No description available.

No description available.

The presented study comprises a complete morphological and phylotaxonomic revision of basal Sphenacodontia, designated as the paraphyletic ‘haptodontines’. Ianthodon from the Kasimovian is known from newly identified elements, including most of the skull and particular postcrania. This species is determined as the best model for the initial morphology of the Sphenacomorpha (Edaphosauridae and Sphenacodontia). Remarkably older sphenacodontian remains from the Moscovian indicate a derived, though fragmentarily known form, possibly basal Sphenacodontoidea. The genus Haptodus is conclusively revised, including the revalidation of the type species H. baylei from the Artinskian. Haptodus grandis is renamed as Hypselohaptodus, gen. nov. “Haptodus” garnettensis is not monophyletic with Haptodus, moreover the material assigned to it yielded a greater diversity. Thus, its renaming includes Eohaptodus garnettensis, gen. nov., Tenuacaptor reiszi, gen. et spec. nov., and Kenomagnathus scotti, gen. et spec. nov. Along with Ianthodon and the basal edaphosaurid Ianthasaurus, these taxa from a single assemblage are differentiated by dentition and skull proportions, providing a case study of annidation. Since Ianthodon can be excluded from Sphenacomorpha, the larger, stem-based taxon Haptodontiformes is introduced. More derived ‘haptodontines’ apparently form another radiation, named as Pantherapsida. This new taxon includes Cutleria, Tetraceratops, Hypselohaptodus, the Palaeohatteriidae (Pantelosaurus and Palaeohatteria), and the Sphenacodontoidea. The ‘pelycosaur’-therapsid transition is affirmed as a long-term development. An integrative evolutionary hypothesis of basal sphenacodontians is provided, within which the ghost lineage of Early Permian therapsids can be explained by biome shift.

Soil nematodes play an important role in indication for assessing soil environments and ecosystems. Previous studies of nematode community analyses based on molecular identification have shown to be useful for assessing soil environments. Here we applied PCR-DGGE method for molecular analysis of five soil nematode communities (designed as S1 to S5) collected from four provinces in Southeastern Vietnam (Binh Duong, Ba Ria Vung Tau, Binh Phuoc and Dong Nai) based on SSU gene. By sequencing DNA bands derived from S5 community sample, our data show 15 species containing soil nematode, other nematode and non-nematode (fungi) species. Genus Meloidogyne was found as abundant one. The genetic relationship of soil nematode species in S5 community were determined by Maximum Likelihood tree re-construction based on SSU gene. This molecular approach is applied for the first time in Vietnam for identification of soil nematode communities. / Tuyến trùng đất đóng vai trò chỉ thị quan trọng trong công tác đánh giá môi trường và hệ sinh thái đất. Các nghiên cứu trước đây đã cho thấy lợi ích của việc phân tích cộng đồng tuyến trùng đất bằng định danh sinh học phân tử đối với việc đánh giá môi trường đất. Ở đây, chúng tôi ứng dụng phương pháp PCR-DGGE dựa trên gene SSU để phân tích năm (ký hiệu từ S1 đến S5) cộng đồng tuyến trùng đất thuộc các vùng trồng chuyên canh cây hồ tiêu ở miền nam Việt Nam (Bình Dương, Bà Rịa Vũng Tàu, Bình Phước và Đồng Nai). Bằng cách giải trình tự các vạch của mẫu tuyến trùng S5, kết quả cho thấy cộng đồng tuyến trùng này có 15 loài gồm nhóm tuyến trùng đất, nhóm các loại tuyến trùng khác và nhóm không phải tuyến trùng (nấm) và trong đó Meloidogyne là giống ưu thế. Mối quan hệ di truyền của các các loài tuyến trùng đất thuộc cộng đồng S5 được xác định bằng việc thiết lập cây phát sinh loài Maximum Likelihood dựa trên gene SSU. Đây là nghiên cứu đầu tiên ở Việt Nam sử dụng kỹ thuật PCR-DGGE để phân tích các cộng đồng tuyến trùng đất trồng hồ tiêu.

