Syftet med denna uppsats är att undersöka eventuella samband mellan svenska noterade bolags hållbarhetsarbete och hållbarhetsredovisning utifrån ESG hållbarhetsbetyg, primärt i relation till uppfattat bolagsvärde och sekundärt även i relation till bolagsstorlek vad gäller nettoomsättning och redovisat eget kapital. Fåtalet snarlikastudier har utförts på den svenska marknaden vilket motiverade syftet i denna uppsats.  Metod: Studien tillämpade en kvantitativ forskningsstrategi med utgångspunkt från nyckeltalsdata och ESG-betyginsamlade från S&P Global  2016-2020. Finansiella nyckeltalsdata inklusive estimerat bolagsvärde insamlades från Morningstar Direct. Regressionsanalyser och Pearsons korrelationsanalys genomfördes i Excel och testades mot fyra hypoteser.  Resultat & slutsats: Inga samband påvisades mellan bolagsvärde och ESG. Samband mellan nyckeltalen för eget kapital och nettoomsättning i förhållande till bolagsstorlek kunde konstateras, men inte i samband med ESG hållbarhetsbetyg. Slutsatsen blev att samband saknades på grund av de motsatta effekter som hållbarhetsarbete har på kort respektive lång sikt, där hållbarhet innebär minskat bolagsvärde på kort sikt men ökat bolagsvärde på lång sikt. En annan slutsats var att framtida analyser behöver bygga på separerade snarare än aggregerade EGS-betyg som analyseras branschvis.  Studiens bidrag: Studien tillför ytterligare kunskap till forskningen genom iakttagelsen att relationen mellan ESG och bolagsvärde kan variera beroende på bolagsstorlek, tidsperspektiv och bransch. / The aim of this thesis is to investigate possible connections between Swedish listed companies' sustainability work and sustainability reporting based on ESG's sustainability rating, primarily in relation to perceived company value and secondarily also in relation to company size in terms of net sales and reported equity. Few similar studies have been performed on the Swedish market, which justified the aim of this essay. Method: The study applied a quantitative research strategy based on key figure data and ESG ratings collected from S&P Global 2016-2020. Financial key figures data including estimated company value were collected from Morningstar Direct. Regression analyzes and Pearson's correlation analysis were performed in Excel and tested against four hypotheses. Results & conclusion: No relationship was demonstrated between company value and ESG. A relationship between the key ratios for equity and net sales in relation to company size could be established, but not in connection with the ESG sustainability rating. The conclusion was that there was a lack of connection due to the opposite effects that sustainability work has in the short and long term, respectively, where sustainability means reduced company value in the short term but increased company value in the long term. Another conclusion was that future analyzes need to be based on separate rather than aggregated EGS scores that are analyzed by industry. Contribution of the thesis: The study adds additional knowledge to the research by observing that the relationship between ESG and company value can vary depending on company size, time perspective and industry.

Sustainability has become a pressing global issue due to environmental and social challenges caused by human activity which has led to a rise in sustainable investing, including ESG investing. Research on financial performance and sustainable investing have not only showed mixed results, but they are also generally conducted in greater markets such as the US, Europe, and Asia-pacific markets. Currently, there is a lack of research on performance of sustainable investment strategies in the Nordic Region. The purpose of this paper is to examine the performance of portfolios constructed with an ESG investment strategy, which involves creating two portfolios consisting of top and bottom ESG scored companies. The portfolios are measured against each other and a market index benchmark, in the context of various theories, including the efficient market hypothesis, adaptive market hypothesis, shareholder theory, and stakeholder theory. The theoretical framework includes asset-pricing models and portfolio theory. A quantitative study with a deductive approach is utilized to construct the portfolios, focusing on mid-cap companies in the Nordics with data collected from Refinitiv Eikon’s database. The portfolio construction process yields financial metrics such as returns, volatility, and risk-adjusted returns. To test for outperformance in returns, the unpaired t-test is utilized. The Carhart four-factor model is also used to explain variations in returns related to risk factors and investigate the presence of positive and significant abnormal returns. The results demonstrate that the bottom ESG portfolio exhibits superior portfolio characteristics compared to the top ESG portfolio and the index benchmark, including annual returns and risk-adjusted returns. Furthermore, this study identifies significant positive abnormal returns when using the Carhart four-factor model, and evidence of outperformance in mean cumulative returns for the bottom ESG portfolio relative to the top ESG portfolio and index benchmark. On the other hand, the performance of the top ESG portfolio and index benchmark is inconclusive, with mixed results across different performance metrics and years. Although the top ESG portfolio outperforms in two out of three years in terms of annual returns, volatility, and risk-adjusted returns, no evidence of positive abnormal returns is found. Meanwhile, the index benchmark demonstrates evidence of outperformance in terms of cumulative returns. Overall, the findings suggest that the bottom ESG investment strategy is more effective in generating superior performance, while the mixed results of the top ESG portfolio make it difficult to draw definitive conclusions about its performance characteristics.

