<p>Sustainability reports have during the last decade had a strong development. Both in terms of establishing a sustainability assurance, in its form, and get it assured together with standards, principles and regulations which organisations and accountants have utilized. The growth of sustainability reports and the choice of getting them assured have in particular favoured the accounting business. Due to this result, some critics have voiced that assuring a sustainability report gain accounting firms more than it gains the actual organisation. Other say that it is necessary in order to increase the credibility and the eligibility of the report, while it also has become a requirement from stakeholders. A clash of opinions within this subject awoke our interest and the results of this study will show the reality of assurance reports in Sweden. The purpose with this paper is to find out how much companies pay to get their sustainability report assured and to identify the factors that might affect the price. In this study, we ask:</p><p>-What is the cost/benefit of assuring a sustainability report?</p><p>The methodology used in this study was web surveys. The target group consisted of 41 organisations based all over Sweden. The web survey was answered by the contact person confirmed as responsible for the organisations sustainability report. Further, to create a foundation for the study we conducted a literature review from books, scientific articles and other scientific papers covering this subject. Data which has gained focus are for example sustainability reports, revisions and assurance of sustainability reports, framework and current theories in the field. Other types of data we have used come from the respondents themselves.</p><p>It is significantly easier for organisations to calculate the cost as it is concrete while the benefit is abstract and more difficult to identify. In general, organisations that took part in the study feel that using assurance reports is beneficial. One of the reasons for this is because the organisations claim they get knowledge, which is shown in that the internal audit is improved and the credibility of the organisations is strengthened. The width was between 0 SEK- and more than 300 000 SEK. We have been able to confirm through this study that large organisations with a high turnover and a well designed sustainability report pay significantly more than what a company with a lower turnover and a less well designed sustainability report does. There was no compulsion to these two factors would occur at the same time. The difference in cost we assumed could be connected to the number of revision points in the assurance report, but this was not confirmed as such events proved to be unrelated.</p> / <p>Hållbarhetsredovisning har under de senaste två decennierna haft en stark utveckling. Såväl när det gäller att upprätta en hållbarhetsredovisning i dess form och att få den bestyrkt. Men även när det gäller standarder, principer och lagförordningar som företag och revisorer använt sig av. Framväxten av hållbarhetsredovisning och valet att få den bestyrkt har framförallt gynnat revisionsbranschen. På grund av detta utfall uttalade sig en del kritiker om att bestyrka en hållbarhetsredovisning gav mer nytta för revisionsbyråerna än för själva företagen. Andra menar på att det var nödvändigt för att öka trovärdighet och legitimitet i rapporten samt att det har blivit ett krav från intressenterna. Motsättningar kring detta ämne väckte vårt intresse. Därför valde vi att genomföra en studie om hur det verkligen ligger till i Sverige gällande bestyrkanderapporter. Syftet med uppsatsen var att ta reda på hur mycket företagen betalade för att få sin hållbarhetsredovisning bestyrkt. Samt identifiera faktorer som eventuellt påverkade priset. Uppsatsens frågeställning var följande; vilken kostnad/nytta kände företagen av att ha låtit bestyrka sin hållbarhetsredovisning? Tillvägagångssätt vid genomförandet av studien var genom webbenkäter. Urvalet var 41 företag som geografiskt sett befann sig över hela Sverige. Webbenkäten besvarades av den kontaktperson som var angiven till företagets hållbarhetsredovisning. För att vidare bygga upp uppsatsen skedde vår litteraturinsamling bland annat från böcker, artiklar och tidigare skrivna uppsatser. Data som fick fokus var exempelvis hållbarhetsredovisning, granskning och bestyrkande av hållbarhetsredovisning, ramverk samt teorier som var aktuella inom området. Annan typ av data som användes var det som studien fick fram från respondenterna. Det är betydligt enklare för företag att beräkna kostnaden då den är konkret medan nyttan är abstrakt och svårare att identifiera. Överlag ansåg dock de företag som ingick i studien att bestyrkanderapport gav nytta. Bland annat genom att företagen tycke att de fick lärdom, vilket visades genom att företagets interna kontroll blev bättre samt att tillförlitligheten stärktes för företaget. Hur mycket företag hade betalat för sin bestyrkanderapport var väldigt olika. Spannet låg mellan 0 - över 300 000 kr. Vi konstaterade från studien att priset hade samband med 2 faktorer, företagets storlek och hur välutformad företagets hållbarhetsredovisning var. Det var dock inget tvång att dessa två faktorer skulle förkomma samtidigt. Att priset skiljde sig åt trodde vi bland annat kunde bero på antalet granskningspunkter i en bestyrkanderapport. Detta kunde vi dock inte konstatera eftersom inga sådana samband urskiljdes.</p>

