After recognizing the need for a simpler approach to the teaching of mathematical terminology, I concluded it would be valuable to make a unit of simplified terms and describe methods of teaching these terms. In this thesis I have compared the terminology found in the Virginia Standards of Learning objectives to the materials found at each grade level. The units developed are as follows: The Primary Persistence Unit- for grades K-2; The Elementary Expansion Unit- for grades 3-5; and The Middle School Mastery Unit- for grades 6-8.

This study examined the mathematical thinking of English learners as they were taught mathematics vocabulary through research-based methods. Four English learners served as focus students. After administering a pre-performance assessment, I taught a 10-lesson unit on fractions. I taught mathematics vocabulary through the use of a mathematics word wall, think-pair-shares, graphic organizers, journal entries, and picture dictionaries. The four focus students were audio recorded to capture their spoken discourse. Student work was collected to capture written discourse. Over the course of the unit, the four focus students used the mathematics vocabulary words that were taught explicitly. The focus students gained both procedural and conceptual knowledge of fractions during this unit. Students also expressed elevated confidence in their mathematics abilities.

Thesis (Ph.D. (Education))--North-West University, Potchefstroom Campus, 2008

Thesis (Ph.D. (Education))--North-West University, Potchefstroom Campus, 2008

Thesis (Ph.D. (Education))--North-West University, Potchefstroom Campus, 2008

Studiens syfte är att synliggöra hur lärare använder det matematiska språket vid undervisandet av addition i årskurserna 1–3. För att uppfylla syftet undersöktes fem lärare vilka observerades vid två tillfällen, där observationerna följdes upp med en intervju. För att analysera lärarnas matematiska språk användes Bergvalls (2016), Hajers, Kindenbergs och Ramsfeldts (2016) samt Kiselmans och Mouwitzs (2008) kategorisering och definiering av matematikens språk. Även lärarnas intervjusvar användes för att bringa klarhet i lärarnas ord- och begreppsanvändning. Resultatet visar att det främst är synonymer till additionens formella ord som används av studiens lärare. Samtliga lärare menar att det matematiska språket ska genomsyra undervisningen. De ser sig själva som språkliga förebilder där de aktivt ska använda additionens formella ord. Det är dock inte lärarens syn på vikten av formellt matematiska språk som påverkar dennes ord- och begreppsval utan lärarens uppfattning om elevens språkliga förmåga. / The aim of this study is to shine a light on how teachers use the mathematical language when teaching addition in grades 1–3. Five teachers were examined to achieve the purpose of the study. The teachers were observed on two occasions which were followed up with an interview. To analyze the teachers' mathematical languages Bergvall’s (2016), Hajer’s, Kindenberg's and Ramsfeldt’s (2016) and Kiselman’s and Mouwitz's (2008) categorizations and definitions of mathematical language were used. The teachers' interview responses were also used to bring clarity to the results from the observations. The result of the study shows that it is primarily synonyms to the formal words of addition that are used by the teachers in the study. All teachers see themselves as linguistic models, where they actively should use the formal words of addition. However, it is not the teacher's view of the importance of formal mathematical language that affects the choice of words and concepts, it’s the teacher's perception of the pupil's linguistic ability.

