No description available.

p. 1-83 / Submitted by Santiago Fabio (fabio.ssantiago@hotmail.com) on 2013-04-22T19:39:16Z No. of bitstreams: 1 666.pdf: 2638580 bytes, checksum: 1b5a9919b450e70cb0078f9f01da2583 (MD5) / Approved for entry into archive by Maria Creuza Silva(mariakreuza@yahoo.com.br) on 2013-05-04T17:20:11Z (GMT) No. of bitstreams: 1 666.pdf: 2638580 bytes, checksum: 1b5a9919b450e70cb0078f9f01da2583 (MD5) / Made available in DSpace on 2013-05-04T17:20:11Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 666.pdf: 2638580 bytes, checksum: 1b5a9919b450e70cb0078f9f01da2583 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2010 / Objetivo: Esta pesquisa visou realizar um estudo de avaliabilidade do Curso de Habilitação Profissional de Técnico em Saúde Bucal, desenvolvido pela Escola de Formação Técnica em Saúde Prof. Jorge Novis da Superintendência de Recursos Humanos da Secretaria da Saúde do Estado da Bahia, tendo como objetivo identificar pontos para sua melhoria e focos para avaliação futura. Metodologia: Foi uma pesquisa avaliativa, onde se elaborou um modelo lógico do curso a partir do documento-base, entendendo que o modelo lógico cumpre o papel de explicitar a teoria do programa, verificando se está bem desenhado e se apresenta um plano plausível de alcance de resultados. Foram realizadas doze entrevistas e a observação in loco, nos momentos de dispersão do curso com os cirurgiões dentistas, sendo um coordenador, instrutores e com os beneficiários do curso, os futuros TSB. Resultados: Os resultados revelaram que tanto o objetivo do curso quanto a identificação dos beneficiários estavam claros para os informantes-chave, mas que apenas os futuros TSB, expressaram o objetivo terminal do curso que é o de melhorar os serviços do SUS. As opiniões dos informantes acerca das atividades desenvolvidas durante o curso para a formação profissional foram amplamente convergentes. Os resultados intermediários propostos pelo plano de curso foram ressaltados na área da mobilização dos valores, expressando a capacidade do “saber ser”. Por fim foram identificadas áreas críticas que requerem avaliação, como a efetivação da diretriz da integração ensino-serviço, avaliação do processo ensinoaprendizagem, aperfeiçoamento do currículo integrado, capacitação técnico pedagógica dos instrutores, critérios de seleção para os alunos e instrutores e infraestrutura dos serviços. Conclusão: O estudo revelou que o curso de TSB está suficientemente implementado, para submeter-se a uma avaliação sistemática, tendo como principal foco de avaliação futura a magnitude da inserção profissional do TSB no SUS da Bahia. / Salvador

Spinal cord injury (SCI) is an acquired physical disability through traumatic injuries such as car accidents and shooting incidents, and non-traumatic injury such as a tumour on the spinal cord, amongst others. Unlike other parts of the body, the spinal cord does not have the ability to repair itself if it is damaged. Consequently, a person who has acquired an SCI will have a physical disability and will be either a paraplegic – paralysis of the lower part of the body, including the legs, or a quadriplegic, which is paralysis of all four limbs. Acquiring a spinal cord injury (SCI) has devastating long-term negative outcomes for the injured person as well as his/her cohabiting partner on a physical, psychological, psychosocial and socio-economical level. Exposure to such prolonged adversity and resulting negative outcomes calls for resilience, namely the ability to positively adapt despite the adversity being exposed to. Not all individuals have the natural ability to “bounce back”, and consequently resilience promotion is imperative. In South Africa, the focus of service delivery in rehabilitation centres is mainly centred on the injured person and consequently the well-being of the spinal cord injured person’s partner (SCIPP) is neglected. Little information is