Market Timing Strategy is an active investment strategy, which is based on the signals of indicators, for the investors to make their investment decisions. However, there has always been the question on which variable is a good indicator, that would provide superior returns for the investment. Bond to Equity Yield Ratio (BEYR) is a new indicator widely researched by many academics in the field of finance and extensively applied by practitioners of the financial markets during the last two decades. Efficient Market Hypothesis (EMH) is a theory in finance which states that stock prices are always reflected with the relevant information and beating the market from predicting the trend of future stock prices is not possible. Therefore, if the market is in accordance with EMH, market timing strategy is not useful and passive investment strategy is better than active investment strategy. Although extant literatures have proved BEYR as a good indicator to be used in market timing strategy, the focus of the existing research is on the financial markets in the United States, the United Kingdom, and the Europe; the study on Asian financial markets is very limited. The main objective of the research is mainly motivated by this knowledge gap. This study will use extreme value strategy as an active trading strategy to conduct research on the market timing ability of BEYR in three Asian financial markets: Japan, Malaysia and Singapore. In addition, passive trading strategy will be used to compare with active trading strategy in each country to identify whether the markets comply with weak form of EMH. Deductive approach of quantitative research is conducted and three main hypotheses are developed to achieve the research objective. The empirical findings from our research and the responses to the main hypotheses can be summarized as active trading strategy does perform better than passive trading strategy for all countries and the market timing ability of BEYR is not as good as the traditional indicators: dividend yields and earning yields for all countries. Therefore, the financial markets of all counties under scrutiny do not comply with weak form of EMH. However, it is worthy to take note that the sample period chosen for this research includes the period when the Global Financial Crisis occurred in 2008. Therefore, it is assumed that the impact of the financial crisis is the main reason contributing the difference between the findings from our research and the existing literatures. Moreover, the difference in the nature of financial market can be considered as another underlying factor for the new perspective on BEYR resulting from our empirical results.

The modelling of volatility has long been seminal to finance and risk management in general, as it provides information on the spread of portfolio returns. In order to reduce the overall volatility of a stock portfolio, modern portfolio theory (MPT), within an efficient market hypothesis (EMH) framework, dictates that a well-diversified portfolio should have a market beta of one (thereafter adjusted for risk preference), and thus move in sync with a benchmark market portfolio. Such a stock portfolio is highly correlated with the market, and considered to be entirely hedged against unsystematic risk. However, the risks within and between stocks present in a portfolio still impact on each other. In particular, risk present in a particular stock may spill over and affect the risk profile of another stock included within a portfolio - a phenomenon known as volatility spill-over effects. In developing economies such as South Africa, portfolio managers are limited in their choices of stocks. This increases the difficulty of fully diversifying a stock portfolio given the volatility spill-over effects that may be present between stocks listed on the same exchange. In addition, stock portfolios are not static, and therefore require constant rebalancing according to the mandate of the managing fund. The process of constant rebalancing of a stock portfolio (for instance, to follow the market) becomes more complex and difficult during times of financial distress. Considering all these conditions, portfolio managers need all the relevant information (more than MPT would provide) available to them in order to select and rebalance a portfolio of stocks that are as mean-variance efficient as possible. This study provides an additional measure to market beta in order to construct a more efficient portfolio. The additional measure analyse the volatility spill-over effects between stocks within the same portfolio. Using intraday stock returns and a residual based test (aggregate shock [AS] model), volatility spill-over effects are estimated between stocks. It is shown that when a particular stock attracts fewer spill-over effects from the other stocks in the portfolio, the overall portfolio volatility would decrease as well. In most cases market beta showcased similar results; this change is however not linear in the case of market beta. Therefore, in order to construct a more efficient portfolio, one requires both a portfolio that has a unit correlation with the market, but also includes stocks with the least amount of volatility spill-over effects among each other. / MCom (Risk Management), North-West University, Potchefstroom Campus, 2013

