Base Teórica: A prevalência de dor crônica na infância é bem documentada e estima-se que atinja entre 20 a 35% da população pediátrica, podendo causar enorme sofrimento em seus portadores, inaptidões pessoais e ser acompanhada de sintomas emocionais importantes. O manejo dessas criancas inclui a compreensão dos fatores biomecânicos, psicológicos e socioculturais associados ao seu contexto. Dentre os fatores psíquicos o pensamento catastrófico sobre a dor, definido como uma resposta negativa exagerada a mesma, tem sido identificado como uma estratégia adaptativa às circunstâncias. A escala de avaliação do pensamento catastrófico em crianças - Pain Catastrophizing Scale – child version (PCS-C), adaptada da escala para adultos, já está validada em diferentes línguas, no entanto, pouco se sabe sobre o catastrofismo em crianças brasileiras. Objetivos: O objetivo desse estudo é validar e adaptar a PCS-C para o português do Brasil, examinar as propriedades psicométricas, bem como a estrutura fatorial da escala, e sua correlação com a dor e suas consequências em crianças com e sem dor crônica. Métodos: A versão em português do Brasil foi modificada por um grupo de especialistas a fim de torná-la apropriada para aplicação em crianças entre 7-12 anos. Para avaliar as propriedades psicométricas, 100 crianças (44 com dor crônica e 56 saudáveis) responderam a versão brasileira da PCS-C (BPCS-C). Também foram questionadas quanto aos níveis de dor e quanto à capacidade funcional durante atividades da prática de educação física na escola. Ainda, amostras de saliva foram passivamente coletadas a fim de se medir o fator neurotrófico derivado do cérebro (BDNF). O subgrupo de crianças com dor crônica foi recrutado dos ambulatórios de gastro pediatria, oncologia e reumatologia do Hospital de Clínicas de Porto Alegre e o subgrupo de crianças saudáveis foi recrutado de uma escola pública. Resultados: O estudo mostrou uma boa consistência interna do instrumento (alfa de Crombach: 0,81 para o escore total da BPCS-C). Tanto a análise paralela, quanto a análise fatorial exploratória identificaram 2 dimensões (fatores) no instrumento. A análise fatorial confirmatória apresentou os melhores valores de ajustamento (CFI, confirmatory fit-index) quando comparada a outros modelos já existentes. Os escores totais da BPCS-C não diferiram entre as crianças com dor crônica e as saudáveis. No entanto, a dificuldade progressiva de realizar as atividades da Educação Física na escola foi associada com o catastrofismo (p=0,019) nos pacientes com dor crônica. BDNF salivar apresentou fraca associação (r=0,27 p=0,012) com o catastrofismo. Conclusão: Os resultados suportam a validade e confiabilidade da BPCS-C. A estrutura de 2 fatores apresentou adequado ajustamento podendo ser usada, mesmo que diferindo do número de fatores da escala original, pois escore total é o valor mais utilizado para composição do diagnóstico. A ausência de diferença entre os escores nas crianças doentes e saudáveis sugere a necessidade de estudos mais profundos sobre a catastrofização em crianças e a necessidade de instrumentos específicos, e não apenas adaptação daqueles utilizados em adultos. / Introduction: The prevalence of chronic pain in childhood is well documented and is estimated to reach 20 and 35% of the pediatric population. Chronica pain can cause enormous suffering, personal miscarriages and it can be accompanied by important emotional symptoms. The management of these children includes understanding the biomechanical, psychological and sociocultural factors associated in this context. Among the psychic factors, catastrophic thinking about pain is identified as an adaptive strategy to the circumstances. The instrument for catastrophic thinking evaluation in children - Pain Catastrophizing Scale - child version (PCS-C), adapted from the scale for adults, is already validated in different languages, however little is known about catastrophism in Brazilian children. Objectives:. With this cross-sectional study, we aim to