available on resilience-promoting programmes for SCIPPs; thus the main aim of this study was to design and develop a group resilience-promoting programme (GRPP) for SCIPPs. The researcher mainly followed a qualitative research approach and included a small quantitative component. In the context of applied research, an intervention research model comprising six phases was employed. Phase 1, Problem analysis and project planning, was reported on in section A. Manuscript 1 reports on phase 2 (information gathering and synthesis), and consists of a qualitative research synthesis, and mainly aimed at organizing and synthesizing previous research on resilience-promoting processes in order to inform the design and development of a group resilience-promoting programme (GRPP) for SCIPPs. After a systematic review and quality appraisal a total of 74 papers were selected to be quality appraised after abstracts and titles were assessed for relevance. Twenty-one studies were included and synthesized where after an outline for the content of a GRPP for SCIPPs was formulated. Conclusions and recommendations highlight that the formulated GRPP for SCIPPs needs to be further developed into an intervention that could be implemented with SCIPPs. As such, the researcher therefore proceeded with the study (see manuscript 2), aiming in developing small-group programme content and activities (using knowledge gathered from pre-existing interventions; resilience literature; consultations with experts; people living with spinal cord injury (SCI) and personal experience) to promote resilience in SCIPPs. By means of purposive sampling six advisory panel members from a diverse background were interviewed before and after the pilot study with two SCIPPs and one observer to contribute towards the further development of the GRPP for SCIPPs. A six-session GRPP for SCIPPs was formulated, including the following: (1) Information on SCI and resilience; (2) Help SCIPPs understand that their reactions to/emotions regarding these huge changes are normal; (3) Caretaking and support; (4) My dual role; (5) Own caretaking by SCIPPs; and (6) Termination and way forward. The newly developed GRPP for SCIPPs however had to be formally evaluated. Recommendations were made by professionals in the field that the GRPP for SCIPPs should first be subjected to peer review prior to implementing it with the target population. Therefore in manuscript 3 (reporting on phase 5 – evaluation ) the evaluation purpose was to subject the GRPP for SCIPPs to peer review by means of an empirical study with professional role-players (social workers and psychologists) in the field of spinal cord injury, prior to exhibiting it to the target population. The six group sessions were presented to professional role-players (n=12) working within the field of SCI during two 2-day workshops, whereby they were requested to evaluate the content and procedural elements of the GRPP for SCIPPs mainly by means of qualitative research, with a small numerical (quantitative) component. Thematic content analysis and basic descriptive statistics were employed. Overall positive feedback regarding the newly developed intervention was received, with suggested adjustments that needed to be made to the GRPP for SCIPPs prior to formal evaluation with the target group. The GRPP for SCIPPs will further be subjected to expert review in other provinces in South Africa, as the current participants were all from Gauteng. Furthermore, postgraduate students will be recruited to test the programme with the target-population in South Africa for possible further improvement and suggestions, as well as possible expansion to adjust this intervention to meet the needs of male SCIPPs; SCIPs themselves; children of a parent/s living with SCI; and also for post-injury cohabiting relationships, as this intervention might be a starting point for above-mentioned research-opportunities.

