It is important for elementary teachers to provide quality mathematics instruction for English Learner (EL) students to close achievement gaps. Elementary mathematics teachers in the Keystone School District were struggling to implement instructional practices for EL students in mathematics as evidenced by communications with teachers, administrators, and documents from the state-required action plan. The purpose of this study was to explore the instructional practices and the challenges encountered by teachers related to providing mathematics instruction for ELs. The Sheltered Instruction Observation Protocol Model served as the conceptual framework. The research questions focused on the instructional practices that teachers were implementing related to building background knowledge, student interactions, application, and teacher challenges. This study used a qualitative case study design with data being collected through interviews and observations of 8 teachers in 1st through 5th grades. Data analysis was conducted by coding and thematic analysis. The results showed a gap in practice related to supporting ELs during mathematics interactions and measures of accountability. Teachers reported challenges related to the lack of accurate assessments and appropriate instructional resources for ELs in mathematics. Based on the findings of this project study, a professional development program was developed to provide teachers with the knowledge, skills, and resources to support EL students in mathematics. This study has implications for positive social change by preparing teachers to provide effective mathematics instruction for EL students through the professional development program as well as informing future district decisions related to EL students in mathematics.

No description available.

This study investigated South Africa’s secondary school teachers’ understandings of the nature of science (NOS) in relation to their instructional practices. The participants were three Grade 10 Physical Science teachers conveniently selected from three schools in the Gauteng province of South Africa. Teacher understandings of the nature of science were elicited through semi-structured interviews. The core questions for the interviews were adapted from the Views of Nature of Science Questionnaire (VNOS) – Form C developed by Abd-El-Khalick, Lederman, Bell and Schwartz (2002). The nature of science tenets explored were: what is science?: the role and purpose of experiments in science: the difference between scientific theories and laws in science and how scientists settle scientific disputes. Teacher instructional practices were ascertained through semi-structured interviews and lesson observations. The results were analyzed using a combination of typological analysis and interpretive analysis. These results show that on the selected NOS tenets, the sampled teachers hold a mixture of naïve and sophisticated understandings. These understandings are, however, largely naïve. It was found that the teachers only teach about NOS implicitly. None of the teachers was found to explicitly teach about the NOS. It also came out that the teachers were experiencing difficulties in both interpreting and implementation of Learning Outcome 3 of South Africa’s new science curriculum. It is concluded that the interaction between teachers’ NOS understandings and their instructional practices occurs without the teachers being aware of it, i.e. unconsciously. Recommendations for teaching, curriculum implementation and future research are suggested.

No description available.

This study sought to understand effective and ineffective instructional practices in clinical settings and to identify problem-solving strategies used by students and instructors. Three research questions were addressed: where in the undergraduate athletic training education program do students learn, or fail to learn, particular skills; "what instructional methods are of most worth" in teaching these skills, as perceived by the students; and what are the problem-solving strategies used by novice, experienced non-expert, and expert athletic trainers when confronted with novel situations. The subjects were nine students ("novices") and ten Approved Clinical Instructors (ACI's) from three programs in the Southeast United States. Five ACI's were categorized as "experienced non-experts" and five as "experts". All subjects were videotaped while performing various tasks. Each subject was required to think-aloud while they performed typical tasks expected of an entry-level certified athletic trainer, as designated by the NATA Education Council. Subjects then performed a stimulated-recall session, with analysis adapted from Ericsson and Simon (1993). The main findings of this study supported the well-respected teaching notion of "first teach them, then show them, then have them do it". Most concepts were first taught via lecture in the classroom; however, participants believed the "method of most worth" to be hands-on strategies displayed in clinical settings and labs. This study confirmed and disconfirmed aspects of prior research on problem solving. Experts: offered the most verbal comments, used their self-talk to stay on task, displayed intimate rapport with the models, and used various problem-solving strategies based upon the task at hand. Experienced non-experts: tended to drift in their verbal comments, felt the need to justify their answers, spoke mostly with verbal commands, and used several problem solving strategies. Novices: provided the fewest verbal comments, apologized throughout their sessions, often found the problem statement to be the problem itself, and used basic problem solving strategies. Demographics revealed that close relationships, balanced with manageable ACI's and clinical sites, created the most successful programs. Based on the findings of this study, future research must focus on how to best design the curriculum to take advantage of these "methods of most worth".