adapt the Brazilian version of the PCS-C (BPCS-C) and to examine the psychometric properties and factorial structure of the scale for children with and without chronic pain. Methods: The Brazilian version of the PCS-C was modified by a group of experts to appropriate it for children between 7-12 years. To asses the psychometric properties of the version, 100 children (44 with chronic pain and 56 healthy children) answered the BPCS-C, the visual analog scale and one functional school activity question. It was also collected a passive salivary sample to measure BDNF. The chronic pain children sample was recruited from the gastropediatric, oncologic, and reumatologic ambulatories at a tertiary hospital and the healthy children from a fifth grade public school. Results: We observed good internal consistency (Cronbach’s value of 0.81 for the total BPCS-C). Both parallel analysis and exploratory factorial analysis retained 2 factors for instrument dimensions. The confirmatory factorial analysis presented the best adjustment values (CFI, confirmatory fit-index) when compared to other existing pre-existing models. BPCS-C total scores were not diferente between chronic pain and healthy children. However, the progressive difficulty of performing physical education activities at school was associated with catastrophism (p = 0.019) in patients with chronic pain. 6 Salivary BDNF presented a weak association (r = 0.27 p = 0.012) with catastrophism. Discussion: The results support the validity and reliability of BPCS-C. The 2-factors structure presented an adequate adjustment and can be used for brazilian children population. Although different from the number of factors of the original scale, the instrument measured the most used value for diagnosis, total score. The lack of difference between scores in chronic pain and healthy children suggests the necessity of further studies on catastrophizing in children, as well as for specific instruments, instead of simple adaptation of those used in adults.

Base Teórica: A prevalência de dor crônica na infância é bem documentada e estima-se que atinja entre 20 a 35% da população pediátrica, podendo causar enorme sofrimento em seus portadores, inaptidões pessoais e ser acompanhada de sintomas emocionais importantes. O manejo dessas criancas inclui a compreensão dos fatores biomecânicos, psicológicos e socioculturais associados ao seu contexto. Dentre os fatores psíquicos o pensamento catastrófico sobre a dor, definido como uma resposta negativa exagerada a mesma, tem sido identificado como uma estratégia adaptativa às circunstâncias. A escala de avaliação do pensamento catastrófico em crianças - Pain Catastrophizing Scale – child version (PCS-C), adaptada da escala para adultos, já está validada em diferentes línguas, no entanto, pouco se sabe sobre o catastrofismo em crianças brasileiras. Objetivos: O objetivo desse estudo é validar e adaptar a PCS-C para o português do Brasil, examinar as propriedades psicométricas, bem como a estrutura fatorial da escala, e sua correlação com a dor e suas consequências em crianças com e sem dor crônica. Métodos: A versão em português do Brasil foi modificada por um grupo de especialistas a fim de torná-la apropriada para aplicação em crianças entre 7-12 anos. Para avaliar as propriedades psicométricas, 100 crianças (44 com dor crônica e 56 saudáveis) responderam a versão brasileira da PCS-C (BPCS-C). Também foram questionadas quanto aos níveis de dor e quanto à capacidade funcional durante atividades da prática de educação física na escola. Ainda, amostras de saliva foram passivamente coletadas a fim de se medir o fator neurotrófico derivado do cérebro (BDNF). O subgrupo de crianças com dor crônica foi recrutado dos ambulatórios de gastro pediatria, oncologia e reumatologia do Hospital de Clínicas de Porto Alegre e o subgrupo de crianças saudáveis foi recrutado de uma escola pública. Resultados: O estudo mostrou uma boa consistência interna do instrumento (alfa de Crombach: 0,81 para o escore total da