INTRODUÇÃO: A incidência de pacientes apresentando alergia à proteína do leite de vaca (APLV) após os 5 anos de idade vem crescendo. Definir se estes pacientes tolerariam a ingestão de alimento produzido com leite processado a altas temperaturas (LPAT) proporcionaria melhor qualidade de vida, definiria melhor prognóstico e possibilitaria avaliar a indicação de dessensibilização com muffin. OBJETIVO: (1) identificar quais pacientes com APLV persistente aos quatro anos poderiam tolerar a ingestão de LPAT, (2) descrever as características clínicas e laboratoriais dos grupos reativo e não reativo ao LPAT, e (3) compara-las entre os dois grupos. MÉTODOS: Estudo transversal, utilizando amostra de conveniência, incluindo todos os pacientes acompanhados no ambulatório de alergia alimentar do Instituto da Criança HCFMUSP que preenchiam os critérios de inclusão e que concordaram em realizar o TPO, entre janeiro/2013 e novembro/2014. Os pacientes foram admitidos em hospital-dia sob supervisão médica e submetidos à ingestão de um muffin contendo 2,8 gramas de proteína do leite de vaca. Foram definidos como tolerantes se não apresentassem nenhuma reação alérgica. Estes pacientes foram submetidos na sequência a novo TPO com leite de vaca in natura para excluir a tolerância ao leite de vaca. RESULTADOS: Foram realizados 38 TPO com LPAT, sendo que 30 pacientes (15 masculinos) preencheram todos os critérios de inclusão. A mediana da idade foi de 7 anos e 7 meses (4a10m -14a2m). 14 pacientes (46%) não apresentaram reação após a ingestão do muffin, sendo considerados como não reativos. A análise comparativa entre os grupos reativos e não reativos ao LPAT, não mostrou diferença estatisticamente significante quanto às características clínicas: idade (p=0,8), sexo (p=0,4), história pessoal de rinite (p=0,7), história pessoal de asma (p=0,7), história pessoal de outras alergias (p=0,6), história familiar de rinite (p=0,7), história familiar de asma (p=0,3), história familiar de outras alergias (p=0,1), relato de anafilaxia prévia (p=0,07), relato de ingestão de traços de leite previamente ao TPO (p=0,4), relato de reação alérgica no último ano antes da provocação (p=0,6), relato de anafilaxia no último ano antes do TPO (p=0,6). Não se observou diferença estatisticamente significante entre os dois grupos para IgE total (p=0,1) e eosinófilos (p=0,6). O teste de puntura para leite de vaca e frações mostrou diferença estatisticamente significante para ?-lactoalbumina (p= 0,01) e para a caseína (p = 0,004); em relação ao ImmunoCAP® apenas para a caseína (p= 0,05) essa diferença foi significante. Ao avaliar estes pacientes 1 ano após o TPO, nenhum dos 16 pacientes que foram reativos ao LPAT estava ingerindo leite de vaca, enquanto 28% dos pacientes que foram tolerantes ao LPAT estavam consumindo leite de vaca in natura sem reação (p=0,037). CONCLUSÃO: O estudo mostrou que os pacientes com APLV desta amostra brasileira apresentaram 2 diferentes fenótipos, sendo que aproximadamente metade tolerou o LPAT. Sendo assim, o TPO para LPAT deve ser considerado para pacientes com APLV, sempre sob supervisão médica e estrutura segura e adequada, pois pode contribuir para uma mudança no paradigma do seguimento destes pacientes. Teste de puntura e ImmunoCAP® para caseína podem sugerir quais pacientes estariam tolerantes ao TPO com LPAT, reforçando dados da literatura internacional / INTRODUCTION: The incidence of patients with cow\'s milk allergy (CMA) after the age of 5 has been growing. Defining whether these patients can tolerate the ingestion of food produced with baked milk without allergy reaction could provide a better quality of life, a better prognosis and would make it possible to evaluate indication of desensitization with baked milk. OBJECTIVE: (1) To identify which patients with persistent CMA at the age of four could tolerate the baked milk, (2) to describe the clinical and laboratory characteristics of the baked milk reactive group and the baked milk non-reactive group, and (3) to compare those two groups. METHODS: A cross-sectional study was conducted between January/2013 and November/2014. A convenience sample was applied, including all the patients followed