The purpose of this study was to investigate the differences between general and special educators regarding the implementation of research-based strategies that target the needs of students with LD in mathematics, as well as general and special educators' perceptions of their preparedness to use instructional strategies in mathematics. A sample of general and special educators who taught mathematics to students with learning disabilities (LD) at the middle school level responded to an online survey. The survey examined teacher self-reported classroom use of instructional practices specifically aligned with NCTM standards, direct instruction, graduated instruction, grouping practices, and self-monitoring. Additionally, educators responded to perceptions of their preparedness to use the aforementioned instructional practices. From the survey results, several strategies exhibited statistically significant differences between general and special educators. Special educators showed significantly greater use of two instructional strategies, as well as significantly greater perceptions of preparedness to use two instructional strategies. Overall, significantly more special educators reported using the research-based strategies aligned with all instructional practices. Additional results, limitations, implications for practice, and recommendations for future research are provided.

No description available.

No description available.

No description available.

There is a significant body of literature showing improved student outcomes in higher education STEM courses when evidence-based instructional practices (EBIPs) are used. Despite this, traditional, lecture-style instruction remains the primary means of instruction in these courses. However, given the situation of the sudden shift to online teaching as a result of the COVID-19 pandemic, faculty were participating in training programs with greater frequency, and thus learning more about the use of EBIPs than ever before. Through the lens of Kurt Lewin’s theory of organizational change in the three stages of unfreezing, change, and refreezing, this explanatory mixed methods study sought to explore through a survey and interviews whether this shift to online teaching and the resulting increase in training participation did, in fact, result in changes in instructional practices, implementation, and perceptions of EBIPs, and whether any changes were sustained upon the return to in-person instruction.The survey tool used in this study was a subset of the Teaching Practices Inventory, developed by the Carl Wieman Science Education Initiative from the University of British Columbia. This generated a modified “extent of use of research-based teaching practices” (METP) score, as well as METP sub-scores in five subcategories of the survey. These results, as well as data obtained from demographic questions and questions about teaching responsibilities and training participation, informed the selection of twelve participants for semi-structured interviews. Through one-way ANOVA testing, the quantitative analysis showed a statistically significant increase in METP (p < .001) from Pre-Covid to Post-Covid scores. Statistical significance was also found in the subcategories of In Class Features (p = .003) and Collaboration (p = .005). Two-way ANOVA testing was also done to explore statistical significance for demographic subcategories, which was found to exist for gender, tenure status, and various categories relating to participation in training and professional development. Interview data supported the quantitative data analysis, and offered further insight and context for the changes that have been made and sustained, including changes regarding the use of educational technology tools, introduction of authentic learning experiences, streamlining of content, and intentional alignment of activities and assessments with course goals. Additional analysis showed faculty relied on virtual collaboration to develop community with other instructors, and realized the importance of student feedback to inform their instruction and of fostering a classroom community. Most significantly, the ability to see first-hand the effect of the pandemic on students and to have a window into their personal lives caused faculty to make sweeping changes with respect to their beliefs in the affective domains of learning, emphasizing the need for empathy, flexibility, and equity-mindedness in their classrooms. This study showed that faculty became convinced of the need for change, consistent with Lewin’s unfreezing stage, not solely through training and professional development, but largely through the realizations about the individuality of students that faculty experienced during the pandemic. This occurred simultaneously with an increase in virtual collaboration as well as the influence of changes peers had made and suggested upon the return to in-person instruction. The recognition of the need to center students in learning combined with these outside influences resulted in the increased use of EBIPs upon the return to in-person instruction, therefore creating the desired change. Lastly, these practices have been maintained as of two years after the return to in-person, thus indicating refreezing, and further data showed that faculty continue to adapt their practices to create more inclusive and student-centered learning environments. / Policy, Organizational and Leadership Studies