BPCS-C). Tanto a análise paralela, quanto a análise fatorial exploratória identificaram 2 dimensões (fatores) no instrumento. A análise fatorial confirmatória apresentou os melhores valores de ajustamento (CFI, confirmatory fit-index) quando comparada a outros modelos já existentes. Os escores totais da BPCS-C não diferiram entre as crianças com dor crônica e as saudáveis. No entanto, a dificuldade progressiva de realizar as atividades da Educação Física na escola foi associada com o catastrofismo (p=0,019) nos pacientes com dor crônica. BDNF salivar apresentou fraca associação (r=0,27 p=0,012) com o catastrofismo. Conclusão: Os resultados suportam a validade e confiabilidade da BPCS-C. A estrutura de 2 fatores apresentou adequado ajustamento podendo ser usada, mesmo que diferindo do número de fatores da escala original, pois escore total é o valor mais utilizado para composição do diagnóstico. A ausência de diferença entre os escores nas crianças doentes e saudáveis sugere a necessidade de estudos mais profundos sobre a catastrofização em crianças e a necessidade de instrumentos específicos, e não apenas adaptação daqueles utilizados em adultos. / Introduction: The prevalence of chronic pain in childhood is well documented and is estimated to reach 20 and 35% of the pediatric population. Chronica pain can cause enormous suffering, personal miscarriages and it can be accompanied by important emotional symptoms. The management of these children includes understanding the biomechanical, psychological and sociocultural factors associated in this context. Among the psychic factors, catastrophic thinking about pain is identified as an adaptive strategy to the circumstances. The instrument for catastrophic thinking evaluation in children - Pain Catastrophizing Scale - child version (PCS-C), adapted from the scale for adults, is already validated in different languages, however little is known about catastrophism in Brazilian children. Objectives:. With this cross-sectional study, we aim to adapt the Brazilian version of the PCS-C (BPCS-C) and to examine the psychometric properties and factorial structure of the scale for children with and without chronic pain. Methods: The Brazilian version of the PCS-C was modified by a group of experts to appropriate it for children between 7-12 years. To asses the psychometric properties of the version, 100 children (44 with chronic pain and 56 healthy children) answered the BPCS-C, the visual analog scale and one functional school activity question. It was also collected a passive salivary sample to measure BDNF. The chronic pain children sample was recruited from the gastropediatric, oncologic, and reumatologic ambulatories at a tertiary hospital and the healthy children from a fifth grade public school. Results: We observed good internal consistency (Cronbach’s value of 0.81 for the total BPCS-C). Both parallel analysis and exploratory factorial analysis retained 2 factors for instrument dimensions. The confirmatory factorial analysis presented the best adjustment values (CFI, confirmatory fit-index) when compared to other existing pre-existing models. BPCS-C total scores were not diferente between chronic pain and healthy children. However, the progressive difficulty of performing physical education activities at school was associated with catastrophism (p = 0.019) in patients with chronic pain. 6 Salivary BDNF presented a weak association (r = 0.27 p = 0.012) with catastrophism. Discussion: The results support the validity and reliability of BPCS-C. The 2-factors structure presented an adequate adjustment and can be used for brazilian children population. Although different from the number of factors of the original scale, the instrument measured the most used value for diagnosis, total score. The lack of difference between scores in chronic pain and healthy children suggests the necessity of further studies on catastrophizing in children, as well as for specific instruments, instead of simple adaptation of those used in adults.