in the Food Allergy Center of the Instituto da Criança HCFMUSP, who met inclusion criteria and agreed to carry out the oral food challenge (OFC). The patients were admitted to a day-hospital under medical supervision. They were submitted to a muffin intake containing 2.8 grams of cow\'s milk protein, and then classified as tolerant if they did not present any allergic reaction. To exclude cow\'s milk tolerance these patients were submitted to a new OFC with cow\'s milk in natura. RESULTS: 38 OFC with baked milk were performed, 30 patients (15 male) met all of the inclusion criteria. The median of age was 7 years and 7 months (4y10m -14y2m). 14 patients (46.6%) were considered as non-reactive because they did not present any reaction after the muffin intake. The comparative analysis between baked milk reactive group and baked milk non-reactive group did not show statistically significant difference in the clinical characteristics: age (p=0.8), gender (p=0.4), personal history of rhinitis (p=0.7), personal history of asthma (p=0.7), personal history of others allergies (p=0.6), family history of rhinitis (p=0.7), family history of asthma (p=0.3) family history of others allergies (p=0.1), previous anaphylaxis report (p=0.07), report of milk traits intake prior to OFC (p=0.4), allergic reaction in the last year before the OFC (p=0.6), anaphylaxis in the last year before the OFC (p=0.6). There was no statistically significant difference between the two groups for total IgE (p=0.1) and eosinophils (p=0.6). The Prick test for cow\'s milk and fractions showed statistically significant difference for ?-lactalbumin (p = 0.01) and for casein (p =0.004); in relation to the ImmunoCAP® only for casein (p=0.05) this difference was significant. After 1 year of the OFC, none of the patients which have been reactive to the baked milk were ingesting cow\'s milk, while 28% of the baked milk tolerant patients were consuming cow\'s milk in natura without reaction (p=0.037). CONCLUSION: The present study showed that patients with CMA of this brazilian sample presented 2 different phenotypes. Approximately half of them tolerated baked milk at age four. In conclusion, OFC for baked milk should be considered for patients with CMA, always under medical supervision and appropriate structure, so it could contribute for a change in these patients follow-up. Prick test and ImmunoCAP® for casein can suggest which patients would tolerate the OFC with baked milk, strengthening data of international literature

INTRODUÇÃO: A incidência de pacientes apresentando alergia à proteína do leite de vaca (APLV) após os 5 anos de idade vem crescendo. Definir se estes pacientes tolerariam a ingestão de alimento produzido com leite processado a altas temperaturas (LPAT) proporcionaria melhor qualidade de vida, definiria melhor prognóstico e possibilitaria avaliar a indicação de dessensibilização com muffin. OBJETIVO: (1) identificar quais pacientes com APLV persistente aos quatro anos poderiam tolerar a ingestão de LPAT, (2) descrever as características clínicas e laboratoriais dos grupos reativo e não reativo ao LPAT, e (3) compara-las entre os dois grupos. MÉTODOS: Estudo transversal, utilizando amostra de conveniência, incluindo todos os pacientes acompanhados no ambulatório de alergia alimentar do Instituto da Criança HCFMUSP que preenchiam os critérios de inclusão e que concordaram em realizar o TPO, entre janeiro/2013 e novembro/2014. Os pacientes foram admitidos em hospital-dia sob supervisão médica e submetidos à ingestão de um muffin contendo 2,8 gramas de proteína do leite de vaca. Foram definidos como tolerantes se não apresentassem nenhuma reação alérgica. Estes pacientes foram submetidos na sequência a novo TPO com leite de vaca in natura para excluir a tolerância ao leite de vaca. RESULTADOS: Foram realizados 38 TPO com LPAT, sendo que 30 pacientes (15 masculinos) preencheram todos os critérios de inclusão. A mediana da idade foi de 7 anos e 7 meses (4a10m -14a2m). 