In the banking sector, there is an ongoing development in green financing with the emergence of green corporate loans. However, there are variations in banks risk’ management and the level of acceptance for issuing green loans. Similarly, there are disparities in the role of different sources of information to assess organisational risks, as per ESG ratings and sustainability reporting. As for now, there is a limited level of research of the operational work in this area as risks and risk management are dynamic and changes with the development of society. Thus, this study explores the operational risk management of green corporate loans and perceives the role of organisations’ ESG rating and sustainability reporting in the same context when assessing risks.  The study applies a qualitative method with triangulation, as it combines empirical material from five semi-structured interviews and five sustainability reports from the respective bank to get nuances of the research area. The results show that risk management is partially based on bankers' own perceptions of companies and their relationships with their clients. The level of acceptance of risks is spread which delimits standardisations in processes of assessment. Individual frameworks are used by banks to manage green corporate loans, but these require continuous development and some environmental knowledge. Additional sources of information in assessments therefore play a big role and can be seen as the main source to understand organisations and their related risks. However, organisations’ ESG ratings and sustainability reporting are still perceived with a lack of credibility and should be used with precaution in the assessment. Thus, this study contributes to an extension of the empirical material as it demonstrates implications with variations in risk management and provides indications of the role of additional information sources when assessing risks.

We uses ESG thematic funds to conduct a detailed statistical profile of their operating status in the Chinese market, including the size, the proportion of different investment types, and the characteristics of return and risk. The OLS model is used to empirically analyze the applicability of the Fama-French five-factor model in the Chinese mutual fund market. Based on the a ESG rating as a starting point, we study the profit improvement mechanism and risk-return characteristics of the ESG portfolios. The main findings are that the five-factor model better explained the excess returns of ESG thematic funds during the entire sample period of the study and can be used for attribution analysis of the performance. It shows that, despite the poor performance of ESG thematic funds in the market during certain periods, there is no significant difference between the performance of ESG thematic funds and the market during the economic crisis. The ROEs and dividend rates of the ESG high-scoring groups are both higher than those of the ESG low-scoring groups. This shows that companies with higher ESG scores have higher and more sustainable profitability and greater willingness to pay dividends. Furthermore, the ESG high-scoring group has better returns and lower risks. / Business Administration/Finance

Sustainability and Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) are increasingly important subjects in today's society. To measure a company's Corporate Social Performance (CSP); the ESG-rating has been developed throughout the years. As investors and the public are starting to acknowledge a company's sustainable actions and the importance of these, more and more companies choses to be rated using ESG-rating. As the knowledge around the subject has started to increase, we want to find out if it affects the risk of a company or an investment? Theories relating to the topic, such as stakeholder theory, suggests that satisfying all of a company’s stakeholders creates value for a company. Previous studies in the topic has interpreted this as high ESG-ratings should equal lower risks for the company. Additionally, previous studies in the relationship between sustainability and profitability shows a positive correlation between the two, meaning that companies that incorporate sustainability in general have higher profits. The purpose of this study is to investigate if high ESG-ratings could lead to lower firm’s risk in Sweden. There has been a lot of previous research in the area, but none focusing on Sweden. The majority of the previous studies have concluded that there exists a negative relationship between CSP and a firm’s risk, which indicates that if a company would integrate CSR it could lower the risk. This study will include 145 Swedish companies with 2,610 firm-year observations from the period 2001-12-21 to 2019-12-31. The risk measures used are; Total Risk (Volatility), Systematic Risk (Beta) and Idiosyncratic Risk. As for the ESG-ratings, the data is obtained from ASSET4 from the database Thomson Reuters Eikon as the measure of CSP. Furthermore a multiple regression analysis is performed to statistically investigate the relationship between a company's ESG-rate (and the three pillars Environmental, Social and Governance) and risk. The study concluded that there exists a statistically significant positive relationship between Volatility and Idiosyncratic Risk and the ESG-score for Swedish firms. As for the individual pillars; Environmental (ENV), Social (SOC) and Governance (GOV); the result indicated that there existed a statistically significant positive relationship between Volatility and Idiosyncratic Risk with the two pillars; ENV and GOV, respectively. This suggests that the higher ESG-score, ENV and GOV-scores of Swedish firms the higher Volatility and Idiosyncratic Risk. Neither Volatility or Idiosyncratic risk showed a statistically significant relationship with the social pillar. Consequently we are not able to confirm the relationship between Volatility and Idiosyncratic Risk with the Social pillar. Regarding Beta, the study found no statistically significant relationship with the ESG-score, as well as for the individual pillars; Environmental, Social and Governance. Therefore we are not able to confirm a relationship for Beta and the ESG-score, ENV, SOC and GOV-scores. As a final remark this study concluded the opposite as for previous research and consequently this thesis has contributed with new knowledge within the area of ESG-rating and risk for Swedish companies.