The study investigated the strategies used in teaching geometry in primary six as well as the perception of teachers on geometry vocabulary teaching, how geometry vocabularies were taught and, lastly, how the teaching of geometry vocabulary influenced primary six learners’ performance in geometry. The Van Hiele Theory of geometrical thinking and the Constructivist Theory of learning guided the study. The study conveniently sampled 250 primary 6 learners and 7 primary 6 mathematics teachers from three privately-owned primary schools in the Greater Accra Region of Ghana. It combined quantitative and qualitative approaches, using O1–X–O2 design. Data collection instruments were 5-point Likert type scale questionnaires (one for teachers, one for learners), a pre-test and post-test of basic geometry, and a semi-structured one-on-one audio-recorded interview of a selected number of learners and all seven teachers. An intervention was carried out in-between the pre-test and post-test, where the researcher taught geometry vocabulary to participants. Quantitative data were analysed using tables, charts, and simple tests while the qualitative analysis involved the transcription of interviews that were coded, categorised and themed. The study found that geometry vocabularies were not taught and that the most commonly used strategy for teaching geometry was the drawing of 2-D shapes and models of 3-D objects on the board. The pre-test and post-test scores were analysed using a paired t-test and the results indicated that the intervention had a positive effect. The qualitative and quantitative results confirmed that the teaching of geometry vocabulary improved learners’ performance in geometry. The study developed a prototype lesson plan for teaching 3-D objects, a geometry vocabulary activity sheet, a sample assessment for prisms and pyramids and recommends a curricular reform to inculcate the teaching of geometry vocabulary in the curriculum with a geometry vocabulary list for learners in each year group, as contribution to knowledge in mathematics education. The study recommends further research to investigate the effect of geometry vocabulary teaching on learners’ performance in geometry across all year groups in the primary school. / Dyondzo a yi lavisisa maendlelo lawa ya tirhisiwaka ku dyondzisa geometry ya tidyondzo ta le hansi ta ka ntsevu, mavonelo ya vadyondzisi eka madyondziselo ya marito ya geometry, tindlela leti tirhisiweke ku dyondzisa marito ya geometry xikan’we ni ndlela leyi madyondziselo ya marito ya geometry ya khumbheke matirhelo ya vadyondzi va tidyondzo ta le hansi ta ka ntsevu. Dyondzo ya ndzavisiso yi leteriwile hi ehleketelelo ra Van Heile ra maehleketelelo ra ndlela ya geometry ni ndlela yo dyondzisa leyi pfumelelaka vadyondzi ku vumba vutivi ku nga ri ntsena ku teka vutivi ku suka eka mudyondzisi. Dyondzo ya vulavisisi yi hlawurile vana va 250 va tidyondzo ta le hansi ta ka ntsevu na 7 wa vadyondzisi va tnhlayo ta tidyondzo ta le hansi ta ka ntsevu kusuka eka swikolo swinharhu swo ka swi nga ri swa mfumo e Greater Accra etikweni ra Ghana. Yi hlanganisile qualitative na quantiutative aapproach, yi tirhisa O1–X–O2 design. Switirhisiwa swo hlengeleta data a swi ri swivutiso hi muxaka wa 5-point scale(yin’we ya vadyondizi, yin’we ya vadyondzi), xikambelwana xo rhanga na xo hetelela xa geometry ya masungulo, xikan’we na nkandziyiso wa mburisano wa vanhu vambirhi eka nhlayo ya vadyondzi ni vadzyondzisi hinkwavo va nkombo. Ntirho wo nghenelerisa wu endliwile exikarhi ka xikambelwana xo rhanga ni xo hetelela laha mulavisisi a nga dyondzisa marito ya geometry eka vanhu lava ngheneleleke. Quantitative data yi hleriwile hi ku tirhisa matafula, ti charts ni swikambelwana swo olova kasi vuhleri bya qualitative byi nghenise kutsariwa ka miburisano leyi hundzuluxiweke yi nyika tinhlamuselo leti tumbeleke. Leti vekiweke hi ku ya hi mintlawa ni maendlelo ya tona. Dyondzo ya