14 pacientes (46%) não apresentaram reação após a ingestão do muffin, sendo considerados como não reativos. A análise comparativa entre os grupos reativos e não reativos ao LPAT, não mostrou diferença estatisticamente significante quanto às características clínicas: idade (p=0,8), sexo (p=0,4), história pessoal de rinite (p=0,7), história pessoal de asma (p=0,7), história pessoal de outras alergias (p=0,6), história familiar de rinite (p=0,7), história familiar de asma (p=0,3), história familiar de outras alergias (p=0,1), relato de anafilaxia prévia (p=0,07), relato de ingestão de traços de leite previamente ao TPO (p=0,4), relato de reação alérgica no último ano antes da provocação (p=0,6), relato de anafilaxia no último ano antes do TPO (p=0,6). Não se observou diferença estatisticamente significante entre os dois grupos para IgE total (p=0,1) e eosinófilos (p=0,6). O teste de puntura para leite de vaca e frações mostrou diferença estatisticamente significante para ?-lactoalbumina (p= 0,01) e para a caseína (p = 0,004); em relação ao ImmunoCAP® apenas para a caseína (p= 0,05) essa diferença foi significante. Ao avaliar estes pacientes 1 ano após o TPO, nenhum dos 16 pacientes que foram reativos ao LPAT estava ingerindo leite de vaca, enquanto 28% dos pacientes que foram tolerantes ao LPAT estavam consumindo leite de vaca in natura sem reação (p=0,037). CONCLUSÃO: O estudo mostrou que os pacientes com APLV desta amostra brasileira apresentaram 2 diferentes fenótipos, sendo que aproximadamente metade tolerou o LPAT. Sendo assim, o TPO para LPAT deve ser considerado para pacientes com APLV, sempre sob supervisão médica e estrutura segura e adequada, pois pode contribuir para uma mudança no paradigma do seguimento destes pacientes. Teste de puntura e ImmunoCAP® para caseína podem sugerir quais pacientes estariam tolerantes ao TPO com LPAT, reforçando dados da literatura internacional / INTRODUCTION: The incidence of patients with cow\'s milk allergy (CMA) after the age of 5 has been growing. Defining whether these patients can tolerate the ingestion of food produced with baked milk without allergy reaction could provide a better quality of life, a better prognosis and would make it possible to evaluate indication of desensitization with baked milk. OBJECTIVE: (1) To identify which patients with persistent CMA at the age of four could tolerate the baked milk, (2) to describe the clinical and laboratory characteristics of the baked milk reactive group and the baked milk non-reactive group, and (3) to compare those two groups. METHODS: A cross-sectional study was conducted between January/2013 and November/2014. A convenience sample was applied, including all the patients followed in the Food Allergy Center of the Instituto da Criança HCFMUSP, who met inclusion criteria and agreed to carry out the oral food challenge (OFC). The patients were admitted to a day-hospital under medical supervision. They were submitted to a muffin intake containing 2.8 grams of cow\'s milk protein, and then classified as tolerant if they did not present any allergic reaction. To exclude cow\'s milk tolerance these patients were submitted to a new OFC with cow\'s milk in natura. RESULTS: 38 OFC with baked milk were performed, 30 patients (15 male) met all of the inclusion criteria. The median of age was 7 years and 7 months (4y10m -14y2m). 14 patients (46.6%) were considered as non-reactive because they did not present any reaction after the muffin intake. The comparative analysis between baked milk reactive group and baked milk non-reactive group did not show statistically significant difference in the clinical characteristics: age (p=0.8), gender (p=0.4), personal history of rhinitis (p=0.7), personal history of asthma (p=0.7), personal history of others allergies (p=0.6), family history of rhinitis (p=0.7), family history of asthma (p=0.3) family history of others allergies (p=0.1), previous anaphylaxis report (p=0.07), report of milk traits intake prior to OFC (p=0.4), allergic reaction in the last year before the OFC (p=0.6), anaphylaxis in the last year before the OFC (p=0.6). There was no statistically significant difference between the two groups for total IgE (p=0.1) and eosinophils (p=0.6). The Prick test for cow\'s milk and fractions showed statistically significant difference for ?