Critique of trade union freedomThe article begins of the protective character of Labor Law and of the study of trade union freedom as an instrument of compensatory inequality, to analyze critically the protection of this right in the Committeeof Trade Union Freedom. Then, it develops causes of the current crisis of trade unionism and the possibility of atrade union self-reform and of an International Court of Trade Union Freedom. Finally, the article presents some strategies for overcoming the crisis of trade unionism / El artículo parte del carácter protector del derecho del trabajo y del estudio de la libertad sindical como instrumento de desigualdad compensatoria, para analizar críticamente la protección de este derecho enel Comité de Libertad Sindical. Seguidamente, se desarrollan las causas de la actual crisis del sindicalismo y la posibilidad de una autorreforma sindical y de un Tribunal Internacional de la Libertad Sindical. Finalmente, el artículo presenta algunas estrategias para superar la crisis del sindicalismo

Made available in DSpace on 2016-04-26T20:28:12Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 Carlos Eduardo Oliveira Dias.pdf: 1629045 bytes, checksum: ffe61d239dddfd946bf05155a6beca56 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2008-11-07 / The present study is an interdisciplinary analysis of the collective relations of labour in Brazil since its social and economic conformation, as one estimated for the recognition of the necessity of a limitation to the private collective autonomy. This conclusion is established in the fact of that the Brazilian´s labour market and its regulation had been structuralized with distinct paradigms of those observed in other countries, over all of the Europe, what is an obstacle to the unconditional adoption the ample flexibility of the labor laws, despite based in collective bargainings. On the other hand, the syndical structure in Brazil is another factor that prohibits the possibilities of evolution of the collective bargaining model, still marked by typical elements of the corporative standard, what it contributes for the transformation of the collective bargaining in precariousness instrument and not of emancipation of the workers, as would have to be considered, also on account of its condition of fundamental rights, as is recognized for the International Labour Organization / O presente estudo propõe uma análise interdisciplinar das relações coletivas de trabalho no Brasil a partir da sua conformação socioeconômica, como um pressuposto para o reconhecimento da necessidade de uma limitação à autonomia coletiva privada. Essa conclusão é fundada no fato de que o mercado de trabalho brasileiro e a sua regulação foram estruturados com paradigmas distintos daqueles observados em outros países, sobretudo da Europa, o que compromete a adoção incondicional de diretrizes que admitem a ampla flexibilidade dos direitos trabalhistas, ainda que baseada em negociações coletivas de trabalho. Por outro lado, a estrutura sindical predominante no Brasil é outro fator que interdita as possibilidades de evolução do modelo negocial, ainda marcado por elementos típicos do corporativismo, contribuindo para a transformação da negociação coletiva em instrumento de precariedade e não de emancipação da classe trabalhadora, como deveria ser considerada, inclusive em razão de sua condição de direito fundamental, como é reconhecido pela Organização Internacional do Trabalho

The model of peruvian collective relations: from interventionist and restrictive to promotionalThe article begins by considering a system or democratic model of labor relations implies a significant degree of self-gravitating through the presence of collective autonomy as self-regulation agreed in relations between the representatives of workers and employers. That collides with the fact thatin Latin America, with the exception of Uruguay, the model is remarkably restrictive. Although our country since the Constitutionof 1979 explicitly ascribes to the model of Social State of Law – which in the labor field was expressed in the consecration of a democratic model of labor relations, this has not had correlation with the infra-constitutional regulation.Then, the article presents the main characteristics of a democratic model of labor relations which has as main features: i.–The dialectical conception of labor relations and assignment to the conflict of a functional role within the constitutional scheme, ii.– The consecration of collective autonomy as an essential piece of the regulatory system, iii.– The promotional intervention and feeder system from the state as a notion of closure of exceptional transcendence. Finally, the article points out the principalnovelties on the subject contained in the Project of General Labor Law, the same that is in line within the new Latin American context of impulse of the collective autonomy that exists in countries like Brazil, Paraguay, Dominican Republic, Uruguay and also seeks to promote the gradual substitution of decentralized and dysfunctional model for the functioning of the country, establishing a certain preference for the sectorial bargaining. / El artículo parte de considerar que un sistema o modelo democrático de relaciones de trabajo implica un grado significativo de autodeterminación, mediante la presencia gravitante de la autonomía colectiva como la autorregulación pactada en las relaciones entre los representantes de los trabajadores y empleadores. Ello colisiona con el hecho de que en América Latina, con excepción de Uruguay, el modelo es marcadamente restrictivo. Si bien nuestro país desde la Constitución de 1979 se adscribe explícitamente al modelo de Estado Social de Derecho —lo que en el campo laboral se expresabaen la consagración de un modelo democrático de relaciones laborales—, esto no ha tenido correlato en la regulación infraconstitucional. Seguidamente, el artículo nos presenta las principales características de un modelo democrático de relaciones laborales que tiene como principales rasgos: i. La concepción dialéctica de las relaciones de trabajo y asignación al conflicto de un papel funcional dentro del esquema constitucional; ii. La consagración de la autonomía colectiva como pieza esencial del sistema normativo; iii. La intervención promocional y alimentadora del sistema por parte del Estado como noción de cierre de excepcional trascendencia. Finalmente, el artículo señala las principales novedades que sobre el tema contiene el Proyecto de Ley General de Trabajo, el cual se enmarca dentro del nuevo contextolatinoamericano de impulso de la autonomía colectiva que se vive en países como Brasil, Paraguay, República Dominicana y Uruguay, y que además busca impulsar la paulatina sustitución del modelo descentralizado y disfuncional para el funcionamiento del país, estableciendo una cierta preferencia por la negociación sectorial.