Sammanfattning Titel: Företagsstorlek och ESG-betyg Nivå: Examensarbete på Grundnivå (kandidatexamen) i ämnet företagsekonomi  Författare: Anton Samuelsson och Inga Kemi Handledare: Jan Svanberg Datum: 2021 – Januari Syfte: ESG-betygen spelar en nyckelroll som den vanligaste proxyn för hållbarhetsprestation inom hållbar finansiering. Tidigare studier visar dock att företag har incitament att vara kreativa med hållbarhetsupplysningar, som ligger till grund för ESG-betygen. Incitamenten kan överföras till företagsstorlek då större företag möter en högre press från samhället att vara hållbart ansvarstagande. Om företagens storlek är positivt relaterad till ESG-betyget behöver det också åtföljas av motsvarande förändring i hållbarhetsprestation. Återspeglar inte ESG-betygen hållbarhetprestationen riskerar kapitalet att fördelas mot icke-hållbara företag. Syftet med denna studie är därför att förklara sambandet mellan företagsstorlek och ESG-betyg. Metod: Studien utgår från en positivistisk forskningsfilosofi med en deduktiv ansats. Studien har en kvantitativ strategi och en longitudinell design som genomförts med data på ett urval bestående av 5 658 publika företag vilka erhållit ESG-betyg mellan åren 2015-2019. Studien baseras på sekundär data inhämtad från databasen Thomson Reuters Eikon. Data har analyserats i statistikprogrammet SPSS. Resultat & slutsats: Studiens resultat påvisar att företagens storlek har ett positivt samband med ESG-betyget. Studiens resultat visar vidare att det positiva sambandet inte åtföljs av en ökad grad av hållbarhet. Således drar studien slutsatsen att ESG-betyget inte fungerar optimalt och är i behov av en snabb modifiering. Examensarbetets bidrag: Studiens resultat ger information till investerare som vill investera i hållbara företag. Eftersom ESG-betyget inte återspeglar hållbarhetsprestationen bör inte investerare förlita sig på ESG-betyget i investeringsbesluten. Studiens resultat ger också information till mätinstituten som tillhandahåller ESG-betyg. Då studien visar att det förekommer företagsstorlek-bias kan åtgärder göras för att få ESG-betyget att fungera mer korrekt. Studiens resultat ger vidare information till forskningen inom ESG-betygen. Detta genom att påvisa hur sambandet ser ut i verkligheten. Förslag till fortsatt forskning: Ett förslag till fortsatt forskning är att göra en liknande undersökning, men som innefattar fler mätinstitut som tillhandahåller ESG-betyg. I denna studie används miljödimensionen som proxy för datatillgänglighet och hållbarhet. Ett förslag till fortsatt forskning är att undersöka om detta också är applicerbart inom dimensionerna samhälle och företagsstyrning. Nyckelord: ESG-betyg, företagsstorlek, hållbarhetsrapportering, hållbarhetsredovisning, SRI / Abstract Title: Company size and ESG ratings Level: Student thesis, final assignment for Bachelor Degree in Business Administration Author: Anton Samuelsson and Inga Kemi Supervisor: Jan Svanberg Date: 2021 – January Aim: Investors play an important role in the global sustainability goals by allocating capital to sustainable companies. Previous research, on the other hand, shows that companies have incentives to be creative with sustainability information, which ESG ratings are largely based on. These incentives can be applied to company size. Larger companies face a higher pressure from society to be sustainably responsible. If the size of the companies is positively related to the ESG rating, it also needs to be accompanied by corresponding change in sustainability performance. If the ESG rating does not reflect sustainability performance, capital risks being allocated to non-sustainable companies. The purpose of this study is therefore to explain the relationship between company size and ESG ratings. Method: The study assumes a positivistic research philosophy with a deductive approach. The study uses a quantitative strategy and a longitudinal design implemented with data of a sample consisting 5 658 unique companies that have received ESG ratings, in the years 2015-2019. The study uses secondary data collected from the database Thomson Reuters Eikon. The data have been analyzed in the statistical software package called SPSS.  