No / The United Kingdom is considered to be the world leader in nurse prescribing, no other country having the same extended non-medical prescribing rights. Arguably, this growth has outpaced research to evaluate the benefits, particularly in areas of clinical practice where patients have complex co-morbid conditions such as palliative care. This is the first study of non-medical prescribing in palliative care in almost a decade. AIM: To explore the current position of nurse prescribing in palliative care and establish the impact on practice of the 2012 legislative changes. DESIGN: An online survey circulated during May and June 2013. PARTICIPANTS: Nurse members (n = 37) of a regional cancer network palliative care group (61% response rate). RESULTS: While this survey found non-medical prescribers have embraced the 2012 legislative changes and prescribe a wide range of drugs for cancer pain, we also identified scope to improve the transition from qualified to active non-medical prescriber by reducing the time interval between the two. CONCLUSION: To maximise the economic and clinical benefit of non-medical prescribing, the delay between qualifying as a prescriber and becoming an active prescriber needs to be reduced. Nurses who may be considering training to be a non-medical prescriber may be encouraged by the provision of adequate study leave and support to cover clinical work. Further research should explore the patients' perspective of non-medical prescribing.

Yes / The NHS spends billions of pounds annually on repeat prescriptions in primary care, but data on their extent and use is out of date. Understanding the scale of repeat prescribing and for whom it is prescribed is important for the NHS to plan services and develop policies to improve patient care. Anonymous data on prescription numbers and practice population demographics was obtained from GP computer systems in a large urban area.Searches were conducted in November 2011 to identify the numbers of repeat items listed on individuals' repeat lists by sex and age.The proportion of all prescription items issued as repeats was identified by conducting searches on items issued as repeat and acute prescriptions. In the year of study 4,453,225 items were issued of which 3,444,769 (77%) were repeats (mean 13 items per patient/annum) and 1,008,456 (23%) acute prescriptions (mean 3.9 items per patient per annum). The mean number of repeat Items per patient was 1.87 (range 0.45 ages 0-9 years; 7.1 ages 80-89 years). At least one repeat medicine was prescribed to 43% of the population (range 20% for ages 0-9; over 75% for ages 60+). A significant proportion of the population receive repeat prescriptions and the proportion increases with age. Whilst the proportion of repeat items to acute items has remained unchanged over the last two decades the number of repeat prescriptions items issued has doubled (from 5.8 to 13.3 items/patient/annum). This has implications for general practice workload, patient convenience, NHS costs and risk.

<p>Uvod: Antimikrobna rezistencija bakterija predstavlja globalni problem. Najvažniji faktor za njen nastanak je neadekvatna primena antibiotika, koja podrazumeva: Upotrebu antibiotika bez odgovarajuće dijagnoze, neadekvatan izbor leka, dužinu<br />primene i doziranje. Zbog specifičnosti populacije vitalno ugroženih bolesnika u jedinicama intenzivne terapije (JIT) i bolničkih infekcija uzrokovanih multirezistentnim bakterijama, primena antibiotika je na ovim odeljenjima učestala. Pokazana je povezanost između razvoja antimikrobne rezistencije i veličine potro&scaron;nje antibiotika u JIT. Cilj: Analiza primene antibiotika prema indikacijama na Klinici za anesteziju i intenzivnu terapiju, KC Vojvodine, zatim analiza stanja antimikrobne rezistencije<br />najče&scaron;ćih uzročnika bolničkih infekcija i analiza korelacije između navedenih uzročnika bolničkih infekcija i empirijski primenjivane antibiotske terapije na Klinici za anesteziju i intenzivnu terapiju. Materijal i metode: Prospektivna, opservaciona studija, sprovedena u jednogodi&scaron;njem period, u JIT, Klinike za anesteziju i intenzivnu terapiju, uključila je 856 ispitanika, oba pola, starijih od 18 godina kod kojih je tokom hospitalizacije u JIT bio primenjen antibiotik. Ispitanici su, radi prikupljanja podataka, bili podeljeni u dve grupe u zavisnosti od toga da li su imali bolničku infekciju ili ne. Adekvatnost primene antibiotika je analizirana prema indikacijama (hirur&scaron;ka profilaksa, bolničke infekcije, vanbolničke infekcije i drugo), a u odnosu na izbor