Made available in DSpace on 2016-04-26T20:23:40Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 Luciana da Silva Paggiatto Camacho.pdf: 756384 bytes, checksum: 5b8ff17557686b850a2689d108602a95 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2015-04-28 / This study aims to analyse the principle of reasonable duration of proceedings in relation to procedural reforms guarantees of access to justice, contradictory and full defense. If you live in times in which anxiety is the storm of modern society. Seeks to produce several activities simultaneously both domestic and professional; there is a plurality of activities execution and interpersonal relationships in short periods of time. So there is also the impact of this dynamic law, and therefore would not be different under the process, now more than ever it seeks to build mechanism to make the process quicker meeting the expectations of society. The objectives pursued in this work, briefly, are: (a) conceptualize principle; (b) conceptualize the principles of reasonable duration of proceedings, access to justice, contradictory and full defense; and (c) discuss the recent procedural reforms as well as on the Draft Code of Civil Procedure. As said, the topic is of paramount importance in view of all legislative reforms in the civil case and the impending enactment of a new Code of Civil Procedure, which seeks to clearly bring more promptness in support of the constitutional principle of reasonable duration of the process and bring greater effectiveness judgments. So work on screen, has the ultimate goal collate the principle of reasonable duration of the process with other basic principles and guarantees: access to justice, contradictory and full defense on an analysis of mitigation latest fundamental guarantees in the recent reforms in the speed allowance procedural / O presente trabalho tem como objetivo analisar o princípio da razoável duração do processo nas reformas processuais face às garantias de acesso à Justiça, contraditório e ampla defesa. Esta preocupação parte de um momento social no qual domina a ansiedade pela produção de diversas atividades, simultaneamente, além da manutenção de relações interpessoais em curtos períodos de tempo. Sendo o Direito reflexo da sociedade, esta dinâmica também atinge o Direito, inclusive no âmbito do processo: atualmente, busca-se construir mecanismos eficazes para atender aos anseios da sociedade. Entretanto, existem outros anseios sociais que podem ser atingidos nesta busca pela rápida prestação jurisdicional e que precisam ser tratados com cautela, como os direitos de acesso à Justiça, do contraditório e da ampla defesa. A importância do tema é explícita por estas diversas reformas legislativas no âmbito do Processo Civil e pela promulgação do novo Código de Processo Civil, que busca, com clareza, trazer mais celeridade processual em abono ao princípio constitucional da razoável duração do processo, bem como trazer maior efetividade às decisões judiciais. Mas estas decisões que atendem ao princípio da razoável duração do processo precisam considerar outros princípios e garantias fundamentais: acesso à Justiça, contraditório e ampla defesa em uma análise de mitigação das últimas garantias fundamentais nas recentes reformas em abono à celeridade processual

Die Dissertation befasst sich mit der juristischen Problematik, ob ein Rechtsbehelf anzuerkennen ist, der es Anspruchsgegnern ermöglicht, in lauterkeitsrechtlichen Unterlassungsstreitigkeiten Verfahren des einstweiligen Rechtsschutzes zu initiieren. Ein solcher Rechtsbehelf ist für Anspruchsgegner bislang nicht anerkannt. Dies stellt sich als sehr problematisch dar, da Eilverfahren im Lauterkeitsrecht eine sehr hohe Bedeutung zukommt und Anspruchsgegner in diesen Verfahren signifikant benachteiligt werden. Dieser Umstand begründet auch eine erhebliche Gefahr von Fehlentscheidungen zu Lasten der Anspruchsgegner. Im Wettbewerb kann diesen Fehlentscheidungen große Bedeutung zukommen, weil durch sie beispielsweise der Vertrieb neuer innovativer Produkte untersagt werden kann. Die Arbeit kommt zu dem Ergebnis, dass ein entsprechender Rechtsbehelf anzuerkennen ist, da er dem Anspruchsgegner eine Möglichkeit verschafft, sich wirksam vor schädigenden Fehlentscheidungen zu schützen und damit der Verwirklichung der verfassungsrechtlichen Vorgaben prozessualer Waffengleichheit und effektiven Rechtschutzes dient. / The dissertation deals with the juristic problem whether a legal remedy is to be recognized which enables opponents to initiate procedures of interim legal protection in disputes regarding injunctive relief in the field of unfair competition law. Such a legal remedy is not recognized for opponents up to now. This appears to be very problematic, as preliminary proceedings are of high importance in the field of unfair competition law and opponents are being significantly disadvantaged in these procedures. This fact also founds a considerable danger of wrong decisions at the expense of the opponents. In competition these wrong decisions may be of great importance as, for example, the distribution of new and innovative products can be prohibited by them. The work comes to the conclusion that a corresponding legal remedy is to be recognized, because it provides the opponent with an effective option to protect itself from damaging wrong decisions and it serves the realization of the constitutional requirements of procedural equality of opportunity and effective legal protection.

Die Dissertation befasst sich mit der juristischen Problematik, ob ein Rechtsbehelf anzuerkennen ist, der es Anspruchsgegnern ermöglicht, in lauterkeitsrechtlichen Unterlassungsstreitigkeiten Verfahren des einstweiligen Rechtsschutzes zu initiieren. Ein solcher Rechtsbehelf ist für Anspruchsgegner bislang nicht anerkannt. Dies stellt sich als sehr problematisch dar, da Eilverfahren im Lauterkeitsrecht eine sehr hohe Bedeutung zukommt und Anspruchsgegner in diesen Verfahren signifikant benachteiligt werden. Dieser Umstand begründet auch eine erhebliche Gefahr von Fehlentscheidungen zu Lasten der Anspruchsgegner. Im Wettbewerb kann diesen Fehlentscheidungen große Bedeutung zukommen, weil durch sie beispielsweise der Vertrieb neuer innovativer Produkte untersagt werden kann. Die Arbeit kommt zu dem Ergebnis, dass ein entsprechender Rechtsbehelf anzuerkennen ist, da er dem Anspruchsgegner eine Möglichkeit verschafft, sich wirksam vor schädigenden Fehlentscheidungen zu schützen und damit der Verwirklichung der verfassungsrechtlichen Vorgaben prozessualer Waffengleichheit und effektiven Rechtschutzes dient. / The dissertation deals with the juristic problem whether a legal remedy is to be recognized which enables opponents to initiate procedures of interim legal protection in disputes regarding injunctive relief in the field of unfair competition law. Such a legal remedy is not recognized for opponents up to now. This appears to be very problematic, as preliminary proceedings are of high importance in the field of unfair competition law and opponents are being significantly disadvantaged in these procedures. This fact also founds a considerable danger of wrong decisions at the expense of the opponents. In competition these wrong decisions may be of great importance as, for example, the distribution of new and innovative products can be prohibited by them. The work comes to the conclusion that a corresponding legal remedy is to be recognized, because it provides the opponent with an effective option to protect itself from damaging wrong decisions and it serves the realization of the constitutional requirements of procedural equality of opportunity and effective legal protection.