Adolescent (14-17 year-olds) and young adult (18-20 year-olds) women account for a disproportionate 20% of the total number of unintended pregnancies that occur among women of all reproductive ages (14-55 year-olds) each year in the US. Nearly half (41%) of all unintended pregnancies result from the 18% of women who report inconsistent, incorrect, or no use of their contraceptive method. Evidence shows that a large proportion of these young women, especially those who are sexually active, come to the emergency department for their core sexual and reproductive health care needs. By obtaining a better understanding of the sexual and reproductive health needs and preferences of an urban population that is disproportionately low income and ethnically and racially diverse, our hope is to maximize adolescent and young adult accessibility to contraceptive services most feasible in the PED environment such as Nexplanon, in addition to the provision of comprehensive contraceptive counseling and education. OBJECTIVES: The first objective of this subgroup analysis is to determine the percentage of adolescent and young adult females presenting to an urban PED who are familiar with Nexplanon and to describe the demographic, sexual health, and contraceptive use characteristics of these young women. The second main objective of our study is to evaluate the sources of Nexplanon-related information reported by respondents familiar with Nexplanon. In addition to the main objectives, we also determine participant willingness to initiate or switch to Nexplanon® and receptivity to learning about contraceptive methods during a related or nonrelated visit to the PED. METHODS: This is a cross-sectional descriptive study using a paper-based anonymous questionnaire distributed to female patients, ages 16-21 years, presenting to a Boston urban pediatric emergency department (PED). This is a sub-group analysis of a larger study aimed at describing the contraceptive use history of young women who present to the PED. To identify if any statistically significant categorical variables existed between the two assigned groups, univariate analysis was performed using Chi-squared tests. Odds ratios with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were obtained for the relationship between participants who have heard of Nexplanon and the three statistically significant variables: history of STDs, gravidity, and prior sexual intercourse with a male. Mean and Standard Deviation were used to describe the one continuous variable, age, followed by univariate analysis using independent t-test. Statistical significance was indicated using p-values for the categorical variables and odds ratio with 95% CI for the continuous variable—age. RESULTS: Of the 366 adolescent and young adult females included in our subgroup analysis, 230 (62.8%) indicated they were familiar with Nexplanon. We found that female participants familiar with Nexplanon were 1.3 times more likely to have had a prior STI, twice as likely to have had one or more previous pregnancies, and 3.5 times more likely to have previously engaged in sexual intercourse with a male compared to those female participants unfamiliar with Nexplanon. We also found that most (42.2%) female participants familiar with Nexplanon obtained their contraceptive information from their family and friends only, while about a third obtained their contraceptive information from medical professionals only. Among our total population of respondents, 6% (22/366) of our sub-group participants identified the contraceptive implant as their current method of contraception. Lastly, approximately 21% of female participants familiar with Nexplanon indicated current use of a long-acting reversible contraceptive method at the time of the survey. CONCLUSION: Overall, our study findings are supportive of and consistent with the provision and education of Nexplanon in the PED. This would be a crucial opportunity to provide comprehensive contraceptive counseling and convenient access to the most effective method of contraception among a population that disproportionately affected by unintended pregnancy. This can be made possible by enabling PED health care providers with the proper access to and training in Nexplanon. By adapting these patient-centered practices and techniques, the PED setting can contribute to the notable reduction in teen pregnancy seen in a variety of similar clinic-based interventions. The PED atmosphere has enormous potential to serve young women as an additional venue for contraception education and access.

BACKGROUND: One in ten sexually active adolescents in the United States become pregnant each year. Significant differences in unintended pregnancy and use of long-acting reversible contraceptive (LARC) methods: the sub-dermal implant, the copper intrauterine device (IUD) and hormonal IUDs, exist between socioeconomic strata as well as ethnic and racial groups. Women using LARC are 20 times less likely to experience a pregnancy than women using short-acting reversible methods. Thus, LARCs present a major opportunity for the prevention of unintended pregnancy. PURPOSE: Characterize contraceptive use, demographics, and behavioral characteristics of a novel population: young women presenting to an urban Pediatric Emergency Department (PED) in order to better understand the contraceptive needs of this population. METHODS: We characterized the current LARC usage. Using an anonymous paper-based questionnaire, we surveyed women ages 16-21 years regardless of chief complaint presenting to our PED regarding their demographics, health care access, sexual history, and history of contraceptive use. We conducted a cross-sectional analysis of demographic characteristics for current LARC and non-LARC users (n=331) using chi-squared for categorical variables and student's t-test for continuous variables. RESULTS: No significant differences were found between women currently using LARC and those not using LARC, however current LARC usage in our population was 15.8%, about three times that documented in the most recent national studies conducted in 2013. CONCLUSION: Current LARC use is particularly high in our urban PED setting. More research is necessary to determine if this is part of a larger national trend or if the early implementation of no-cost contraception in Massachusetts and changes in provider or patient attitudes towards LARC may explain the large observed difference in LARC usage.