antibiotika, dužinu primene, režim doziranja, veličinu pojedinačne doze i način promene terapije (prema preporukama farmakoterapijskog vodiča The Sanford guide to antimicrobial therapy i antimikrobnoj osetljivosti bakterijskih uzročnika bolničkih infekcija u JIT. Za izračunavanje potro&scaron;nje antibiotika u JIT kori&scaron;ćena je ATC/DDD metodologija. Podaci o antimikrobnoj osetljivosti dobijeni su iz rezultata mikrobiolo&scaron;ke obrade uzorkovanog materijala. Statistička analiza je izvr&scaron;ena pomoću statističkog paketa IBM SPSS 21 Statistics. Podaci su predstavljeni tabelarno i grafički, obrađeni su standardnim statističkim testovima, a statistička značajnost određivanja je bila na nivou p&lt; 0,05. Ispitivanje povezanosti između potro&scaron;nje anibiotika i antimikrobne rezistencije urađeno je primenom Pirsonovog koeficijenta korelacije. Rezultati: Izbor antibiotika kod bolesnika u JIT nije bio adekvatan u 52,19% preskripcija. Izbor empirijski indikovanih antibiotika za lečenje bolničkih infekcija nije bio u skladu antimikrobnom osetljivo&scaron;ću izolovanog uzročnika u 78,44% preskripcija. Izbor antibiotika za hirur&scaron;ku profilaksu nije bio adekvatan u 55,6% preskripcija. Antimikrobna rezistencija Acinetobacter spp.na karbapeneme, fluorohinolone i cefalosporine bila je preko 90%, na aminoglikozide preko 70%. Klebsiella pneumoniae bila je rezistentna na fluorohinolone i cefalosporine 80%, dok je na grupu karbapenema bila 18%. Pseudomonas aeruginosa je bio rezistentan na karbapeneme i aminoglikozide preko 50%, na antipseudomonasne cefalosporine preko 40%. Na kolistin nije zabeležena rezistencija ni jedne izolovane bakterijske vrste. Značajna pozitivna korelacija zabeležena je između potro&scaron;nje empirijski indikovanog meropenema i rezistencije Acinetobacter spp. Zaključak: U vise od 50% slučajeva primena antibiotika u JIT nije bila u skladu sa stanjem antimikrobne rezistencije bakterijskih uzročnika bolničkih infekcija i savremenim farmakoterapijskim protokolima. Antimikrobna rezistencija Acinetobacter spp, Klebsiellae pneumoniae и Pseudomonas aeruginosae je iznosila preko 20% na antibiotike preporučene savremenim farmakoterapijskim smernicama, osim u slučaju rezistencije Klebsiellaе pneumoniae na grupu karbapenema. Između pojave rezistencije Acinetobacter spp. i potro&scaron;nje empirijski indikovanog meropenema utvrđena je statistički značajna pozitivna povezanost, dok za druge dve navedene bakterijske vrste ova povezanost nije bila statistički značajna. Na osnovu podataka o najče&scaron;ćim bakterijskim uzročnicima i njihovoj antimikrobnoj osetljivosti za empirijsku<br />terapiju pneumonija mogao bi biti preporučen jedino kolistin, dok bi za lečenje urinarnih infekcija mogao biti preporučen imipenem ili meropenem. Potrebno je promeniti farmakoterapijski pristup u primeni antibiotika u JIT.</p> / <p>Uvod: Antimikrobna rezistencija bakterija predstavlja globalni problem. Najvažniji faktor za njen nastanak je neadekvatna primena antibiotika, koja podrazumeva: Upotrebu antibiotika bez odgovarajuće dijagnoze, neadekvatan izbor leka, dužinu<br />primene i doziranje. Zbog specifičnosti populacije vitalno ugroženih bolesnika u jedinicama intenzivne terapije (JIT) i bolničkih infekcija uzrokovanih multirezistentnim bakterijama, primena antibiotika je na ovim odeljenjima učestala. Pokazana je povezanost između razvoja antimikrobne rezistencije i veličine potro&scaron;nje antibiotika u JIT. Cilj: Analiza primene antibiotika prema indikacijama na Klinici za anesteziju i intenzivnu terapiju, KC Vojvodine, zatim analiza stanja antimikrobne rezistencije<br />najče&scaron;ćih uzročnika bolničkih infekcija i analiza korelacije između navedenih uzročnika bolničkih infekcija i empirijski primenjivane antibiotske terapije na Klinici za anesteziju i intenzivnu terapiju. Materijal i metode: Prospektivna, opservaciona studija, sprovedena u jednogodi&scaron;njem period, u JIT, Klinike za anesteziju i intenzivnu terapiju, uključila je 856 ispitanika, oba pola, starijih od 18 godina kod kojih je tokom hospitalizacije u JIT bio primenjen antibiotik. Ispitanici su, radi prikupljanja podataka, bili podeljeni u dve grupe u zavisnosti od toga da li su imali bolničku infekciju ili ne. Adekvatnost primene antibiotika je analizirana prema indikacijama (hirur&scaron;ka profilaksa, bolničke infekcije, vanbolničke infekcije i drugo), a u odnosu na izbor antibiotika, dužinu primene, režim doziranja, veličinu pojedinačne doze i način promene terapije (prema preporukama farmakoterapijskog vodiča The Sanford guide to antimicrobial