SOUZA, R. M. \\Estatstica em Bioequivaência: Garantia na qualidade do medicamento generico\". 2008. 42 f Dissertação (Mestrado em Saude na Comunidade) Faculdade de Medicina de Ribeir~ao Preto - USP Como alternativa aos medicamentos de uso humano de grande circulação no mercado brasileiro foram regulamentados os medicamentos genericos, conforme a Lei dos genericos no 9787/99, que evidenciaram os estudos de bioequivalência e biodisponibilidade no Brasil com o objetivo de avaliar a bioequivalência das formulações genericas, tomando-se como referências os medicamentos ja existentes no mercado e com eficacia comprovada. Duas formulações de um mesmo medicamento são consideradas bioequivalentes se suas biodisponibilidades não apresentam evidências de diferenças signicativas segundo limites clinicamente especificados, denominados limites de bioequivalência. Os estudos de bioequivalência são realizados mediante a administração de duas formulações, sendo que uma esta em teste e a outra e a referência, em um numero de voluntários previamente denidos, usando-se um planejamento experimental, na maioria das vêzes do tipo crossover. Apos a retirada de sucessivas amostras sanguíneas ou urinárias em tempos pre-determinados, estudam-se alguns parâmetros farmacocinéticos como area sob a curva de concentrac~ao, concentrac~ao maxima do farmaco e tempo em que a concentração ao maxima ocorre. Esta dissertação de mestrado introduz alguns conceitos basicos de bioequivalênncia para, logo em seguida, apresentar analises Bayesianas para medidas de bioequivalência tanto univariada como multivariada assumindo a distribuição ao normal multivariada para os dados e também a distribuição de Student multivariada. Uma aplicação a de exemplicar o que foi introduzido e apresentada e, para o conjunto de dados em estudo têm, por meio de criterios de seleção ao de modelos, evidências favoraveis a escolha dos modelos multivariados para a condução deste estudo de bioequivalência media. / SOUZA, R. M. \\Statistics on Bioequivalence: Guarantee in quality of generic drug\". 2008. 42 s Dissertation (Master Degree) Faculdade de Medicina de Ribeir~ao Preto - USP As an alternative to medicines for human use of great movement in Brazil, the use of generic medicines were regulated, according to the law of the generic no 9787/99, which establish the studies of bioavailability and bioequivalence in Brazil in order to evaluate bioequivalence of generic formulations, considering as reference existing medicinal products, with proved ecacy. Two formulations of the same drug are considered bioequivalents if your bioavailability do not present evidence of signicant dierences according to clinically specied limits known as bioequivalence limits. Bioequivalence studies are carried out by the administration of two formulations (one is in test and the other one is the reference) in a pre-dened number of volunteers using an experimental plan that is often the crossover one. After the withdrawn of successive blood or urinary samples in predetermined intervals, some pharmacokinetic parameters were studied, such as area under concentration curve, maximum concentration of drug and time that the maximum concentration occurs. This dissertation introduces some basic concepts of bioequivalence and following that, it is presented Bayesian analysis for both as univariate and as multivariate bioequivalence measures assuming the multivariate normal distribution for the data and also the distribution of multivariate t student distribution. An application in order to illustrate what was introduced is presented in this work, and by using means of selection criteria of models, it was observed that for all data on study, there were evidences that lead to choose the multivariates models in order to conduct this study of average bioequivalence.