Spinal cord injury (SCI) is an acquired physical disability through traumatic injuries such as car accidents and shooting incidents, and non-traumatic injury such as a tumour on the spinal cord, amongst others. Unlike other parts of the body, the spinal cord does not have the ability to repair itself if it is damaged. Consequently, a person who has acquired an SCI will have a physical disability and will be either a paraplegic – paralysis of the lower part of the body, including the legs, or a quadriplegic, which is paralysis of all four limbs. Acquiring a spinal cord injury (SCI) has devastating long-term negative outcomes for the injured person as well as his/her cohabiting partner on a physical, psychological, psychosocial and socio-economical level. Exposure to such prolonged adversity and resulting negative outcomes calls for resilience, namely the ability to positively adapt despite the adversity being exposed to. Not all individuals have the natural ability to “bounce back”, and consequently resilience promotion is imperative. In South Africa, the focus of service delivery in rehabilitation centres is mainly centred on the injured person and consequently the well-being of the spinal cord injured person’s partner (SCIPP) is neglected. Little information is available on resilience-promoting programmes for SCIPPs; thus the main aim of this study was to design and develop a group resilience-promoting programme (GRPP) for SCIPPs. The researcher mainly followed a qualitative research approach and included a small quantitative component. In the context of applied research, an intervention research model comprising six phases was employed. Phase 1, Problem analysis and project planning, was reported on in section A. Manuscript 1 reports on phase 2 (information gathering and synthesis), and consists of a qualitative research synthesis, and mainly aimed at organizing and synthesizing previous research on resilience-promoting processes in order to inform the design and development of a group resilience-promoting programme (GRPP) for SCIPPs. After a systematic review and quality appraisal a total of 74 papers were selected to be quality appraised after abstracts and titles were assessed for relevance. Twenty-one studies were included and synthesized where after an outline for the content of a GRPP for SCIPPs was formulated. Conclusions and recommendations highlight that the formulated GRPP for SCIPPs needs to be further developed into an intervention that could be implemented with SCIPPs. As such, the researcher therefore proceeded with the study (see manuscript 2), aiming in developing small-group programme content and activities (using knowledge gathered from pre-existing interventions; resilience literature; consultations with experts; people living with spinal cord injury (SCI) and personal experience) to promote resilience in SCIPPs. By means of purposive sampling six advisory panel members from a diverse background were interviewed before and after the pilot study with two SCIPPs and one observer to contribute towards the further development of the GRPP for SCIPPs. A six-session GRPP for SCIPPs was formulated, including the following: (1) Information on SCI and resilience; (2) Help SCIPPs understand that their reactions to/emotions regarding these huge changes are normal; (3) Caretaking and support; (4) My dual role; (5) Own caretaking by SCIPPs; and (6) Termination and way forward. The newly developed GRPP for SCIPPs however had to be formally evaluated. Recommendations were made by professionals in the field that the GRPP for SCIPPs should first be subjected to peer review prior to implementing it with the target population. Therefore in manuscript 3 (reporting on phase 5 – evaluation ) the evaluation purpose was to subject the GRPP for SCIPPs to peer review by means of an empirical study with professional role-players (social workers and psychologists) in the field of spinal cord injury, prior to exhibiting it to the target population. The six group sessions were presented to professional role-players (n=12) working within the field of SCI during two 2-day workshops, whereby they were requested to evaluate the content and procedural elements of the GRPP for SCIPPs mainly by means of qualitative research, with a small numerical (quantitative) component. Thematic content analysis and basic descriptive statistics were employed. Overall positive feedback regarding the newly developed intervention was received, with suggested adjustments that needed to be made to the GRPP for SCIPPs prior to formal evaluation with the target group. The GRPP for SCIPPs will further be subjected to expert review in other provinces in South Africa, as the current participants were all from Gauteng. Furthermore, postgraduate students will be recruited to test the programme with the target-population in South Africa for possible further improvement and suggestions, as well as possible expansion to adjust this intervention to meet the needs of male SCIPPs; SCIPs themselves; children of a parent/s living with SCI; and also for post-injury cohabiting relationships, as this intervention might be a starting point for above-mentioned research-opportunities.

