Este trabalho tem por objetivo fazer uma análise textual do Tractatus de Intellectibus de Pedro Abelardo, esmiuçando o estudo ali apresentado sobre a ordenação das afecções humanas. Destacamos no primeiro capítulo como Abelardo apresenta uma ambivalência das afecções sensitiva e imaginativa que resulta, simultaneamente, em uma impossibilidade de conhecer as coisas particulares e os conceitos universais, uma vez que cada sensação ou imaginação estará atrelada a um sentido particular. À essa \"confusão dos sentidos\" será oposta uma potência atentiva do intelecto, a qual permite tomar qualquer natureza ou propriedade e, aplicando-a às sensações ou imaginações, formar intelecções. Em seguida, focamos na ordenação interna do intelecto e na proposta de categorização das intelecções a partir de critérios discursivos. Nesta etapa, nosso principal objetivo é determinar a amplitude desta proposta, que apresenta um projeto de desreificação do intelecto - que não é fundado no conhecimento das coisas, mas na atenção da alma - e simultaneamente circunscreve o intelecto à sua origem nos sentidos. Para compreender essa operação interna do intelecto, Abelardo mobiliza conceitos oriundos da gramática e da lógica, como predicação e estado, e apresenta uma série de procedimentos mentais, como a ligação predicativa entre intelecções e a abstração, que permitem o intelecto extrapolar os limites impostos pela origem do conhecimento humano e formular para si conceitos, cuja validade e veracidade dependerão do desnudamento da atenção. / This work aims to make a textual analysis of Peter Abelards Tractatus de Intellectibus, by examining the study on the organization of human affections there presented. In the first chapter we emphasize how Abelard presents an ambivalence of sensitive and imaginative affections that results, simultaneously, in the impossibility of knowing particular things and universal concepts, considering that each sensation or imagination is associated with a particular sense. An attentive potency of the intellect will be opposed to this confusion of sensation, which allows it to take any nature or property and apply to sensations or imaginations and thereafter form intellections. We then focus on the internal organization of the intellect and in Abelards categorization of intellections with a discursive criteria. In this part, our first objective is to determine the range of Abelards proposal which presents a project of de-objectification of the intellect which is not founded in the knowledge of things, but in the souls attention and at the same time circumscribes the intellect to its origin in sensation. To understand this internal movement of the intellect, Abelard employs concepts from grammar and logic, such as the predicate and status, and presents a series of mental procedures, as the predicative connection between intellections and abstraction, which allows the intellect to extrapolate the limits imposed by the origin of human knowledge and formulate concepts to itself, whose validity and veracity will depend on the denudation of attention.

Este trabalho tem por objetivo fazer uma análise textual do Tractatus de Intellectibus de Pedro Abelardo, esmiuçando o estudo ali apresentado sobre a ordenação das afecções humanas. Destacamos no primeiro capítulo como Abelardo apresenta uma ambivalência das afecções sensitiva e imaginativa que resulta, simultaneamente, em uma impossibilidade de conhecer as coisas particulares e os conceitos universais, uma vez que cada sensação ou imaginação estará atrelada a um sentido particular. À essa \"confusão dos sentidos\" será oposta uma potência atentiva do intelecto, a qual permite tomar qualquer natureza ou propriedade e, aplicando-a às sensações ou imaginações, formar intelecções. Em seguida, focamos na ordenação interna do intelecto e na proposta de categorização das intelecções a partir de critérios discursivos. Nesta etapa, nosso principal objetivo é determinar a amplitude desta proposta, que apresenta um projeto de desreificação do intelecto - que não é fundado no conhecimento das coisas, mas na atenção da alma - e simultaneamente circunscreve o intelecto à sua origem nos sentidos. Para compreender essa operação interna do intelecto, Abelardo mobiliza conceitos oriundos da gramática e da lógica, como predicação e estado, e apresenta uma série de procedimentos mentais, como a ligação predicativa entre intelecções e a abstração, que permitem o intelecto extrapolar os limites impostos pela origem do conhecimento humano e formular para si conceitos, cuja validade e veracidade dependerão do desnudamento da atenção. / This work aims to make a textual analysis of Peter Abelards Tractatus de Intellectibus, by examining the study on the organization of human affections there presented. In the first chapter we emphasize how Abelard presents an ambivalence of sensitive and imaginative affections that results, simultaneously, in the impossibility of knowing particular things and universal concepts, considering that each sensation or imagination is associated with a particular sense. An attentive potency of the intellect will be opposed to this confusion of sensation, which allows it to take any nature or property and apply to sensations or imaginations and thereafter form intellections. We then focus on the internal organization of the intellect and in Abelards categorization of intellections with a discursive criteria. In this part, our first objective is to determine the range of Abelards proposal which presents a project of de-objectification of the intellect which is not founded in the knowledge of things, but in the souls attention and at the same time circumscribes the intellect to its origin in sensation. To understand this internal movement of the intellect, Abelard employs concepts from grammar and logic, such as the predicate and status, and presents a series of mental procedures, as the predicative connection between intellections and abstraction, which allows the intellect to extrapolate the limits imposed by the origin of human knowledge and formulate concepts to itself, whose validity and veracity will depend on the denudation of attention.