SOUZA, R. M. \\Estatstica em Bioequivaência: Garantia na qualidade do medicamento generico\". 2008. 42 f Dissertação (Mestrado em Saude na Comunidade) Faculdade de Medicina de Ribeir~ao Preto - USP Como alternativa aos medicamentos de uso humano de grande circulação no mercado brasileiro foram regulamentados os medicamentos genericos, conforme a Lei dos genericos no 9787/99, que evidenciaram os estudos de bioequivalência e biodisponibilidade no Brasil com o objetivo de avaliar a bioequivalência das formulações genericas, tomando-se como referências os medicamentos ja existentes no mercado e com eficacia comprovada. Duas formulações de um mesmo medicamento são consideradas bioequivalentes se suas biodisponibilidades não apresentam evidências de diferenças signicativas segundo limites clinicamente especificados, denominados limites de bioequivalência. Os estudos de bioequivalência são realizados mediante a administração de duas formulações, sendo que uma esta em teste e a outra e a referência, em um numero de voluntários previamente denidos, usando-se um planejamento experimental, na maioria das vêzes do tipo crossover. Apos a retirada de sucessivas amostras sanguíneas ou urinárias em tempos pre-determinados, estudam-se alguns parâmetros farmacocinéticos como area sob a curva de concentrac~ao, concentrac~ao maxima do farmaco e tempo em que a concentração ao maxima ocorre. Esta dissertação de mestrado introduz alguns conceitos basicos de bioequivalênncia para, logo em seguida, apresentar analises Bayesianas para medidas de bioequivalência tanto univariada como multivariada assumindo a distribuição ao normal multivariada para os dados e também a distribuição de Student multivariada. Uma aplicação a de exemplicar o que foi introduzido e apresentada e, para o conjunto de dados em estudo têm, por meio de criterios de seleção ao de modelos, evidências favoraveis a escolha dos modelos multivariados para a condução deste estudo de bioequivalência media. / SOUZA, R. M. \\Statistics on Bioequivalence: Guarantee in quality of generic drug\". 2008. 42 s Dissertation (Master Degree) Faculdade de Medicina de Ribeir~ao Preto - USP As an alternative to medicines for human use of great movement in Brazil, the use of generic medicines were regulated, according to the law of the generic no 9787/99, which establish the studies of bioavailability and bioequivalence in Brazil in order to evaluate bioequivalence of generic formulations, considering as reference existing medicinal products, with proved ecacy. Two formulations of the same drug are considered bioequivalents if your bioavailability do not present evidence of signicant dierences according to clinically specied limits known as bioequivalence limits. Bioequivalence studies are carried out by the administration of two formulations (one is in test and the other one is the reference) in a pre-dened number of volunteers using an experimental plan that is often the crossover one. After the withdrawn of successive blood or urinary samples in predetermined intervals, some pharmacokinetic parameters were studied, such as area under concentration curve, maximum concentration of drug and time that the maximum concentration occurs. This dissertation introduces some basic concepts of bioequivalence and following that, it is presented Bayesian analysis for both as univariate and as multivariate bioequivalence measures assuming the multivariate normal distribution for the data and also the distribution of multivariate t student distribution. An application in order to illustrate what was introduced is presented in this work, and by using means of selection criteria of models, it was observed that for all data on study, there were evidences that lead to choose the multivariates models in order to conduct this study of average bioequivalence.

Prescription drugs play an increasingly significant role in the Canadian healthcare system. Drug spending accounts for a considerable share of total healthcare expenditure and continues to be one of the fastest growing expenditure components in Canada. But, drug manufacturers’ price setting behaviours are not well understood in the literature. I develop a framework of oligopoly theory with two-dimension product differentiation based on a synthesis of the literature on the institutional history and development of the Canadian pharmaceutical system. I find that: (1) The differentiation in perceived quality between brand-name and generic drugs can explain the generic competition paradox. The degree of the product differentiation can be pivotal in shaping the brand-name drug manufacturers’ price setting behaviours in response to the shift in patients’ preference and changes in government policies. (2) Copay and generic drug price-cap policies are commonly adopted by the Canadian public drug plans to contain drug reimbursement cost. Policy-makers should use caution when applying these policies in combination or separately in order to reach the intended outcomes. (3) The generic drug price-cap can elicit competition among brand-name drug manufacturers, but it may need coordinated regulations on patented drug prices. Without full coordination among major stakeholders and across jurisdictions, the benefits of lowered drug prices for some can become additional costs for others. I innovatively adopt the multilevel model to analyze the pharmaceutical market structure and evaluate the net effect of the generic competition paradox. The empirical research on the drug price dynamics is consistent with the predictions of the previously developed theory. I find that: (1) More generic substitutes in a drug molecule are associated with a net effect of increases in drug prices, after other contextual variables are properly controlled for. (2) More therapeutic substitutes do not have a net effect of lowering drug prices. (3) When a generic substitution policy is in place, the studied brand-name drugs maintain net price premiums over their generic substitutes. But, the net price premiums in the case when there is a generic substitution policy are lower than those where there is no such policy.