Sustainability reports have during the last decade had a strong development. Both in terms of establishing a sustainability assurance, in its form, and get it assured together with standards, principles and regulations which organisations and accountants have utilized. The growth of sustainability reports and the choice of getting them assured have in particular favoured the accounting business. Due to this result, some critics have voiced that assuring a sustainability report gain accounting firms more than it gains the actual organisation. Other say that it is necessary in order to increase the credibility and the eligibility of the report, while it also has become a requirement from stakeholders. A clash of opinions within this subject awoke our interest and the results of this study will show the reality of assurance reports in Sweden. The purpose with this paper is to find out how much companies pay to get their sustainability report assured and to identify the factors that might affect the price. In this study, we ask: -What is the cost/benefit of assuring a sustainability report? The methodology used in this study was web surveys. The target group consisted of 41 organisations based all over Sweden. The web survey was answered by the contact person confirmed as responsible for the organisations sustainability report. Further, to create a foundation for the study we conducted a literature review from books, scientific articles and other scientific papers covering this subject. Data which has gained focus are for example sustainability reports, revisions and assurance of sustainability reports, framework and current theories in the field. Other types of data we have used come from the respondents themselves. It is significantly easier for organisations to calculate the cost as it is concrete while the benefit is abstract and more difficult to identify. In general, organisations that took part in the study feel that using assurance reports is beneficial. One of the reasons for this is because the organisations claim they get knowledge, which is shown in that the internal audit is improved and the credibility of the organisations is strengthened. The width was between 0 SEK- and more than 300 000 SEK. We have been able to confirm through this study that large organisations with a high turnover and a well designed sustainability report pay significantly more than what a company with a lower turnover and a less well designed sustainability report does. There was no compulsion to these two factors would occur at the same time. The difference in cost we assumed could be connected to the number of revision points in the assurance report, but this was not confirmed as such events proved to be unrelated. / Hållbarhetsredovisning har under de senaste två decennierna haft en stark utveckling. Såväl när det gäller att upprätta en hållbarhetsredovisning i dess form och att få den bestyrkt. Men även när det gäller standarder, principer och lagförordningar som företag och revisorer använt sig av. Framväxten av hållbarhetsredovisning och valet att få den bestyrkt har framförallt gynnat revisionsbranschen. På grund av detta utfall uttalade sig en del kritiker om att bestyrka en hållbarhetsredovisning gav mer nytta för revisionsbyråerna än för själva företagen. Andra menar på att det var nödvändigt för att öka trovärdighet och legitimitet i rapporten samt att det har blivit ett krav från intressenterna. Motsättningar kring detta ämne väckte vårt intresse. Därför valde vi att genomföra en studie om hur det verkligen ligger till i Sverige gällande bestyrkanderapporter. Syftet med uppsatsen var att ta reda på hur mycket företagen betalade för att få sin hållbarhetsredovisning bestyrkt. Samt identifiera faktorer som eventuellt påverkade priset. Uppsatsens frågeställning var följande; vilken kostnad/nytta kände företagen av att ha låtit bestyrka sin hållbarhetsredovisning? Tillvägagångssätt vid genomförandet av studien var genom webbenkäter. Urvalet var 41 företag som geografiskt sett befann sig över hela Sverige. Webbenkäten besvarades av den kontaktperson som var angiven till företagets hållbarhetsredovisning. För att vidare bygga upp uppsatsen skedde vår litteraturinsamling bland annat från böcker, artiklar och tidigare skrivna uppsatser. Data som fick fokus var exempelvis hållbarhetsredovisning, granskning och bestyrkande av hållbarhetsredovisning, ramverk samt teorier som var aktuella inom området. Annan typ av data som användes var det som studien fick fram från respondenterna. Det är betydligt enklare för företag att beräkna kostnaden då den är konkret medan nyttan är abstrakt och svårare att identifiera. Överlag ansåg dock de företag som ingick i studien att bestyrkanderapport gav nytta. Bland annat genom att företagen tycke att de fick lärdom, vilket visades genom att företagets interna kontroll blev bättre samt att tillförlitligheten stärktes för företaget. Hur mycket företag hade betalat för sin bestyrkanderapport var väldigt olika. Spannet låg mellan 0 - över 300 000 kr. Vi konstaterade från studien att priset hade samband med 2 faktorer, företagets storlek och hur välutformad företagets hållbarhetsredovisning var. Det var dock inget tvång att dessa två faktorer skulle förkomma samtidigt. Att priset skiljde sig åt trodde vi bland annat kunde bero på antalet granskningspunkter i en bestyrkanderapport. Detta kunde vi dock inte konstatera eftersom inga sådana samband urskiljdes.

