- About
-
The Global ETD Search service is a free service for researchers
to find electronic theses and dissertations. This service is
provided by the
Networked Digital Library of Theses and Dissertations.
Our metadata is collected from universities around the world. If you manage a university/consortium/country archive and want to be added, details can be found on the NDLTD website.
Search results
Showing 1 to 5 of 5 (0.061 seconds)Spelling suggestions: "subject:"fodern democracy"" "subject:"amodern democracy""
| 1 |
The democratic order as a supra-civilization : novus ordo seclorumDuncan, Phillip Brooks 01 October 2003 (has links)
No description available.
|
| 2 |
L'autorité bienveillante dans la modernité démocratique. Entre éducation, pédagogie et politique / Benevolent authority in modern democracy. At the meeting point between education, pedagogy and politicsRoelens, Camille 09 April 2019 (has links)
Ce travail de thèse adopte le point de vue de la philosophie politique de l’éducation pour penser une métamorphose de l’autorité dans la modernité démocratique, à l’aune du principe de légitimité individualiste. Nous y prenons acte des transformations majeures ayant traversé les démocraties occidentales après 1945 et de la trajectoire de la notion d’autorité dans cette même période. Il s’agit ensuite d’envisager l’articulation syntagmatique des concepts d’autorité et de bienveillance pour en faire des moyens au service de l’autonomie des individus. Cette conceptualisation de l’autorité bienveillante permet alors de reprendre à nouveaux frais la question de l’articulation de la notion d’autorité avec le mode de positionnement dans le temps et le mode de liens entre les êtres que peuvent être ceux de la modernité démocratique, soit une refonte de la trinité romaine autorité-religion-tradition. Il devient également possible de traiter de concert les questions de la reconnaissance de l’autorité dans sa légitimité et de la contribution des relations d’autorité à la quête par chacun de la reconnaissance individuelle. Ainsi envisagée, la praxis de l’autorité bienveillante dans l’éducation peut être explorée, et sa fécondité pour faire face aux défis éducatifs contemporains être mise en lumière. Penser l’autorité en éducation comme une praxis signifie renoncer à prétendre proposer un modèle figé d’autorité, valable en tout, pour tout et pour tous. La dimension éthique de l’assomption d’une place d’autorité ne peut qu’en être renforcée. Faire de l’autonomie individuelle le but de l’éducation implique que cette éthique ne soit ni moraliste, ni paternaliste, ni abstentionniste. / This thesis work adopts the point of view of educational political philosophy to contemplate a metamorphosis of authority in democratic modernity, in the light of the principle of individualist legitimacy. In this context, we acknowledge the major changes which occurred in modern democracies since 1945, as well as the path of the notion of authority over the same period of time. Then, we consider the syntagmatic articulation of authority and kindness concepts, to turn them into means serving autonomy of individuals. This conceptualization of benevolent authority allows to reconsider, from the very beginning, the link between authority, and the positioning in time and relationships between the beings within democratic modernity, that is to say redesigning the roman trinity authority – religion – tradition. Hence, one can also investigate jointly the questions of authority acknowledgment in its legitimacy, and of the role of authority relationships in everyone’s quest for individual reconnaissance. Thus, the praxis of benevolent authority in education can be explored, allowing to highlight its fruitfulness to face contemporary educational challenges. Considering authority in education as a praxis means renouncing to propose a frozen model of authority, applicable to any situation and for anyone. This approach can only strengthen the assumption of a place of authority. Setting individual authority as a goal of education requires this ethics to be neither moralistic, nor paternalistic nor abstentionist.
|
| 3 |
Democracy in Islamic and international law : a case study of Saudi ArabiaAl-Harbi, Ibrahim Sulaiman January 2010 (has links)
Following the rise of Islamic fundamentalism, Muslim nations have been placed in the spotlight of international debate; the prevailing understanding is that democracy and Islam are fundamentally incompatible. This verdict is particularly damning in light of the trend in International Law which, since the collapse of communism in Eastern Europe, has equated democracy with human rights. Yet, a thorough analysis of the debate, taking into account the historical and theoretical bases of liberal democracy — the cultural, legal, and political development of Islam, and the extent to which the politics of Islamic countries represents the politics of Islam — reveals that democracy and Islam are, in fact, fundamentally compatible. In practice, Islamic Law can be applied alongside developments in democratic representations and human rights, whilst popular perceptions of Islam as inhibiting development in human rights are often unfounded, as can be demonstrated by examining the case of Saudi Arabia.
|
| 4 |
中山先生的權能區分思想與當代民主政治的運作莊輝濤, ZHUNG, HUI-TAO Unknown Date (has links)
第一章：「緒論」：
說明論文的研究目的、研究方法、研究架構。
第二章：「民主政治的理想主義與實際」：
先揩評古典民主思想，後經驗性民主理論為基礎，配合國家主權的概念，說論現代民
主政治不過是政府統治權與人民控制權的互動。
第三章：「當代民主效治中政府治權與人民控制權的互動」：
分析當代民主政治的運作；以政府職能的擴增、專家統台、統治權集中化為政府統治
權運作的特徵；以憲政制度、選舉權擴大、普通法律的創制複決權與罷免權的式微、
輿論、壓力團體、政黨的發達、有利人民控制的垃會條件的存在為人民控制權運作的
特徵或方式；末以平常時期政府統治權與人民控制權的平衡互動與非常時期的調適做
結。
第四章：「中山先生的權能區分思想」：
說明權能區分思想提出的時代背景，並依次論列權能的概念區分、權能平衡的政治運
作理想、權能平衡的制的制度設計。
第五章：「權能區分思想的評估」：
經驗性民主理論與當代民主政治的實際運作，概符合權能區分思想中的原則；唯若干
問題值得討論。
|
| 5 |
Ett diadem och dess ikonografi : En studie av kejsarinnan Josephines pärl- och kamédiadem i porträtt mellan 1812 och 2010 / A Diadem and its Iconography : A Study of Empress Josephine’s Pearl and Cameo Diadem in Portraits between 1812 and 2010af Klinteberg, Kristina January 2021 (has links)
The main purpose of this study of a pearl and cameo diadem, given by Napoleon to his first wife Josephine in 1809, is to follow its representation in portraiture from Paris in 1812 to Stockholm in 2010, and explore how the iconography develops during these 200 years. From the earlier years, the diadem is found only in miniatures, then after coming to the new royal family in Sweden, the Bernadottes, it is given a role of an heirloom representing history and families in grand paintings, arriving to the present well-known wedding hairpiece, covered by modern media, where the diadem is more of a crown than the open, forehead-covering piece of fashion jewellery it was during the Napoleonic era in France. The portraits from 1812, 1814, 1836, 1837, 1877, 1976, 2000/2003 and 2010 also portray a development of the female role model of its time. Just like the hair piece attains an iconography which comprises not only the highest dress codes but also a possibility of status transformation for the people involved in ceremony, the role of the country’s First Lady is about to change into a higher, more egalitarian position of present days.
|
Page generated in 0.0684 seconds