The modelling of volatility has long been seminal to finance and risk management in general, as it provides information on the spread of portfolio returns. In order to reduce the overall volatility of a stock portfolio, modern portfolio theory (MPT), within an efficient market hypothesis (EMH) framework, dictates that a well-diversified portfolio should have a market beta of one (thereafter adjusted for risk preference), and thus move in sync with a benchmark market portfolio. Such a stock portfolio is highly correlated with the market, and considered to be entirely hedged against unsystematic risk. However, the risks within and between stocks present in a portfolio still impact on each other. In particular, risk present in a particular stock may spill over and affect the risk profile of another stock included within a portfolio - a phenomenon known as volatility spill-over effects. In developing economies such as South Africa, portfolio managers are limited in their choices of stocks. This increases the difficulty of fully diversifying a stock portfolio given the volatility spill-over effects that may be present between stocks listed on the same exchange. In addition, stock portfolios are not static, and therefore require constant rebalancing according to the mandate of the managing fund. The process of constant rebalancing of a stock portfolio (for instance, to follow the market) becomes more complex and difficult during times of financial distress. Considering all these conditions, portfolio managers need all the relevant information (more than MPT would provide) available to them in order to select and rebalance a portfolio of stocks that are as mean-variance efficient as possible. This study provides an additional measure to market beta in order to construct a more efficient portfolio. The additional measure analyse the volatility spill-over effects between stocks within the same portfolio. Using intraday stock returns and a residual based test (aggregate shock [AS] model), volatility spill-over effects are estimated between stocks. It is shown that when a particular stock attracts fewer spill-over effects from the other stocks in the portfolio, the overall portfolio volatility would decrease as well. In most cases market beta showcased similar results; this change is however not linear in the case of market beta. Therefore, in order to construct a more efficient portfolio, one requires both a portfolio that has a unit correlation with the market, but also includes stocks with the least amount of volatility spill-over effects among each other. / MCom (Risk Management), North-West University, Potchefstroom Campus, 2013

Investors are continuously looking to increase the return on their investments. In an ideal world investors want to increase there return and outperform the market. Theory states that it is impossible to do so without increasing your risk. Arbitrage is a concept where investors are able to generate risk-free returns exceeding the market. Dividend is a common tool for publicly listed firms when rewarding their shareholders. On ex- dividend day, the day after the dividend payout, the stock price should according to theory decrease in order for the valuation of the stock to be held constant. In our research we investigate if there are arbitrage opportunities in connection to the dividend payouts, namely the ex-dividend effect. We want to generalize our results across experimental settings, thus across different stock markets. As a basis for our research we picked the OMXS. We base our research on three theoretical areas: the dividend irrelevancy theory, the efficient market hypothesis and the anchoring theory. The dividend irrelevancy relates to how the stock price ought to behave on ex-dividend day whereas the efficient market hypotheses states that prices on a market fully reflects all available information. Both theories concur that no arbitrage opportunities should be available on the financial market. The anchoring theory highlights the fact that investors formulate an anchor price for financial assets, for example stocks. In our research we aim to formulate a practical method on how to make abnormal returns on the ex dividend effect, based on the anchoring theory. Our census sample consists of dividend-paying firms publicly registered on the OMXS, and consists of 694 observations taken from 2009 to 2012. The sample was picked on the basis of characteristics, for example that the firm has been registered for at least four years and paid dividend one time during the four years of investigation. In order to tests for arbitrage opportunities on ex-dividend day, we used a simple mathematical model measuring the deviation between the price drop cum-dividend day to ex-dividend day, and the dividend amount. We conclude that the price drop differs from the dividend amount, only accounting for a price drop of 0.73 of the dividend amount. Thus, the price drop for each dividend unit is 0.73, in relation to a perfectly efficient market where there should be no difference; hence the price drop would be equal to the dividend amount, 1. Research on the ex-dividend effect is a thoroughly investigated area, where the first research was presented in 1955. Previous research all attempts to explain why there are market anomalies, but none examine how one can capitalize on the findings. In our research we examine if it is possible to make abnormal returns based on a segmenting of stocks, depending on their price volatility. This research is thereby first in examining how to capitalize on found arbitrage opportunities.