Syfte: Syftet i denna studie uppkom ur vårt intresse för nyckeltalsanvändning inom ett relativt nytt område som hållbarhet. Vi läste på om hållbarhetsnyckeltal och ur denna tidigare forskning inom ämnet så blev vårt syfte att skapa en ökad förståelse kring den praktiska användningen samt nyttan med hållbarhetsnyckeltal, med avseende på TBL-modellen. Metod: Studien bygger på en kvalitativ forsningsmetod inom vilken personliga intervjuer har utförts på fem fallföretag. Intervjuerna spelades in och sedan jämfördes samt analyserades resultatet av dessa med det teoretiska ramverket inom studien.           Resultat &amp; slutsats: Studien har visat på vilken praktisk användning samt nytta hållbarhetsnyckeltal har eller skulle kunna ha för företag eller organisationer. Studien har därutöver också visat på att företag och organisationer aktivt talar om hållbarhet samt att hållbarhetsfrågor är integrerade i den dagliga verksamheten.

The purpose of this study is to examine the accounting standard-setting process in relation to emissions rights and related liabilities in the Korean context in order to provide a better understanding of accounting issues under an emissions trading scheme (ETS). Using an interpretive inductive approach, this study comprises semi-structured, face-to-face interviews and analysis of relevant documents. Interviews were carried out with a wide range of key players, including accounting standard setters (Korean Accounting Standards Board, International Accounting Standards Board, and Autorité des Normes Comptables), accounting experts, industry and government. This study identifies how problematic accounting issues on emissions rights and related liabilities have been addressed by accounting standard setters. The key accounting issues under ETS are linked mainly with free allowances. It is found that accounting standard setters attempt to establish the most appropriate accounting standard under the given circumstances reflecting a variety of considerations, and that the most common elements affecting the development of accounting standards for ETS are the legal and economic context, the existing accounting framework, and preceding models and practices. Nevertheless, these factors affect the development of accounting standards for ETS in different ways. Accordingly, the primary accounting issues on which each standard setter concentrates vary depending on different circumstances and considerations. This study investigates the accounting standard-setting process for emissions rights by Korean accounting standard setters, from the agenda-setting stage to the final publication of the standard. The findings reinforce the importance of political factors in the standard-setting process, including stakeholders’ participation in the process, prominent stakeholders, and the motivation, methods and timing of lobbying activities. In particular, the findings have important implications for the effectiveness of lobbying. Overall, the findings confirm that accounting standards are likely to be the political outcome of interactions between the accounting standard setter and stakeholders. The findings highlight desirable factors for accounting models of emissions rights. Desirability or appropriateness of standard is judged by the extent to which stakeholders in institutional environments consider the promulgation to be legitimate or authoritative. Therefore, accounting standard setters must make greater efforts to encourage stakeholders to participate in the standard-setting process in order to ensure institutional legitimacy. The originality of this study lies in its empirical research on accounting issues for ETS from a practical point of view. In particular, in its timely and detailed investigation of Korean accounting standard setters, this study provides a broader understanding of the accounting standard-setting process in the Korean context. The study also advances legitimacy theory by offering a framework particularly applicable to accounting standard setting process, which also incorporates stakeholder theory research. The study finds support from the framework and further contributes to the related literature by reviewing legitimacy conflicts. From an accounting policy point of view, the findings have implications for both national and international standard setters and provide guidance on how to achieve high-quality accounting standards with a high degree of compliance.