therapy i antimikrobnoj osetljivosti bakterijskih uzročnika bolničkih infekcija u JIT. Za izračunavanje potro&scaron;nje antibiotika u JIT kori&scaron;ćena je ATC/DDD metodologija. Podaci o antimikrobnoj osetljivosti dobijeni su iz rezultata mikrobiolo&scaron;ke obrade uzorkovanog materijala. Statistička analiza je izvr&scaron;ena pomoću statističkog paketa IBM SPSS 21 Statistics. Podaci su predstavljeni tabelarno i grafički, obrađeni su standardnim statističkim testovima, a statistička značajnost određivanja je bila na nivou p&lt; 0,05. Ispitivanje povezanosti između potro&scaron;nje anibiotika i antimikrobne rezistencije urađeno je primenom Pirsonovog koeficijenta korelacije. Rezultati: Izbor antibiotika kod bolesnika u JIT nije bio adekvatan u 52,19% preskripcija. Izbor empirijski indikovanih antibiotika za lečenje bolničkih infekcija nije bio u skladu antimikrobnom osetljivo&scaron;ću izolovanog uzročnika u 78,44% preskripcija. Izbor antibiotika za hirur&scaron;ku profilaksu nije bio adekvatan u 55,6% preskripcija. Antimikrobna rezistencija Acinetobacter spp.na karbapeneme, fluorohinolone i cefalosporine bila je preko 90%, na aminoglikozide preko 70%. Klebsiella pneumoniae bila je rezistentna na fluorohinolone i cefalosporine 80%, dok je na grupu karbapenema bila 18%. Pseudomonas aeruginosa je bio rezistentan na karbapeneme i aminoglikozide preko 50%, na antipseudomonasne cefalosporine preko 40%. Na kolistin nije zabeležena rezistencija ni jedne izolovane bakterijske vrste. Značajna pozitivna korelacija zabeležena je između potro&scaron;nje empirijski indikovanog meropenema i rezistencije Acinetobacter spp. Zaključak: U vise od 50% slučajeva primena antibiotika u JIT nije bila u skladu sa stanjem antimikrobne rezistencije bakterijskih uzročnika bolničkih infekcija i savremenim farmakoterapijskim protokolima. Antimikrobna rezistencija Acinetobacter spp, Klebsiellae pneumoniae i Pseudomonas aeruginosae je iznosila preko 20% na antibiotike preporučene savremenim farmakoterapijskim smernicama, osim u slučaju rezistencije Klebsiellae pneumoniae na grupu karbapenema. Između pojave rezistencije Acinetobacter spp. i potro&scaron;nje empirijski indikovanog meropenema utvrđena je statistički značajna pozitivna povezanost, dok za druge dve navedene bakterijske vrste ova povezanost nije bila statistički značajna. Na osnovu podataka o najče&scaron;ćim bakterijskim uzročnicima i njihovoj antimikrobnoj osetljivosti za empirijsku<br />terapiju pneumonija mogao bi biti preporučen jedino kolistin, dok bi za lečenje urinarnih infekcija mogao biti preporučen imipenem ili meropenem. Potrebno je promeniti farmakoterapijski pristup u primeni antibiotika u JIT.</p> / <p>Introduction: Antimicrobial resistance is a global health problem.The most important factor in the development of antimicrobial resistance is inadequate use of antibiotics, which means: inadequate diagnosis of bacterial infection, inadequate antibiotic choice, dosage and duration of therapy. Specificities of critically ill patients and nosocomial infections caused by multidrug-resistant pathogens are important reasons for large antibiotic consumption in ICU settings. Many studies have confirmed a positive correlation between antibiotic use and antimicrobial resistance. Aims: The aims of this study were: to analyze the use of antibiotics at the ICU of the Clinic for anesthesia and intensive care at the Clinical Centre of Vojvodina, according to indications for antibiotic treatment; to analyze the pattern of antimicrobial resistance ofthe most common bacteria causing hospital acquired infections in our participants and to analyze the correlation between the consumption of empirically indicated antibiotics and antimicrobial resistance pattern. Methodology: Prospective observational study was conducted during a one-year period at the Clinic for anesthesia and intensive care, Clinical Centre of Vojvodina. The study included 856 participatns, aged over 18 years and of both genders. The participants were divided into two cohorts, depending on whether they showed symptoms of hospital-acquired infection or not. Adequacy of antibiotic use was analyzed with regard to indication for antibiotic treatment (surgical prophylaxis, treatment of hospital acquired infection, outpatient infection or other) and with regard to antibiotic choice, dosage and duration of treatment. An adequate antibiotic choice was compared to the resistance pattern of positive bacterial isolates as outlined by The Sanford guide to antimicrobial therapy). To calculate the consumption of antibiotics in ICU we used