Den här uppsatsen undersöker hur aktiekursen reagerar när bolag offentliggör information angående ett VD-byte. Studien undersöker både frivilliga uppsägningar och avsked av VD:n på bolag noterade på Stockholmsbörsen mellan år 2011 och 2018. För att kunna undersöka aktiekursens reaktion har MacKinlays form av eventstudie tillämpats på 90 bolag. Bolags aktiekurs tenderar att reagera negativt vid ett tillkännagivande angående ett byte av verkställande direktör. Studien finner signifikanta resultat beroende på om bytet varit frivillig uppsägning eller avsked under eventdagen. Undersökningen påvisar signifikanta resultat på aktiekursen när investerare haft kännedom om ersättare och om tillkännagivandet skett innan ett byte. / This paper examines how the share price responds when companies publish information regarding a change of CEO. All the companies that are examined are listed on the Stockholm Stock Exchange between 2011 and 2018. The study is based on a sample of 90 companies where the CEO has been replaced. Of the entire sample there has been 65 voluntary CEO´s changes and 25 involuntary. To investigate how the share price react we use MacKinlays (1997) form of event study. This study also examines how different factors effect the reaction of the share price. These factors are; the availability of a successors, the size of the firm, the time interval between the event day and the day the CEO leaves the company. We find that the market tends to react negatively at the event day. We also find a significant difference between voluntary and involuntary change of CEO a few days after the event. The involuntary change of CEO´s tends to give a positive market reaction and the voluntary a continued negative market reaction. When companies announce a change of CEO simultaneously as they announce successors the market tends to react positively.

This diploma thesis was aimed at analysing the investment strategies on the American stock market. The main aim was to evaluate the market efficiency, to analyse various strategies and to select the most appropriate one according to the assessed form of the market efficiency. Firstly, the weak-form efficiency was validated by correlation and runs tests. Subsequently, the methods of technical and fundamental analysis were applied. The final part is focused on creating the investment portfolio, which is also considered the most suitable strategy.

Submitted by Rodrigo Fernandes Malaquias (rodrigofmalaquias@yahoo.com.br) on 2012-04-17T22:25:22Z No. of bitstreams: 1 Tese_Rodrigo_F_Malaquias.pdf: 576659 bytes, checksum: 8f69c77c88c361b0ff739ef8c6b56262 (MD5) / Approved for entry into archive by Gisele Isaura Hannickel (gisele.hannickel@fgv.br) on 2012-04-18T12:03:43Z (GMT) No. of bitstreams: 1 Tese_Rodrigo_F_Malaquias.pdf: 576659 bytes, checksum: 8f69c77c88c361b0ff739ef8c6b56262 (MD5) / Made available in DSpace on 2012-04-18T12:40:01Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 Tese_Rodrigo_F_Malaquias.pdf: 576659 bytes, checksum: 8f69c77c88c361b0ff739ef8c6b56262 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2012-03-20 / The aim of this study was to analyze the performance of Brazilian multimarket investment funds, using a measure that is more adequate to the characteristics of their returns distribution. Given that these class involve the Brazilian funds which most resemble the foreign hedge funds, traditional measures such Sharpe’s Ratio and Jensen’s Alpha may not be appropriate to analyze the ability of its managers to add extraordinary value. The measure used is related to the paper of Amin and Kat (2003), which compares the expected return of the fund with the returns generated by a strategy that, in the absence of arbitrage, has no cost to be implanted and yields a risk-free rate. With monthly data of 107 multimarket funds in the period from January 2005 to August 2011, the main results showed that the average net performance of the funds was lower than zero. On the other hand, the average gross performance (measured with returns before management fees and performance) was statistically greater than zero, indicating that managers can add extraordinary value, but these gains are eroded by management and performance fees. The work also showed that periods of crisis not only have a significantly (and negative) impact on the performance of the funds, but also on the relationship of this performance with its determinants. Thus, the results of this work may have important contributions to the development of the theory on investment fund performance in Brazil, both because it involves the use of a more adequate analysis tool and considers the crisis as a variable that moderates the relationship between performance and its determinants. / A proposta deste trabalho foi analisar a performance dos fundos multimercados brasileiros com uma medida mais adequada às características da distribuição de frequência de seus retornos. Tendo em vista que estes são os fundos brasileiros que mais se assemelham aos hedge funds estrangeiros, medidas tradicionais, como o Índice de Sharpe e o Alfa de Jensen, podem não ser adequadas para analisar a habilidade dos gestores em agregar valor extraordinário para os seus cotistas. A medida utilizada está relacionada com o trabalho de Amin e Kat (2003), que compara o retorno esperado do fundo com o retorno gerado por uma estratégia que, na ausência de arbitragem, possui custo zero para ser implantada e rende a taxa livre de risco. Com dados mensais de 107 fundos multimercados no período de Janeiro/2005 a Agosto/2011, os principais resultados mostraram que a performance líquida média dos fundos foi estatisticamente menor que zero. Já a performance média medida com base nos retornos brutos (antes das taxas de administração e de performance) foi estatisticamente superior a zero, indicando que os gestores podem até agregar valor extraordinário, mas esses ganhos são corroídos por taxas de administração e de performance. Destacam-se também resultados mostrando que períodos de crise impactaram significativamente não só a performance dos fundos, mas também a sua relação com seus determinantes. Desta forma, entende-se que os resultados podem introduzir importantes contribuições para a construção da teoria sobre a performance de fundos de investimentos brasileiros, tanto por envolver a utilização de uma ferramenta de análise mais adequada quanto por considerar a crise como uma variável moderadora da relação entre a performance e seus determinantes.

