Flexible working arrangements have increased significantly, especially as a result of Covid-19. Previous research has described the deregulation of traditional work forms as an opportunity to increase control among employees. On the other hand, research also shows that more flexibility increases the individuals’ responsibility to set boundaries and make time for sufficient recovery. The purpose of this study was to investigate differences in the need for recovery among workers with flextime and non-regulated work hours, while also comparing the employees based on parental status.The study also investigates whether the need for recovery differs among flexible workers parental status, while controlling for the perception of control. A registry study was conducted using a cross-sectional design and data from 830 flexible workers have been analyzed. Results show no significant difference in the need for recovery among employees with flextime compared to non-regulated work hours. Neither did the results show a significant difference among flexible workers based on their parental status. Lastly, results showed that the employees’ perception of control was associated with the need for recovery. In conclusion, no significant differences were found among the groups, but findings suggest that employees’ perception of control is associated with their need for recovery. Keywords: flexible work arrangements, need for recovery, control, parental status

No description available.

South Africa, being a multicultural society, is faced with unique and unusual circumstances that can influence the interaction between their work and personal lives. However, countries can vary noticeably in cultural norms, values and gender-role beliefs, which can lead to the different experience of work-life interaction. Because of these differences, South African workers could experience the interaction between work and home in different ways, and this interaction may manifest differently in various socio-demographic groups. This makes it difficult to develop strategies and intervention programmes that will help workers integrate their work and personal lives more effectively. The general objective of this study was to investigate the relationship between socio-demographic characteristics and four dimensions of work-home interaction and to establish which socio-demographic characteristics best predict work-home interaction amongst South African employees. A sample (n = 2040) was taken from four industries in South Africa (i.e. police service, the earthmoving equipment industry, mining and nursing). A socio-demographic questionnaire and the 'Survey Work-Home Interaction - Nijmegen' (SWING) were used. Descriptive statistics, Cronbach alpha coefficients, Pearson product-moment correlation and multiple regression analyses were used to analyse the data. The results indicated that robust predictors included occupation, gender and language for negative work-home interference (WHI), occupation, language and age for positive WHI, language and occupation for negative home-work interference (HWI) and language, occupation, age and education for positive HWI. Recommendations were made for organisations and for future research. / Thesis (M.A. (Industrial Psychology))--North-West University, Potchefstroom Campus, 2008.

South Africa, being a multicultural society, is faced with unique and unusual circumstances that can influence the interaction between their work and personal lives. However, countries can vary noticeably in cultural norms, values and gender-role beliefs, which can lead to the different experience of work-life interaction. Because of these differences, South African workers could experience the interaction between work and home in different ways, and this interaction may manifest differently in various socio-demographic groups. This makes it difficult to develop strategies and intervention programmes that will help workers integrate their work and personal lives more effectively. The general objective of this study was to investigate the relationship between socio-demographic characteristics and four dimensions of work-home interaction and to establish which socio-demographic characteristics best predict work-home interaction amongst South African employees. A sample (n = 2040) was taken from four industries in South Africa (i.e. police service, the earthmoving equipment industry, mining and nursing). A socio-demographic questionnaire and the 'Survey Work-Home Interaction - Nijmegen' (SWING) were used. Descriptive statistics, Cronbach alpha coefficients, Pearson product-moment correlation and multiple regression analyses were used to analyse the data. The results indicated that robust predictors included occupation, gender and language for negative work-home interference (WHI), occupation, language and age for positive WHI, language and occupation for negative home-work interference (HWI) and language, occupation, age and education for positive HWI. Recommendations were made for organisations and for future research. / Thesis (M.A. (Industrial Psychology))--North-West University, Potchefstroom Campus, 2008.

No description available.