-lactalbumin (p = 0.01) and for casein (p =0.004); in relation to the ImmunoCAP® only for casein (p=0.05) this difference was significant. After 1 year of the OFC, none of the patients which have been reactive to the baked milk were ingesting cow\'s milk, while 28% of the baked milk tolerant patients were consuming cow\'s milk in natura without reaction (p=0.037). CONCLUSION: The present study showed that patients with CMA of this brazilian sample presented 2 different phenotypes. Approximately half of them tolerated baked milk at age four. In conclusion, OFC for baked milk should be considered for patients with CMA, always under medical supervision and appropriate structure, so it could contribute for a change in these patients follow-up. Prick test and ImmunoCAP® for casein can suggest which patients would tolerate the OFC with baked milk, strengthening data of international literature

INTRODUÇÃO: A alergia a camarão é causa comum e potencialmente grave de alergia alimentar IgE mediada, incluindo anafilaxia. Ao contrário de outras alergias alimentares, a alergia a camarão afeta predominantemente adultos e geralmente é vitalícia. Até o momento, não existe terapia específica para a alergia a camarão. Os pacientes necessitam excluir o crustáceo de sua dieta e portar adrenalina auto-injetável, para uso em reações por exposição acidental. A complexidade do perfil alergênico do camarão tem sido cada vez mais reconhecida nos últimos dez anos. A proteína muscular tropomiosina foi o primeiro alérgeno do camarão identificado e é considerada o seu principal alérgeno. Alguns estudos indicam que a tropomiosina apresenta alta especificidade na alergia a camarão, sendo apontada como uma possível e importante ferramenta diagnóstica. OBJETIVO: O objetivo deste estudo foi avaliar sensibilidade, especificidade, valor preditivo positivo e valor preditivo negativo da tropomiosina em pacientes brasileiros em restrição alimentar por suspeita de alergia a camarão. MÉTODOS: Selecionou-se 32 indivíduos com suspeita de alergia a camarão, os quais foram submetidos a testes cutâneos de leitura imediata para camarão (extrato) e \"in natura\" (cru e cozido), ácaros e barata. Também foram realizadas dosagens séricas de IgE específica para camarão, tropomiosina de camarão, ácaros e barata americana. Avaliou-se reatividade clínica a camarão através de testes de provocação oral. O camarão utilizado nos testes cutâneos e nos testes de provocação oral foi o Xiphopenaeus kroyeri (sete barbas). Foi realizado Western Blot 1 D dos pacientes alérgicos. Foram realizados cálculos de valor de corte para teste cutâneo de leitura imediata e IgE sérica específica através da utilização da curva ROC. RESULTADOS: Alergia a camarão foi confirmada em 17 pacientes. A IgE sérica específica para tropomiosina de camarão neste estudo apresentou sensibilidade de 58,8%, especificidade de 60%, valor preditivo positivo de 62,5% e valor preditivo negativo 56%. Em comparação com a IgE especifica para camarão e os testes cutâneos para camarão com extrato e \"in natura\", a IgE específica para tropomiosina apresentou a menor sensibilidade e menor valor preditivo positivo. Em sete pacientes alérgicos, a tropomiosina não foi detectada, apontando a importância de outros alérgenos do camarão, avaliados no Western blot. Os testes cutâneos apresentaram diferença estatística significativa entre alérgicos e não alérgicos e foi possível definir um ponto de corte, útil na distinção entre ambos. Os resultados dos valores de corte do teste cutâneo (média) para extrato comercial foram 5,75 mm, para camarão cru 6,75 mm e para camarão cozido 5,00 mm. Todos os pacientes são atópicos. CONCLUSÃO: A IgE específica para tropomiosina neste estudo não apresentou superioridade diagnóstica quando comparada aos testes cutâneos com camarão \"in natura\" e extrato, e a IgE específica para o camarão. Outros alérgenos, além da tropomiosina, devem ser considerados na avaliação diagnóstica para a alergia a camarão / INTRODUCTION: Shrimp allergy is a common and potentially serious cause of food allergy-mediated IgE, including anaphylaxis. Unlike other food allergies, shrimp allergy affects predominantly adults and is usually lifelong. To date, there is no specific therapy for shrimp