La mise en œuvre d’activités de prévention de la consommation de substances psychoactives (SPA) (tabac, alcool et cannabis) en milieu scolaire est une stratégie couramment utilisée pour rejoindre un grand nombre de jeunes. Ces activités s’inspirent, soit de programmes existant, soit d’innovations dictées par le contexte d’implantation ou l’existence de données de recherche. Dans un cas comme dans l’autre, l’évaluation de ces programmes représente la meilleure voie pour mesurer leur efficacité et/ou connaître comment ceux-ci sont implantés. C’est cet impératif qui a motivé une commission scolaire du Québec a recommandé l’évaluation de l’Intervention en Réseau (IR), un programme développé en vue de retarder l’âge d’initiation et de réduire la consommation problématique de SPA chez les élèves. Ce programme adopte une approche novatrice avec pour principal animateur un intervenant pivot (IP) qui assure le suivi des élèves de la 5e année du primaire jusqu’en 3e secondaire. Inspiré des modèles en prévention de la santé et de l’Approche École en santé (AES), le rôle de l’IP ici se démarque de ceux-ci. Certes, il est l’interface entre les différents acteurs impliqués et les élèves mais dans le cadre du programme IR, l’IP est intégré dans les écoles primaires et secondaires qu’il dessert. C’est cet intervenant qui assure la mobilisation des autres acteurs pour la mise en œuvre des activités. Cette thèse vise à rendre compte de ce processus d’évaluation ainsi que des résultats obtenus. L’approche d’évaluation en est une de type participatif et collaboratif avec des données quantitatives et qualitatives recueillies par le biais de questionnaires, d’entrevues, de groupes de discussion, d’un journal de bord et de notes de réunions. Les données ont été analysées dans le cadre de trois articles dont le premier concerne l’étude d’évaluabilité (ÉÉ) du programme. Les participants de cette ÉÉ sont des acteurs-clés du programme (N=13) rencontrés en entrevues. Une analyse documentaire (rapports et journal de bord) a également été effectuée. Cette ÉÉ a permis de clarifier les intentions des initiateurs du programme et les objectifs poursuivis par ces derniers. Elle a également permis de rendre la théorie du programme plus explicite et de développer le modèle logique, deux éléments qui ont facilité les opérations d’évaluation qui ont suivi. Le deuxième article porte sur l’évaluation des processus en utilisant la théorie de l’acteur-réseau (TAR) à travers ses quatre moments du processus de traduction des innovations (la problématisation, l’intéressement, l’enrôlement et la mobilisation des alliés), l’analyse des controverses et du rôle des acteurs humains et non-humains. Après l’analyse des données obtenues par entrevues auprès de 19 informateurs-clés, les résultats montrent que les phases d’implantation du programme passent effectivement par les quatre moments de la TAR, que la gestion des controverses par la négociation et le soutien était nécessaire pour la mobilisation de certains acteurs humains. Cette évaluation des processus a également permis de mettre en évidence le rôle des acteurs non-humains dans le processus d’implantation du programme. Le dernier article concerne une évaluation combinée des effets (volet quantitatif) et des processus (volet qualitatif) du programme. Pour le volet quantitatif, un devis quasi-expérimental a été adopté et les données ont été colligées de façon longitudinale par questionnaires auprès de 901 élèves de 5e et 6e année du primaire et leurs enseignants de 2010 à 2014. L’analyse des données ont montré que le programme n’a pas eu d’effets sur l’accessibilité et les risques perçus, l’usage problématique d’alcool et la polyconsommation (alcool et cannabis) chez les participants. Par contre, les résultats suggèrent que le programme pourrait favoriser la réduction du niveau de consommation et retarder l’âge d’initiation à l’alcool et au cannabis. Ils suggèrent également un effet potentiellement positif du programme sur l’intoxication à l’alcool chez les élèves. Quant au volet qualitatif, il a été réalisé à l’aide d’entrevues avec les intervenants (N=17), de groupes de discussion avec des élèves du secondaire (N=10) et d’une analyse documentaire. Les résultats montrent que le programme bénéficie d’un préjugé favorable de la part des différents acteurs ayant participé à l’évaluation et est bien acceptée par ces derniers. Cependant, le roulement fréquent de personnel et le grand nombre d’écoles à suivre peuvent constituer des obstacles à la bonne marche du programme. En revanche, le leadership et le soutien des directions d’écoles, la collaboration des enseignants, les qualités de l’IP et la flexibilité de la mise