Made available in DSpace on 2017-07-10T18:13:27Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 Magali R S Orsi.pdf: 820994 bytes, checksum: ec0d061929d9701eac9c971bd40b8b8d (MD5) Previous issue date: 2011-08-02 / The sustainable use of natural resources, particularly in the case of fishery resources is a challenge that must be seen in terms of technical, political, economical and social, and Brazil is one of the few countries where inland fishery has a considerable economic value, which emphasizes the cultivation of fish in cages, allowing rivers and hydroelectric reservoirs been utilized not only for power generation. In this context fits Tekoha Ocoy, Ava-Guarani indigenous, allocated in São Miguel do Iguaçu at Paraná state and affected by dam construction for installation of the Itaipu Hydroelectric Plant. Thus, this work was characterized by a case study and survey data on fish farming in cages in this indigenous community, assisted by the Cultivando Água Boa Project, developed by Itaipu Binacional aims to promote social inclusion, recovery and enhancement of indigenous communities in the Bacia do Paraná 3 (BP3), providing better quality of life for these communities. It was found that the program, and its proposes, is not meeting the needs of the indigenous community, even showing its support to the implementation of the program, expressed no satisfaction over the results achieved and the manner of its execution, according to the data collected in the development of this research. The results obtained showed that fish culture in cages for this community in question can be a great lever of social, economic and cultural development, enabling the effective use of natural local resources, yet respecting the views of affected and the environment. For this, the activity should be planned considering the characteristics of community areas where it is deployed, been necessary to harmonize the production process with the local culture and environment, to become a viable alternative to sustainable development. / A utilização sustentável de recursos naturais, particularmente no caso de recursos pesqueiros, é um desafio que necessita ser considerado do ponto de vista técnico, político, econômico e social, e o Brasil é um dos poucos países em que a pesca em águas interiores possui um valor econômico apreciável, no qual se destaca o cultivo de peixes em tanques-rede, possibilitando que rios e reservatórios de usinas hidrelétricas sejam aproveitados não apenas para geração de energia. Neste contexto se insere a comunidade indígena Tekoha Ocoy, do ramo Avá-Guarani, alocada na cidade de São Miguel do Iguaçu PR e afetada pela construção da barragem para instalação da Usina Hidrelétrica de Itaipu. Assim, este trabalho caracterizou-se pelo estudo de caso e levantamento de dados sobre a piscicultura em tanques-rede nessa comunidade indígena, assistida pelo Programa Cultivando Água Boa, desenvolvido pela Itaipu Binacional, e que, na sua formatação, tem por objeto promover a inclusão social, o resgate e a valorização das comunidades indígenas na Bacia do Paraná 3 (BP3), de forma a proporcionar melhor qualidade de vida a essas comunidades. Evidenciou-se que o programa, pelo que propõe, não está atendendo às necessidades da comunidade indígena que, mesmo mostrando-se favorável à sua implantação, não demonstrou satisfação com relação aos resultados alcançados e à forma de sua execução, de acordo com os dados levantados no desenvolvimento desta pesquisa. A partir dos resultados obtidos, concluiu-se que a piscicultura em tanques-rede para essa comunidade em questão pode ser uma grande alavanca de desenvolvimento social, econômico e cultural, possibilitando o aproveitamento efetivo dos bens naturais locais, no entanto respeitando a opinião dos afetados e o meio ambiente. Para isso, a atividade deve ser planejada considerando-se as características da comunidade das áreas em que for implantada, sendo necessário harmonizar o processo produtivo com a cultura local e o ambiente, para tornar-se uma alternativa viável ao desenvolvimento sustentável.

