No description available.

Thesis (M.S.)--University of Wisconsin -- La Crosse, 1983. / Includes bibliographical references (leaves 47-51).

De 1396 à 1512, Gênes, incapable de se gouverner seule, se donne trois fois à la France, permettant la rencontre entre deux modèles politiques, sociaux et culturels opposés. L’évolution de leurs relations, forcément conflictuelles, dessine au cours du XV° siècle le triomphe de la Monarchie sur la Commune : dans le domaine diplomatique, où Gênes devient progressivement la porte d’Italie des Français, fournissant capitaux et navires à chaque expédition ; au sein du gouvernement de la cité, où les gouverneurs multiplient les pratiques arbitraires inspirées des principes monarchiques. Victoire temporaire cependant, qui masque la résurgence d’un idéal civique dans la cité. Développé tout au long du siècle sous l’influence des dominations françaises et porté par un groupe citadin réuni autour des valeurs de Liberté et d’Union, il sera le socle de la réforme de 1528 et permettra aux Génois, en se débarrassant de la tutelle royale, de renouer avec la stabilité et la prospérité. / From 1396 to 1512, Genoa, incapable of ruling itself, gives itself over to France three times, thus enabling the encounter of two opposit political, social and cultural models. The evolution of their relationship, obviously conflictual, outlines throughout the fifteenth century the triumph of the Monarchy over the Commune. On the diplomatical level first, where Genoa becomes progressively the French gateway to Italy, providing funds and ships to each expedition. Then amoung the Citys' government, where the governors implement increasingly arbitrary practices inspired by monarchy principles. But a victory in appearance only, masking the resurgence of a civic ideal in the city. An ideal that will flourish all along the century under foreign influence, supported by a group of city dwellers united around the values of Liberty, Union and Stability. And an ideal that will end up being the basis of the 1528, enabling the Genovese to enter their « golden century ».

本論文では、19世紀終わりのトンマーゾ・アルベルト・ディ・サヴォイア＝ジェノヴァ王子(イタリア王国の王族、第2代ジェノヴァ公)の二度の来日を中心に、詳細に幕末と明治時代における日伊間の最初の外交貿易関係の状況を分析する。本論文の目的は、トンマーゾ・ディ・サヴォイア王子の来日とその頃の駐日イタリア公使たちの活動および姿勢を考慮にいれ、イタリア王国に対する明治政府の考えと外交政策を検討することである。 / In this thesis, I analyze in detail the situation of the early diplomatic and trade relations between Japan and the Kingdom of Italy at the end of the Edo Period and at the Meiji Period, focusing on two visits to Japan by Prince Thomas of Savoy, 2nd Duke of Genoa at the end of the 19th century. The aim of this thesis is to consider the thought and the foreign policy of the Meiji Government toward Italy, taking into account the activities and the attitudes of the Italian diplomats in Japan during the two visits by the Duke of Genoa. / 博士(文化史学) / Doctor of Philosophy in History / 同志社大学 / Doshisha University

La littérature française des voyages présente un univers complexe, bien souvent ancré à l'identité culturelle du pays. Cependant la clôture de ce système littéraire n'interdit pas la présence d'une large intertextualité et la possibilité de comparaisons avec l'histoire de l'art et la production artistique italienne analysée par les auteurs. À l'intérieur du voyage français en Italie, Gênes reste une étape encore inconnue dont l'approche des auteurs envers son patrimoine artistique n'a jamais était suffisamment étudiée. La présente thèse de doctorat a donc pour objet celui de comprendre la perception du patrimoine artistique génois dans les journaux français de voyage entre le XVIIe et le XVIIIe siècle. La recherche, à travers une étude critique et détaillée, a donc comme but non seulement celui de déterminer les divers processus culturels qui ont contaminé le goût et les préférences artistiques des voyageurs durant leur permanence à Gênes, mais aussi celui de comprendre l'approche de ces derniers à l'égard de la production artistique locale. / This project aims to be a critical study on how the artistic heritage of the city of Genoa is perceived in French travel literature from the 17th and 18th centuries.To this date no study has examined in depth what was the French travelers view on the artistic work they encountered and how their view and taste was heavily influenced by the art literature conventions of the Royal Academy of Paris.This research is a comparison study between travel literature, art literature and local guides of the of the time. The purpose of the work is therefore to determine which were the wider cultural processes that influenced the taste and preferences of the travelers and, more specifically, to understand what was their view on the Genoese artistic production.