Intolerance of uncertainty concerns how one views and reacts touncertainty, where one who’s highly intolerant would find it verydiscomforting when confronted with uncertain situations. The purposeof this study was to examine the associations between intolerance ofuncertainty, pain catastrophizing, emotion regulation andpsychopathic traits. These variables were to be examined in thecontext of a Beads Task and a Cold Pressor Test (CPT). Wehypothesized that there would be a positive significant associationbetween intolerance of uncertainty, pain catastrophizing, emotionregulation, psychopathic traits. We also hypothesized that there wouldbe a difference depending on the difficulty of the Beads Task. To doso, data was collected from 60 university students (32 females and 28males). The results showed that there was a significant, positiveassociation between intolerance of uncertainty, pain catastrophizing,emotion regulation and the Beads Task measurements. Some of theseresults were similar to previous studies. / Intolerans mot osäkerhet berör hur en person uppfattar och reagerarpå osäkerhet, där någon som är intolerant upplever osäkra situationersom obehagliga. Syftet med denna studie var att undersökaassociationerna mellan intolerans mot osäkerhet,smärtkatastrofiering, känsloreglering och psykopatiskapersonlighetsdrag. Dessa variabler undersöktes i sammanhang medBeads Task och ett Kallvattentest. Där några av hypoteserna var attdet finns positiva signifikanta associationer mellan intolerans motosäkerhet, smärtkatastrofiering, känsloreglering och psykopatiskapersonlighetsdrag. Vi hade också en hypotes att det kommer finnas enskillnad beroende på svårighetsgraden av Beads Task. För att göradetta samlades data in från 60 universitetsstudenter (32 kvinnor och28 män). Resultaten visade på en signifikant, positiv associationmellan intolerans mot osäkerhet, smärtkatastrofiering,känsloreglering och Beads Task-måtten. Några av dessa resultat varlikt de i tidigare studier.

No description available.

Base Teórica: A prevalência de dor crônica na infância é bem documentada e estima-se que atinja entre 20 a 35% da população pediátrica, podendo causar enorme sofrimento em seus portadores, inaptidões pessoais e ser acompanhada de sintomas emocionais importantes. O manejo dessas criancas inclui a compreensão dos fatores biomecânicos, psicológicos e socioculturais associados ao seu contexto. Dentre os fatores psíquicos o pensamento catastrófico sobre a dor, definido como uma resposta negativa exagerada a mesma, tem sido identificado como uma estratégia adaptativa às circunstâncias. A escala de avaliação do pensamento catastrófico em crianças - Pain Catastrophizing Scale – child version (PCS-C), adaptada da escala para adultos, já está validada em diferentes línguas, no entanto, pouco se sabe sobre o catastrofismo em crianças brasileiras. Objetivos: O objetivo desse estudo é validar e adaptar a PCS-C para o português do Brasil, examinar as propriedades psicométricas, bem como a estrutura fatorial da escala, e sua correlação com a dor e suas consequências em crianças com e sem dor crônica. Métodos: A versão em português do Brasil foi modificada por um grupo de especialistas a fim de torná-la apropriada para aplicação em crianças entre 7-12 anos. Para avaliar as propriedades psicométricas, 100 crianças (44 com dor crônica e 56 saudáveis) responderam a versão brasileira da PCS-C (BPCS-C). Também foram questionadas quanto aos níveis de dor e quanto à capacidade funcional durante atividades da prática de educação física na escola. Ainda, amostras de saliva foram passivamente coletadas a fim de se medir o fator neurotrófico derivado do cérebro (BDNF). O subgrupo de crianças com dor crônica foi recrutado dos ambulatórios de gastro pediatria, oncologia e reumatologia do Hospital de Clínicas de Porto Alegre e o subgrupo de crianças saudáveis foi recrutado de uma escola pública. Resultados: O estudo mostrou uma boa consistência interna do instrumento (alfa de Crombach: 0,81 para o escore total da BPCS-C). Tanto a análise paralela, quanto a análise fatorial exploratória identificaram 2 dimensões (fatores) no instrumento. A análise fatorial confirmatória apresentou os melhores valores de ajustamento (CFI, confirmatory fit-index) quando comparada a outros modelos já existentes. Os escores totais da BPCS-C não diferiram entre as crianças com dor crônica e as saudáveis. No entanto, a dificuldade progressiva de realizar as atividades da Educação Física na escola foi associada com o catastrofismo (p=0,019) nos pacientes com dor crônica. BDNF salivar apresentou fraca associação (r=0,27 p=0,012) com o catastrofismo. Conclusão: Os resultados suportam a validade e confiabilidade da BPCS-C. A estrutura de 2 fatores apresentou adequado ajustamento podendo ser usada, mesmo que diferindo do número de fatores da escala original, pois escore total é o valor mais utilizado para composição do diagnóstico. A ausência de diferença entre os escores nas crianças doentes