ATC/DDD methodology. Data on antibacterial sensitivity was obtained from the results of microbiological analysis of sample materials. IBM SPSS version 21 was used for statistical analysis, standard statistical tests were applied. The results were presented in tables and graphs. Statistically significant correlation was set at the value of p˂0.05. Pearson correlation coefficient was used to measure the strength between variables. Results: Antibiotic choice was inadequate in 52,19% of all antibiotic prescriptions for all indications. Antibiotic choice in surgical prophylaxis was inadequate in 55,59% of prescriptions for this indication. Inadequate choice of empirically indicated antibiotics (for treatment of hospital-acquired infections) according to antimicrobial resistance pattern occurred in 78,44% of all prescription for this indication. The three the most important bacterial causative agents of hospital acquired infections in ICU were: Acinetobacter spp, Klebsiella pneumonia and Pseudomonas aeruginosa. The resistance of Acinetobacter spp. to antibiotic groups was as follows: to carbapenems, fluoroquinolones and cephalosporins over 90% and to aminoglycosides over 70%. The antimicrobial resistance of Klebsiella pneumoniae was: to fluoroquinolones and cephalosporins over 80% and to carbapenems up to 20%. The resistance pattern of Pseudomonas aeruginosa was as follows: to carbapenems and aminoglykozides over 50%, and to antipseudomonal cephalosporins over 40%. Statistically significant correlation was found between the consumption of empirically prescribed meropenem and antimicrobial resistance of Acinetobacter spp. Conclusion:In more than 50% of antibiotic prescriptions at ICU, regardless of indication, the choice of prescribed antibiotics was inadequate. Antimicrobial resistance pattern of Acinetobacter spp, Klebsiella pneumoniae and Pseudomonas aeruginosa to antibiotics recomennded by contemporary guidelines for antimicrobial therapy was over 20%, except in the case of the resistance of Klebsiellae peneumoniae to carbapenems. Statistically significant correlation was found between the consumption of empirically prescribed meropenem and antimicrobial resistance of Acinetobacter spp. No statistically significant correlation was observed in the other two bacterial strains. Initial, empiric therapy for nosocomial pneumonia in our ICU, should be colistin, and for urinary tract infection imipenem or meropenem. It is important to change antibiotic prescribing praxis in ICU.</p>

The overall aim of this thesis was to explore aspects of the subjective views and experiences of doctors as prescribers, focusing on responsibility for and factors of importance in achieving appropriate prescribing. To provide insights into the prescriber’s perspective the study designs were qualitative. In the first studies secondary care doctors’ perceptions of appropriate prescribing and influences in prescribing were investigated in interviews. The doctors perceived that appropriate prescribing needed continuous revision. From the perspective of the prescribers the definition of prescribing could be rephrased as: “the outcome of the recurring processes of decision making that maximises net individual health gains within society’s available resources”. Among the influences in prescribing were guidelines, colleagues and therapeutic traditions. In the subsequent studies the experiences of exchanging information regarding a patient’s drugs in an electronic patient medical record (e-PMR) shared between primary and secondary care and views of responsibility was explored, using focus groups with both primary and secondary care doctors. Considering the gap between health care levels, doctors’ views of responsibility in prescribing and exchange of information are of concern. The doctors expressed how they assume information to be in the e-PMR and active information transfer has decreased. On the other hand, they experienced an information overload in the e-PMR system. There is a need for improved and structured communication between health-care givers. Taking responsibility to review all the patient’s medications was perceived as important, but described as still not done. Lack of responsibility taken was often due to acts of omission, i.e. that doctors did not make needed changes to the list of medications due to different barriers. The barriers rested both with individual doctors and the system, but to ensure solutions that are realisable in practise, perspectives of the doctors need to be taken into consideration when overcoming those barriers.

