Background/Aims: Neonatal quinpirole (NQ) treatment to rats increases dopamine D2 (DAD2) receptor sensitivity in adult animals. We investigated if increased DAD2 sensitivity would be passed to the next (F1) generation, and if these animals demonstrated sensorimotor gating deficits and enhanced behavioral responses to nicotine. Methods: Male and female rats were intraperitoneal (IP) administered quinpirole (1 mg/kg) or saline (NS) from postnatal day (P)1–21. Animals were either behaviorally tested (F0) or raised to P60 and mated, creating F1 offspring. Results: Experiment 1 revealed that F1 generation animals that were the offspring of at least one NQ-treated founder increased yawning behavior, a DAD2-mediated behavioral event, in response to acute quinpirole (0.1 mg/kg). F1 generation rats also demonstrated increased striatal β arrestin-2 and decreased phospho-AKT signaling, consistent with increased G-protein independent DAD2 signaling, which was equal to F0 NQ-treated founders, although this was not observed in all groups. RNA-Seq analysis revealed significant gene expression changes in the F1 generation that were offspring of both NQ-treated founders compared to F0 NQ founders and controls, with enrichment in sensitivity to stress hormones and cell signaling pathways. In Experiment 2, all F1 generation offspring demonstrated sensorimotor gating deficits compared to controls, which were equivalent to F0 NQ-treated founders. In Experiment 3, all F1 generation animals demonstrated enhanced nicotine behavioral sensitization and nucleus accumbens (NAcc) brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) protein. Further, F1 generation rats demonstrated enhanced adolescent nicotine conditioned place preference equivalent to NQ-treated founders conditioned with nicotine. Conclusions: This represents the first demonstration of transgenerational effects of increased DAD2 sensitivity in a rodent model.

Increased neuroinflammation has been shown in individuals diagnosed with schizophrenia (SCHZ). This study evaluated a novel immune modulator (PD2024) that targets the pro-inflammatory cytokine tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNFα) to alleviate sensorimotor gating deficits and microglial activation employing two different rodent models of SCHZ. In Experiment 1, rats were neonatally treated with saline or the dopamine D2-like agonist quinpirole (NQ; 1 mg/kg) from postnatal day (P) 1-21 which produces increases of dopamine D2 receptor sensitivity throughout the animal's lifetime. In Experiment 2, rats were neonatally treated with saline or the immune system stimulant polyinosinic:polycytidylic acid (Poly I:C) from P5-7. Neonatal Poly I:C treatment mimics immune system activation associated with SCHZ. In both experiments, rats were raised to P30 and administered a control diet or a novel TNFα inhibitor PD2024 (10 mg/kg) in the diet from P30 until P67. At P45-46 and from P60-67, animals were behaviorally tested on auditory sensorimotor gating as measured through prepulse inhibition (PPI). NQ or Poly I:C treatment resulted in PPI deficits, and PD2024 treatment alleviated PPI deficits in both models. Results also revealed that increased hippocampal and prefrontal cortex microglial activation produced by neonatal Poly I:C was significantly reduced to control levels by PD2024. In addition, a separate group of animals neonatally treated with saline or Poly I:C from P5-7 demonstrated increased TNFα protein levels in the hippocampus but not prefrontal cortex, verifying increased TNFα in the brain produced by Poly I:C. Results from this study suggests that that brain TNFα is a viable pharmacological target to treat the neuroinflammation known to be associated with SCHZ.

No description available.