Faces de bebês são um estímulo emocional extremamente saliente para humanos. O objetivo deste estudo foi comparar a interferência emocional de faces de bebês e estímulos de ameaça (faces adultas com medo) na atenção automática de homens e mulheres com e sem filhos. Após estudo piloto, recrutou-se 61 homens e mulheres de 20 a 35 anos. Os participantes responderam a uma tarefa Go/No-Go na qual imagens de bebês com expressões de sofrimento, alegria ou neutra e imagens de adultos com expressões de medo, alegria e neutra, eram apresentadas. Foram calculados os vieses de atenção para faces de bebês em sofrimento, faces de adultos com medo e faces de bebês vs. adultos. Participantes com filhos, de ambos os sexos, apresentaram mais viés de cuidado (bebês vs adultos) do que os sem filhos. Os resultados indicaram que apenas status parental influenciou o viés para faces de bebês. / Babies are extremely salient emotional stimuli to human beings. The current study aimed to compare the emotional interference of baby faces and threat stimuli (adult fearful faces) on the automatic attention of men and women, parents and non-parents. A pilot study was conducted to adapt instruments and procedures. For the main study 61 men and women aged 20 to 35 years with minimum complete elementary school were recruited. Images of distressed, happy and neutral baby faces and fearful, happy and neutral adult faces were used in a Go/No-Go paradigm. Attentional bias indexes were calculated for biases towards baby distress, adult fear and baby vs. adult faces. Parents, regardless of sex, showed a higher nurturing attentional bias (baby vs. adult faces) in comparison to non-parents. This finding demonstrates that parental status influences the attentional bias to babies.

Faces de bebês são um estímulo emocional extremamente saliente para humanos. O objetivo deste estudo foi comparar a interferência emocional de faces de bebês e estímulos de ameaça (faces adultas com medo) na atenção automática de homens e mulheres com e sem filhos. Após estudo piloto, recrutou-se 61 homens e mulheres de 20 a 35 anos. Os participantes responderam a uma tarefa Go/No-Go na qual imagens de bebês com expressões de sofrimento, alegria ou neutra e imagens de adultos com expressões de medo, alegria e neutra, eram apresentadas. Foram calculados os vieses de atenção para faces de bebês em sofrimento, faces de adultos com medo e faces de bebês vs. adultos. Participantes com filhos, de ambos os sexos, apresentaram mais viés de cuidado (bebês vs adultos) do que os sem filhos. Os resultados indicaram que apenas status parental influenciou o viés para faces de bebês. / Babies are extremely salient emotional stimuli to human beings. The current study aimed to compare the emotional interference of baby faces and threat stimuli (adult fearful faces) on the automatic attention of men and women, parents and non-parents. A pilot study was conducted to adapt instruments and procedures. For the main study 61 men and women aged 20 to 35 years with minimum complete elementary school were recruited. Images of distressed, happy and neutral baby faces and fearful, happy and neutral adult faces were used in a Go/No-Go paradigm. Attentional bias indexes were calculated for biases towards baby distress, adult fear and baby vs. adult faces. Parents, regardless of sex, showed a higher nurturing attentional bias (baby vs. adult faces) in comparison to non-parents. This finding demonstrates that parental status influences the attentional bias to babies.

Faces de bebês são um estímulo emocional extremamente saliente para humanos. O objetivo deste estudo foi comparar a interferência emocional de faces de bebês e estímulos de ameaça (faces adultas com medo) na atenção automática de homens e mulheres com e sem filhos. Após estudo piloto, recrutou-se 61 homens e mulheres de 20 a 35 anos. Os participantes responderam a uma tarefa Go/No-Go na qual imagens de bebês com expressões de sofrimento, alegria ou neutra e imagens de adultos com expressões de medo, alegria e neutra, eram apresentadas. Foram calculados os vieses de atenção para faces de bebês em sofrimento, faces de adultos com medo e faces de bebês vs. adultos. Participantes com filhos, de ambos os sexos, apresentaram mais viés de cuidado (bebês vs adultos) do que os sem filhos. Os resultados indicaram que apenas status parental influenciou o viés para faces de bebês. / Babies are extremely salient emotional stimuli to human beings. The current study aimed to compare the emotional interference of baby faces and threat stimuli (adult fearful faces) on the automatic attention of men and women, parents and non-parents. A pilot study was conducted to adapt instruments and procedures. For the main study 61 men and women aged 20 to 35 years with minimum complete elementary school were recruited. Images of distressed, happy and neutral baby faces and fearful, happy and neutral adult faces were used in a Go/No-Go paradigm. Attentional bias indexes were calculated for biases towards baby distress, adult fear and baby vs. adult faces. Parents, regardless of sex, showed a higher nurturing attentional bias (baby vs. adult faces) in comparison to non-parents. This finding demonstrates that parental status influences the attentional bias to babies.