e saudáveis sugere a necessidade de estudos mais profundos sobre a catastrofização em crianças e a necessidade de instrumentos específicos, e não apenas adaptação daqueles utilizados em adultos. / Introduction: The prevalence of chronic pain in childhood is well documented and is estimated to reach 20 and 35% of the pediatric population. Chronica pain can cause enormous suffering, personal miscarriages and it can be accompanied by important emotional symptoms. The management of these children includes understanding the biomechanical, psychological and sociocultural factors associated in this context. Among the psychic factors, catastrophic thinking about pain is identified as an adaptive strategy to the circumstances. The instrument for catastrophic thinking evaluation in children - Pain Catastrophizing Scale - child version (PCS-C), adapted from the scale for adults, is already validated in different languages, however little is known about catastrophism in Brazilian children. Objectives:. With this cross-sectional study, we aim to adapt the Brazilian version of the PCS-C (BPCS-C) and to examine the psychometric properties and factorial structure of the scale for children with and without chronic pain. Methods: The Brazilian version of the PCS-C was modified by a group of experts to appropriate it for children between 7-12 years. To asses the psychometric properties of the version, 100 children (44 with chronic pain and 56 healthy children) answered the BPCS-C, the visual analog scale and one functional school activity question. It was also collected a passive salivary sample to measure BDNF. The chronic pain children sample was recruited from the gastropediatric, oncologic, and reumatologic ambulatories at a tertiary hospital and the healthy children from a fifth grade public school. Results: We observed good internal consistency (Cronbach’s value of 0.81 for the total BPCS-C). Both parallel analysis and exploratory factorial analysis retained 2 factors for instrument dimensions. The confirmatory factorial analysis presented the best adjustment values (CFI, confirmatory fit-index) when compared to other existing pre-existing models. BPCS-C total scores were not diferente between chronic pain and healthy children. However, the progressive difficulty of performing physical education activities at school was associated with catastrophism (p = 0.019) in patients with chronic pain. 6 Salivary BDNF presented a weak association (r = 0.27 p = 0.012) with catastrophism. Discussion: The results support the validity and reliability of BPCS-C. The 2-factors structure presented an adequate adjustment and can be used for brazilian children population. Although different from the number of factors of the original scale, the instrument measured the most used value for diagnosis, total score. The lack of difference between scores in chronic pain and healthy children suggests the necessity of further studies on catastrophizing in children, as well as for specific instruments, instead of simple adaptation of those used in adults.

There is a well-documented bidirectional relationship between pain and cognitive dysfunction, especially working memory. Despite this extensive body of research, the pain–working memory relationship is poorly understood. Pain catastrophizing – exaggerated negative cognitive and emotional responses towards pain – may contribute to working memory deficits by occupying finite, shared cognitive resources, but this has yet to be investigated. The present study sought to clarify the role of pain catastrophizing (assessed as both a trait-level disposition and state-level process) in working memory dysfunction. Healthy undergraduate participants were randomized to an ischemic pain or control task, during which they completed verbal and non-verbal working memory tests. They also completed measures of state- and trait-level pain catastrophizing. Mediation analyses indicated that state-level pain catastrophizing mediated the relationships of pain group to both verbal and non-verbal working memory, such that participants in the pain group (vs. the control group) catastrophized more about their pain, which then resulted in worse verbal and non-verbal working memory performance. In moderated mediation analyses, trait-level pain catastrophizing moderated this mediation effect for both verbal and non-verbal working memory. Those participants in the pain group who reported greater tendency to catastrophize about pain in general exhibited greater catastrophizing in-the-moment during the pain task, thereby leading to worse verbal and non-verbal working memory performance. These results provide evidence for pain catastrophizing as a putative mechanism and moderating factor of working memory dysfunction in pain. Future research should replicate these results in chronic pain samples, investigate other potential mechanisms (e.g., sleep), and develop interventions to ameliorate cognitive dysfunction by targeting pain catastrophizing.