allergy. Patients need to exclude the crustacean from their diet and carry selfinjectable adrenaline to be used if the reaction begins after accidental exposure. The complexity of the allergenic profile of shrimp has been increasingly recognized in the last ten years. The tropomyosin muscle protein was the first identified shrimp allergen and is considered its main allergen. Some studies indicate that tropomyosin presents high specificity in shrimp allergy, being pointed out as a possible and important diagnostic tool. OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to evaluate sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value and negative predictive value of tropomyosin in Brazilian patients under food restriction due to the suspicion of allergy to shrimp. METHODS: Thirty-two individuals with suspected allergy to shrimp were selected, who underwent immediate skin tests for shrimp (extract) and \"in natura\" (raw and cooked), mites and cockroaches. Serum dosages of IgE specific for shrimp, shrimp tropomyosin, mites and American cockroach were also performed. Clinical reactivity to shrimp was assessed by oral challenge tests. Shrimp used in skin tests and oral challenge tests was Xiphopenaeus kroyeri (seabob). Western Blot 1 D of the allergic patients was performed. Cut-off calculations were performed for immediate-reading skin test and specific serum IgE using the ROC curve. RESULTS: Shrimp allergy was confirmed in 17 patients. Serum IgE specific for shrimp tropomyosin in this study showed sensitivity of 58.8%, specificity of 60%, positive predictive value of 62.5% and negative predictive value of 56%. Compared to shrimp-specific IgE and cutaneous shrimp skin tests with extract and \"in natura\", tropomyosin was not detected, indicating the importance of other shrimp allergens evaluated in the Western blot. The skin tests presented a statistically significant difference between allergic and non-allergic and it was possible to define a cutoff point, useful in distinguishing between both. The results of the cutoff values of the skin test (average) for commercial extract were 5.75 mm, for raw shrimp 6.75 mm and for cooked shrimp 5.00 mm. All patients are atopic. CONCLUSION: The tropomyosin-specific IgE in this study did not present diagnostic superiority when compared to cutaneous tests with in natura shrimp and extract, and shrimp specific IgE. Other allergens, in addition to tropomyosin, should be considered in the diagnostic evaluation for shrimp allergy

<p>A diagnosis of coeliac disease (CD) in adults relies on the presence of a structurally abnormal intestinal mucosa, followed by a clear clinical remission on a gluten-free diet. There is a clear need for a rapid, simple, safe and sensitive method to determine the type and intensity of inflammation in the gut mucosa in clinical practice. The overall aims of our studies were to develop and evaluate a new technique, “the mucosal patch technique”, to characterize rectal local inflammatory process after rectal food challenge in patients with CD<b>. In study 1</b> we evaluated the potential of the new technique. The technique was well tolerated and easily applied. Pronounced neutrophil and eosinophil involvement in ulcerative colitis (UC) was demonstrated. With the high sensitivity of the technique, low-degree mucosal neutrophil activation could also be quantified in patients with collagen colitis,UC in clinical remission and in patients with irritable bowel syndrome. <b>In study 2 and 3</b> the aim was to elucidate the dynamics of the rectal inflammatory response and nitric oxide (NO) production after rectal gluten challenge. We found a pronounced neutrophil activation in coeliac patients after rectal gluten challenge. This activation was apparent 4 hours after challenge and remains for at least 48 hours. A more modest eosinophil activation started 1-2 hours later and remained at least for 48 hours. The biphasic pattern of neutrophil and eosinonphil activation after challenge suggests a biphasic inflammatory reaction. The activation of neutrophils and eosinophils precedes a pronounced enhancement of mucosal NO production. Some of our coeliac patients displayed signs of an inflammatory reaction after rectal corn gluten challenge. <b>In study 4</b> the aim was to investigate the local inflammatory reaction to gluten and cow’s milk protein in CD patients in remission. The findings indicate that not only gluten sensitivity but also cow’s milk (CM) protein sensitivity is common in CD. The data support the hypothesis that CM sensitivity may contribute to persistent symptoms in coeliac patients on gluten-free diet.</p>