Result & Conclusions: The results indicate that company size has a positive relationship with the ESG rating. The results indicate that the positive relationship does not attend on a higher level of sustainability. Thus, the study concludes that ESG rating does not function optimally and is in need of a quick modification Contribution of the thesis: The result provides information for investors interested in investing in sustainable companies. Since the ESG rating does not reflect the sustainability performance, investors should not rely on the ESG-rating in the investment decision. The result also provides information to the rating agencies which provide the ESG-ranking. As the study indicates that there exists a company size bias, actions can be taken to correct the ESG-ranking. The result of this study also provides information to the research field of ESG ratings. Suggestions for future research: A suggestion for further studies is to conduct a similar research but include other rating agencies of ESG ratings. A suggestion for further studies is to investigate if this also is applicable in the social and governance dimensions. Key words: ESG-rating, company size, sustainability reporting, sustainability disclosure, SRI

Background: Interest in CSR has increased among investors and other stakeholders. They usually require the company to work sustainably, which makes the incentive to invest in ESG activities greater. Legitimacy theory and stakeholder theory suggest that the overall ESG rating should have a positive impact on the company's profitability. However, there is no consensus among previous studies on whether there is a significant relationship between the overall ESG rating and profitability, which creates a research gap. Purpose: The purpose of this study is to investigate whether there is any significant relationship between the total ESG rating and profitability among the companies listed on the OMX Stockholm Large Cap. The study examines whether there is a significant relationship between the total ESG rating and profitability in the form of ROA and ROE. Method: The method used in this study is a quantitative method with a deductive approach. The data collection has been done using the Refinitiv Eikon database for the overall ESG rating and Retriever Business for ROA and ROE. The statistical program used in this study is Jamovi and this program is used to perform all statistical tests. A total of 113 companies are examined with data for the financial year 2022. Conclusion: The study's results answer the study's questions and no significant relationship between the ESG rating and profitability in the form of ROA and ROE is demonstrated. The result indicates a weak positive relationship between the ESG rating and profitability, but the relationship is not significant. / Bakgrund: Intresset för CSR har ökat bland investerare och andra intressenter. De ställer oftast krav på att företaget ska arbeta hållbart, vilket gör incitamentet att satsa på ESG-aktiviteter större. Legitimitetsteori och intressentteori tyder på att det totala ESG-betyget bör ha en positiv påverkan på företagets lönsamhet. Däremot råder det ingen konsensus bland tidigare studier om huruvida det finns ett signifikant samband mellan det totala ESG-betyget och lönsamhet vilket skapar ett forskningsgap. Syfte: Syftet med denna studie är att undersöka om det föreligger något signifikant samband mellan det totala ESG-betyget och lönsamhet bland företagen noterade på OMX Stockholm Large Cap. Studien undersöker om det föreligger ett signifikant samband mellan det totala ESG-betyg och lönsamheten i form av ROA och ROE. Metod: Metoden som används i denna studie är en kvantitativ metod med en deduktiv ansats. Datainsamlingen har gjorts med hjälp av databasen Refinitiv Eikon för det totala ESG-betyget och Retriever Business för ROA och ROE. Statistiska programmet som används i den här studien är Jamovi och detta program används för att genomföra samtliga statistiska tester. Totalt undersöks 113 företag med data för räkenskapsåret 2022. Slutsats: Studiens resultat besvarar studiens frågeställningar och inget signifikant samband mellan ESG-betyget och lönsamheten i form av ROA och ROE påvisas. Resultatet tyder på ett svagt positivt samband mellan ESG-betyget och lönsamheten men sambandet är inte signifikant.