Submitted by Rodolfo Zeidler (rodolfo.zeidler@gmail.com) on 2014-10-14T12:22:56Z No. of bitstreams: 1 Dissertação_RodolfoZeidler_MPFE_27.09.2014.pdf: 1031393 bytes, checksum: f0f0d7d38e2df5bf53a35f847db68555 (MD5) / Approved for entry into archive by JOANA MARTORINI (joana.martorini@fgv.br) on 2014-10-14T12:55:20Z (GMT) No. of bitstreams: 1 Dissertação_RodolfoZeidler_MPFE_27.09.2014.pdf: 1031393 bytes, checksum: f0f0d7d38e2df5bf53a35f847db68555 (MD5) / Made available in DSpace on 2014-10-14T13:09:41Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 Dissertação_RodolfoZeidler_MPFE_27.09.2014.pdf: 1031393 bytes, checksum: f0f0d7d38e2df5bf53a35f847db68555 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2014-10-13 / O objetivo deste trabalho é realizar procedimento de back-test da Magic Formula na Bovespa, reunindo evidências sobre violações da Hipótese do Mercado Eficiente no mercado brasileiro. Desenvolvida por Joel Greenblatt, a Magic Formula é uma metodologia de formação de carteiras que consiste em escolher ações com altos ROICs e Earnings Yields, seguindo a filosofia de Value Investing. Diversas carteiras foram montadas no período de dezembro de 2002 a maio de 2014 utilizando diferentes combinações de número de ativos por carteira e períodos de permanência. Todas as carteiras, independentemente do número de ativos ou período de permanência, apresentaram retornos superiores ao Ibovespa. As diferenças entre os CAGRs das carteiras e o do Ibovespa foram significativas, sendo que a carteira com pior desempenho apresentou CAGR de 27,7% contra 14,1% do Ibovespa. As carteiras também obtiveram resultados positivos após serem ajustadas pelo risco. A pior razão retorno-volatilidade foi de 1,2, comparado a 0,6 do Ibovespa. As carteiras com pior pontuação também apresentaram bons resultados na maioria dos cenários, contrariando as expectativas iniciais e os resultados observados em outros trabalhos. Adicionalmente foram realizadas simulações para diversos períodos de 5 anos com objetivo de analisar a robustez dos resultados. Todas as carteiras apresentaram CAGR maior que o do Ibovespa em todos os períodos simulados, independentemente do número de ativos incluídos ou dos períodos de permanência. Estes resultados indicam ser possível alcançar retornos acima do mercado no Brasil utilizando apenas dados públicos históricos. Esta é uma violação da forma fraca da Hipótese do Mercado Eficiente. / The main purpose of this work is to back-test the Magic Formula in the Bovespa Stock Exchange, gathering evidences of violations of the Efficient Market Hypothesis in the Brazilian market. The Magic Formula was developed by Joel Greenblatt and consists in a methodology for stock picking that creates portfolios of stocks with high ROICs and high Earnings Yield, following the Value Investing philosophy. Many portfolios were created in the period between December 2002 and May 2014 combining different number of assets per portfolio and different holding periods. All the portfolios, independently of their number of assets or holding periods, presented returns higher than Ibovespa. The differences between the CAGR from the portfolios and from the Ibovespa were significant, the worst performance portfolio presenting CAGR of 27,7%, as compared with 14,1% of Ibovespa. The portfolios also held positive results after being adjusted for risk. The worst return-volatility ratio was 1.2, as compared to 0.6 from Ibovespa. The portfolios containing the assets with the lowest scores also presented good results in the majority of the scenarios, contradicting the initial expectations and the results observed in other works. In addition, simulations were performed for various 5-year periods aiming to check if the results were robust. All the portfolios presented higher CAGR than Ibovespa in all the simulated periods, independently of the number of assets included in the portfolio or the holding period. These results indicate that it is possible to reach above-market returns using historical public data in Brazil. This is a violation of the Efficient Market Hypothesis in its weak form.