The dopamine D2 receptor exists in vitro in two states of agonist affinity: a high-affinity state mediating dopamine’s physiological effects, and a physiologically-inert low-affinity state. Our primary goal was to determine the in vivo relevance of this two-affinity-state model for the agonist PET radiotracer [11C]-(+)-PHNO, developed for measurement of the D2 high-affinity state. Our second goal was to characterize the regional D2 versus D3 pharmacology of [3H]-(+)-PHNO binding and assess its utility for measuring drug occupancy at both receptor subtypes. Using ex vivo dual-radiotracer experiments in conscious rats, we showed that, contrary to the two-affinity-state model, the binding of [11C]-(+)-PHNO and the antagonist [3H]-raclopride were indistinguishably inhibited by D2 partial agonist (aripiprazole), indirect agonist (amphetamine) and full agonist ((-)-NPA) pretreatment. Furthermore, ex vivo [11C]-(+)-PHNO binding was unaffected by treatments that increase in vitro high-affinity state density (chronic amphetamine, ethanol-withdrawal), whereas unilateral 6-OHDA lesion, which increases total D2 receptor expression, similarly increased the ex vivo binding of [11C]-(+)-PHNO and [3H]-raclopride. These results do not support the in vivo validity of the two-affinity-state model, suggesting instead a single receptor state for [11C]-(+)-PHNO and [3H]-raclopride in conscious rat. Importantly, we also demonstrated that the increased amphetamine-sensitivity of the agonist radiotracers [11C]-(+)-PHNO and [11C]-(-)-NPA, commonly seen in isoflurane-anaesthetized animals and cited as evidence for the two-affinity-state model, is due to the confounding effects of anaesthesia. Using in vitro and ex vivo autoradiography in rat and the D3 receptor-selective drug SB277011, we found that [3H]-(+)-PHNO binding in striatum and cerebellum lobes 9 and 10 was due exclusively to D2 and D3 receptor binding, respectively, but in other extra-striatal regions to a mix of the two receptor subtypes. Surprisingly, the D3 contribution to [3H]-(+)-PHNO binding was greater ex vivo than in vitro. Also surprising, several antipsychotic drugs, at doses producing 80% D2 occupancy, produced insignificant (olanzapine, risperidone, haloperidol) or small (clozapine, ~35%) D3 occupancy, despite similarly occupying both receptor subtypes in vitro. These data reveal a significant discrepancy between in vitro and ex vivo measures of dopamine receptor binding and suggest that the D3 occupancy is not necessary for the therapeutic effect of antispychotic drugs.

A filamina A (FLNA) é uma proteína de citoesqueleto com diversas funções, dentre as quais estão motilidade celular e ancoragem de receptores de membrana. A alteração de sua expressão foi anteriormente descrita em diversos tipos de neoplasia. Em tumores hipofisários, demonstrou-se que sua expressão se correlacionou à expressão de receptores de dopamina tipo 2 (DRD2) em prolactinomas, e com a sinalização intracelular do receptor de somatostatina tipo 2 (SSTR2) após ativação por agonista, em somatotropinomas. Neste estudo, avalariam-se a expressão da FLNA, DRD2, SSTR2 e SSTR5 em diversos tumores hipofisários: prolactinomas, somatotropinomas, corticotropinomas e adenomas clinicamente não funcionantes (ACNF). Avaliou-se também a correlação entre a expressão da FLNA e resposta aos tratamentos medicamentosos, com agonista dopaminérgico (AD) ou com ligantes do receptor de somatostatina (LRS), e entre FLNA e as características de invasividade e/ou agressividade tumorais. Houve correlação entre a expressão de FLNA e a expressão de DRD2 e, entre FLNA e a resposta ao AD, nos ACNFs. Nos corticotropinomas, houve correlação entre a expressão da FLNA e critérios de invasividade tumoral. Portanto, o papel da FLNA nos tumores hipofisários pode depender do tipo celular implicado. Além disso, o envolvimento da FLNA nos mecanismos de resistência aos medicamentos utilizados nos tumores hipofisários, AD ou LRS, não deve estar relacionado apenas à sua ação na ancoragem e reciclagem dos receptores DRD2 e SSTRs, mas também à sua ação na motilidade celular, propiciando caratecterísticas de invasividade / Filamin A (FLNA) is a cytoskeletal protein with a variety of functions, including cell motility and membrane receptor anchorage. Changes in FLNA expression has already been described in several types of neoplasia. In pituitary tumors, its expression has been shown to correlate with the expression of dopamine type 2 receptors (DRD2) in prolactinomas and with intracellular somatostatin type 2 receptor (SSTR2) signaling after agonist activation in somatotropinomas. The expression of FLNA, DRD2, SSTR2 and SSTR5 in different pituitary tumors: prolactinomas, somatotrophinomas, corticotrophinomas and clinically nonfunctioning adenomas (CNFA) were evaluated. We also correlate FLNA expression to sensibility to drug treatments with dopamin agonists (DA) or somatostatin receptor ligands (SRL), and to tumor invasiveness and/or aggressiveness. Positive correlation between FLNA expression and DRD2 expression and between FLNA and DA response were found in CNFA. In corticotrophinomas, there was correlation between FLNA expression and tumor invasiveness. Therefore, the role of FLNA in pituitary tumors seems to depend on the cell type involved. Additionally, FLNA involvement in the mechanisms of drug (DA or SRL) resistance in pituitary tumors could not be related only to its action in the anchoring and recycling of DRD2 and SSTR receptors, but also to its action on cellular motility and invasiveness