Indiana University-Purdue University Indianapolis (IUPUI) / Chronic pain, defined as pain lasting more than 3 months, is a common and costly health condition. Thirty-three percent of adults and upwards of 35% of children report experiencing pain due to various diseases, disorders, or accidents. Recent research has identified perceived injustice and anger as important constructs in an adult’s pain experience and a possible focus for intervention efforts. The present study explored the extent to which perceived injustice and anger expression operate similarly in children with chronic pain as in adults. This was a retrospective analysis of data from 122 patients seeking treatment at a pediatric pain clinic. Results supported anger expression as a mediator in the relationship between perceived injustice and pain intensity but not psychological distress, suggesting that anger expression operates similarly in children as in adults with chronic pain. Unlike previous findings in adults with chronic pain, injustice did not moderate the relationship between pain intensity and psychological distress, suggesting that injustice operates differently in children with chronic pain compared to adults. The strong association between injustice and pain outcomes (i.e. pain intensity, quality of life, functional disability) suggests that injustice is an important construct to explore in the chronic pain experience of children.

La chiropratique est une profession de la santé qui s’intéresse au diagnostic, au traitement, et à la prévention des troubles musculosquelettiques. L’intervention la plus communément utilisée en chiropratique est la manipulation vertébrale (dite « ajustement chiropratique »). D’ailleurs, les consultations en chiropratique sont principalement pour des douleurs vertébrales, particulièrement dans la région lombaire. La lombalgie est la principale cause d'incapacité à travers le monde. Elle engendre des coûts considérables pour la société et les individus atteints. Chez environ un tiers des individus, la lombalgie persiste et devient chronique, entraînant une incapacité et une diminution de la qualité de vie. Chez ces individus, aucun processus pathologique affectant les tissus vertébraux ne peut être mis en évidence. En effet, cette douleur, dite nociplastique, serait plutôt causée par des mécanismes pathologiques du système nociceptif. La lombalgie chronique, dite primaire chez ces individus, est ainsi considérée comme le diagnostic en soi, et non un symptôme secondaire à une pathologie sous-jacente. Chez certains individus, les manipulations vertébrales peuvent soulager la lombalgie chronique primaire. Cependant, leur efficacité comme intervention de première ligne et leurs mécanismes hypoalgésiques restent à démontrer. L'objectif général de cette thèse est d’examiner les mécanismes hypoalgésiques des manipulations vertébrales. Le premier objectif spécifique est d’examiner les mécanismes hypoalgésiques d’une manipulation vertébrale à l’aide d’un modèle expérimental de douleur persistante chez des individus en santé. Le deuxième objectif spécifique est d’examiner les mécanismes du soulagement de la douleur lombaire chronique primaire par une intervention chiropratique de quatre semaines, qui comprend douze séances de manipulations vertébrales. La thèse comprend deux études empiriques, soit une étude expérimentale et une étude clinique, qui sont précédées d’une revue de littérature ciblée. Le premier article est une revue narrative explorant les mécanismes neurophysiologiques de la manipulation vertébrale pour soulager la douleur vertébrale. Le deuxième article décrit les résultats d’une étude expérimentale chez des individus en santé. Dans cette étude, nous avons examiné les mécanismes d'inhibition de la douleur en réponse à une manipulation vertébrale ciblant un segment vertébral dont la peau a été sensibilisée par une application topique de capsaïcine. Le troisième article est une revue narrative examinant l'efficacité des manipulations vertébrales pour le traitement des douleurs vertébrales. Le quatrième article décrit les résultats d’un essai contrôlé randomisé avec groupe placebo chez des individus atteints de lombalgie chronique primaire. Dans cette étude, nous avons examiné si le soulagement de la lombalgie chronique primaire par une intervention chiropratique s’accompagne d’une atténuation de processus pathologiques contribuant à la douleur nociplastique. Les résultats indiquent qu’une manipulation vertébrale peut atténuer l’hyperalgésie mécanique secondaire observée avec le modèle expérimental de douleur persistante. Ceci