Given the ongoing biodiversity decline during a time of Indigenous resurgence, Indigenous Protected and Conserved Areas (IPCAs) are garnering interest from the academic community, Indigenous and state governments, and protected area practitioners. Though Indigenous forms of land and sea protection have existed for millennia, these actors are exploring how IPCA development and support can meet needs to protect biodiversity and respect Indigenous rights and roles in conservation. My main research objective was to advance academic and practical applications of IPCAs by drawing from global IPCA research while assisting the Kitasoo/Xai’xais Nation’s IPCA planning process. I investigated two research questions: 1. What are the key successes, challenges, and lessons from IPCA research globally? 2. What can we learn from the Kitasoo/Xai’xais Nation’s rationale and process for developing an IPCA? To answer my first question, I reviewed 58 papers, describing 86 specific IPCA initiatives involving at least 68 Indigenous Peoples across 25 countries. Indigenous Peoples established IPCAs independently and through local- and broad-scale partnerships. Where state IPCA support existed, it was through formal legislation, agreements, and policies, and informally through local relationships and shared values. IPCAs created socio-cultural, political, and ecological benefits. Challenges limited benefits while demanding additional resources for mitigation. I recommend that states and other external actors create/improve IPCA policies, legislations, and resources as defined by Indigenous Peoples; facilitate Indigenous leadership to shape external IPCA establishment and development mechanisms; and create internal Indigenous engagement/partnerships mechanisms. I suggest that Indigenous Peoples would benefit from building partnerships to support and manage their IPCAs. Finally, I recommend that IPCA managers commit more resources, particularly in monitoring and management that integrates management priorities with local and larger scale social-environmental issues. To answer my second question, in collaboration with the Kitasoo/Xai’xais Nation, we used participatory action research to assist efforts to plan a land-and-sea IPCA in Kitasoo/Xai’xais Territory. Together, we used mixed methods to summarize the Nation’s rationale and process. IPCA development is an iteration of ongoing efforts to address limitations of state protected areas to better reflect Kitasoo/Xai’xais rights and responsibilities while preserving culture, biodiversity, and economic opportunity. The Kitasoo/Xai’xais process is rooted in long-term Territory planning and contemporary stewardship capacity building, has benefitted from global IPCA research, and has ongoing multi-generational engagement. The Nation faces challenges similar to other protected areas and is additionally burdened by ongoing colonization impacts. To address these challenges, the Nation is seeking state legislative IPCA recognition, applying Indigenous and complementary western stewardship approaches, and pursuing responsibility-based partnerships. This research makes both practical and academic contributions. It assisted the Kitasoo/Xai’xais IPCA process by contributing to planning and documentation, to be used and modified by the Nation to implement current and future IPCAs. Other Indigenous organizations can adapt the lessons and processes described for their IPCA interests. Additionally, this work provides recommendations for states and other actors at various scales to improve IPCA support and recognition. This work also contributes to literature which highlight Indigenous-led conservation initiatives, including IPCAs, as potential pathways towards supporting biodiversity conservation and Indigenous resurgence. / Graduate

En collaboration avec Anita Rousselot Dir. adj. SSS, Inf., B. Sc. chef en soins de 1ère ligne du Centre de Santé et des Services Sociaux de Pessamit / Les populations autochtones doivent avoir des ressources pour la petite enfance culturellement sécurisantes, qui soient respectueuses de l’identité culturelle des autochtones, qui visent l’équité et promeuvent l’autonomisation, car la colonisation a créé dans ces populations une méfiance due au racisme et à la discrimination vécus. Dans la communauté de Pessamit, située sur la Côte-Nord du Québec, une étude qualitative descriptive a été réalisée. Dans une perspective de « sécurisation culturelle » et d’acceptabilité des soins, le but de cette étude était d’explorer les barrières et les facilitants influençant la participation et l’engagement des familles autochtones avec des enfants âgés de 0-5 ans dans les ressources de la communauté. Quinze entrevues semi-dirigées ont été réalisées. De l’analyse thématique se dégagent divers thèmes comme « les défis liés à la parentalité avec un enfant », « le soutien des proches et de la famille » et « le développement personnel des parents ». Plusieurs barrières ont été identifiées, entre autres, « la méconnaissance et le manque de cohérence » et « les besoins non comblés ». Nombreux facilitants ont également été relevés comme « les services accueillants et sécuritaires » et « la disponibilité et l’accessibilité des intervenants et des ressources ». Une des recommandations était une table de concertation pour la petite enfance afin de développer et de renforcer les ressources communautaires pour les familles. Ces nouvelles connaissances aideront le centre de santé de Pessamit à promouvoir la participation et l’engagement des familles dans les ressources. / Indigenous peoples need to have culturally safe early childhood resources (i.e., respect the cultural identity of the indigenous peoples and promote empowerment and equity), since these populations have significant mistrust due to a long history of racism and discrimination associated with colonization. In Pessamit, an Indigenous community located on the North Coast of Québec, a descriptive qualitative study was conducted. Using the perspectives of cultural safety and acceptability of care, the aim of this study was to explore the facilitators and barriers of Indigenous families with children 0 to 5 years old participating and engaging in the community’s early childhood resources. Fifteen semi-structured interviews were conducted. Using thematic analysis various themes were identified, such as “the challenges of parenthood with a child”, and “support from friends and family” “the personal growth of parents with a child”. Several barriers were named, including “lack of knowledge and consistency” and “unmet needs”. Many facilitators were also named like the “friendly and safe services”, and “the availability and the accessibility of care-providers and resources”. One key recommendation made was to implement an early childhood round Table to further develop and strengthen the community resources for young families. This new knowledge will help the Pessamit Health Centre to promote the participation and engagement of families in the community’s early childhood resources.

