro. Os resultados permitiram identificar os componentes do sistema visual prim?rio o complexo geniculado lateral, o complexo pr?-tectal e o col?culo superior. O complexo geniculado lateral cont?m o n?cleo geniculado lateral dorsal, o n?cleo geniculado lateral ventral e o folheto intergeniculado. Todos recebem fibras da retina com predomin?ncia contralateral, menos intensa para o folheto intergeniculado. O complexo pr?-tectal cont?m os n?cleos pr?-tectal anterior, pr?-tectal medial, pr?-tectal posterior, olivar pr?-tectal e n?cleo do trato ?ptico, os quais recebem proje??o retiniana predominantemente contralateral. Do mesmo modo, o col?culo superior recebe fibras da retina contralateral nas camadas superficiais. Tamb?m foi identificado o sistema ?ptico acess?rio completo no moc?, constitu?do pelos n?cleos terminal medial, terminal lateral, terminal dorsal e intersticial do fasc?culo superior posterior. Esses n?cleos recebem inerva??o retiniana com forte predomin?ncia contralateral, sendo que o n?cleo terminal medial, embora preserve a predomin?ncia contralateral, exibe uma evidente inerva??o ipsolateral.