Every actor of the society has its own expectations about the companies. Shareholders are interested in the maximization of the profitability, managers are interested in sustainability, and partners are interested in fulfilment of the business ethics. And the company with well-structured CSR policy should be able to meet expectations of all stakeholders. This can cost large part of the company's resources. It can potentially impact on company’s profitability whether positively or negatively. Using the quantitative research method we tried to explore the impact of CSR policy on the short-term profitability. Our research question is composed as:What is the relationship between CSR and short-term profitability?The main purpose of this study is to analyze and present positive or negative links between CSR policy and corporate financial performance (CFP) using different profitability indicators. We analyzed impact of weighted average CSR score and environmental rank on the short-term profitability.The theoretical framework of the thesis consists of different theories, such as stakeholder theory, shareholder theory, agency theory, legitimacy theory and etc.The research conducted in accordance with the functionalist research paradigm, the objectivist ontological and positivist epistemic research philosophies using the deductive approach. Our result indicates that there negative relationship between CSR performance and short-term profitability. Also we found that CSR policy can negatively impact on return on assets. This in turn could have negative implications on shareholders and stakeholders. No positive correlation between CSR policy and profitability observed. All in all, the expenses on CSR policy have a negative impact on indicators of financial performance.

CoordenaÃÃo de AperfeiÃoamento de Pessoal de NÃvel Superior / O presente estudo objetivou investigar a relaÃÃo entre o disclosure socioambiental e a prÃtica de incentivos governamentais, pela perspectiva da Teoria da Legitimidade. Tal questÃo surge a partir do cenÃrio das empresas incentivadas por benefÃcios governamentais. Essas empresas criam uma imagem socialmente irresponsÃvel, por utilizarem recursos pÃblicos para satisfazer objetivos privados, perdendo sua legitimidade. Como forma de resgate de legitimidade, as empresas utilizam ferramentas capazes de mitigar o problema causado pelo recebimento de SubvenÃÃes e AssistÃncias Governamentais (SAG). Uma dessas ferramentas, apontadas pela literatura cientÃfica, à a evidenciaÃÃo socioambiental. Os estudos sobre disclosure socioambiental, legitimidade e SAG tÃm instigado diversos pesquisadores. Entretanto, quando esses temas sÃo abordados em conjunto, as pesquisas ainda sÃo incipientes e se restringem ao nÃvel internacional. A partir dessa hipÃtese, a presente pesquisa se propÃe investigar a associaÃÃo entre o nÃvel de divulgaÃÃo socioambiental e a prÃtica de recebimento de SAG das empresas listadas na BM&FBovespa. Foram utilizadas ferramentas qualitativas (AnÃlise de ConteÃdo das DemonstraÃÃes Financeiras Padronizadas disponibilizadas nos websites da BM&FBovespa e da CVM, alÃm dos RelatÃrios de Sustentabilidade e similares disponÃveis nos websites das empresas) e quantitativas (estatÃstica descritiva, teste de diferenÃas de mÃdias e regressÃo linear mÃltipla) para compreender o comportamento da amostra, que, apÃs criteriosa seleÃÃo, totalizou 337 empresas. Com relaÃÃo Ãs SAG recebidas pelas empresas avaliadas, constatou-se que o normativo a elas referente ainda nÃo à aplicado como devido. No que diz respeito à evidenciaÃÃo socioambiental, ressalta-se o fato de o governo se destacar como principal stakeholder-alvo das empresas estudadas. AtravÃs da anÃlise conjunta das SAG e da evidenciaÃÃo socioambiental, foi possÃvel constatar que as empresas que recebem incentivos governamentais e que divulgam a receita deles proveniente divulgam mais, corroborando a Teoria da Legitimidade. Na anÃlise dos possÃveis fatores determinantes do comportamento do Ãndice de Disclosure Socioambiental, o tamanho da firma se destaca como fator influenciador em todos os grupos analisados. Contudo, a anÃlise de variÃveis diretamente relacionadas ao recebimento de incentivos e o Valor do Incentivo e o Tipo de Incentivo nÃo se mostram determinantes para a evidenciaÃÃo de informaÃÃes socioambientais. Concluiu-se que, para as firmas brasileiras, os incentivos governamentais nÃo estimulam a utilizaÃÃo de ferramentas de resgate da legitimidade, no caso da presente pesquisa, o disclosure socioambiental. / The objective of this study was to investigate the relationship between environmental disclosure and the practice of government incentives, from the perspective of the theory of legitimacy. This question arises from the scenario of the companies encouraged by government benefits. These companies create a socially irresponsible image for using public resources to meet private goals, losing its legitimacy. As a way of redemption of legitimacy, companies use tools that can mitigate the problem caused by the receipt of