suggère qu’une manipulation vertébrale pourrait agir sur des processus pathologiques qui mènent à la douleur chronique. Ces résultats sont cohérents avec la réduction de la douleur observée chez les patients atteints de lombalgie chronique primaire recevant des manipulations vertébrales. De plus, la réduction de la lombalgie chronique était accompagnée d’une réduction de l’hyperalgésie mécanique lombaire et de la dramatisation de la douleur. Dans l’ensemble, ces résultats suggèrent qu’une intervention chiropratique comprenant des manipulations vertébrales est efficace pour réduire la lombalgie chronique primaire, et que cet effet pourrait découler en partie d’une réduction de processus contribuant à la douleur nociplastique. Ceci renforce les recommandations cliniques sur l’utilisation de la chiropratique pour le soulagement de la lombalgie chronique primaire. D’autres études seront nécessaires pour clarifier les mécanismes neurophysiologiques et anti-inflammatoires des manipulations vertébrales. / Chiropractic is a health profession focused on the diagnosis, treatment, and prevention of musculoskeletal disorders, mainly through spinal manipulation (also known as "chiropractic adjustment"). The majority of patients consult a chiropractor seeking spine pain relief, primarily in the lower back. Low back pain is the leading cause of global disability, generating considerable costs for society and affected individuals. At least one third of people with low back pain experience persistent pain, leading to chronic disability and a decrease in quality of life. In affected individuals, no pathological process affecting the spinal tissues can be identified. Instead, this pain, called nociplastic, is presumed to be caused by pathological mechanisms within the nociceptive system. Thus, in these individuals, low back pain is considered as chronic primary pain, and not the symptom of an underlying disease. In some individuals, spinal manipulations can relieve chronic primary low back pain. However, their effectiveness as a first-line intervention and their hypoalgesic mechanisms remain to be demonstrated. The overarching aim of this thesis is to examine the hypoalgesic mechanisms of chiropractic spinal manipulations. The first specific objective is to investigate the hypoalgesic mechanisms of a spinal manipulation using an experimental model of persistent back pain in healthy individuals. The second specific objective is to investigate the mechanisms of relief of chronic primary low back pain by a four-week chiropractic intervention, including twelve sessions of spinal manipulations. The thesis includes two empirical studies: an experimental study and a clinical study, both preceded by a targeted literature review. The first study is a narrative review exploring the neurophysiological mechanisms of spinal manipulation to relieve spine pain. The second article describes the results of an experimental trial on healthy individuals, where we examined the mechanisms of pain inhibition following a spinal manipulation targeting a spinal segment sensitized by the topical application of capsaicin The third article is a narrative review examining the effectiveness of spinal manipulation for the treatment of spine pain. The fourth article describes the results of a randomized placebo-controlled trial with individuals suffering from chronic primary low back pain. In this study, we examined whether the relief of chronic primary low back pain by a chiropractic intervention is accompanied by an attenuation of pathological processes contributing to nociplastic pain. The results indicate that a single spinal manipulation can mitigate segmental mechanical hyperalgesia observed with the experimental model of persistent pain. This suggests that spinal manipulations could act on pathological processes that lead to chronic pain. These results are consistent with the pain reduction observed in patients with chronic primary low back pain receiving spinal manipulations. Furthermore, low back pain relief was accompanied by a reduction in mechanical hyperalgesia and in pain catastrophizing. Overall, these results indicate that a chiropractic intervention including spinal manipulations is efficacious in reducing chronic primary low back pain, and that this effect could in part stem from a reduction in processes contributing to nociplastic pain. This reinforces clinical recommendations on the use of chiropractic for the relief of chronic primary low back pain. Further studies will be needed to clarify the neurophysiological and anti-inflammatory mechanisms of spinal manipulations.