A diagnosis of coeliac disease (CD) in adults relies on the presence of a structurally abnormal intestinal mucosa, followed by a clear clinical remission on a gluten-free diet. There is a clear need for a rapid, simple, safe and sensitive method to determine the type and intensity of inflammation in the gut mucosa in clinical practice. The overall aims of our studies were to develop and evaluate a new technique, “the mucosal patch technique”, to characterize rectal local inflammatory process after rectal food challenge in patients with CD<b>. In study 1</b> we evaluated the potential of the new technique. The technique was well tolerated and easily applied. Pronounced neutrophil and eosinophil involvement in ulcerative colitis (UC) was demonstrated. With the high sensitivity of the technique, low-degree mucosal neutrophil activation could also be quantified in patients with collagen colitis,UC in clinical remission and in patients with irritable bowel syndrome. <b>In study 2 and 3</b> the aim was to elucidate the dynamics of the rectal inflammatory response and nitric oxide (NO) production after rectal gluten challenge. We found a pronounced neutrophil activation in coeliac patients after rectal gluten challenge. This activation was apparent 4 hours after challenge and remains for at least 48 hours. A more modest eosinophil activation started 1-2 hours later and remained at least for 48 hours. The biphasic pattern of neutrophil and eosinonphil activation after challenge suggests a biphasic inflammatory reaction. The activation of neutrophils and eosinophils precedes a pronounced enhancement of mucosal NO production. Some of our coeliac patients displayed signs of an inflammatory reaction after rectal corn gluten challenge. <b>In study 4</b> the aim was to investigate the local inflammatory reaction to gluten and cow’s milk protein in CD patients in remission. The findings indicate that not only gluten sensitivity but also cow’s milk (CM) protein sensitivity is common in CD. The data support the hypothesis that CM sensitivity may contribute to persistent symptoms in coeliac patients on gluten-free diet.

Made available in DSpace on 2015-07-22T20:49:46Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 0 Previous issue date: 2011-01-31 / Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior (CAPES) / Support Produtos Nutricionais Ltda / Objetivo: Avaliar o conhecimento e a prática de profissionais pediatras, gastroenterologistas pediátricos, alergistas e nutricionistas quanto à prevenção da alergia alimentar. Métodos: Trata-se de um estudo descritivo e transversal, do qual participaram pediatras (n=80), gastro-pediatras (n=120), alergistas (n=100) e nutricionistas (n=220), totalizando 520 profissionais. O instrumento de coleta foi um questionário auto-administrado elaborado a partir das recomendações atuais das principais sociedades de especialidades sobre a prevenção da alergia alimentar. Resultados: A média de idade dos profissionais foi 29,1±5,8 anos. A maioria dos profissionais era do sexo feminino, constituindo um total de 90,4% (n = 470) dos entrevistados. A média do tempo de graduação dos profissionais foi 7,2±5,8 anos. Quanto à recomendação de dieta de exclusão alimentar na gestação, 89 (17,1%) profissionais concordaram com tal prática, sendo maior a indicação por parte dos nutricionistas. Os gastro-pediatras diferenciaram-se estatisticamente dos demais profissionais por apresentarem a menor taxa de recomendação (p< 0,001). A recomendação de dieta de exclusão alimentar materna na lactação foi indicada por maior número de profissionais, sendo recomendada por 212 (40,8%) entrevistados, verificando-se novamente maior recomendação dos nutricionistas e também dos pediatras em comparação