government grant and assistance. One of these tools, cited by the scientific literature, is the environmental disclosure. Studies on environmental disclosure, legitimacy and government grant and assistance have instigated many researchers (PATTEN , 2002; DEEGAN , 2002; SMITH WARD , 2007; HANLON ; Slemrod , 2009; Taveira , 2009; RODRIGUES ; SILVA ; FAUSTINO , 2011; LOUREIRO ; GALLON ; DE LUCA , 2011) . However, when these issues are addressed together, the research is still scarce and are restricted to the international level ( FREEDMAN , 2003; CHRISTENSEN ; MURPHY , 2004; WILLIAMS , 2007; PREUSS , 2010; LANIS ; RICHARDSON , 2012, 2013 ). From this hypothesis, the present research proposes to investigate the association between the level of environmental disclosure and the practice of receive grants and government assistance by the companies listed on the BM & FBovespa. Qualitative ( content analysis of the Standardized Financial Statements available on the BM&FBOVESPA and CVM sites, and Sustainability Reporting and the like available on the websites of companies ) and quantitative ( descriptive statistics , mean comparison test and multiple linear regression) tools were used to understand the behavior of the sample studied. After selection criteria, 337 companies were evaluated. Regarding the Governmentâs Grants and Assistance (GGA) received by the companies studied, it was found that the normative references are still not properly implemented. In relation to social and environmental disclosure, it was emphasized the fact that the government stands out as a target-stakeholder of companies studied. Through joint analysis of SAGs and environmental disclosure, it was found that companies that receive government incentives and disclose income from these incentives, disclose more, corroborating the theory of legitimacy. In the analysis of possible determinants of IDS behavior, the size of the company stands out as influential factor in all analyzed groups. However, analysis of variables directly related to the receipt of incentives and the value of the Incentive and Incentive Type, do not show as a decisive factor for the disclosure of environmental information. It was concluded that, for Brazilian companies, the incentives of the government does not stimulates the use of rescue tools of legitimacy, in the case of this research, the environmental disclosure.

O crescente número de empresas brasileiras que preparam e divulgam voluntariamente relatórios de sustentabilidade, bem como as motivações propostas pela Teoria da Legitimidade para a adoção dessa prática, causam questionamentos a respeito da idoneidade da informação oferecida. Dessa maneira, o presente trabalho investigou se os gráficos apresentados nos relatórios de sustentabilidade publicados por cinquenta empresas brasileiras de capital aberto foram utilizados como ferramentas para o gerenciamento de impressões, sendo manipulados de forma a melhorar a apresentação do desempenho obtido por essas organizações e auxiliar em seus processos de legitimação. A amostra final compreendeu 3.422 informações gráficas e as análises realizadas abrangeram duas formas de gerenciamento de impressões por meio do uso de gráficos abordadas na literatura: a seletividade e a distorção de medidas. Os resultados encontrados, embora explicativos, não forneceram evidências seguras de que os gráficos identificados foram empregados como ferramentas para o gerenciamento de impressão. Apesar da predominância da utilização de gráficos para a representação de notícias positivas e das distorções de medidas físicas identificadas, as evidências conduzem com maior segurança para a interpretação de que tais resultados decorrem de um despreparo e/ou desatenção dos responsáveis pela elaboração dos relatórios de sustentabilidade. / The growing number of Brazilian companies that voluntarily prepare and disclose sustainability reports, and the reasons proposed by the Legitimacy Theory for the adoption of this practice, lead to questions about the trustworthiness of the information offered. Thus, the present study investigated whether the graphs in sustainability reports published by fifty publicly traded Brazilian companies were used as tools for managing impressions, being manipulated in order to improve the presentation of the performance achieved by these organizations and assist in process of legitimation. The final sample consisted of 3,422 raphical information and the analyzes encompassed two forms of impression management through the use of graphs addressed in the literature: selectivity and measures distortion. The results, although explanatory, did not provide good evidence that the identified graphs were used as tools for managing print. Despite the prevalence of the use of graphs to represent positive news and distortions of physical measurement distortions identified, the evidence leads to more safely to the interpretation that such results derive from of a lack of both preparation and/or attention of those responsible for the preparation of sustainability reports.