Introduction: Contraceptive decision-making is individual in nature and access to high-quality contraceptive care, including counseling and the full range of contraceptive methods, can help individuals achieve their personal reproductive goals and prevent unintended pregnancy. The COVID-19 pandemic disrupted provision and utilization of contraceptive counseling and contraceptive methods. Long-acting reversible contraception (LARC) methods, such as the contraceptive implant and intrauterine devices (IUDs), were particularly affected by the pandemic because they require placement by a health care provider in a clinical setting. Choose Well (CW), an ongoing statewide contraceptive access initiative in South Carolina, launched in 2017 and continues through 2022. CW aims to implement best practices of contraceptive care via training and funding for IUD and implant methods. This study examined the perceptions of access to contraceptive counseling and implant and IUD methods during the pandemic in 2020 among CW hospital partners. Methods: Data were collected in 2021 via key informant interviews with partners (n=9) at CW implementing hospitals to assess perceptions of CW activities in 2020, the first year of the COVID-19 pandemic. A semi-structured interview guide was used, and interviews were recorded, transcribed, and consensus coded. A codebook was developed based on the interview guide. Data from select questions of interest related to perceived access to contraceptive counseling, access to LARC methods, and the impact of the pandemic on contraceptive care services were analyzed for this study. Coding was conducted with NVivo software version 1.6.1. Results: Findings show that there was continued provision of contraceptive services during COVID-19 at CW partner hospitals, including an increase in access to contraceptive counseling and LARCs in 2020. The most prevalent facilitator for increased access to contraceptive counseling and LARCs at CW partner hospitals was having key personnel available such as physicians and Obstetrics (OB) navigators. Expanded access to outpatient sites was also noted as a facilitator of contraceptive counseling. Advertising and wide-spread patient education, buy-in and engagement from staff were additional facilitators for the increased access to LARCs. Considering the context of the COVID-19 pandemic, patients wanting to quickly leave the hospital and challenges with staffing contributed to an overall decline in access in some hospital locations. Challenges with staffing included not being able to receive training and nurses being overworked and overburdened. Conclusion: While COVID-19 has posed challenges to contraceptive care service provision, most individuals perceived an increase in access to contraceptive counseling and LARCs at CW partner hospitals. Hospital partners have continued to provide contraceptive services during COVID-19. The findings suggest the success of the CW initiative in increasing access to contraceptive services, particularly during COVID-19 through key facilitators. Staffing positions such as OB Navigators should be funded and maintained to increase access to contraceptive care services in hospital inpatient settings. Coordinating care between hospital inpatient and outpatient settings is similarly important for widespread patient education about contraceptive care services.

Objective: State medicaid programs provide access to effective contraception for people with lower incomes. This study examined contraception use and pregnancy among reproductive-age women enrolled in the South Carolina Medicaid, by eligibility program and socio-demographic sub-groups. Methods: A retrospective cohort of women aged 15–45 who were newly eligible for South Carolina Medicaid from 2012 to 2016 was examined. Log-binomial regression and average marginal effects assessed relationships between contraception use and pregnancies ending in live and non-live births. Contraception was categorized as permanent, long acting reversible contraception (LARC), short-acting hormonal contraception (SAC), or no contraceptive claims. Women with family planning or full-benefit medicaid coverage were included. Results: Approximately 11% of women used LARC methods, 41% used SAC methods, and 46% had no evidence of contraceptive claims. Method utilization varied by eligibility program, race/ethnicity and age. The likelihood of pregnancy was lower among SAC users and lowest among LARC users compared to women with no evidence of contraception across all three programs (family planning APR = 0.44; 95% CI 0.41–0.49 and APR = 0.13, 95% CI 0.10–0.17; Low income families APR = 0.82; 95% CI 0.77–0.88 and APR = 0.33, 95% CI 0.28–0.38; Partners for Healthy Children APR = 0.72; 95% CI 0.68–0.77 and APR = 0.35, 95% CI 0.30–0.43, respectively). Non-Hispanic Black and Hispanic teens were less likely to experience a pregnancy than non-Hispanic white teens. Conclusions for Practice: The likelihood of pregnancy was lower among women using SAC methods and markedly lower among women using LARC. Variation in contraceptive use among racial/ethnic groups was noted despite Medicaid coverage. As new policies and initiatives emerge, these findings provide important context for understanding the role of Medicaid programs in reducing financial barriers to contraceptive services and ensuring access to effective contraception, while fostering reproductive health autonomy among women.