Made available in DSpace on 2016-04-25T20:20:13Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 Clarissa Maria Rosa Gagliardi.pdf: 5829483 bytes, checksum: 74eb3bc151669d792fba7e5cd2564122 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2011-05-20 / The redesign policies of urban spaces have been seen as instruments to suit cities to the demands of capital for new spaces of reproduction and often such transformations overlap the aspirations of the place itself. The historical centers, favorable zones for such policies for their cultural potential to generate new economical opportunities, end up being a point of convergence between dimensions of local life and distant interests. But on account of the peculiarity how each experience is built, according to the different levels of participation of the social groups involved, the historical inheritance of each town, the political usages proper to each administration, in sum, having the local culture as mediator, it is possible to notice that urban redesign plans may not respond exclusively to market interests, but they can also attend society local necessities, gathering distant and proximate orders. Therefore, it is assumed that there are no predefined models of urban redesign plans, unless as the result of social activity at a certain time and in a certain space, which makes important to know each of the cases in which this kind of policy is introduced. Here the analysis is centered on two recent redesign programs of the historical center of the Italian city of Genoa, the Program URBAN II, an initiative of the European Community, and the Contratto di Quartiere del Ghetto, promoted by the Italian Ministry for Infrastructure and by the Region of Liguria. Based on an approach of qualitative countenance and driving attention to the local context and to the typology of the interventions that distinguish the programs, this thesis tries to identify the relevance of social activity of the various participants on the process and of local inheritance, reflecting upon the implication that this kind of policy has on the city, its impact on urban space and the new uses it induces in the areas where it occurs / As políticas de requalificação dos espaços urbanos têm sido vistas como instrumentos de adequação das cidades às demandas do capital por novos espaços para sua reprodução e, muitas vezes, tais transformações se sobrepõem às aspirações do próprio lugar. Os centros históricos, zonas privilegiadas para tais políticas por seu potencial cultural para a geração de novas oportunidades econômicas, acabam por ser um ponto de encontro entre dimensões da vida local e interesses de origem distante. Mas, em função da peculiaridade com que cada experiência é construída, de acordo com os diferentes níveis de participação dos grupos sociais envolvidos, das heranças históricas de cada cidade, das práticas políticas próprias de cada administração, enfim, tendo a cultura local como mediadora, observa-se que os projetos de requalificação urbana podem não responder unicamente aos interesses do mercado, mas também atender a necessidades sociais locais, agrupando ordens distantes e ordens próximas. Parte-se, assim, do princípio de que não há um modelo pré-definido de requalificação urbana, senão como produto da ação social em um determinado tempo e em um determinado espaço, tornando-se importante conhecer cada um dos casos em que se implementa este tipo de política. Aqui, a análise centra-se em dois programas recentes de requalificação do centro histórico da cidade italiana de Gênova, o Programa URBAN II, uma iniciativa da Comunidade Europeia, e o Contratto di Quartiere del Ghetto, promovido pelo Ministério Italiano da Infra-Estrutura e pela Região Ligúria. Com base em uma abordagem de caráter qualitativo, voltando a atenção para o contexto local e para a tipologia das intervenções que caracterizam os programas, tenta-se identificar a relevância das heranças locais e da ação social dos diversos sujeitos envolvidos no processo, refletindo sobre as implicações que este tipo de política tem na cidade, suas repercussões urbano-espaciais e os novos usos que induz nas áreas onde incide