Purpose: To estimate the willingness and ability of private plans to manage costs during the generic drug procurement reform era that began in 2006 in Canada. Two cost management aspects were assessed; the prices paid for generic drugs and the extent to which private plans have enacted measures to increase generic substitution. Methods: IMS-Brogan Pharmastat data was used to estimate the price of commonly prescribed generic drugs and generic share of prescriptions, by plan type, province and quarter from 2003 to 2012. Results: Prices did not decline unless the provincial governments mandated the reductions. Savings from this mandate was approximately $264 million in Ontario. Rates of generic substitution were unaffected by the price reductions, possibly because the rates were high beforehand. Conclusion: Private plans did not independently obtain lower generic prices. Due to already high substitution rates, there may have been limited potential for additional savings from mandatory substitution controls.

Purpose: To estimate the willingness and ability of private plans to manage costs during the generic drug procurement reform era that began in 2006 in Canada. Two cost management aspects were assessed; the prices paid for generic drugs and the extent to which private plans have enacted measures to increase generic substitution. Methods: IMS-Brogan Pharmastat data was used to estimate the price of commonly prescribed generic drugs and generic share of prescriptions, by plan type, province and quarter from 2003 to 2012. Results: Prices did not decline unless the provincial governments mandated the reductions. Savings from this mandate was approximately $264 million in Ontario. Rates of generic substitution were unaffected by the price reductions, possibly because the rates were high beforehand. Conclusion: Private plans did not independently obtain lower generic prices. Due to already high substitution rates, there may have been limited potential for additional savings from mandatory substitution controls.

Background: To reduce the increasing cost for pharmaceuticals on prescription in Sweden, the generic drug exchange was introduced in 2002. According to the law (2002:160) of drug benefits all pharmacies are forced to exchange the brand-name product/original for a generic drug, i.e. a drug that is covered by the Swedish drug benefit system and in addition has been found by The Swedish Medical Products Agency (MPA) to be equivalent to the brand-name product/original in question. The Dental and Pharmaceutical Benefits Agency, TLV, determines which available drug is the lowest price, "the product of the period". The reform has led to major economic savings for both the individual and the society. For some patients the generic drug exchange has resulted in increased safety problems in the form of medication errors, lack of drug effects, and new unwanted side effects. Insufficient information from prescribers and pharmacists and different names of drugs has led to confusion among patients. Purpose: The purpose of the study was to investigate the customers' experience of the generic drug exchange at pharmacies, the potential problems of generic exchange, and whether any differences in how the generic drug exchange is experienced can be explained by the customer's level of education. Method: The investigation was conducted as a survey, which consisted of 10 different multiple choice questions where the respondent was able to choose the answer best in line with their perception. Results and discussion: The majority (87%) of the participants stated that they had accepted the generic exchange. In general, there was no apparent difference in regards to the different levels of education. Nevertheless, among those with university/college as the highest level of education, there was a greater proportion of women (45%) than men (29%). A small percentage (22%) of the participants had experienced problems in connection with or after the exchange. Among the problems mentioned were, among other things, unknown name, tablet, or packaging; and new side effects. 42% of the participants had received information about the generic drug exchange from the medical doctors while 90% of the participants had received information at the pharmacy. No difference between different groups could be detected. The overall experience with the generic exchange showed that 81% of participants were satisfied with the exchange. No difference between different groups could be detected. Conclusion: The study showed that the main part of the (survey) participants has a positive attitude towards generic exchange. The majority of the participants felt that they had gotten adequate information regarding the exchange at the pharmacy (from the pharmacist), whilst the survey revealed that the medical doctors was insufficient in informing their patients about the possibility of generic exchange. There was no apparent difference amongst different groups when it comes to acceptance and general perception of the generic drug exchange.

No description available.