No description available.

Teenage childbearing is considered a societal ill, despite the evidence failing to demonstrate a causative link between teenage childbearing and negative consequences for teens or their children. This thesis argues that the strongly held assertion that teenage childbearing is detrimental to teens and society is rooted in racist eugenics theories and histories of reproductive coercion. Today, social scientists, health care providers, and public health professionals develop and celebrate programs that reduce rates of teen pregnancy, particularly programs that provide Long Acting Reversible Contraceptives (LARCs) to teens in marginalized communities. While these efforts are well-intentioned, they fail to recognize their perpetuation of histories of reproductive coercion of young women of color. This paper recommends ways in which the medical community can be better informed and respect reproductive autonomy in caring for teens from marginalized communities. / Urban Bioethics

Bakgrund: Kvinnors behov av modern familjeplanering är inte tillgodosett. Samhällsekonomiska vinster finns att hämta om fler använder långverkande reversibla preventivmedel (LARC), i stället för mindre effektiva kortverkande metoder. Det finns ett behov av förbättrade arbetssätt för att kvinnor genom ett välinformerat beslut ska kunna välja effektiva preventivmedel. Syfte: Att undersöka om reproduktiv anamnes och sociodemografiska faktorer har en inverkan på valet av LARC vid strukturerad respektive sedvanlig preventivmedelsrådgivning, bland ungdomar och unga vuxna (18–24 år) på ungdomsmottagningar i Stockholmsregionen. Metod: Kvantitativ ansats. Klusterrandomiserad studie och substudie av LOWE-studien. Resultat: Planerad användning av LARC innan besöket (OR 45.78, 95% CI 23,54–89,02) och strukturerad preventivmedelsrådgivning (intervention) (OR 3,67, 95% CI 2,24–5,97) var de variabler som visade sig vara påverka valet av LARC. Slutsats: En trolig anledning till att sociodemografiska faktorer och reproduktiv anamnes inte påverkar valet av LARC i denna studie kan vara att preventivmedelsanvändning är ett mer komplext område. Den information som ges vid preventivmedelsrådgivning har en inverkan på majoriteten av alla patienter, men rådande samhällsnormer styr valet av preventivmedel tillsammans med paradigmskiften inom SRHR. Klinisk tillämpbarhet: Resultatet var av klinisk signifikans för vårdpersonal på ungdomsmottagningar och kan kliniskt tillämpas för en fördjupad kunskap kring bidragande faktorer för valet av LARC. / Background: Women’s need for modern family planning is not met. Socioeconomic benefits can be obtained if less-safe methods are replaced by long-acting reversible contraceptives (LARC). There is a need for improvement within the work to enable women to choose effective contraceptives by a well-informed decision. Aim: To investigate if reproductive history and socioeconomic factors have an impact on the choice of LARC under the influence of customary and structured contraceptive counselling, among adolescents and young adults (18-24) at youth clinics in Stockholm, Sweden. Method: Quantitative method. Cluster randomized controlled intervention study, and a substudy of LOWE. Result: Planned use of LARC before the visit (OR 45.78, 95% CI 23,54–89,02) and structured contraceptive counselling (intervention) (OR 3,67, 95% CI 2,24–5,97) was the variables that influenced the choice of LARC. Conclusion: A likely reason why sociodemographic factors and reproductive history did not influence the choice of LARC, could be that contraceptive use is a part of a more complex context. The information provided in contraceptive counselling has an influence on the majority of all patients, but current societal norms control the choice of contraception, as well as paradigm shifts within SRHR. External validity: The result was of clinical significance for staff at youth clinics and can be clinically applied for in-depth knowledge of influencing factors for the choice of LARC.