The author discusses the nature and reality of the marginalisation and disempowerment of ordinary citizens. He also highlights how democratic constitution making in Africa has so far left marginalisation and disempowerment unchallenged / Thesis (LLM (Human Rights and Democratisation in Africa)) -- University of Pretoria, 2008. / A Dissertation submitted to the Faculty of Law University of Pretoria, in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the degree Masters of Law (LLM in Human Rights and Democratisation in Africa). Prepared under the supervision of Orquidea Palmira Orquidea, Faculty of Law, Universidade Eduardo Mondlane, Mozambique / http://www.chr.up.ac.za/ / Centre for Human Rights / LLM

No description available.

This thesis examines the role of civil society in promoting good governance and development in Zimbabwe. This is done through a case study of the National Constitutional Assembly (NCA). Specifically, the thesis looks at the role of constitutionalism as a tool in promoting good governance and development by situating the Zimbabwean struggle for constitutional reform within the context of an unprecedented socio-economic and humanitarian crisis that engulfed Zimbabwe at the beginning of 2000. One of the central questions explored in this thesis is that of the value of the concept of civil society in understanding African post-colonial situations in general and the Zimbabwean situation in particular. The thesis looks at the history of constitutionalism in order to assess if the Zimbabwean crisis could be understood within the context of a constitutional crisis. Therefore, the thesis ventures into the complex dynamics of state-civil society relations while at the same time examining the formation, structure and programmes of the NCA. This is meant to highlight how the NCA’s internal governance system, its leadership style and accountability worked as well as if it reflected good governance or not. An analysis of NCA’s relationship with donors is also presented in order to dispel or validate claims that civil society is just a front for western interests to effect regime change in Zimbabwe. Of critical importance in this study is how civil society (represented by the NCA) interacted with the government and the opposition political parties. The NCA actively participated in opposition politics coming in the open to urge its supporters to vote for the opposition and later ditched the opposition when they had disagreements but their reputation as impartial actors had been destroyed. The thesis concludes by questioning the strategies that are used by civil society in engaging with the government and that in their present structure they should not be antagonistic to the state but should work in tandem with the state for the attainment of good governance and development. Civil society organisations should be politically neutral in their pursuit of developmental goals and ought to practice what they preach by being democratic and accountable themselves. / Development Studies / M.A. (Development Studies)

This thesis examines the role of civil society in promoting good governance and development in Zimbabwe. This is done through a case study of the National Constitutional Assembly (NCA). Specifically, the thesis looks at the role of constitutionalism as a tool in promoting good governance and development by situating the Zimbabwean struggle for constitutional reform within the context of an unprecedented socio-economic and humanitarian crisis that engulfed Zimbabwe at the beginning of 2000. One of the central questions explored in this thesis is that of the value of the concept of civil society in understanding African post-colonial situations in general and the Zimbabwean situation in particular. The thesis looks at the history of constitutionalism in order to assess if the Zimbabwean crisis could be understood within the context of a constitutional crisis. Therefore, the thesis ventures into the complex dynamics of state-civil society relations while at the same time examining the formation, structure and programmes of the NCA. This is meant to highlight how the NCA’s internal governance system, its leadership style and accountability worked as well as if it reflected good governance or not. An analysis of NCA’s relationship with donors is also presented in order to dispel or validate claims that civil society is just a front for western interests to effect regime change in Zimbabwe. Of critical importance in this study is how civil society (represented by the NCA) interacted with the government and the opposition political parties. The NCA actively participated in opposition politics coming in the open to urge its supporters to vote for the opposition and later ditched the opposition when they had disagreements but their reputation as impartial actors had been destroyed. The thesis concludes by questioning the strategies that are used by civil society in engaging with the government and that in their present structure they should not be antagonistic to the state but should work in tandem with the state for the attainment of good governance and development. Civil society organisations should be politically neutral in their pursuit of developmental goals and ought to practice what they preach by being democratic and accountable themselves. / Development Studies / M. A. (Development Studies)

La théorie du droit constitutionnel tend, en raison de la prégnance de certains présupposés épistémologiques, à négliger l’étude de l’exercice du pouvoir constituant originaire, c’est à dire le processus d’élaboration d’une nouvelle constitution. Cette thèse entend participer à combler cette lacune à travers le recours à un concept de «pouvoir pré-constituant», qui renvoie à la compétence de définir les règles d’élaboration d’un nouveau texte constitutionnel. Nous postulons que ces règles ont pour fonction d’instituer une procédure constituante et ainsi de justifier et contraindre le phénomène constituant. Nous avançons aussi qu’elles ont pour caractéristique d’irrémédiablement disparaître du système juridique dès l’adoption de la constitution dès lors que l’acte constituant n’est pas justifié par sa conformité aux énoncés qui ont encadré sa production mais par la seule volonté du souverain. La première partie montre comment l’adoption des règles d’élaboration de la nouvelle constitution est tributaire de l’ensemble du système juridique existant lors de la période transitoire. Dans la seconde partie, le recours au concept de pouvoir pré-constituant permet d’envisager l’exercice du pouvoir constituant originaire en tant qu’objet normatif auquel est articulé un ensemble de règles doté d’une autonomie relative vis-à-vis des règles non pré-constituantes. Dans la troisième partie nous montrons comment les acteurs de la procédure constituante peuvent, en raison du caractère provisoire du pouvoir préconstituant, être contraints de précipiter son déroulé afin d’empêcher la contestation de sa légalité. Cette thèse repose sur une étude approfondie à partir de l’analyse de sources primaires du processus constituant égyptien entre la chute du président Hosni Moubarak en février 2011 et celle du président Morsi en juillet 2013. Elle apporte également un éclairage nouveau à la trajectoire du pays après la Révolution du 25 janvier 2011, puisque la question constituante a représenté l’un des enjeux politiques majeurs de la période postrévolutionnaire. / Due to certain epistemological assumptions, constitutional law theory tends to neglect the study of the exercise of original constituent power, namely, the process of new constitution-making. This PhD intends to address the gap in investigation by proposing the concept of “pre-constituent power”, which entails the competence to define rules for drafting a new constitution. We argue that these rules serve to institute a constituent procedure and thus justify and constrain the constituent phenomenon. We also maintain that these rules inevitably vanish from the legal system as soon as the constitution is adopted, as a constitution’s adoption does not derive its legal legitimacy from the rules that framed its production, but rather from the sole will of the sovereign. The first part of this work demonstrates how the establishment of rules for new constitution drafting is reliant on the rest of the legal system in existence during the transitional period. In the second part, employing the concept of pre-constituent power enables us to consider the constitution-making process as an object of normativity, governed by a set of rules characterized by relative autonomy vis-à-vis non-pre-constituent rules. In the third part, we illustrate how actors in the constituent procedure can be compelled to precipitate the process. This occurs as the actors attempt to prevent contestations regarding the legality of the process, given the provisional character of the pre-constituent power. This PhD is rooted in an in-depth case study, based on the analysis of primary sources detailing the Egyptian constitution-making process that took place between the fall of President Hosni Mubarak in February 2011 and that of President Morsi in July 2013. It also sheds new light on the country's trajectory after the January 25, 2011 Revolution, given that the constitutional issue represented one of the major political concerns in the post-revolutionary period.