O principal objetivo deste trabalho é demonstrar que no romance Os cus de Judas, de Antonio Lobo Antunes, o momento histórico que corresponde à guerra colonial na África no começo dos anos 70, é questionado por meio da ficção, com a finalidade de esclarecer que não existe uma única verdade a respeito do passado, revisitado neste romance para que possa, finalmente, ser compreendido sob uma nova perspectiva, o que sugere que as verdades são muitas e o registro histórico documentado constitui apenas mais uma delas. O trabalho será realizado na seguinte ordem: primeiro apresentaremos e discutiremos a teoria a respeito do discurso da História e da Ficção. Depois disso, faremos uma análise comparando os cronotopos discutidos por Bakhtin e os encontrados no romance de Lobo Antunes, para finalmente verificarmos como os cronotopos são atualizados em Os cus de Judas e de que forma eles contribuem para que possamos explicar a relação entre ficção e história e também para discutirmos aquilo que Linda Hutcheon denomina metaficção historiográfica. / The main objective of this assignment is to show that in the novel Os cus de Judas by Antonio Lobo Antunes , the historical moment, which is related to the colony war in Africa in the beginning of the 1970, is coming back through the fiction, in order to make clear that there isn\'t only one true about the past, seen again in this novel to make possible for us to understand it in a new point of view, and it suggest that there is a lot of true possibilities and the historical documents are only one of them. This assignment is going to be doing in this order: in the first time, we are going to show and discuss the theory about the speech that differ History and Literature. Secondly we are going to analyze and compare the chronotopes from Bakhtin with the ones finding in Lobo Antunes\'s novel and finally we are going to verify that the chronotopes are actualized in the Cus de Judas and that they are important for us to explain the relationship between History and Literature and to discuss what Linda Hutcheon call historiografic-metafiction.

O principal objetivo deste trabalho é demonstrar que no romance Os cus de Judas, de Antonio Lobo Antunes, o momento histórico que corresponde à guerra colonial na África no começo dos anos 70, é questionado por meio da ficção, com a finalidade de esclarecer que não existe uma única verdade a respeito do passado, revisitado neste romance para que possa, finalmente, ser compreendido sob uma nova perspectiva, o que sugere que as verdades são muitas e o registro histórico documentado constitui apenas mais uma delas. O trabalho será realizado na seguinte ordem: primeiro apresentaremos e discutiremos a teoria a respeito do discurso da História e da Ficção. Depois disso, faremos uma análise comparando os cronotopos discutidos por Bakhtin e os encontrados no romance de Lobo Antunes, para finalmente verificarmos como os cronotopos são atualizados em Os cus de Judas e de que forma eles contribuem para que possamos explicar a relação entre ficção e história e também para discutirmos aquilo que Linda Hutcheon denomina metaficção historiográfica. / The main objective of this assignment is to show that in the novel Os cus de Judas by Antonio Lobo Antunes , the historical moment, which is related to the colony war in Africa in the beginning of the 1970, is coming back through the fiction, in order to make clear that there isn\'t only one true about the past, seen again in this novel to make possible for us to understand it in a new point of view, and it suggest that there is a lot of true possibilities and the historical documents are only one of them. This assignment is going to be doing in this order: in the first time, we are going to show and discuss the theory about the speech that differ History and Literature. Secondly we are going to analyze and compare the chronotopes from Bakhtin with the ones finding in Lobo Antunes\'s novel and finally we are going to verify that the chronotopes are actualized in the Cus de Judas and that they are important for us to explain the relationship between History and Literature and to discuss what Linda Hutcheon call historiografic-metafiction.

Die Dissertation vergleicht die Konzeptkunst in New York und den Moskauer Konzeptualismus am Beispiel zwei ihrer zentralen Vertreter: Joseph Kosuth und Ilya Kabakov. Beide haben unter dem Titel "The Corridor of Two Banalities" 1994 gemeinsam eine Installation realisiert. In Kosuth und Kabakov fanden die Zeitgenossen und Nachfolger sowohl ihr Vorbild als auch Gegenbild. In komparatistischer Perspektive werden Probleme diskutiert (z. B. das der (Selbst-)Referentialität), die die Diskussion über konzeptuelle Kunst begleiten, und konzeptuelle Kunst als Scharnier zwischen Moderne und Postmoderne erscheinen lassen. Konzeptkünstler betrachten kunsttheoretische und -historische Überlegungen in demselben Maße als selbstverständlichen Teil ihrer künstlerischen Arbeit, wie Kunst als universelle Kategorie für sie ihre Selbstverständlichkeit verloren hat. Sie setzen sich mit deren Rahmenbedingungen auseinander, die diktieren, was zu einer bestimmten Zeit und an einem bestimmten Ort als Kunst wahrgenommen wird. Die Dissertation konzentriert sich daher auf die Frage, wie Kosuth und Kabakov die (Konzept-)Kunst diesseits und jenseits des Eisernen Vorhangs selbst konzeptualisieren. Unter Einbeziehung der Rezeptionsgeschichte wird untersucht, welche Vorstellung von Autor- und Leserschaft Kosuth und Kabakov entwerfen, vom welchem Werkbegriff sie ausgehen und auf welche sprachphilosophischen Modelle sie sich dabei beziehen. / The thesis compares the Conceptual Art in New York with the Moscow Conceptualism while using the example of two of their greatest representatives: Joseph Kosuth and Ilya Kabakov. Together, they have created an installation entitled "The Corridor of Two Banalities" (1994). For their contemporaries and successors, Kosuth and Kabakov served as models or just the opposite. In a comparatistical perspective the thesis discusses problems (e.g. the (self-)referentiality) which go along with the debate about conceptual art and which let the conceptual art appear as a link between modernism and postmodernism. For conceptual artists, theoretical and historical considerations of art form an evident part of their artistic work to the same degree as art as a universal category has lost its self-evidence for them. They examine its frame conditions which dictate what is being considered as art at a specific time and in a specific place. Hence the thesis focusses on the question about the ways Kosuth and Kabakov conceptualise the (Conceptual) Art on both sides of the Iron Curtain. Taking into account the reception history it examines which concept of author- and readership Kosuth and Kabakov formulate, which definition of artwork they have assumed and which models of philosophy of language they refer to.