SAMMANFATTNING Titel: Värdesätts företags rapporterade hållbarhetsinformation mer eller mindre av investerare, efter att den blivit lagstadgad?  Nivå: Examensarbete på Grundnivå (kandidatexamen) i ämnet företagsekonomi  Författare: Eva-Maria Johansson och Ann-Louise Larsson  Handledare: Jan Svanberg  Datum: 2021 – januari  Syfte: Företags hållbarhetsredovisning och nyttan med den för investerare, har under många år varit ett aktuellt ämne inom företagsekonomisk forskning. Flertalet tidigare studier har undersökt hur företags hållbarhetsredovisning påverkar hur ett företag värderas av investerare på kapitalmarknaden. Få studier har dock gjorts på den svenska börsmarknaden, och framförallt studier som fokuserar på samtliga delar inom hållbarhetsredovisningen. Denna studie ser därför ett stort intresse i att undersöka om 2016 års lagstadgade hållbarhetsrapportering har påverkat värderelevansen för hållbarhetsprestanda för företagens marknadsvärden på den svenska börsmarknaden.  Metod: I denna studie har en kvantitativ forskningsstrategi tillämpats, med en longitudinell forskningsdesign. Sekundär data inhämtades från Thomson Reuters databas för de 61 företag på Stockholmsbörsen med ESG-betyg för åren 2014-2019. Dataanalyser genomfördes via flertalet regressionsanalyser i statistikprogrammet SPSS.  Resultat & slutsats: Resultaten visar att det finns värderelevans för hållbarhetsprestanda och att den är positivt relaterad till företagens marknadsvärden. Däremot har inga resultat kunnat påvisa att lagändringen givit effekt på hur företagens hållbarhetsrapporter värderas på aktiemarknaden.  Examensarbetets bidrag: Denna studie är relevant för både forskningen och företagen med resultat om huruvida lagstadgat hållbarhetsarbete ger ekonomiska fördelar ur ett värderings- och kapitalmarknadsperspektiv. Den är även den första i sitt slag att undersöka om den lagstadgade hållbarhetsrapporteringen 2016 har värdemässig relevans för marknadsvärdet för företag på den svenska börsmarknaden.   Förslag till fortsatt forskning: Eventuella skillnader i värderelevans för ESG-betygets olika dimensioner och underkategorier skulle kunna undersökas genom en uppdelning av betygets olika delar för att utröna en eventuell utjämnande effekt. Ytterligare studier skulle också kunna göras med en annan proxy för hållbarhetsprestanda som inkluderar de företag som fallit utanför denna studies urval med anledning av förekomst av ESG-betyg.  Nyckelord: Hållbarhet, hållbarhetsprestanda, ESG, ESG-betyg, värderelevans, lagstadgad hållbarhetsrapportering, hållbarhetsrapport. / ABSTRACT Title: Is a company's reported sustainability information valued higher or lower by investors, after it has become statutory?  Level: Student thesis, final assignment for Bachelor Degree in Business Administration  Author: Eva-Maria Johansson and Ann-Louise Larsson  Supervisor: Jan Svanberg  Date: 2021 – January  Aim: Corporate sustainability reporting and the benefits of it for investors, has for many years been a current topic in business economics research. Several previous studies have examined how companies' sustainability reporting affects how a company is valued by investors in the capital market. However, few studies have been conducted regarding the Swedish stock market, especially studies that focus on the total spectrum of sustainability reporting. This study therefore sees great interest in examining whether the 2016 statutory sustainability reporting has affected the value relevance of sustainability performance for companies' market values in the Swedish stock market.  Method: In this study, a quantitative research strategy has been applied, with a longitudinal research design. Secondary data were obtained from Thomson Reuters' database for the 61 companies on the Stockholm Stock Exchange with ESG ratings for the years 2014-2019. Data analyzes were performed through several regression analyzes in the statistical program SPSS.  Result & Conclusions: The results show that there is value relevance for sustainability performance and that it is positively related to companies' market values. On the other hand, no results have been able to show that the law change has had an impact on how companies' sustainability reports are valued in the stock market. Contribution of the thesis: This study is relevant for both research and companies with results on whether statutory sustainability work provides economic benefits from a valuation and capital market perspective. It is also the first of its kind to examine whether the statutory sustainability reporting in 2016 has value relevance for the market value of companies on the Swedish stock market.  Suggestions for future research: Possible differences in value relevance for the different dimensions and subcategories of the ESG grade could be investigated by dividing the different parts of the grade in order to ascertain a possible leveling effect. Additional studies could also be performed with another sustainability performance proxy that includes those companies that fell out of the scope of this study due to the presence of ESG ratings.  Key words: Sustainability, sustainability performance, ESG, ESG rating, value relevance, statutory sustainability reporting, sustainability report.

