- About
-
The Global ETD Search service is a free service for researchers
to find electronic theses and dissertations. This service is
provided by the
Networked Digital Library of Theses and Dissertations.
Our metadata is collected from universities around the world. If you manage a university/consortium/country archive and want to be added, details can be found on the NDLTD website.
Search results
Showing 31 to 40 of 2539 (0.042 seconds)Spelling suggestions: "subject:"nonjudicial"" "subject:"andjudicial""
| 31 |
Justiciability before the International Court of JusticeMaciolek, Nicholas January 2014 (has links)
No description available.
|
| 32 |
The distinct use and development of administrative law principles by the European Court of JusticeMakris, Maria C. January 1991 (has links)
No description available.
|
| 33 |
A reconsideration of constitutional review in the United Arab Emirates : 'a posteriori' or 'a priori' review?Al-Ghufli, Saeed M. A. O. January 2000 (has links)
No description available.
|
| 34 |
Sanitizing the administration of the dealth penalty in the Commonwealth Caribbean : a critical appraisal of Pratt and Morgan v Attorney General of Jamaica and its progenyStoute, Graham January 2003 (has links)
No description available.
|
| 35 |
Family, property and the state in Ghana : changing customary law in an urban settingJosiah-Aryeh, Nii Armah January 1996 (has links)
No description available.
|
| 36 |
Public participation in administrative rulemaking : a comparative study of the American and of European (English, German, Greek) legal systemsZiamou, Theodora January 1998 (has links)
No description available.
|
| 37 |
Judges and unjust lawsEdlin, Douglas E. January 2002 (has links)
No description available.
|
| 38 |
Reforma del Poder Judicial: Reflexiones sobre la agenda a seguirCampos Noriega, Miguel Ángel 11 May 2015 (has links)
En mi opinión el plan de
Ceriajus es una excelente plataforma para iniciar un
verdadero cambio del Poder Judicial, por supuesto,
como toda obra humana -y habiendo sido entregada
en mayo del 2004- es evidente que hay algunos
aspectos que pueden ser perfeccionados, pero como
plataforma de inicio es fundamental porque por
primera vez en el Perú, cuando se habla oficialmente
sobre reforma judicial lo que se está planteando es
una reforma de todo el sistema de justicia y no solo
del Poder Judicial. Lo segundo, es el eterno debate
sobre quién debe liderar la reforma, en nuestra opinión
quien tiene la responsabilidad de liderar naturalmente
la reforma -entre otros pero principalmente- es la Corte
Suprema. Lamentablemente la Corte Suprema fue
contraria al informe Ceriajus, ha habido resistencia
en los hechos, aunque ahora coinciden parcialmente
en que el plan de Ceriajus es bueno y que hay que
implementarlo.
|
| 39 |
Forums and methods of dispute settlement in Lesotho : a fresh look at the depictions of the judicial systemKimane, Itumeleng January 1989 (has links)
No description available.
|
| 40 |
Reformation of international judicial institutions as key to global conflict preventionNyuykonge, Wiykiynyuy Charles 19 March 2010 (has links)
MA, Faculty of Humanities, School of Social Sciences, University of the Witwatersrand, 2007 / The settlement of international disputes by peaceful means has been described as one of the principles basic to the whole structure of the international system. It has been contended that this principle is the natural corollary for the prohibition of the use of force in settlement of international disputes enshrined in Art. 24 of the United Nations Charter, and embodied in Art. 2 (3). The UN’s organ assigned this mediation role is the International Court of Justice (ICJ) for matters with respect to state responsibility. The International Criminal Court (ICC), the International Criminal Tribunal for Yugoslavia (ICTY), the International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda (ICTR), and the Special Court of Sierra Leone are international tribunals with jurisdiction to try matters relating to individual criminal responsibility. At continental as well as at regional levels, some states have set up their own institutions to peacefully manage conflict amongst them and in the broader region. Nevertheless, the question—in a world where dispute settlement institutions and processes are supernumerary relative to conflicts, can they effectively serve as key to conflict prevention? remains a major concern. Based on critical research, this report inquires whether conflict prevention is mythical or an attainable objective and whether the international judiciary which is prima facie a conflict mediation body can catalyze conflict prevention. In attempting to answer these questions, an understanding of the concepts of free and fair trial is preponderant; coupled with understanding current debates about the undermining of international justice by the states.
|
Page generated in 0.0487 seconds