Submitted by Andrea Hayashi (deachan@gmail.com) on 2016-06-22T18:20:16Z No. of bitstreams: 1 dissertacao-ricardo-bergmann.pdf: 1211623 bytes, checksum: 475f3191bc2c99ba36d2bb58428f1ead (MD5) / Approved for entry into archive by Andrea Hayashi (deachan@gmail.com) on 2016-06-22T18:21:18Z (GMT) No. of bitstreams: 1 dissertacao-ricardo-bergmann.pdf: 1211623 bytes, checksum: 475f3191bc2c99ba36d2bb58428f1ead (MD5) / Made available in DSpace on 2016-06-22T18:21:18Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 dissertacao-ricardo-bergmann.pdf: 1211623 bytes, checksum: 475f3191bc2c99ba36d2bb58428f1ead (MD5) Previous issue date: 2014-05-20 / Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior (CAPES) / A presente dissertação tem por objetivo central analisar as origens da dialética marxiana segundo Lucien Goldmann, pensador marxista, que de forma original defende a ideia que a referida dialética tem suas origens nas filosofias de Pascal e de Kant. Em primeiro lugar será feita uma introdução ao tema da dialética em três pensadores que no decorrer da História da Filosofia dedicaram enorme importância ao tema: Platão, Hegel e Marx. A questão da totalidade, ou processos totalizadores, bem como a metafísica e sua superação, fornecerão o pano de fundo para as análises das mesmas. Isso pavimentará o caminho para que seja abordada a origem da dialética marxiana em Pascal e em Kant. O primeiro é visto por Goldmann como aquele que critica o racionalismo individualista representado por Descartes, filósofo que constrói sua filosofia centrada na ideia do Eu. Pascal contrapõe ao Eu cartesiano o Nós, o todo, ou a relação partes e todo que se esclarecem mutuamente. Já o segundo é visto como o filósofo que leva o racionalismo individualista às últimas consequências, e mesmo não conseguindo superá-lo, traz de volta a ideia de comunidade humana, ideia perdida desde o fim da Idade Média, e que abre caminho para as Filosofias da História posteriores, principalmente a marxiana. Pascal e Kant ainda possuem mais dois pontos em comum: Em primeiro lugar a visão trágica do mundo, visão que se opõe ao racionalismo individualista, e cuja principal característica é tender para objetos suprassensíveis sem nunca atingi-los. E em segundo lugar o fragmento da aposta nos Pensamentos de Pascal, que com sua ideia de possibilidade de risco e fracasso, abre caminho para toda filosofia prática posterior, seja o imperativo categórico em Kant, seja a possibilidade da construção da sociedade comunista em Marx / This dissertation is aimed to analyse the origins of Marxian dialectics based on Lucien Goldmann, a Marxist philosopher who, in an original way, supports the idea that Marxian dialectics has its origins in the philosophies of Pascal and Kant. First, the idea of dialectics is introduced according to the view of three philosophers who, throughout the history of philosophy, devoted an enormous importance to this theme: Plato, Hegel and Marx. The issues of totalisation, or totalising processes, together with metaphysics and its overcoming, provide the background for their analysis, and paves the way for addressing Marxian dialectics in Pascal and Kant. Goldmann sees Pascal as the one who criticizes the individualist rationalism represented by Descartes, a philosopher who builds his philosophy centred on the Self (Moi). Pascal opposed to the Cartesian Self (Moi) to the idea of We (Nous), the whole, or a mutually clarifying relationship amongst the parts and the whole. Then Goldmann portrays Kant as a philosopher who takes the individualist rationalism to its ultimate consequences. Even though Kant could not overcome it, he brings back the idea of human community, something lost since the end of the Middle Ages, and clears the way for later history philosophies, especially the Marxian. Pascal and Kant still have two points in common. First they share a tragic view of the world. A view that opposes the individualistic rationalism, whose the main characteristic is to tend to supersensible objects, never reaching them. Secondly Pascal's Wager, as presented in his Pensées, introduces his idea of risk and failure. Such idea leads the way for all subsequent practical philosophy, either Kant 's categorical imperative or Marx’s work on the possibility of building a communist society.

Les trois oeuvres de notre corpus déclinent les données d'un vivre-ensemble tissé de solitude, d’une existence qui est coexistence. La solitude affecte des personnages qui constituent les témoins de l'humaine condition. L’oubli qui les hante est également solitude. Dès lors, la mémoire constitue l’antidote communautaire à une amnésie menaçante, et l’intertexte permet d’unir les solitudes par la matérialisation d'une communauté humaine aux prises avec l’altérité du réel. Cette communauté s'exprime de manière privilégiée dans ces trois récits qui donnent libre cours aux tensions et contradictions d'un réel toujours étranger à l'homme. Murakami, Auster et Quignard reflètent cette solitude communautaire dans des récits ouverts au dèmos qui accueillent cette altérité à laquelle le sacré et les mythes donnent voix. Chez les trois auteurs, c’est le problème de l'absolument autre et de sa traduction mythique qui permet de comprendre ce qui unit les hommes, mais aussi ce qui en eux – et dans le réel –, résiste à la socialité. Ce problème est donc éminemment communautaire. Présente dans les trois ouvrages, la musique, expression du génie humain, est également solitude. Elle traduit dans les oeuvres une présence/absence du souvenir, donne voix à l’indicible, renvoie à une moralité infinie, ou reste liée à l’animalité. Quant à la présence de l’auteur ou du narrateur dans les textes, le lecteur est confronté à trois manières différentes de donner voix à la communauté humaine, que ce soit par le deuil du lyrisme auctorial, en dotant au contraire sa voix d'une forte expressivité, ou à travers une voix narrative qui gagne en puissance au fil de l'ouvrage, illustrant ainsi l'engagement graduel du personnage dans le texte. La dimension historique, mémorielle et politique des communautés représentées, l’effort vers l’être-pour, qui constitue à la fois une théorisation du partage du sensible et une forme non militante de l’engagement personnel et collectif, sont également analysés dans ces trois oeuvres, qui mettent en évidence l’impossibilité d’une solitude non peuplée. / The three novels under scrutiny confront the very fact of existence as coexistence; they express solitude, considered as an unquestionable fact of life. Solitude affects characters who represent all mankind. The oblivion which haunts the protagonists is also an expression of solitude. Memory then becomes the common antidote to an impending amnesia, and intertextuality provides a way to bring solitudes together in a human community confronted to the strangeness of reality. Giving a voice to human community is the aim of these three contemporary novels, which express the tensions and contradictions of a reality filled with an undeniable otherness. Murakami, Auster and Quignard reflect on this common solitude in narratives that are open to that very strangeness, which is conveyed by mythology and the presence of sacred people or objects in the novels. For the three writers, it is the question of otherness and its mythical transcription that allows to understand what brings men together, and the things which, within people and reality, resist to socializing. Therefore, otherness must be considered as an eminently communal element in the novels. Music, an expression of human genius, is also a product of solitude. It expresses the presence/absence of things past, the unspeakable, refers to the infinity of morality, or else remains linked with animality. The reader is confronted to three different ways of expressing human community in the narratives, whether by accepting to give up one's lyricism, or on the contrary by using a very expressive style, or else by allowing the narrative voice to gather momentum throughout the text, to match the gradual social commitment of the protagonist. Therefore music, memory, the historical and political dimension of the depicted communities, the efforts of the characters towards involvement, a non-militant form of commitment, emphasize the fact that solitude, in these novels, is essentially communal.