Made available in DSpace on 2016-04-26T14:53:02Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 Clarissa Maria Rosa Gagliardi.pdf: 5829483 bytes, checksum: 74eb3bc151669d792fba7e5cd2564122 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2011-05-20 / The redesign policies of urban spaces have been seen as instruments to suit cities to the demands of capital for new spaces of reproduction and often such transformations overlap the aspirations of the place itself. The historical centers, favorable zones for such policies for their cultural potential to generate new economical opportunities, end up being a point of convergence between dimensions of local life and distant interests. But on account of the peculiarity how each experience is built, according to the different levels of participation of the social groups involved, the historical inheritance of each town, the political usages proper to each administration, in sum, having the local culture as mediator, it is possible to notice that urban redesign plans may not respond exclusively to market interests, but they can also attend society local necessities, gathering distant and proximate orders. Therefore, it is assumed that there are no predefined models of urban redesign plans, unless as the result of social activity at a certain time and in a certain space, which makes important to know each of the cases in which this kind of policy is introduced. Here the analysis is centered on two recent redesign programs of the historical center of the Italian city of Genoa, the Program URBAN II, an initiative of the European Community, and the Contratto di Quartiere del Ghetto, promoted by the Italian Ministry for Infrastructure and by the Region of Liguria. Based on an approach of qualitative countenance and driving attention to the local context and to the typology of the interventions that distinguish the programs, this thesis tries to identify the relevance of social activity of the various participants on the process and of local inheritance, reflecting upon the implication that this kind of policy has on the city, its impact on urban space and the new uses it induces in the areas where it occurs / As políticas de requalificação dos espaços urbanos têm sido vistas como instrumentos de adequação das cidades às demandas do capital por novos espaços para sua reprodução e, muitas vezes, tais transformações se sobrepõem às aspirações do próprio lugar. Os centros históricos, zonas privilegiadas para tais políticas por seu potencial cultural para a geração de novas oportunidades econômicas, acabam por ser um ponto de encontro entre dimensões da vida local e interesses de origem distante. Mas, em função da peculiaridade com que cada experiência é construída, de acordo com os diferentes níveis de participação dos grupos sociais envolvidos, das heranças históricas de cada cidade, das práticas políticas próprias de cada administração, enfim, tendo a cultura local como mediadora, observa-se que os projetos de requalificação urbana podem não responder unicamente aos interesses do mercado, mas também atender a necessidades sociais locais, agrupando ordens distantes e ordens próximas. Parte-se, assim, do princípio de que não há um modelo pré-definido de requalificação urbana, senão como produto da ação social em um determinado tempo e em um determinado espaço, tornando-se importante conhecer cada um dos casos em que se implementa este tipo de política. Aqui, a análise centra-se em dois programas recentes de requalificação do centro histórico da cidade italiana de Gênova, o Programa URBAN II, uma iniciativa da Comunidade Europeia, e o Contratto di Quartiere del Ghetto, promovido pelo Ministério Italiano da Infra-Estrutura e pela Região Ligúria. Com base em uma abordagem de caráter qualitativo, voltando a atenção para o contexto local e para a tipologia das intervenções que caracterizam os programas, tenta-se identificar a relevância das heranças locais e da ação social dos diversos sujeitos envolvidos no processo, refletindo sobre as implicações que este tipo de política tem na cidade, suas repercussões urbano-espaciais e os novos usos que induz nas áreas onde incide

Dans les années centrales du XVe siècle, un notaire corse du nom de Giovanni della Grossa écrit le tout premier récit historique de l’île dans un contexte géopolitique particulier où s’affrontent les partisans seigneuriaux de la Corse aragonaise et ceux de la Commune de Gênes. À la fois témoin et acteur des événements qui déchirent la Corse du Quattrocento, Giovanni della Grossa participe à la guerre géno-aragonaise en livrant sa vision du conflit : une Corse chaotique. À travers son récit, il entend réordonner sur le plan idéologique les partis politiques insulaires, à savoir communal et seigneurial. Pour ce faire, il invente des origines politiques à la Corse qu’il transforme en modèle. Ce modèle est celui d’une monarchie comtale régie par un comte de Corse dont sont issus les ennemis de la Commune de Gênes : les Cinarchesi. Cette légende politique, de surcroît sans fondements historiques, motive plusieurs réécritures de l’œuvre du notaire au cours du Cinquecento. Deux versions nous sont alors parvenues : la « version courte », éditée en 1594 sous le titre d’Historia di Corsica, et la « version longue », imprimée pour la première fois en 1910. Les Histoires de Corse désignent ainsi ce corpus historiographique complexe qui comprend deux compilations historiques de plusieurs écrivains des XVe et XVIe siècles que les copistes, les compilateurs et les éditeurs scientifiques ont confondus. Cette thèse vise alors à retrouver, parmi les versions manuscrites et leur paratexte, le récit historique médiéval corse, plus précisément son discours politique qui s’est égaré entre la France, l’Italie et l’Espagne au cours des guerres des XVe et XVIe siècles. / In the middle of the Fifteenth century, a Corsican notary named Giovanni della Grossa wrote the earliest historical account of the island of Corsica, in the particular geopolitical context of the struggles between the feudal partisans of Aragonese Corsica and of the Commune of Genoa. At the same time witness and actor of the events that divide Corsica during the Quattrocento, Giovanni della Grossa participates in the Geno-Aragonese War and delivers his account of the conflict, describing a chaotic Corsica. Through his History, he intends to ideologically “reorder” the island’s political parties, distinguishing the communal party on one hand, and the seigneurial one on the other. In order to do this, he invents the political origins of Corsica and turns his invention into a model. This model consists in a monarchical county, under the rule of a count of Corsica chosen within the ranks of the Cinarchesi, enemies of the Commune of Genoa. This political legend, which is not founded on any historical basis, generates several rewritings of the work of the notary during the Cinquecento. Two versions survived: the “short version”, published in 1594 under the title of Historia di Corsica, and the “long version”, published for the first time in 1910. The Histories of Corsica thus designates this complex historiographical corpus, which includes two historical compilations of several writers of the Fifteenth and Sixteenth centuries that copyists, compilers and scientific publishers have often mixed up. This thesis aims to find, among the manuscript versions and their paratext, the medieval Corsican historical narrative, and thus tries to precisely seize a political discourse that was lost between France, Italy and Spain during the wars of the Fifteenth and Sixteenth centuries.