en œuvre sont identifiés comme des éléments ayant contribué au succès du programme. Les résultats et leur implication pour les programmes et l’évaluation sont discutés. Enfin, un plan de transfert des connaissances issues de la recherche évaluative est proposé. / Implementation of school-based substance use prevention activities is a widespread strategy to reach out to a significant number of young people. These activities are based either on existing programs or innovations dictated by the context of implantation or the existence of research data. In one case or another, evaluation of these programs is the best way to measure their effectiveness and/or to know how they operate. It is this need that motivated a school board in Quebec to recommend the evaluation of the Intervention Network (IR), a program developed to delay the age of substance use onset and to reduce problematic use of substances among students. This program takes an innovative approach with a patient navigator (PN) as the main implementation actor who keeps track of students from grade 5th to 9th. Inspired by such models in the fields of health prevention and the Healthy Schools Approach (HSA), the role of the PN here differs from those fields. S/he serves as an interface between the various stakeholders and students but in the IR program, the PN is integrated in primary and secondary schools involved in the program. The PN is also the one who ensures mobilization of other actors for the implementation of the program activities. This thesis aims to provide an account of the evaluation process and the results obtained. The evaluation approach is participatory and collaborative and combines both quantitative and qualitative data collected through questionnaires, interviews, focus groups, a logbook and meeting notes. Data were analyzed in the framework of three articles, the first being an evaluability assessment (EA) of the program. Participants of this EA are key-informants involved in the program implementation (n=13). A document review (report, logbook) was also conducted. The EA was helpful to clarify the intentions and objectives of the initiators of the program. It helped provide explicit information on the program theory and develop the logic model, two elements that facilitated subsequent evaluation operations. The second article is a process evaluation that uses Actor-Network Theory (ANT) as analytical framework, through the four moments of innovation translation (problematization, interessment, enrollment and mobilization of allies), controversies analysis, and the role of human and non-human actors. After analysis of the 19 interviews and available documents, results showed that the program implementation phases adequately follow the four moments of the ANT, that management of controversies by negotiation and support was needed for the mobilization of some human actors. This process evaluation also highlighted the role of non-human actors in the implementation process. The last article is a combined evaluation of the effects (quantitative component) and the process (qualitative component) of the program. For the quantitative component, a quasi-experimental design was used and data were collected longitudinally by questionnaires from 901 students of 5th and 6th grades and their teachers from 2010 to 2014. Data analysis indicated that the program had no effect on the accessibility and perceived risk, problematic use of alcohol and use of both alcohol and cannabis among participants. On the other hand, results suggest that the program could help reduce the level of consumption and delay the age of onset of alcohol and cannabis. These results also suggest a potentially positive effect of the program on alcohol intoxication among students. As for the qualitative component, stakeholder interviews (N = 17) and focus groups with high school students (N = 10) were conducted. Program documents were also analyzed. Results of this second process evaluation showed that the program is highly viewed and positively appreciated by the different actors involved in the program. However, frequent staff turnover and the number of schools to follow can be obstacles to the smooth running of the program. Nevertheless, the leadership role and support from the principals, teacher’s collaboration, the quality of the PN and flexibility in the implementation process are identified as factors contributing to the success of the program. All the results and their implication for program implementation and evaluation are discussed. Finally, to ensure greater access to the results, this thesis concludes with a plan for transferring knowledge drawn from the evaluation research.

