Cette thèse examine le comportement de quatre doyens canadiens dont les facultés sont en situation financière précaire. Dans un contexte d’imputabilité accrue des établissements universitaires et de modification constante aux rapports de pouvoir internes, cette étude présente une importance particulière pour la compréhension de l’exercice réel des fonctions administratives des cadres académiques intermédiaires. La recherche scientifique sur ce sujet attribue aux doyens une contribution vitale au bon fonctionnement des établissements; le doyen en demeure pourtant un des rouages les moins étudiés. La position intermédiaire qu’occupent les doyens les place dans un conflit de rôle évident. Pris entre des rôles et des attentes contradictoires émis par la communauté facultaire, d’une part, et par la direction de l’établissement, d’autre part, ils doivent conjuguer cette ambiguïté avec des responsabilités croissantes en matière de gestion financière, de leadership et d’opérationnalisation des visées stratégiques de l’université. Comprendre la façon dont les doyens arrivent à mobiliser les leviers institutionnels à leur disposition pour résoudre des situations critiques permettra d’améliorer notre compréhension de la complexité de la prise de décision au niveau intermédiaire et notre compréhension globale du fonctionnement des établissements universitaires. La présente étude importe de la théorie culturelle-historique de l’activité (culturalhistorical activity theory, ou CHAT) un modèle d’analyse de l’activité collective en situation de contradictions systémiques. Quatre doyens d’une même université ont été interviewés afin de présenter une situation vécue de difficulté budgétaire, et le processus de résolution qui a suivi. Les données ont été analysées qualitativement afin de décrire les interventions que réalisent les doyens sur les leviers présents dans leurs environnements. Les résultats suggèrent que les participants ont misé sur une maîtrise fine des rouages institutionnels et sur des interventions diversifiées afin de résoudre les contradictions de leurs systèmes d’activité. / The purpose of this doctoral thesis is to study the work of four Canadian deans dealing with precarious financial situations. In a governance context of increasing accountability and ever-shifting power patterns, this study sheds a particularly important light upon the understanding of the real exercise of administrative functions by academic middle managers. Current research on the subject identifies deans as essential to an institution’s smooth operations; yet, it is one of the least understood cogs in the machine. The middle-of-the-ladder position they claim puts deans in an obvious conflict of roles and loyalty. Stuck between contradictory expectations from faculty and administrators, they must deal daily with this ambiguity in addition to increasing financial, leadership and operational responsibilities. To understand how deans use institutional levers and strategies in order to solve complex, contradictory situations is to increase our understanding of the complexity of decision-making in higher education as well as of higher education institutions in general. This study imports concepts and tools from the cultural-historical activity theory (CHAT) and suggests an analysis model of collective activity in situations of systemic contradictions. Four deans from the same university were interviewed in order to exhaustively map a critical incident related to budget difficulties, as well as the process through which the situation was resolved. A qualitative analysis of the data allowed for an in-depth description of the tools and institutional levers deans used when confronted with financial difficulties. Results suggest that the participants mobilised a keen mastery of both the rules and their community to develop and implement a wide variety of systemic interventions in order to solve the contradictions in their activity systems.

Cette thèse a démontré que les athlètes élites vivent en moyenne 7 ans de plus que la population générale, notamment en raison d’une réduction de 35 à 45% de la mortalité par maladies cardiovasculaires et par cancers. Ces résultats s’appuient sur l’analyse de l’ensemble des sportifs français (n= 3.600) ayant participé aux Jeux Olympiques depuis 1912 et au Tour de France depuis 1947. Des nouvelles méthodes en analyse de survie ont été mises au point pour investiguer ces cohortes qui ont la particularité de survivre mieux que leurs référents. A ces démonstrations s’ajoute le ralentissement de la progression de la longévité maximale humaine. Ce constat résulte de la comparaison des tendances de durée de vie de tous les olympiens depuis 1896 (n= 19.012) et des doyens de l’humanité (n= 1.205). Ces travaux répondent au besoin de mieux comprendre la relation dose-réponse de l’activité physique, médicament du 21ème siècle, en raison de son impact majeur sur la longévité des populations, ainsi qu’à l’intérêt d’explorer les marges d’augmentation possibles de cette longévité. / Background and objectives: along their careers, elite athletes are subjected to specific constraints that distinguish them from the general population. Such constraints, related to the high intensity of their physical activity, their overexposure to injuries or particular lifestyle, may have long-term consequences on the athletes' health, and ultimately on their longevity. Thus, the main goals of the present study are the following: 1) to describe and analyze elite athletes’ longevity and specific causes of mortality in comparison with the general population and according to the type of effort they performed; and 2) to investigate their lifespan trends in comparison with the longest-lived humans in order to apprehend the current scenario of human longevity trends. Methods: we collected data on the biography and the athletic performances of all the French athletes who participated in the Olympic Games (OG) from 1912 to 2012 (n = 4708), and all the French cyclists who participated in the Tour de France (TDF) from 1947 to 2012 (n=786). Then, we verified their vital statuses through the National Registry of Identification of Physical Persons (RNIPP). For the deceased athletes, we obtained the causes of their deaths through the Centre for epidemiology on medical causes of death (CépiDc). We compared the athletes’ overall and specific mortality (according to the main chapters of the International Classification of Disease) with the French civilian life tables using Standardized Mortality Ratio (SMR) and the Kaplan-Meier methods. We adapted and applied the life years-lost method under the competing risk model to quantify differences on longevity due to major causes of death according to the athletes’ type of effort. Furthermore, we collected data on worldwide deceased Olympians participating in the OG from 1896 to 2012 (n=19 012) and on worldwide supercentenarians (>110 years) deceased between 1900 and 2013 (n= 1 205) in order to analyze their lifespan trends using a density analysis tool (total number of life durations per birth date). Findings and conclusion: French elite athletes show consistently lower mortality (≈40-50% lower) in comparison with their compatriots, whether female or male Olympians, or professional cyclists, mostly related with a lower cardiovascular (≈ 40-60% lower) and cancer mortality (≈ 45% lower). No excess mortality was observed in elite athletes for any of the specific causes of death we studied. French Olympians’ lower mortality results in an average of seven years of life saved in relation to the general population. This gain partitioned according to specific causes of deaths shows that cardiovascular longevity benefit is associated with the type of sports practiced during the Olympic career, favoring combined type of effort over very short- or very long-duration effort. In relation to cancer mortality, all types of effort studied were associated with better longevity. Despite their survival advantage, no Olympian in the world, up to date, has ever reached the status of a supercentenarian, as the longest-lived was 106 years old. The common lifespan trends between Olympians and supercentenarians indicate similar mortality pressures over both populations that increase with age, a scenario that is better explained by a biological “barrier” limiting further progression. The supercentenarians’ density trends show a current stagnation of the human longevity.