Thesis (Ph. D.)--Bryn Mawr College, 1999. / eContent provider-neutral record in process. Description based on print version record. Includes bibliographical references (leaves 353-379).

Dans cette thèse, il s'agit d'observer les logiques de fonctionnement de la monarchie polycentrique des Habsbourg à travers l'exposition d'une étude de cas centrée sur Gênes. En 1528, emportée dans le giron du condotierri génois Andrea Doria, la seigneurerie de Gênes s'était affranchie de la domination du roi de France et avait intégré le système impérial des Habsbourg en tant que république indépendante et alliée. L'entretien du système politique, militaire et financier hispano-génois dut beaucoup aux liens entre les maisons Habsbourg et Doria. Si la figure d'Andrea Doria a été mise en valeur par une importante production historiographique, son petit neveu Giovanni Andre - qui fut pourtant capitaine général de la mer entre 1584 et 1602 - n'a pas encore été l'objet d'études abouties. Par l'observation de sa trajectoire individuelle, l'objectif est de créer un outil permettant de questionner le rôle et la figure de l'entrepreneur de la guerre dans la politique impérialiste des Habsbourg. En croisant les perspectives empiriques et micro-analytiques et en redimensionnant les échelles analytiques, l'enjeu est de comprendre la stratégie du roi qui consistait à confier des parcelles de pouvoir politique à des particuliers et d'observer comment certains génois en tiraient profit. Enfin, il s'agit de mesurer les conséquences que ce modus operandi eut sur la politique guerrière des Habsbourg en Méditerranée. Par ces questionnements, c'est l'incidence de l'intérêt privé dans la construction de la monarchie polycentrique qui est soulevé. / In this thesis, we study the articulation of the polycentric monarchy of the Habsburgs through the exposure of a case study centered on Genoa. In 1528, trained in the lap of the genoese condotierri Andrea Doria, Genoa was freed from the domination on the king of France and had integrated the Habsburg imperial system, as an independent and allied republic. The Hispano-Genoese political military and financial system owed much to the links between the Habsburg and Doria houses. If Andrea Doria was highlighted by an important historiographical production, his little nephew Giovanni Andrea, - who was admiral for the Spanish between 1584 and 1602 - has not yet been the object of completed studies. By observing his individual trajectory, the objective is to create a tool to question the role of the figure of the war contractor in the Habsburg imperialist policy. By crossing the empirical and micro-analytical perspectives, and resizing the analytical scales, the challenge is to understand the king's strategy of entrusting parcels of political power to individuals and to observe how Genoese took advantage of it. Finally, it is a question of measuring the consequences that this modus operandi had on the Habsburg war policy in the Mediterranean area. Through these questions it is the impact of the private interest in the construction of the polycentric monarchy that is raised.