Neonatal quinpirole (NQ) treatment to rats increases dopamine D2 receptor sensitivity persistent throughout the animal’s lifetime. In Experiment 1, we analyzed the role of α7 and α4β2 nicotinic receptors (nAChRs) in nicotine behavioral sensitization and on the brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) response to nicotine in NQ- and neonatally saline (NS)-treated rats. In Experiment 2, we analyzed changes in α7 and α4β2 nAChR density in the nucleus accumbens (NAcc) and dorsal striatum in NQ and NS animals sensitized to nicotine. Male and female Sprague-Dawley rats were neonatally treated with quinpirole (1mg/kg) or saline from postnatal days (P)1-21. Animals were given ip injections of either saline or nicotine (0.5mg/kg free base) every second day from P33 to P49 and tested on behavioral sensitization. Before each injection, animals were ip administered the α7 nAChR antagonist methyllycaconitine (MLA; 2 or 4mg/kg) or the α4β2 nAChR antagonist dihydro beta erythroidine (DhβE; 1 or 3mg/kg). Results revealed NQ enhanced nicotine sensitization that was blocked by DhβE. MLA blocked the enhanced nicotine sensitization in NQ animals, but did not block nicotine sensitization. NQ enhanced the NAcc BDNF response to nicotine which was blocked by both antagonists. In Experiment 2, NQ enhanced nicotine sensitization and enhanced α4β2, but not α7, nAChR upregulation in the NAcc. These results suggest a relationship between accumbal BDNF and α4β2 nAChRs and their role in the behavioral response to nicotine in the NQ model which has relevance to schizophrenia, a behavioral disorder with high rates of tobacco smoking.

Attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) affects up to 10% of school-aged children and half as many adults. The core features of impulsivity, hyperactivity, and inattentiveness commonly give rise to academic underachievement, poor social relationships, and increased risk for mood and anxiety disorders. Although the relevant neurobiological mechanisms remain poorly understood, altered mesocorticolimbic dopamine (DA) transmission has been proposed. The aim of the present study was to compare striatal DA function in treatment-naive adults with ADHD vs. age- and IQ-matched controls. Two PET/[11C]raclopride scans, one with placebo and one with d-amphetamine (d-AMP; 0.3 mg/kg, p.o.), were administered to five men with ADHD and five healthy male volunteers. The ADHD group differed from controls in demonstrating significant d-AMP-induced reductions in posterior caudate (p<0.05). These results may support a proposed model of reduced DA tone leading to increased phasic signaling in ADHD.

The dopamine D2 receptor exists in vitro in two states of agonist affinity: a high-affinity state mediating dopamine’s physiological effects, and a physiologically-inert low-affinity state. Our primary goal was to determine the in vivo relevance of this two-affinity-state model for the agonist PET radiotracer [11C]-(+)-PHNO, developed for measurement of the D2 high-affinity state. Our second goal was to characterize the regional D2 versus D3 pharmacology of [3H]-(+)-PHNO binding and assess its utility for measuring drug occupancy at both receptor subtypes. Using ex vivo dual-radiotracer experiments in conscious rats, we showed that, contrary to the two-affinity-state model, the binding of [11C]-(+)-PHNO and the antagonist [3H]-raclopride were indistinguishably inhibited by D2 partial agonist (aripiprazole), indirect agonist (amphetamine) and full agonist ((-)-NPA) pretreatment. Furthermore, ex vivo [11C]-(+)-PHNO binding was unaffected by treatments that increase in vitro high-affinity state density (chronic amphetamine, ethanol-withdrawal), whereas unilateral 6-OHDA lesion, which increases total D2 receptor expression, similarly increased the ex vivo binding of [11C]-(+)-PHNO and [3H]-raclopride. These results do not support the in vivo validity of the two-affinity-state model, suggesting instead a single receptor state for [11C]-(+)-PHNO and [3H]-raclopride in conscious rat. Importantly, we also demonstrated that the increased amphetamine-sensitivity of the agonist radiotracers [11C]-(+)-PHNO and [11C]-(-)-NPA, commonly seen in isoflurane-anaesthetized animals and cited as evidence for the two-affinity-state model, is due to the confounding effects of anaesthesia. Using in vitro and ex vivo autoradiography in rat and the D3 receptor-selective drug SB277011, we found that [3H]-(+)-PHNO binding in striatum and cerebellum lobes 9 and 10 was due exclusively to D2 and D3 receptor binding, respectively, but in other extra-striatal regions to a mix of the two receptor subtypes. Surprisingly, the D3 contribution to [3H]-(+)-PHNO binding was greater ex vivo than in vitro. Also surprising, several antipsychotic drugs, at doses producing 80% D2 occupancy, produced insignificant (olanzapine, risperidone, haloperidol) or small (clozapine, ~35%) D3 occupancy, despite similarly occupying both receptor subtypes in vitro. These data reveal a significant discrepancy between in vitro and ex vivo measures of dopamine receptor binding and suggest that the D3 occupancy is not necessary for the therapeutic effect of antispychotic drugs.