La vaccination qui est le sujet sur lequel porte cette recherche est une des questions de santé publique les plus importantes; elle fait néanmoins l’objet de nombreuses controverses. Dans le contexte de cette thèse, c’est plutôt l’accès à la vaccination qui est mis en question. La présente recherche vise à analyser une stratégie d’amélioration de la couverture vaccinale à l’aide d’une évaluation de processus extensive en trois étapes faisant suite à une documentation approfondie du contexte. En effet, la recherche analyse les perceptions et les facteurs d’influence de la couverture vaccinale avant l’intervention, les assises conceptuelles et théoriques de cette intervention, l’implantation et la réception de l’intervention et enfin les résultats et les mécanismes mis en œuvre pour les atteindre. Les résultats indiquent que la vaccination s’insère dans l’ensemble des stratégies locales de protection fondées sur des notions endogènes du risque. Ces éléments culturels associés à des facteurs socioéconomiques et aux rapports entre parents et services de santé concourent à expliquer un niveau relativement bas de couverture vaccinale complète de 50% avant l’intervention. L’analyse exploratoire de l’intervention indique que celle-ci intègre une théorie initiale implicite et une philosophie. L’intervention finale était évaluable; cependant, la validation de sa théorie a été compromise par des écarts dans l’implantation. L’approche descriptive montre des taux de réalisation d’activités assez élevés, une atteinte de plus de 95% des cibles et un niveau de réception acceptable, ce qui indique que l’intervention est une stratégie réalisable mais à améliorer. La couverture vaccinale après l’intervention est de 87%; elle est influencée positivement par les niveaux de connaissance élevés des parents et le fait pour les enfants d’être nés dans un centre de santé, et négativement par l’éloignement par rapport au site de vaccination. L’atteinte des résultats suit la procédure principale d’amélioration du niveau de connaissance des parents. Celle-ci est basée sur un mécanisme latent qui est la perception des « opportunités » que fournit la vaccination pour prévenir divers risques sanitaires, sociaux et économiques. Cependant, des approches complémentaires tentent de maximiser les effets de l’intervention en utilisant les pouvoirs conférés aux relais communautaires féminins et la coercition sociale. Cette recherche contribue à éclairer la relation entre l’évaluation du processus et l’analyse de l’évaluabilité, à conceptualiser et opérationnaliser autrement les notions de doses d’intervention administrées et de doses reçues. Sur le plan de la pratique, la recherche contribue à proposer l’amélioration des profils de personnel pour les activités de vaccination et la vulgarisation de la stratégie. Des propositions sont faites pour l’amélioration de l’intervention et l’information des institutions de financement des interventions. / Immunization is one of the most important subjects in public health despite constant on-going controversies. In the context of this research it is more its accessibility that is at issue. This particular research is situated in the perspective of the comprehensive approaches to evaluation and analyses an immunization improvement strategy using a three steps process evaluation after documenting its context. The perceptions and factors influencing immunization coverage before the intervention are assessed, as well as the conceptual and theoretical foundations of the intervention, the implementation and reception of the intervention and mechanisms used to attain the results. The results indicate that immunization is integrated into the local strategies used for protection and grounded in the local concept of risk. Results show also that the context associated with socioeconomic factors and the relations between parents and health services contribute to explain the relatively low complete immunization coverage rate (50.3%) before the intervention. The exploratory analysis indicates that the intervention had an implicit theory and a philosophy. Although the intervention was adequate for an evaluation, discrepancies in the implantation compromised the possibilities of validating its initial theory and philosophy. The descriptive analysis showed that more than 95% of the recipients were reached by the intervention and the received dose of intervention was acceptable indicating that the intervention is a workable strategy that needs to be improved. The complete immunization coverage after the intervention was 87.3%; it was influenced positively by factors including parents’ level of knowledge and the fact that the child was born in a health center, and negatively by the long distances from household to immunization place. The strategies involved in the attainment of the results used parents’ knowledge improvement as a principal procedure. This contains an underlying mechanism mainly related to the perception of the opportunities that immunization permits for preventing various health, social and economic risks. However, complementary approaches tend to maximize intervention outcome by using the power given to female community immunization facilitators and social coercion. The research contributes to highlight the relationship between evaluability assessment and process evaluation, to propose a new conceptual and operational understanding of dose of intervention administered and dose of intervention received. On practical grounds, this research recommended the improvement of the immunization activities staff profile and the widespread adoption of the strategy after it improvement. Indications are provided to improve the intervention and to inform founding agencies.

No description available.