No description available.

原住民族長期生活於山村地區，有著特殊民族文化維繫個人或團體間長期的互動，惟日本時期沿襲迄今的保留地制度，無論是空間區位的選擇或增劃編地點的決定，原住民族毫無參與的餘地，導致無法妥善勘選區位適當的土地作為原住民保留地使用，進而使文化傳承、經濟生活所依賴的母土逐漸流失；近年來受國外原住民保留地經營管理成功案例的激勵及民族意識的興起下，原住民發起三次還我土地運動，而政府部門在增劃編的回應中，也認真的思索保留地興革的建議，遂在學者專家及原住民族菁英的討論過程，凝聚回復傳統產權共有舊制的共識。 　　憲法增修條文第十條第十二項對原住民族基本權的規範，含有「制度保障」之意涵，因此原住民族土地管理法規，是有提昇為法律位階之必要性，爰由內政部研定「原住民族土地開發管理條例」草案，刻正依法定程序送請立法院審議中。按該條例草案異於前之管理辦法者，在於增加了「原住民族保留區」的制度設計，新制在原住民族社會已有共識，惟尚缺乏個案研究的實證分析，因此難以辨別制度可能引發的後遺症，爰有本研究就桃源鄉進行個案分析驗證。 　　本研究以國外學者Elinor Ostrom在制度經濟學對共用資源共管機制的制度設計原則，來檢驗分析個案在保留區新制實施過程中，可能衍生的問題，以實地問卷訪談的方式進行調查；嗣經得知劃設原住民族保留區可以解決桃源鄉現存的保留地問題，而劃設地點以該鄉梅山村及寶山村最適宜，惟應建立一套劃設指標據以實施且應有相關配套措施，最後根據當地原住民的意見反應，證明集體決策理論觀點，適合運用在劃設原住民族保留區的決策過程。 　　此外，在後續研究的部分，本研究亦建議：桃源鄉小規模群體自主治理的資源利用方式，可否全面運用到保留區新制，有待與其他個案比較分析及探討，而欲達此政策目的，必須選定實驗區域，進行試驗及檢討，方得確保制度設計成為法律後，能夠彌補現行保留地措施肇致政府失靈與市場失靈的缺失。 / Taiwan indigenous people have lived in mountainous area for centuries. The interactions between their individuals and groups are regulated by specific cultures. However, the Reserved Land Institution began with Japan Colonist Era does not allow indigenous people to chose the place they live in by themselves. It made improper zoning. urthermore, it led to the land, which had supported their cultural and economic life lapsed gradually. In past twenty years, encouraged by the international indigenous movements and domestic ideology wakening, Taiwan indigenous people had held the Return My Land Demonstrations for three times. Government began to deliberate the reform of Indigenous Reserved Land Institution, and acquired conclusions after long-term discussion between government, scholars and indigenous elites. One of the conclusions is to revert to the traditional land tenure co-owning institution. 　　According to the Added Article of the Constitution (article 10, item 12) , this country has obligation to protect the basic rights of indigenous people with formal institutions. It means the Indigenous Reserved Land Developing and Managing Regulation needs to be promoted to a formal law. At this moment, The Legislative Yuan is deliberating the Indigenous Reserved Land Developing and Managing Law drafted by the Exclusive Yuan. A new designing named Reserved Area was made in it. This new designing was agreed by most of indigenous people. However, there is no empirical analysis to it and its side effect so far. Therefore, this research examined the Reserved Area Institution by case study in Taoyuan Township of Kaohsiung County. 　　The theoretical basis of this research is the institution designing principles of common pool resources self-governance, which addressed by Elinor Ostrom. Meanwhile, the investigation was processed by questionnaires. After the analysis, this research pointed that Indigenous Reserved Area Institution can solve the problems of Reserved land in Taoyuan Township now. The most proper locations of Indigenous Reserved Area are May-Shan and Pao-Shan villages. In farther step, it needs relative supporting measures and concrete area setting index. Beside, base on the responses of local residences, the research proved that Collective Action Theory is proper to be applied in the decision making process of setting the Indigenous Reserved Area. 　　In the end, the research suggested: the way people in Taoyuan Township governing their resource is not definitely proper to other indigenous groups. The precondition of implementing the new designing is to make more case tudies, compares and analysis. It is necessary to have small-scale experiments in advance. In the way, it can just correct the market failure and government failure caused by on going regulation when the new designing becomes a formal new law.