Ibn Rushd, mieux connu sous son nom latinisé, Averroès, incarne l’esprit de la pensée rationnelle en Islam médiéval comme contemporain. L’œuvre de celui qui a voulu éradiquer, il y a de cela plus de huit siècles, le dogmatisme et le fanatisme religieux en défendant plutôt un Islam éclairé, nécessitant, pour ce faire, d’accueillir à bras ouverts la pratique philosophique, n’a, en effet, aujourd’hui certainement pas perdu de son actualité. Le présent travail propose ainsi de s’intéresser à cette importante tentative de réformation religieuse encouragée par Averroès, en étudiant, dans le détail, l’articulation entre philosophie et religion qui caractérise surtout sa pensée politique. Averroès était un penseur musulman, ayant développé sa pensée dans un contexte politico-religieux bien précis, dont la première partie s’évertuera à établir les bases nécessaires permettant d’entreprendre notre recherche tout en reconnaissant son caractère moderne. La deuxième partie du travail consistera à exposer la manière dont Averroès fonde, en droit, l’obligation, en vertu de la Révélation, de la pratique philosophique, pour le musulman qui en est capable. La troisième et dernière partie présentera finalement les retombées pratiques de cette interdépendance entre religion et philosophie, précisément en ce qui a trait à l’établissement d’une Cité juste en Terre d’Islam. S’imposera alors de poser un regard critique sur la pensée d’Averroès duquel émergera plusieurs réflexions dont la pertinence aura su persister à travers les siècles. / Ibn Rushd, better known under his latinized name, Averroes, embodies the spirit of the rational thinking in medieval and contemporary Islam. Indeed, the work of him who wanted to eradicate, eight centuries ago, religious dogmatism and fanatism by defending an enlightened Islam, requiring, in doing so, to welcome philosophical practice with open arms, certainly did not lost its relevance. The present work thus proposes to take an interest in this important attempt to a religious reform, defended by Averroes, by studying, in detail, the articulation between philosophy and religion which particularly characterizes his political though. Averroes was a Muslim philosopher who developed his approach in a very specific political-religious context whose foundations will then be developed in the first part of this work in order to understand the necessary basis to undertake our research, while recognizing its modern character. The second part of this work will consist in exposing the way Averroes legitimizes the obligation of the philosophical practice, in virtue of the Revelation, for those who are capable of it. The third and last part will finally present the practical repercussions of the interdependence between religion and philosophy, precisely with regards to the establishment of a just City in the land of Islam. A critical look will then be taken on the thoughts of Averroes from which will emerge several reflections whose relevance has persisted throughout the centuries.

La biographie intellectuelle de François Picavet (1851-1921) fournit l’occasion d’explorer les débuts de l’histoire de la philosophie médiévale en tant que discipline institutionnalisée, en France, de 1880 à 1920. Figure oubliée du médiévisme philosophique, Picavet fut maître de conférence à l’EPHE (section des sciences religieuses) dès 1888, puis directeur d’études à partir de 1907, secrétaire du Collège de France en 1904 et chargé de cours en histoire des philosophies médiévales à la Faculté des lettres de la Sorbonne dès 1906.Le parcours académique de Picavet s’inscrit dans un contexte particulier, qui voit l’histoire de la philosophie médiévale s’implanter de façon structurée et stable dans l’enseignement supérieur français. De même que d’autres disciplines institutionnalisées, l’histoire de la philosophie médiévale tire profit de la nécessité d’une réforme profonde du système universitaire, articulée dans les sphères politiques et scientifiques dès les années 1860 puis prolongée sous l’impulsion de la IIIe République, et qui aboutit à l’émergence de nouvellesstructures institutionnelles dans l’enseignement supérieur français (fondation de l’EPHE en 1868, création de nouveaux enseignements à la Sorbonne, dont une charge de cours en histoire de la philosophie médiévale en 1906). L’historiographie originale de Picavet restreint la signification des questions philosophiques médiévales qui demeurent liées à leur contexte historique d’origine: chaque système philosophique est ainsi l’expression partielle d’une civilisation donnée, au même titre que les expressions scientifiques, artistiques et artisanales que celle-ci est en mesure de produire et qui la caractérisent. / The intellectual biography of François Picavet (1851-1921) is an opportunity to explore the early days of the history of mediaeval philosophy as an institutionalised discipline in France from 1880 to 1920. A forgotten figure of the study of mediaeval philosophy, Picavet was a lecturer at EPHE (Religious Sciences department) from 1888 and director of studies from 1907, secretary of the Collège de France in 1904 and lecturer in the history of mediaeval philosophy at the Arts Faculty of the Sorbonne from 1906 onwards. Picavet’s academic career took place within a particular context in which the history of mediaeval philosophy came to be established in a structured and stable manner in French higher education. Like other institutionalised disciplines, the history of mediaeval philosophy benefited from the need for deep-seated reform of the university system, which was expressed in political and scientific circles from around 1860 and continued under the Third Republic, resulting in the emergence of new institutional structures in French higher education (the foundation of EPHE in 1868 and the creation of new courses at the Sorbonne, including a history of mediaeval philosophy course in 1906). Picavet’s original historiography confines the significance of mediaeval philosophical questions, which remain bound to the historical context in which they originated: thus, every philosophical system is the partial expression of a given civilisation, just like the scientific, artistic and craft related expressions which it produces and which characterise it.