Research concerning New Taiwanese issue is focused on New Taiwanese students’ family environment, academic achievement, school life adaptability, behavioral development in the past years. Although New Taiwanese adolescents will be an emerging population, there has no research that looks specifically at the identity development during early adolescence. There is considerable literature on school life; however, no of it addresses New Taiwanese psychological development. This study, informed by Erikson’s (1959) model of psychosocial development and Marcia’s (1966) four statuses of identity, compared ego- identity development in New Taiwanese junior high students to local Taiwanese junior high students. The purpose in the present study was to provide an approach to the investigation of identity formation among local Taiwanese and New Taiwanese junior high students. The hypothesis of this study is that there are differences in ego- identity development between local Taiwanese and New Taiwanese junior high students. Variations in identity status will be measured by administering the EOM-EIS- 2 (Adams & Bennion, 1989) and a demographic survey to junior high students from three different schools in Xindian City, Taipei County. The study also utilized the qualitative approach method to provide a sound basis for analyzing respondents’ experience and/ or perspectives by Marcia’s Identity Status Interview (ISI). Identity scores and distributions were examined for 550 (422 local Taiwanese, 128 New Taiwanese) junior high students. Results indicated that the significant difference in Foreclosure Identity between New Taiwanese and local Taiwanese was observed with local Taiwanese scoring higher. Local Taiwanese may therefore be more inclined to adopt their parents’ commitments to religious and political beliefs, occupational preferences, and philosophical lifestyles. Results also indicated that New Taiwanese were founded to be significantly more ideological diffused than their local Taiwanese peers. The environment for New Taiwanese was more constricted and less likely to provide room for the adolescent’s exploration and have not made decision regarding. Additionally, the present study revealed that 52% of the sample (245 participants including 196 local Taiwanese and 49 New Taiwanese junior high students) fell into one of the four discrete identity status categories, with 56% of this group classified as either diffused or foreclosed. Within these two less sophisticated statuses, New Taiwanese less frequently fell into Identity Foreclosed than local Taiwanese but more frequently fell into Identity Diffusion than local Taiwanese. To gain in- depth information of participants’ experience and/ or perspectives, 43 (32 local Taiwanese, 11 New Taiwanese) of the 245 participants were also assessed using Marcia’s Identity Status Interview (ISI). Although this finding highlights the differences ego- identity development during early adolescence among local Taiwanese and New Taiwanese junior high students, most of the identity developmental outcomes were the same between the two groups. / Research concerning New Taiwanese issue is focused on New Taiwanese students’ family environment, academic achievement, school life adaptability, behavioral development in the past years. Although New Taiwanese adolescents will be an emerging population, there has no research that looks specifically at the identity development during early adolescence. There is considerable literature on school life; however, no of it addresses New Taiwanese psychological development. This study, informed by Erikson’s (1959) model of psychosocial development and Marcia’s (1966) four statuses of identity, compared ego- identity development in New Taiwanese junior high students to local Taiwanese junior high students. The purpose in the present study was to provide an approach to the investigation of identity formation among local Taiwanese and New Taiwanese junior high students. The hypothesis of this study is that there are differences in ego- identity development between local Taiwanese and New Taiwanese junior high students. Variations in identity status will be measured by administering the EOM-EIS- 2 (Adams & Bennion, 1989) and a demographic survey to junior high students from three different schools in Xindian City, Taipei County. The study also utilized the qualitative approach method to provide a sound basis for analyzing respondents’ experience and/ or perspectives by Marcia’s Identity Status Interview (ISI). Identity scores and distributions were examined for 550 (422 local Taiwanese, 128 New Taiwanese) junior high students. Results indicated that the significant difference in Foreclosure Identity between New Taiwanese and local Taiwanese was observed with local Taiwanese scoring higher. Local Taiwanese may therefore be more inclined to adopt their parents’ commitments to religious and political beliefs, occupational preferences, and philosophical lifestyles. Results also indicated that New Taiwanese were founded to be significantly more ideological diffused than their local Taiwanese peers. The environment for New Taiwanese was more constricted and less likely to provide room for the adolescent’s exploration and have not made decision regarding. Additionally, the present study revealed that 52% of the sample (245 participants including 196 local Taiwanese and 49 New Taiwanese junior high students) fell into one of the four discrete identity status categories, with 56% of this group classified as either diffused or foreclosed. Within these two less sophisticated statuses, New Taiwanese less frequently fell into Identity Foreclosed than local Taiwanese but more frequently fell into Identity Diffusion than local Taiwanese. To gain in- depth information of participants’ experience and/ or perspectives, 43 (32 local Taiwanese, 11 New Taiwanese) of the 245 participants were also assessed using Marcia’s Identity Status Interview (ISI). Although this finding highlights the differences ego- identity development during early adolescence among local Taiwanese and New Taiwanese junior high students, most of the identity developmental outcomes were the same between the two groups.

台湾の「外籍」の配偶者との国際結婚の現状と実態を把握するため、さまざまな研究課題を設定し、多くの「外籍」の配偶者へのインタビューを行う質的調査、および多くの台湾人を調査対象者にする量的調査を実施し、より客観的な現状と実態を明らかにした。さらに、現在の台湾社会で大きな注目を浴びている、「外籍」の母親の母語や文化の継承や母語学習などのさまざまな問題を明らかにした。 / 博士(教育文化学) / Doctor of Philosophy in Education and Culture / 同志社大学 / Doshisha University

本文主要的內容是討論在「台灣民族主義」的發展之下，無論是國民黨的「新國家霸權計畫」或是民進黨的「台灣獨立建國運動」，兩者皆是訴諸台灣人民(新台灣人)對於新國族的認可，但是這樣的一個民族國家，距離現代「公民國家」的形態還非常遙遠，因為台灣並沒有一個健全的憲政體制文化，得以培養出多元的公共領域及民主的公民意識，而這些都是重建新公民社會所必須的。就算人民成為國家主權的最高擁有者，但在缺乏社會性的結社組織之下，卻只能導向生命共同體之內人民普遍意志的集合，而淪為統治者統治正當性背書的工具。所以批判「台灣民族主義」，就是檢視在民族主義的運作之下對於民主政治發展的影響。最後並提出以「多元公共領域」及「民主公民身份」做為重建新公民社會的基礎，以降低民族主義對於公民社會發展的影響，而穩固的公民社會是民主得以繼續深化的根基。 第一章 導論 1 第一節 研究動機與背景 1 第二節 研究架構與目的 3 第三節 文獻探討 7 第二章 民族、民族主義與民族國家 13 第一節 「民族」理論初探 15 第二節 民族主義與國(家)族的建構 21 第三節 民族主義與人民身份的建構 26 第三章 台灣民族主義的發展 29 第一節 台灣民族意識的萌芽 31 第二節 威權體制轉型期的台灣原型民族主義 38 第三節 新國家論述之下的台灣民族主義 45 第四章 台灣公民社會的重建 53 第一節 消失的民間社會與興起中的「共同體」 55 第二節 民主公民身份及多元公共領域 64 第三節 公民社會的重建 72 第五章 結論 79 參考文獻 83