No description available.

No description available.

No description available.

No description available.

Introdução: Esofagite eosinofílica (EoE) é uma desordem clínico-patológica, caracterizada por sintomas de disfunção esofágica e alterações histopatológicas com inflamação composta principalmente por eosinófilos, sendo necessário, pelo último consenso, 15 ou mais eosinófilos/campo microscópico de grande aumento (cmga). Contudo, esse achado histopatológico geralmente está acompanhado de outras alterações morfológicas na mucosa esofágica que fazem parte do quadro de resposta inflamatória e que têm sido cada vez mais investigadas. Objetivos: Descrever achados histopatológicos em biópsias de pacientes pediátricos e adolescentes com EoE e compará-las aos de pacientes com quadro clínico de epigastralgia. Material e métodos: Foram analisadas biópsias esofágicas, sendo dezessete com diagnóstico de EoE e dezessete com epigastralgia. Analisaram-se aspectos histopatológicos e imuno-histoquímicos, como número máximo de eosinófilos, alongamento das papilas, hiperplasia de células da camada basal, espaços intercelulares, microabscessos e expressão de CD1a. Resultados: Entre os achados histopatológicos, alongamento das papilas e hiperplasia da camada basal foram observados em todos os participantes com EoE e em nenhuma amostra do grupo epigastralgia. Aumento do espaço intercelular foi encontrado em todos os pacientes com EoE e em 29,41% dos pacientes com epigastralgia. Conclusões: A quantidade de eosinófilos pode não mostrar por si só a complexidade da EoE. Estudos futuros devem ser realizados tentando definir se algum achado morfológico pode ajudar no diagnóstico diferencial entre EoE e eosinofilia esofágica responsiva ao inibidor de bomba de prótons e se poderiam ser utilizados para acompanhamento da eficácia do tratamento da EoE. / Introduction: Eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE) is a clinical-pathological disorder, characterized by symptoms related to esophageal dysfunction and histopathological alterations with inflammatory reactions primarily composed of eosinophils, being necessary, by the last consensus, 15 or more eosinófilos / high-power field (hpf). However, this histopathological finding is usually accompanied by other morphological changes in the esophageal mucosa that are part of an inflammatory response that has been increasingly investigated. Objective: To describe the histopathological findings from biopsies of pediatric and adolescent patients with EoE and to compare them with those from patients with clinical symptoms of epigastralgia. Material and methods: The results of esophageal cultures from biopsies were analyzed, seventeen with EoE diagnosis and seventeen with epigastralgia. The histopathological and immunohistochemical aspects, such as maximum number of eosinophils, papillary elongation, basal cell hyperplasia, dilatation of intercellular spaces, microabscesses, and CD1a expression were analyzed. Results: Among the histopathological findings, papillary elongation and basal cell layer hyperplasia were observed in all participants with EoE and in any of the sample of the epigastralgia group. Dilated intercellular space was found in all patients with EoE and in 29.41% of patients with epigastralgia. Conclusions: The amount of eosinophils may not by itself show the complexity of EoE. Future studies should be carried out in order to determine if any morphological findings may help in the differential diagnosis between EoE and proton-pump inhibitor-responsive esophageal eosinophilia, and whether they could be used to monitor the effectiveness of the EoE treatment. / Dissertação (Mestrado)

No description available.

No description available.