No description available.

Objetivos. Estimar la prevalencia de insuficiente acceso efectivo a medicamentos (IAEM) y sus factores asociados en usuarios que reciben prescripción médica en la consulta ambulatoria de instituciones prestadoras de servicios de salud (IPRESS) en Perú. Materiales y métodos. Se realizó un análisis secundario de la Encuesta Nacional de Satisfacción de Usuarios en Salud (ENSUSALUD) del año 2014; estudio con muestreo probabilístico bietápico a nivel nacional en IPRESS del Ministerio de Salud y Gobiernos Regionales (MINSA-GR), Seguro Social de Salud, Fuerzas Armadas y Policiales (sanidades), y clínicas del sector privado (CSP). El IAEM se definió como la dispensación incompleta o de ningún medicamento en la farmacia de la IPRESS. Se realizaron modelos lineales generalizados y se estimaron razones de prevalencia (RP) con IC 95% para muestreo complejo. Resultados. De los 13 670 entrevistados, el 80,9% (IC 95%: 79,9-81,8%) recibieron indicación de medicamentos, y de estos el 90,8% (IC 95%: 90,1-91,6%) los solicitaron en la farmacia de la IPRESS, donde el 30,6% (IC 95%:28,8-32,4%) tuvo IAEM. El ser atendido en el MINSA-GR (razón de prevalencia [RP]: 4,8; IC 95%: 3,5-6,54) y en las sanidades (RP: 3,21; IC 95%: 2,3- 4,5), el ser de la tercera edad (RP: 1,17; IC 95%: 1,04-1,34) y el pertenecer al quintil más pobre (RP: 1,21; IC 95%: 1,05-1,41) incrementaron la probabilidad de IAEM. Asimismo, los pacientes atendidos por una enfermedad de menos de 15 días (RP: 1,37; IC 95%: 1,05-1,79) y de 15 días a más (RP: 1,51; IC 95%: 1,16-1,97) tuvieron una mayor prevalencia de IAEM que aquellos atendidos por embarazo u otros controles. Conclusiones. El IAEM está asociado al subsistema de salud, edad, pobreza y tipo de consulta realizada. Se sugieren implementar estrategias para fomentar el acceso a medicamentos en la población peruana. / Objectives. To estimate the prevalence of ineffective access to drugs (IAD) and associated factors in patients receiving a prescription in an outpatient clinic in the Peruvian health system. Materials and Methods. We performed a secondary dataanalysis of the National Survey of Health Users Satisfaction (ENSUSALUD 2014), a two-stage population-based study carried out in health care centers of the Ministry of Health and Regional Governments (MOHRG), Social Security (EsSalud), Armed Forces and Police (AFP) and the Private Sector across all 25 regions of Peru. IAD was defined as incomplete or no dispensing of any prescribed medication in the health care center pharmacy. Generalized linear models with Poisson distribution for complex survey sampling were fit to estimate prevalence ratios (PR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI). Results. Out of 13,360 participants, 80.9 % (95% CI: 79.9-81.8) had an active prescription, and of those, 90.8 % (95% CI: 90.1-91.6) sought their medications in a health care center pharmacy, where 30.6 % (95% CI 28.8-32.4) had IAD. In the multiple regression model, receiving medical attention in the MOHRG (PR 4.8; 95%CI: 3.5-6.54) or AFP (PR: 3.2; 95%CI: 2.3-4.5), being over 60 years old (PR: 1.17; 95%CI: 1.04-1.34) and being in the poorest income quintile (PR: 1.05; 95%CI: 1.05-1.41) increased IAD. Furthermore, in contrast to seeking care for pregnancy or other routine control, IAD was also more common for medical consultation for diseases diagnosed in the last 15 days (PR: 1.37; 95% CI: 1.05-1.79) or more than 15 days prior (PR: 1.51; 95% CI: 1.16-1.97). Conclusion. In Peru, IAD is associated with the provider institution, older age, poverty and the reason for medical consultation. We suggest strategies to promote access to medicines, especially in the most disadvantaged segments of the Peruvian population. / Revisión por pares