A implementação de medicamentos genéricos no Brasil e de programas e políticas para garantir o acesso da população a medicamentos com qualidade, segurança e eficácia resultaram em mais de 3.800 medicamentos genéricos de 445 fármacos registrados na Agência Nacional de Vigilância Sanitária (ANVISA) desde 1999. Os medicamentos genéricos comprovaram a sua equivalência terapêutica e, portanto, intercambialidade com seus respectivos medicamentos de referência por meio de estudos de bioequivalência. Em 2014, a ANVISA estendeu a intercambialidade aos medicamentos similares, aumentando o número de medicamentos intercambiáveis para cada medicamento de referência. As normas para prescrição e dispensação permitem apenas a substituição de medicamento de referência por seu medicamento genérico ou similar intercambiável e vice-versa. Entretanto, o que se observa na prática é a substituição entre medicamentos genéricos e similares de um mesmo fármaco, tanto na rede privada onde os descontos chegam até 90% do preço estabelecido para a venda, como na rede pública, em função da disponibilidade dos medicamentos, visto que as compras públicas se baseiam no menor preço ofertado pelos fabricantes. Entretanto, a bioequivalência e a intercambialidade entre os medicamentos genéricos ou similares de um mesmo referência não pode ser garantida pois os mesmos não foram testados entre si. A ausência de bioequivalência entre medicamentos substituídos pode provocar ineficácia terapêutica ou aparecimento de eventos adversos ou até mesmo intoxicação em pacientes. Consequentemente, podem ocorrer desperdício, gastos com tratamento de eventos adversos, abandono do tratamento e adoção de segunda linha de tratamentos. Este trabalho avaliou a bioequivalência entre os medicamentos genéricos e similares de um mesmo medicamento de referência por meio do método de metanálise, empregando dados de estudos de bioequivalência realizados para o registro de medicamentos genéricos e similares na ANVISA. Foram incluídos na análise estudos de aciclovir, amoxicilina, cefalexina, doxazosina, fenitoína, fluoxetina, levofloxacino e quetiapina. Os resultados demonstraram a ausência de bioequivalência entre a maioria dos medicamentos genéricos e similares contendo o mesmo fármaco. os resultados comprovam que medicamentos genéricos e similares de mesmo fármaco não são obrigatoriamente intercambiáveis e a substituição, principalmente para aqueles usados no tratamento de doenças crônicas, podem trazer graves consequências clínicas. Esta preocupação é aumentada para os fármacos com estreita faixa terapêutica e aqueles com alta variabilidade no processo de absorção. A adoção de uma lista de medicamentos não substituíveis, a exemplo de outros países, e o investimento na divulgação de informações sobre intercambialidade de medicamentos, tanto para profissionais de saúde como para a população, podem contribuir para a redução da substituição entre medicamentos não intercambiáveis, a promoção do uso racional dos medicamentos, a redução de gastos com medicamentos e tratamento de eventos adversos e o aumento da adesão do paciente ao tratamento. / The implementation of generic drugs in Brazil, as well as programs and policies to ensure access to medicines with quality, safety and efficacy to the overall population, resulted in more than 3,800 generic drug products of 445 drugs registered in the National Health Surveillance Agency (ANVISA) since 1999. Generic drug products proved their therapeutic equivalence in bioequivalence studies and, therefore, the interchangeability with their respective reference drug product. In 2014, ANVISA expanded the interchangeability to similar drug products, increasing the number of interchangeable drug products for each reference drug product. Regulations for the prescription and dispensation of medicine only allow the substitution of a reference drug product for a generic or an interchangeable similar drug product or vice versa. However, in practice, it appears that there is a substitution between generic and similar drug products of a same reference drug product in private pharmacy chains - where discounts reach up to 90% of the selling price - as well as in public pharmacy, depending on the medicine availability, because public purchases are based on the lower price offered by the manufacturers. Nevertheless, the bioequivalence and interchangeability between generic and similar drug products of the same reference drug product cannot be guaranteed because they haven\'t been evaluated. Lack of bioequivalence between substituted drug products may result in therapeutic ineffectiveness or the occurrence of adverse events and even to patient intoxication. As a consequence, there might be waste, expenses due to adverse events treatment, no adherence to the treatment or the adoption of second-line treatment. This study evaluated the bioequivalence between generic and similar drugs of the same reference drug product through a meta-analysis, using data from bioequivalence studies carried out for the registration of generic and similar drug products at ANVISA. The drugs included in the study were acyclovir, amoxicillin, cephalexin, doxazosin, phenytoin, fluoxetine, levofloxacin and quetiapine. Results showed lack of bioequivalence between most of the generic and similar drugs containing the same drug and prove that generic and similar drug products of the reference drug product are not necessarily interchangeable. Moreover, the substitution of drugs used for chronic illnesses could lead to serious clinical consequences. This concern increases for drugs with narrow therapeutic index and those with high variable absorption process. The adoption of a list of non-interchangeable medicines - like in other countries - and investment in the dissemination of information about interchangeability between drug products to health professionals and to the population may contribute to reduce the substitution of drugs which are not interchangeable, promote a rational use of medicines, the reduction of expenses with drugs and adverse effects treatment and to improve treatment adherence.