Introduction: Eosinophilic Esophagitis (EoE) is a rare allergic inflammatory disease affecting approximately 1-4 in every 10,000 individuals in the United States. With the dramatic increase in prevalence of EoE in recent years and the increasing use of the internet as a source of health care information, we sought to evaluate the educational quality of EoE videos on YouTube. Methods: We performed a YouTube search using the keyword “eosinophilic esophagitis” from September 8-27, 2016. All available videos were included and analyzed for video characteristics, source, and content. Source was further classified as health-care provider, alternative-medicine provider, patient and/or patient's parents, company, media, or professional society. A scoring system was created based on current guidelines to evaluate the quality of information (-10 to +30 points).Negative points were assigned for misleading information. Six blinded reviewers scored each video independently. Results: Two hundred and nine videos were analyzed, with a median of 507 views, 1 like, 0 dislikes, and 0 comments. More video presenters were male (50.9%), and the most commonly depicted race was Caucasian (73.6%). The most common type of video source was professional society (39.7%), and the least represented video source was company and media (8.6%). Among the four video sources, the mean scores showed a statistically significant difference from each other (pConclusion: Youtube videos on EoE were shown to be a poor source of valid health care information. Videos by health care providers were a better source of information compared to other sources. This study reiterates the need for higher quality educational videos on EoE by the medical community.

Esofagite Eosinofílica é uma doença inflamatória crônica restrita ao esôfago e imune mediada por antígenos. Sua prevalência descrita varia desde 0,4%, numa população geral, até 15% em pacientes com sintomas de disfagia. Já se conhece sua associação com doenças atópicas, anafilaxia e alergia alimentar, sendo o leite de vaca um dos principais alimentos envolvidos. Existem relatos recentes de casos em que pacientes foram diagnosticados com esofagite eosinofílica após serem submetidos à imunoterapia oral com o alimento causador de sua alergia alimentar mediada por IgE. Porém, em nenhum destes casos foi avaliado previamente se os mesmos pacientes já não apresentavam eosinofilia esofágica latente e/ou sintomas subjetivos sugestivos da doença. Considerando que, atualmente, um dos tratamentos mais promissores para alergia alimentar é a imunoterapia oral, justificou-se a necessidade de entender se esofagite eosinofílica seria de fato uma complicação do tratamento, ou se seria uma condição pré ou coexistente. Portanto, o objetivo deste trabalho foi avaliar a frequência de eosinofilia esofágica em pacientes com anafilaxia à proteína do leite de vaca. Foram analisados 89 pacientes matriculados no ambulatório de alergia alimentar do HC-FMUSP, com mediana de idade de 8 anos e que apresentavam anafilaxia ao leite de vaca. Todos foram submetidos à endoscopia digestiva alta com biópsias de esôfago, estomago e duodeno. Dados demográficos, comorbidades atópicas, uso de medicações e sintomas gastrointestinais foram analisados e comparados. A frequência de eosinofilia esofágica foi de 38,2% (34 de 89 pacientes). Em 15 dos 34 pacientes com eosinofilia esofágica, foi completada a investigação para esofagite eosinofílica com uso de inibidor de bomba de prótons em dose plena por 8 semanas antes de uma segunda endoscopia. Identificou-se, portanto, cinco pacientes (7,1%) com eosinofilia esofágica responsiva a inibidor de bomba de prótons e 