Bakgrund Idag inkluderas arbetet med CSR i företagens verksamheter och de upprättar också hållbarhetsredovisningar vilket är en följd av ökade påtryckningar från samhället och företagets intressenter, däribland aktieägare. Tidigare studier konstaterar att informationen i hållbarhetsredovisningar varierar väldigt mycket vilket försvårar möjligheten att som läsare kunna utvärdera olika hållbarhetsredovisningar och jämföra mellan olika företag. Till exempel måste aktieägarna tolka och värdera CSR-aktiviteterna på rätt sätt för att det ska skapa ett värde för dem. Företagets arbete med CSR kan skapa värde genom att det ökar förtroendet hos intressenterna och vid negativa händelser skyddar det företaget.   Syfte Vårt syfte är att bidra med förståelse för hållbarhetsredovisningens användbarhet vid en jämförelse mellan olika företag samt vilken information som är viktig för aktieägare att utvärdera i hållbarhetsredovisningar.   Genomförande Vi har genomfört vår studie i linje med den kvalitativa metoden. Vi har samlat in empiri via sex semistrukturerade intervjuer. Analysen av det empiriska resultatet i förhållande till de teorier och de tidigare studierna som presenterats i vår teoretiska referensram har lett till fram till vår slutsats.   Resultat Studien visar att transparens, trovärdighet och väsentlighet är viktiga faktorer för aktieägare att utvärdera i hållbarhetsredovisningar. Aktieägare bör dessutom utvärdera risker, samt sannolikheten att dessa kommer inträffa och vad det kommer att få för konsekvenser. Vår studie visar att hållbarhetsredovisningarna är användbara vid en jämförelse mellan olika företag eftersom utvärderingen sker utifrån helhetsperspektiv, vilket gör att aktieägarna kan bortse att hållbarhetsrapporterna redovisar olika slags information. / Background Today companies include CSR in their operations and establish sustainability reports which is a consequence of increased pressure from society and company stakeholders, including shareholders. Previous studies find that the information in sustainability reports varies, which complicates the ability of readers to evaluate different sustainability reports and compare it between companies. For example, to receive value from the CSR-activities, shareholders must in a correct way interpret and value the activities. Companies' work with CSR can create value for shareholders by increasing the trust of stakeholders which leads to protection of the company when negative events occur.   Purpose Our purpose is to contribute to understanding the use of sustainability reports when comparing between different companies and what information that is important for shareholders to evaluate in sustainability reports.   Methods We conducted our study in line with the qualitative method. The empirical data was gathered through six semi-structured interviews. Analyses of the empirical result in relation to theories and previous studies presented in our theoretical framework led to our conclusions.   Results This study shows that transparency, credibility and essential are important factors for shareholders to evaluate in sustainability reports. Shareholders should also evaluate risks, as well as the probability that these will occur and what it will have for consequences. Our study shows that sustainability reports are useful when comparing different companies because the evaluation is based on the comprehensive picture, which allows shareholders to ignore the fact that the companies report different types of information.