aos alergistas e gastroenterologistas (p< 0,001). A duração de aleitamento materno exclusivo considerada ideal foi o período de 4 a 5,9 meses indicado por 275 (52,9%) profissionais, sendo o período de escolha da maioria dos nutricionistas, pediatras e gastro-pediatras. No entanto, 65 alergistas (65,0%) indicaram a faixa de 6 a 7,9 meses. Quanto à época de introdução da alimentação complementar, 218 (41,9%) profissionais afirmaram modificar a idade de introdução com o objetivo de prevenir o desenvolvimento da alergia alimentar. O principal período indicado foi a idade entre 6 a 7,9 meses, assinalada por 118 (54,1%) entrevistados. Comparando a indicação da época de introdução da alimentação complementar entre os profissionais, 70 (70,0%) dos alergistas afirmam modificar a época de introdução da alimentação complementar (p< 0,001). As principais fórmulas infantis especiais indicadas nos casos de impossibilidade de aleitamento materno com o objetivo de prevenir o aparecimento da alergia alimentar foram: Alfaré® (70,6%), Neocate® (66,2%), Pregomin® (57,5%), e Nan HA® (42,1%). Conclusões: Esse estudo revelou que existem erros conceituais no que tange a prevenção da alergia alimentar entre todas as categorias de profissionais. Nossos resultados confirmam que a avaliação do conhecimento e da prática dos profissionais contribui na definição de conteúdos que devem fazer parte dos programas de educação continuada na área da alergia alimentar. / Objective: To evaluate the knowledge and practice of pediatricians, gastroenterologists pediatricians, allergists and nutritionists regarding the primary prevention of food allergy. Methods: A descriptive cross-sectional study that enrolled pediatricians (n = 80), gastro-pediatricians (n = 120), allergists (n = 100) and nutritionists (n = 220), an amount of 520 professionals. The instrument collects used was a self-administered questionnaire prepared by the authors based on current recommendations of the major committees and societies related to prevention of food allergy. Results: The average age of professionals was 29.1 ± 5.8 years. The vast majority of the professionals was female, constituting a total 90.4% (n = 470) of respondents. The average time of graduation of professionals was 7.2 ± 5.8 years. Regarding the recommendation of exclusion diet on pregnancy, 89 (17.1%) professionals agreed with such practice, being the most indication by nutritionists. The gastro-pediatricians statistically differ from the others professionals by submitting the lowest rate of recommendation (p < 0.001). The recommendation of maternal exclusion diet on lactation was indicated by more number of professionals, constituting 40.8% (n = 212) of the sample, with the highest recommendation by nutritionists and pediatricians compared to pediatricians and allergists (p < 0.001). The duration of exclusive breastfeeding considered ideal was the period of 4 to 5.9 months indicated by 52.9% (n = 275) of professionals, according with the choices of most nutritionists, pediatricians and pediatricians. However, most allergists (65%; n = 65) indicated the range of 6 to 7.9 months. Regarding the time of introduction of complementary feeding, 218 (41.9%) professionals recommended modify the age of introduction to prevent the development of food allergy. The main period indicated was aged 6 to 7.9 months, indicated by 118 (54.1%) of respondents. Comparing the indication of the time of introduction of complementary feeding among professionals, 70 (70%) of allergists affirmed modify the time of introduction of complementary feeding (p < 0.001). The majority of special infant formulas indicated in case of impossibility of breastfeeding to prevent the development of food allergies were: Alfare® (70.6%), Neocate® (66.2%), Pregomin® (57.5%) and Nan HA® (42.1%). Conclusions: This study revealed there are misconceptions regarding the prevention of food allergy among all the categories of professionals. Our results confirm that the evaluation of knowledge and professional practice contributes to the definition of content that should be part of continuing education programs in the area of food allergy. / TEDE / BV UNIFESP: Teses e dissertações