10 pacientes com esofagite eosinofílica (14,2%). No grupo total de pacientes com eosinofilia esofágica (n=34) encontrou-se 29,4% de pacientes com quadro clínico gastrointestinal ausente; 23,5% oligossintomáticos, e apenas 47% com sintomas sugestivos de disfunção esofágica e, destes últimos, nem todos apresentavam sintomas esofágicos persistentes. Pode-se concluir que a frequência de esofagite eosinofílica descrita no grupo estudado foi significativamente superior à estimada na população geral e uma das mais altas descritas em grupos de pacientes com fatores de risco específicos. Também foi observada uma grande parcela de pacientes com eosinofilia esofágica, sendo muitos assintomáticos ou oligossintomáticos, surgindo o questionamento se esta não seria uma doença latente, de início precoce, insidioso e não relacionada diretamente como complicação de tratamentos atuais / Eosinophilic esophagitis is a chronic inflammatory disease, which occurs in the esophagus and is immune mediated by antigens. Its observed prevalence varies between 0.4% in the general population to 15% in patients with dysphagia. Its association with atopic diseases, anaphylaxis and food allergy has already been recognized. Cow\'s milk is one of the main food sources involved. There are recent reports of cases in which patients were diagnosed with eosinophilic esophagitis after being submitted to oral immunotherapy with the food that causes the IgE mediated allergy. However, in none of these cases was it previously determined if the same patients did not already present latent esophageal eosinophilia and/or subjective symptoms suggestive of the disease. Considering that, currently, one of the most promising treatment for food allergy is oral immunotherapy, the need to understand if eosinophilic esophagitis could be a treatment complication, or if it is a coexistent or preexistent condition, is justified. Therefore, the objective of this study was to evaluate esophageal eosinophilia frequency in patients with anaphylaxis to cow\'s milk protein. We analyzed eighty-nine patients registered in the Food Allergy Unit of the HCFMUSP, with a median age of 8 years, who presented cow\'s milk anaphylaxis. All of them were submitted to digestive endoscopy as well as esophagus, stomach, and duodenum biopsies. We also analyzed and compared demographic data, atopic comorbidities, use of medication, and gastrointestinal symptoms. The frequency of esophageal eosinophilia was 38.2% (34 of 89 patients). In 15 of the 34 patients with esophageal eosinophilia, full investigation for the disease was carried out using a proton pump inhibitor at full dose for eight weeks prior to a second endoscopy. From this, five patients (7.1%) had the proton pump inhibitor-responsive esophageal eosinophilia phenotype, and ten patients were diagnosed with eosinophilic esophagitis (14.2%). In the whole group of patients with esophageal eosinophilia (n = 34), it was found 29.4% of patients with an absent gastrointestinal clinical condition, 23.5% were oligosymptomatic, and only 47% had symptoms suggestive of esophagic dysfunction. Of these, not all presented persistent esophagic symptoms. It is possible to conclude that the frequency of eosinophilic esophagitis observed in this group was significantly higher than the estimated for the general population, and one of the highest observed in groups of patients with specific risk factors. A large portion of patients with esophageal eosinophilia were oligosymptomatic or asymptomatic, raising the question if this would not in fact be a latent disease, with a precocious beginning, insidious and not directly related to current treatments complications