This thesis investigates the relationship between sustainability performance and capital structure, measured using the ESG (environmental, social and governance) rating and the debt ratio. In the pursuit of analysing the relationship between the ESG rating and the debt ratio, this study investigates publicly listed companies within the EU/EEA due to its mutual legislative framework on sustainable finance. This research has the intention of shedding light upon if a company can use sustainability ratings to alter their optimal debt levels, operate at higher efficiency with access to cheaper capital, and help the manager maximize firm value. This could help them in decision making processes of financing their business through receiving a better understanding of how the ESG rating affects the capital structure. This knowledge would allow management to better understand how the investments necessary in acquiring the ESG rating affect firm value as well as how they affect the dynamics of financing the firm. This is a deductive and quantitative research based on secondary data, gathered using Thomson Reuters (Eikon) database. Furthermore, this research is a cross-sectional study analysing companies in year 2019. No clear relationship between the two concepts has been found, arriving at the conclusion that the optimal capital structure is not influenced by sustainability initiatives. However, sustainability initiatives should always be encouraged since these generate other beneficial effects. Finally, this research contributes to the current field of knowledge on the topic through analysing the results using the Trade-off Theory, Pecking Order Theory, Agency Theory, Legitimacy Theory and Stakeholder Theory. The results are somewhat aligned with the Trade-off Theory of capital structure and the Pecking Order Theory as well as other more traditional financial theories. One can conclude that sustainability performance is not of importance when it comes to the firm's ability to raise capital or the firm’s capital structure. This tells us that there is still a long way to go and that action needs to be taken before sustainability becomes an essential and well-integrated factor considered in investment decisions. The results may be undesirable, but they also give a fair picture of the financial sector’s priorities as of now and highlight the need for sustainable objectives to align with financial profitability.

Sustainable investing has seen a significant increase in the past years and is continuing to gain momentum with the constant rise of awareness and concern of the climate crisis. It is necessary for modern mutual fund companies to conduct ESG assessments as it provides a comprehensive understanding of a firm's sustainability performance, and identifies potential risks and opportunities which lay ground for investment decisions. However, there are still issues with fully aligning financial flows with sustainability goals. This study explores current issues regarding ESG assessment in investment decisions by mapping and examining Swedish fund companies. Furthermore, these issues will be explored if they are consistent with previous research. This study contributes to the literature by giving a comprehensive overview of issues regarding ESG assessments that are well-grounded in a real, sustainability-mature market, and will hopefully help investors and other stakeholders to get a deeper understanding of the issues, challenges and limitations associated with ESG assessment. By doing a case study of the Swedish fund market that tests factors derived from international literature, it was found that there are numerous issues in the process of conducting an ESG assessment in investment decisions. Firstly, there were issues regarding the collection of data that the fund companies use in order to conduct an ESG assessment. There is a lack of available, reliable and accessible data for fund companies to use directly and for the ESG rating agencies to use to rate companies. It is somewhat paradoxical as the fund companies feel strongly about developing their own methods for ESG assessment as they expressed hesitancy in using data from ESG rating agencies due to concerns about accuracy and comparability. By having individual methods, the fund companies gain control over the investment objectives and strategies, and hence, may avoid reputational damage. ESG rating agencies were generally discussed in the literature, as there was clear evidence of divergence between rating agencies and poor coverage of firms, which were also echoed by the fund companies. However, the companies still use ESG rating agency’s services as a support in their own ESG methods. Furthermore, regulations and