A implementação de medicamentos genéricos no Brasil e de programas e políticas para garantir o acesso da população a medicamentos com qualidade, segurança e eficácia resultaram em mais de 3.800 medicamentos genéricos de 445 fármacos registrados na Agência Nacional de Vigilância Sanitária (ANVISA) desde 1999. Os medicamentos genéricos comprovaram a sua equivalência terapêutica e, portanto, intercambialidade com seus respectivos medicamentos de referência por meio de estudos de bioequivalência. Em 2014, a ANVISA estendeu a intercambialidade aos medicamentos similares, aumentando o número de medicamentos intercambiáveis para cada medicamento de referência. As normas para prescrição e dispensação permitem apenas a substituição de medicamento de referência por seu medicamento genérico ou similar intercambiável e vice-versa. Entretanto, o que se observa na prática é a substituição entre medicamentos genéricos e similares de um mesmo fármaco, tanto na rede privada onde os descontos chegam até 90% do preço estabelecido para a venda, como na rede pública, em função da disponibilidade dos medicamentos, visto que as compras públicas se baseiam no menor preço ofertado pelos fabricantes. Entretanto, a bioequivalência e a intercambialidade entre os medicamentos genéricos ou similares de um mesmo referência não pode ser garantida pois os mesmos não foram testados entre si. A ausência de bioequivalência entre medicamentos substituídos pode provocar ineficácia terapêutica ou aparecimento de eventos adversos ou até mesmo intoxicação em pacientes. Consequentemente, podem ocorrer desperdício, gastos com tratamento de eventos adversos, abandono do tratamento e adoção de segunda linha de tratamentos. Este trabalho avaliou a bioequivalência entre os medicamentos genéricos e similares de um mesmo medicamento de referência por meio do método de metanálise, empregando dados de estudos de bioequivalência realizados para o registro de medicamentos genéricos e similares na ANVISA. Foram incluídos na análise estudos de aciclovir, amoxicilina, cefalexina, doxazosina, fenitoína, fluoxetina, levofloxacino e quetiapina. Os resultados demonstraram a ausência de bioequivalência entre a maioria dos medicamentos genéricos e similares contendo o mesmo fármaco. os resultados comprovam que medicamentos genéricos e similares de mesmo fármaco não são obrigatoriamente intercambiáveis e a substituição, principalmente para aqueles usados no tratamento de doenças crônicas, podem trazer graves consequências clínicas. Esta preocupação é aumentada para os fármacos com estreita faixa terapêutica e aqueles com alta variabilidade no processo de absorção. A adoção de uma lista de medicamentos não substituíveis, a exemplo de outros países, e o investimento na divulgação de informações sobre intercambialidade de medicamentos, tanto para profissionais de saúde como para a população, podem contribuir para a redução da substituição entre medicamentos não intercambiáveis, a promoção do uso racional dos medicamentos, a redução de gastos com medicamentos e tratamento de eventos adversos e o aumento da adesão do paciente ao tratamento. / The implementation of generic drugs in Brazil, as well as programs and policies to ensure access to medicines with quality, safety and efficacy to the overall population, resulted in more than 3,800 generic drug products of 445 drugs registered in the National Health Surveillance Agency (ANVISA) since 1999. Generic drug products proved their therapeutic equivalence in bioequivalence studies and, therefore, the interchangeability with their respective reference drug product. In 2014, ANVISA expanded the interchangeability to similar drug products, increasing the number of interchangeable drug products for each reference drug product. Regulations for the prescription and dispensation of medicine only allow the substitution of a reference drug product for a generic or an interchangeable similar drug product or vice versa. However, in practice, it appears that there is a substitution between generic and similar drug products of a same reference drug product in private pharmacy chains - where discounts reach up to 90% of the selling price - as well as in public pharmacy, depending on the medicine availability, because public purchases are based on the lower price offered by the manufacturers. Nevertheless, the bioequivalence