Objetivo: Avaliar o teste de contato atópico (TCA) em pacientes com alergia ao leite de vaca (APLV) IgE mediada - grupo 1 e naqueles com doenças eosinofílicas do trato digestório (DETD) - grupo 2, comparando os extratos de leite de vaca (LV) a 20% com o leite in natura, o tempo ideal de oclusão do teste e o valor preditivo positivo do TCA na identificação do leite como desencadeante no grupo 2, avaliada pela melhora clinica e endoscópica após dieta de restrição. Métodos: Estudo de corte transversal, com avaliação de 45 pacientes e 9 controles. O grupo 1 (n=15) com APLV IgE mediada foram diagnosticados pelo teste de provocação e prick teste positivo para LV e o grupo 2 (n=30) pela biópsia mostrando esofagite eosinofílica (15 eosinófilos/cga) ou enterocolite eosinofílica (>20 eosinófilos/cga), prick teste positivo para LV (n=15) e sintomas desencadeados pelo leite. O grupo 3 (n=9) incluiu pacientes com exclusão do diagnóstico de APLV. Utilizou-se câmaras de 12mm e LV in natura e LV a 20% como extratos ( IPI ASAC, Espanha). Os tempos de leitura foram de 24, 48 e 72 horas e considerou-se como TCA positivo, a presença de hiperemia com infiltração e formação de pápulas ou vesículas. Para avaliação do valor preditivo positivo do TCA, considerou-se pacientes com DETD com sintomas associados ao leite, sem melhora com tratamento adequado, IgE específica ao LV e melhora clínica e histológica com a instituição da dieta de restrição. Resultados: Considerando ambos os extratos, houve semelhança quanto à frequência de positividade do TCA nos três tempos de leitura em ambas situações clínicas. Com relação à concordância entre os tempos de leitura do TCA com ambos extratos, observou-se diferença estatisticamente significante entre o tempo de 24 hs com aqueles de 48 e 72hs (p=0,031 em ambas comparações), o mesmo não ocorrendo entre o tempo de 48 e 72hs tanto na APLV como nas DETD. Isoladamente, o LV a 20% mostrou comportamento semelhante em ambas as doenças, com diferença entre o tempo de 24 e aqueles de 48 (p=0,031 / 0,000) e 72hs (p=0,031/ 0,002) respectivamente na APLV e DETD. O extrato de leite in natura nos pacientes com APLV não mostrou diferença estatisticamente significante entre os tempos avaliados, enquanto nos pacientes com DETD observou-se diferença entre 24 hs e os tempos de 48hs (p=0,003) e 72hs (p=0,003). A restrição dietética do leite naqueles pacientes com DETD e TCA positivo foi associada à melhora clínica em 80% dos pacientes e associação com melhora histológica em 65% destes. Conclusões: O TCA utilizando tanto LV in natura como extrato LV a 20%, com leitura após 48 ou 72hs da sua aplicação mostrou-se útil na identificação de pacientes com DETD desencadeada pelo LV. A instituição de dieta restrita neste alimento contribuiu para a melhora dos sintomas e para a redução do número de eosinófilos na biópsia de controle / Objective: To evaluate the atopic patch test (APT) in IgE mediated cow\'s milk allergic patients (CMA) - Group 1 and those with gastrointestinal eosinophilic diseases (GED) - Group 2, comparing extracts of cow\'s milk (CM) 20% protein concentration and fresh milk, the optimal time reading and the positive predictive value of APT in the identification of milk as a trigger food in the group 2, as assessed by clinical and endoscopic improvement after dietary restriction. Methods: Cross-sectional study with evaluation of 45 patients and 9 controls. The group 1 (n = 15) with IgE-mediated CMA was diagnosed by provocation test and positive skin prick test for CM in all patients and group 2 (n = 30) by biopsy showing eosinophilic esophagitis ( 15 eosinophils / hpf) or eosinophilic enterocolitis (> 20 eosinophils / hpf ), prick test positive for CM (n = 15) and symptoms triggered by milk. Group 3 (n = 9) included patients which CMA was excluded. It was used 12mm a plastic chamber of inert material, and as extracts the fresh milk and CM at 20% (IPI ASAC, Spain). The reading times were 24, 48 and 72 hours and was considered as APT positive, the presence of hyperemia with infiltration and papules or vesicles. To evaluate the positive predictive value of the APT, it was considered GED patients with symptoms associated to milk, no response to treatment, specific IgE to CM and clinical and histological improvement after the restricted diet institution. Results: Considering both extract, there was similarity in the frequency of positive APT evaluating all the reading times in both clinical situations. Regarding the agreement between the reading times with both extracts, there was a statistically significant difference between the time of 24 hours with those of 48 and 72 hours (p = 0.031 for both comparisons). This fact was not observed between the time of 48 and 72 hours in both diseases. The CM 20% extract showed a similar pattern in both diseases, with difference between the reading time of 24 with the 48 hours (p = 0.031/0.000) and 72 hours (p = 0.031/ 0.002) respectively in both diseases. The fresh milk extract in CMA patients showed no statistically significant difference between the reading times evaluated, while in GED patients it was observed difference between 24 hours with the time of 48 hours (p = 0.003) and 72 hours (p = 0.003). The milk restricted diet for GED patients with positive APT was associated to clinical improvement in 80% of patients and in both clinical and histological response in 65% of them. Conclusions: The APT using both fresh CM and CM 20% extract with reading time of 48 or 72 hours showed useful in identifying GED patients triggered by CM. The establishment of milk restricted diet contributed to the improvement of symptoms and to reduce the number of eosinophils in the control biopsy