legislation were an important finding in this study as fund companies perceived it to be developing in the right direction. However, the fund companies experienced being squeezed where they have demands and requirements, but no useful tools or material to achieve and satisfy them effectively. There are too many directives, actors, and initiatives for smaller fund companies to comply with, which causes frustration, misunderstandings and fuzziness among all actors on the financial market. Therefore, industry organizations such as the Swedish Investment Fund Association (SIFA) have a great responsibility to act as legal advisors and facilitate this transition. Lastly, it is ambiguous whether a standardized ESG assessment is desirable and/or even feasible in practice. While uniform regulations are required, there is also a major value in the freedom of interpretation in order to maintain the competitive advantage of having individual assessment methods. Succeeding in identifying material factors and standardizing the definition of sustainable investmentsis a challenge. Better integration between ESG and financial materiality will be required to create attractive longterm value in the future. / Hållbara investeringar har ökat avsevärt de senaste åren och fortsätter att öka i takt med att medvetenheten och oron i samhället för klimatkrisen växer. Det är nödvändigt för fondbolag att genomföra ESG-bedömningar för att få förståelse för ett bolags hållbarhetsprestanda samt identifiera potentiella risker och möjligheter vid investeringsbeslut. Det finns fortfarande utmaningar med att säkerställa att de finansiella flödena går i linje med hållbarhetsmålen. Denna studie undersöker och utforskar vilka utmaningar som finns med ESG-bedömningar vid investeringsbeslut, genom att kartlägga och granska svenska fondbolag. Dessutom kommer de identifierade utmaningarna att sättas i relation till tidigare forskning. Denna studie ämnar att bidra till litteraturen genom att ge en omfattande översikt över huvudsakliga utmaningar som finns vid genomförandet av ESG-bedömningar, som är väl förankrat i en verklig och mogen fondmarknad. Detta kommer hjälpa investerare och andra intressenter att få en djupare förståelse för utmaningarna, problemen och begränsningarna som finns förenat med ESG-bedömningar. Genom att göra en fallstudie av den svenska fondmarknaden med utgångspunkt i att testa faktorer härledda från internationell litteratur, identifierades ett flertal utmaningar med att utföra en ESG-bedömning vid investeringsbeslut. För det första fanns det svårigheter med inhämtningen av den data som börsbolag publicerar. Det råder brist på tillgänglig och pålitlig rådata som fondbolagen använder i sina egna ESG bedömningar samt för ESG ratinginstitut att använda som underlag vid betygsättning. Det blir något paradoxalt när fondbolag känner att det är väsentligt att utveckla egna metoder och modeller för ESG-bedömningar eftersom de anser att ratinginstituten erhåller tveksam data vilket ger upphov till frågor om tillförlitlighet och jämförbarhet. Vid utvecklandet av egna metoder tar de kontrollen genom att definiera sina egna hållbarhetsmål och strategier därefter, och kan därmed undvika potentiellt skadat rykte. Ratinginstitut visade även på osäkerheter såsom skiljaktigheter instituten emellan och dålig täckning på bolag (storleksmässigt), vilket nämndes både i litteratur och intervjustudien. Dock används ratinginstitutens tjänster ändå av fondbolag som en stöttepelare i deras egna metoder. I studien framgår det tydligt att utvecklingen av regelverk och lagstiftning går åt rätt håll, men samtidigt upplevs fondbolagen pressade av de nya överväldigande kraven i brist på resurser och verktyg för att lyckas hantera dem effektivt. De mindre fondbolagen upplever en frustration över den stora mängden direktiv, ramverk och aktörer som måste tas i beaktning vid ESG-bedömningar. Det lägger ett stort ansvar på branschorganisationer, däribland Fondbolagens Förening (SIFA), i rollen som juridiska rådgivare för att underlätta omställningen på fondmarknaden. Slutligen är standardisering ett omdiskuterat begrepp i studien, där det finns delade åsikter om huruvida en standardiserad ESG-bedömning är önskvärd och genomförbar i praktiken. Samtidigt som det finns ett behov av enhetliga regelverk och jämförbarhet finns det också ett värde i flexibiliteten i de egna bedömningsmetoderna för att skapa en konkurrensfördel. Att lyckas identifiera materiella faktorer och etablera en standardiserad definition av en hållbar investering är en genomgående utmaning på fondmarknaden. Bättre integration mellan ESG-faktorer och finansiell materialitet kommer att krävas för att möjliggöra ett långsiktigtvärdeskapande i framtiden.