and interchangeability between generic and similar drug products of the same reference drug product cannot be guaranteed because they haven\'t been evaluated. Lack of bioequivalence between substituted drug products may result in therapeutic ineffectiveness or the occurrence of adverse events and even to patient intoxication. As a consequence, there might be waste, expenses due to adverse events treatment, no adherence to the treatment or the adoption of second-line treatment. This study evaluated the bioequivalence between generic and similar drugs of the same reference drug product through a meta-analysis, using data from bioequivalence studies carried out for the registration of generic and similar drug products at ANVISA. The drugs included in the study were acyclovir, amoxicillin, cephalexin, doxazosin, phenytoin, fluoxetine, levofloxacin and quetiapine. Results showed lack of bioequivalence between most of the generic and similar drugs containing the same drug and prove that generic and similar drug products of the reference drug product are not necessarily interchangeable. Moreover, the substitution of drugs used for chronic illnesses could lead to serious clinical consequences. This concern increases for drugs with narrow therapeutic index and those with high variable absorption process. The adoption of a list of non-interchangeable medicines - like in other countries - and investment in the dissemination of information about interchangeability between drug products to health professionals and to the population may contribute to reduce the substitution of drugs which are not interchangeable, promote a rational use of medicines, the reduction of expenses with drugs and adverse effects treatment and to improve treatment adherence.

The privileges arising from patent protection on pharmaceutical products often prevent the full realization of the right to health, especially in developing countries with scarce resources. This thesis first identifies the international agreements that have established the right to health in international law, obligations and violations associated with it, the problems encountered in the implementation of human rights on the field, compared with the implementation and sanctions associated with economic rights from the World Trade Organization regulatory framework. A comparative study of the legislative frameworks of both developed and developing countries will reveal to what extent Canada, the United States, the European Union, Brazil, India, and South Africa conformed with patent protection exceptions arising from international patent law to protect public health. Finally, the author identifies the crucial indicators that need to be considered in order to assess the conformity of a given approach with the right to health, before he underscores the temporary character of the relevant WTO measures, and the future stakes concerning an increased access to essential medicines. / Les droits issus des brevets d'invention sur les produits pharmaceutiques empêchent souvent la réalisation pleine et entière du droit à la santé, plus spécialement dans les pays en voie de développement ayant des ressources plus limitées. Ce mémoire de recherche retrace d'abord les accords internationaux ayant établi le droit à la santé en droit international, les obligations et les violations qui en découlent, la problématique quant à la mise en oeuvre des droits de l'homme sur le terrain, en comparaison avec la mise en oeuvre et les sanctions pour le non-respect de droits économiques dans le cadre réglementaire de l'Organisation Mondiale du Commerce (OMC). Ensuite, une étude comparative des cadres législatifs de pays développés et de pays en développement révèlera dans quelle mesure le Canada, les États-Unis, l'Union Européenne, le Brésil, l'Inde, et l'Afrique du Sud se sont conformés aux exceptions aux règles de protection issues du droit international des brevets pour cause de santé publique. L'auteur identifie finalement les points de première importance qu'il considère primordial de considérer afin d'évaluer si une approche conforme au droit à la santé a été respectée dans le commerce de médicaments essentiels, avant de souligner l'aspect temporaire des mesures courantes prévues dans l'OMC et des futurs enjeux quant à l'accroissement de l'accès aux médicaments essentiels.