Submitted by Leonardo Milane (lemilane@santander.com.br) on 2016-02-15T21:54:56Z No. of bitstreams: 1 Tese - Leonardo Milane - Magic Formula.pdf: 348511 bytes, checksum: 91d8cd74adea7ad467c334e5d332aeb4 (MD5) / Approved for entry into archive by Renata de Souza Nascimento (renata.souza@fgv.br) on 2016-02-15T21:55:58Z (GMT) No. of bitstreams: 1 Tese - Leonardo Milane - Magic Formula.pdf: 348511 bytes, checksum: 91d8cd74adea7ad467c334e5d332aeb4 (MD5) / Made available in DSpace on 2016-02-16T11:16:35Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 Tese - Leonardo Milane - Magic Formula.pdf: 348511 bytes, checksum: 91d8cd74adea7ad467c334e5d332aeb4 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2016-02-04 / The main purpose of this work is to back-test the Magic Formula in the IBX- 100 index, in order to gather evidence of effectiveness of the respective methodology in the selection of the best stocks and portfolios that beat the IBX-100 in the long run. The Magic Formula was developed by Joel Greenblatt and consists in a methodology for stock picking that creates portfolios of stocks with high ROICs and high Earnings Yield, following the Value Investing philosophy. Many portfolios were created in the period between January 2000 and June 2015 combining different number of stocks per portfolio and different holding periods. Some portfolios did beat the market index, while some did not. Portfolios with a higher number of stocks and longer holding periods seem to perform better than portfolio with fewer stocks and shorter holding periods. The portfolio with 10 stocks, holding period of 1 year, showed the highest CAGR among all portfolios (17,77%), surpassing the IBX-100 CAGR of 13,17% in the same period, even risk-adjusting. Regardless the holding period and the number of stocks, all portfolios presented lower systematic risk than the IBX-100 index (all betas were significant and lower than 1). On the other hand, all alphas were low, rarely significant, suggesting that the active portfolio management that follows the Magic Formula criteria did not add substantial higher returns when compared to market returns. / O objetivo desse trabalho é realizar um procedimento de back-test da Magic Formula no IBX-100, a fim de reunir evidencias sobre a eficiência de tal metodologia no processo de seleção das melhores ações e formação de carteiras que superem o desempenho do IBX-100 no longo prazo. Desenvolvida por Joel Greenblatt, a Magic Formula é uma metodologia de formação de carteiras que consiste em escolher ações com altos ROICs e Earnings Yields, seguindo a filosofia de Value Investing. Diversas carteiras foram montadas no período de janeiro de 2000 a junho de 2015 utilizando diferentes combinações de número de ativos por carteira e períodos de permanência. Nem todas as carteiras apresentaram retornos superiores ao índice de mercado. Aparentemente, as carteiras com mais ações e períodos de permanência mais longos apresentam desempenho superior às carteiras menores e com rotatividade maior (períodos de permanência mais curtos). A carteira de 10 ações, com período de permanência de 1 ano, apresentou o maior CAGR dentre todas as outras (17,77%), superando o CAGR de 13,17% do IBX-100 no mesmo período. Esse resultado foi superior mesmo quando ajustado ao risco. Independentemente do período de permanência e número de ações, todas as carteiras apresentaram riscos sistemáticos menores do que o índice IBX-100 (todos os betas foram significativos e menores do que 1). Por outro lado, os alfas das carteiras foram muito baixos e, raramente, significativos, sugerindo que a gestão ativa de acordo com os critérios da Magic Formula não adiciona retornos substancialmente maiores do que o retorno relacionado à variações de mercado.

The study examined the impact of earnings announcements on the share price of selected mining companies using the most recent data from the Johannesburg Stock Exchange. This study covered a period from 1 January 2011; to 31 December 2015. Using the classical event study methodology, the speed of reaction of the market to annual earnings information releases for a sample of 27 companies listed on the exchange is tested. Over the sample period, the Abnormal Returns (AR), Average Abnormal Returns (AAR) and Cumulative Average Abnormal Returns (CAAR) were calculated. The AR, AAR and CAAR show positive results obtained during the earnings announcement period. The returns yielded from these results are significantly different from zero. / Financial Accounting / M. Phil. (Accounting Sciences)