A filamina A (FLNA) é uma proteína de citoesqueleto com diversas funções, dentre as quais estão motilidade celular e ancoragem de receptores de membrana. A alteração de sua expressão foi anteriormente descrita em diversos tipos de neoplasia. Em tumores hipofisários, demonstrou-se que sua expressão se correlacionou à expressão de receptores de dopamina tipo 2 (DRD2) em prolactinomas, e com a sinalização intracelular do receptor de somatostatina tipo 2 (SSTR2) após ativação por agonista, em somatotropinomas. Neste estudo, avalariam-se a expressão da FLNA, DRD2, SSTR2 e SSTR5 em diversos tumores hipofisários: prolactinomas, somatotropinomas, corticotropinomas e adenomas clinicamente não funcionantes (ACNF). Avaliou-se também a correlação entre a expressão da FLNA e resposta aos tratamentos medicamentosos, com agonista dopaminérgico (AD) ou com ligantes do receptor de somatostatina (LRS), e entre FLNA e as características de invasividade e/ou agressividade tumorais. Houve correlação entre a expressão de FLNA e a expressão de DRD2 e, entre FLNA e a resposta ao AD, nos ACNFs. Nos corticotropinomas, houve correlação entre a expressão da FLNA e critérios de invasividade tumoral. Portanto, o papel da FLNA nos tumores hipofisários pode depender do tipo celular implicado. Além disso, o envolvimento da FLNA nos mecanismos de resistência aos medicamentos utilizados nos tumores hipofisários, AD ou LRS, não deve estar relacionado apenas à sua ação na ancoragem e reciclagem dos receptores DRD2 e SSTRs, mas também à sua ação na motilidade celular, propiciando caratecterísticas de invasividade / Filamin A (FLNA) is a cytoskeletal protein with a variety of functions, including cell motility and membrane receptor anchorage. Changes in FLNA expression has already been described in several types of neoplasia. In pituitary tumors, its expression has been shown to correlate with the expression of dopamine type 2 receptors (DRD2) in prolactinomas and with intracellular somatostatin type 2 receptor (SSTR2) signaling after agonist activation in somatotropinomas. The expression of FLNA, DRD2, SSTR2 and SSTR5 in different pituitary tumors: prolactinomas, somatotrophinomas, corticotrophinomas and clinically nonfunctioning adenomas (CNFA) were evaluated. We also correlate FLNA expression to sensibility to drug treatments with dopamin agonists (DA) or somatostatin receptor ligands (SRL), and to tumor invasiveness and/or aggressiveness. Positive correlation between FLNA expression and DRD2 expression and between FLNA and DA response were found in CNFA. In corticotrophinomas, there was correlation between FLNA expression and tumor invasiveness. Therefore, the role of FLNA in pituitary tumors seems to depend on the cell type involved. Additionally, FLNA involvement in the mechanisms of drug (DA or SRL) resistance in pituitary tumors could not be related only to its action in the anchoring and recycling of DRD2 and SSTR receptors, but also to its action on cellular motility and invasiveness

The process of receptor supersensitivity (RSS) has a long history and is an epiphenomenon of neuronal denervation. Dopamine (DA) RSS (DARSS) similarly occurs after DA denervation, and this process is invoked in neuropsychiatric and neurodegenerative disorders. From studies largely over the past 25 years, much has been learned regarding DARSS. For example, overt D1 DARSS occurs after perinatal destruction of nigrostriatal DA fibers. However, following perinatal destruction of DA innervation, the most-prominent behavioral effects of a D1 agonist are observed after a series of D1 agonist treatments--a process known as priming of D1 DA receptors. Moreover, perinatal lesioning of DA fibers produces prominent serotonin (5-HT) RSS, and in fact 5-HT RSS appears to modulate D1 DA RSS. In rodents, receptor supersensitization by these means appears to be irreversible. In contrast to the observed D1 DARSS, D2 DARSS apparently does not occur after perinatal DA denervation. Also, while repeated D1 agonist treatment of intact rats has no observable effect, repeated D2 agonist treatments, during or after the ontogenetic phase, produces prominent life-long D2 RSS. The process may have an association with substance abuse. Therefore, production of D1 and D2 DARSS occurs by different means and under different circumstances, and in association with perhaps different neuronal phenotypes, and with greater incidence in either intact (D2) or DA-lesioned counterparts (D1). The physiological consequence of RSS are multiple.