Bakgrund: Intern styrning och kontroll är ett centralt begrepp i en organisations verksamhet och finns till för att hjälpa organisationen till en effektiv verksamhet och en tillförlitlig ekonomisk rapportering där lagar och regler efterföljs. Detta ska i sin tur hjälpa organisationen att uppnå sina mål med verksamheten. Ett flertal skandaler i såväl privat som offentlig verksamhet har uppmärksammats efter felaktigheter såsom misstag, bedrägerier och korruption begåtts. Med en god och fungerande intern kontroll hade sådana felaktigheter kunnat förhindras vilket även stärker organisationens möjligheter att nå målen med verksamheten.   Syfte: Syftet med denna studie är att undersöka kommunernas arbete med den interna kontrollen utifrån COSO-modellen.  Teoretisk referensram: Studien baseras på COSO-modellen och dess fem komponenter, kommunernas uppbyggnad och ansvar samt intressent- och legitimitetsteorin.  Metod: Denna flerfallstudie har en kvalitativ ansats med ett abduktivt angreppssätt. Det empiriska materialet samlades in genom fyra delvis strukturerade intervjuer där intervjuerna genomfördes med två personer från respektive kommun. Det empiriska materialet baseras även på kommunernas reglementen och andra interna dokument.   Slutsats: Slutsatsen med denna studie är att Borlänge och Ludvika kommun arbetar på ett liknande sätt med den interna kontrollen. Vi kan utläsa vissa olikheter mellan kommunerna men generellt sett så sker arbetet likartat och utifrån COSO´s ramverk för intern kontroll. Studien visar på att den interna kontrollen för kommunala verksamheter syftar till att säkra en effektiv verksamhet där lagar och regler efterföljs samt bevara förtroendet hos kommunernas intressenter och framstå som legitim i medborgarnas ögon. / Background: Internal control is a central concept in an organization's operations and exists to assist the organization to become an effective operation with reliable financial reporting where laws and regulations are followed. This, in turn, will help the organization achieve their goals with the operation. Several scandals in both the private and public sectors have been noted for errors such as mistakes, fraud and corruption. With a good and functioning internal control, such errors could have been prevented, which also strengthens the organization's ability to achieve the goals of the operation.  Purpose: The purpose of this study is to investigate the municipalities' work on internal control based on the COSO model.  Theoretical framework: The study is based on the COSO model and its five components, the municipalities' structure and responsibility and the theory of stakeholder and legitimacy theory.  Methodology: This multi-case study has a qualitative approach with an abductive profile. The empirical material was collected through four partially structured interviews, where the interviews were conducted with two people from each municipality. The empirical material is also based on the municipal regulations and other internal documents.  Conclusions: The conclusion of this study is that Borlänge and Ludvika municipality work in a similar way with internal control. There are some differences between the municipalities, but in general, the work is done similarly and based on the COSO framework for internal control. The study shows that the internal control of municipal functions aims to ensure an efficient operation where laws and regulations are followed and to maintain the trust of the municipal stakeholders and appear legitimate in the eyes of the citizens.

Sustainability reporting today is an important tool for companies to show how they work with sustainable development. The design of the companies' sustainability reports can vary since the regulations can be seen as somewhat vague. GRI provides a framework and standards that create a common language for organizations and its reporting of current economic, environmental, and social aspects. However, GRI is voluntary to follow which creates a possibility for both similarities and differences in companies' sustainability reporting. The study was conducted with a qualitative research strategy and a comparative design. The purpose of this study is to investigate the sustainability work of selected companies based on sustainability reporting according to GRI based on stakeholder theory, legitimacy theory and institutional theory. The aim of the study is to compare companies active in the trade and real estate industry to distinguish any similarities and differences. To shed light on the purpose of the study, an analysis of the companies' sustainability reports of four selected years has been carried out, as well as an interview from one of the real estate companies. A comparison has then been made between the companies to point out potential similarities or differences. The analysis of the empirical material indicates that there are some similarities and differences between the surveyed industries' reporting of GRI standards. The main differences are found in the social part of GRI reporting, while the financial and environmental reporting appears to be equally similar. Development over time of GRI reporting also differs between industries. These similarities and differences have been analyzed with the use of stakeholder theory, legitimacy theory and institutional theory.