ndzavisiso yi kume leswaku marito ya geometry a ya dyondzisiwanga ni leswaku maendlelo yo toloveleka ya ku dyondzisa geomeyry i ya drawing ya xivumbeko xa 2-D ni mfanekiso wa nchumu wa 3-D eka bodo. Mbuyelo wa Xikambelwana xo sungula na xo hetelela wu hleriwile hi ku tirhisa t-test (xikambelwana xa T) lexi hlanganisiweke naswona mbuyelo wu komba leswaku maendlelo himkwawo ya vile ni xiave lexinene. Mbuyelo wa Qualitative na Quantitative wu tiyisisile leswaku ku dyondzisiwa ka marito ya geometry swi antswisa matirhelo ya vadyondzi eka dyondzo ya geometry. Dyondzo ya vulavisisi yi antswisile kumbe ku kurisa prototype lesson plan ya ku dyondzisa 3-D objects, sheet ya migingiriko ya marito ya geometry na ku bumabumela circular reform ku dyondzisa madyondziselo ya marito ya geometry eka kharikhulamu leyi ng na nxaxamelo wa marito ya geometry ya vadyondzi eka ntlawa wa lembe na lembe, ta ni hi mpfuneto wa vutivi eka dyondzo ya tinhlayo. Dyondzo ya vulavisisi yi bumabumela leswaku vulavisisi byi ya emahlweni ku lavisisa xiave xa madyondziselo ya marito ya geometry eka matirhelo ya vadzyondzi eka geometry eka malembe ni mintlawa hinkwayo exikolweni xa le hansi. / Thuto ye e nyakisisitse ditsela tseo di somiswago go ruteng ga geometry go mphato wa bo tshelela, temogo ya barutisi go ruteng tlotlontsu ya geometry, tsela yeo ditlotlontsu tsa geometry di rutilwego ka gona go akaretswa le, sa mafelelo, ka mokgwa wo thuto ya tlotlontsu ya geometry e tutueditsego mabokgoni a barutwana ba mphato wa bo tshelela go dithuto tsa geometry. Thuto ya van Hiele ya geometrical thinking le ya constructivist theory of learning di hlahlile thuto ye. Thuto ye e somisitse ga bonolo mohlala wa barutwana ba 250 ba mphato wa 6 le barutisi ba dipalo ba supa ba go ruta mphato wa 6 go tswa dikolong tsa tlase tse tharo tsa go ikema seleteng sa Greater Accra Region of Ghana. Thuto ye e kopantse mekgwa ya bontsi/dipalopalo (quantitative) le boleng (qualitative), go somiswa tlhamo ya O1-X-O2. Didiriswa tsa kgobaketso ya boitsebiso e bile 5-point Likert Type Scale Questionnaire (ye tee ya barutisi, ye tee ya barutwana), moleko wa pele le moleko wa morago wa geometry ya motheo, le poledisano yeo e gatisitswego ya tlhamego ya sewelo (semi-structured) ya barutwana bao ba kgethilwego ga mmogo le barutisi ka moka ba supa. Thekgo e ile ya phethagatswa/fiwa magareng ga moleko wa pele le moleko wa morago moo monyakisisi a rutilego tlotlontsu ya geometry go batseakarolo. Boitsebiso bja bontsi (quantitative data) bo sekasekilwe ka go somisa ditafola, ditshate, le teko e bonolo mola ditshekatsheko tsa boleng (qualitative analysis) di akareditse go ngwalolla dipoledisano tseo di thulagantswego, tsa hlophiwa le go beakanywa ka sehlogo. Thuto ye e itullotse gore ditlotlontsu tsa geometry ga se tsa rutwa ebile mekgwana yeo e somisitswego ya setlwaedi go ruta geometry ebile go thala dibopego tsa 2-D le mehlala ya didiriswa tsa 3-D letlapeng. Dintlha tsa moleko wa pele le moleko wa bobedi di sekasekilwe ka go somisa mokgwa wa go phera moleko wa t (t-test). Dipoelo di supeditse gore thekgo yeo e filwego e bile le khuetso ye botse. Dipoelo tsa bontsi le boleng di netefaditse gore go ruta tlotlontsu ya geometry go kaonafatsa mabokgoni a barutwana dithutong tsa geometry. Nyakisiso ye e tsweleditse lenaneothuto la go dira diteko go ruteng didiritswa tsa 3-D le papetlatshomelo ya tlotlontsu ya geometry gape le go kgothaletsa mpshafatso ya lenaneo-thuto go tsenyeletsa thuto ya tlotlontsu ya geometry ka gare ga lenaneo-thuto gammogo le lelokelelo la tlotlontsu ya geometry ya barutwana go dihlopha tsa mengwageng ka moka. Se e tla ba e le tlaleletso ya tsebo go thuto ya dipalo. Thuto ye e kgothaletsa dinyakisiso tsa go ya pele go nyakolla mafelelo a go ruta tlotlontsu ya geometry go tiro ya, goba dipoelo tsa, barutwana go thuto ya geometry go dihlopha tsa mengwaga ka moka tsa sekolo sa tlase. / Mathematics Education / Ph. D. (Mathematics Education)