Major progress has been made during the last twenty years towards a better understanding of the evolution of angiosperms. Early molecular-phylogenetic analyses revealed three major groups, with eudicots as well as monocots being monophyletic, arisen from a paraphyletic group of dicotyledonous angiosperms (= basal angiosperms). Consistently, numerous phylogenetic studies based on sequence data have recovered the eudicot-clade and increased confidence in its existence. Furthermore this clade, which contains about 75% of angiosperm species diversity, is characterized by the possession of tricolpate and tricolpate-derived pollen and has thus also been called the tricolpate clade. Based on molecular-phylogenetic investigations several lineages, such as Ranunculales, Proteales (= Proteaceae, Nelumbonaceae, Platanaceae), Sabiaceae, Buxaceae plus Didymelaceae, and Trochodendraceae plus Tetracentraceae were shown as belonging to a early-diverging grade (early-diverging or “basal” eudicots), while larger groups like asterids, Caryophyllales, rosids, Santalales, and Saxifragales were identified as being members of a highly supported core clade, the so called “core eudicots”. Nevertheless, phylogenetic relationships among several lineages of the eudicots remained difficult to resolve. This thesis is mainly concentrated on fully resolving the branching order among the different clades of the early-diverging eudicots as well as on clarifying phylogenetic and systematic conditions within several lineages, based on phylogenetic reconstructions using sequence data of rapidly-evolving and non-coding molecular regions, such as spacers and introns. Commonly, fast-evolving and non-coding DNA was used to infer relationships among species and genera, as practised in chapter 3, due to the assumption of being inapplicable caused by putative high levels of homoplasy through multiple substitutions and frequent microstructural changes resulting in non-alignability. However, during the last few years numerous molecular-phylogenetic studies were able to present well resolved angiosperm trees on the basis of rapidly-evolving and non-coding regions from the large single copy region of the chloroplast genome comparable to multi-gene analyses concerning topology and statistical support. Mutational dynamics in spacers and introns was revealed to follow complex patterns related to structural constraints like the introns secondary structure. Therefore extreme sequence variability was always confirmed to mutational hotspots that could be excluded from calculations. Moreover it became clear that combining these non-coding regions with the fast-evolving matK gene can lead to further resolved and statistical supported trees. Chapter 1 deals with the placement of Sabiales inside the early-diverging eudicot grade, while investigating mutational dynamics as well as the utility of different kinds of non-coding and rapidly-evolving DNA within deep-level phylogenetics. It was done by analyzing a combination of nine regions from the large single copy region of the chloroplast genome, including spacers, the sole group I intron, three group II introns and the coding matK for a sampling of 56 taxa. The presented topology is in mainly congruence with the hypothesis on phylogenetic relationships among early-branching eudicots that was gained through the application of a reduced set of five non-coding and fast-evolving molecular markers, including the plastid petD (petB-petD spacer, petD group II intron) plus the trnL-F (trnL group I intron, trnL-F spacer) region and the matK gene. It showed a grade of Ranunculales, Sabiales, Proteales, Trochodendrales and Buxales. The current study differs in showing Sabiales as sister to Proteales in all phylogenetic analyses, in contrast to a second-branching inside early-diverging eudicots and a Bayesian tree displaying Sabiales branching after Proteales. All three hypotheses were tested concerning their likelihood. None of them was shown as being significantly declinable. Thus, albeit the number of characters and informative sites was doubled in comparision to the five-region investigation, the exact position of the Sabiales remained to be resolved with confidence. However, the advanced analyses of the phylogenetic structure of the three different non-coding partitions in comparison to coding genes resulted in the recognition of a significantly higher mean phylogenetic signal per informative character within spacers and introns than in the frequently applied slowly-evolving rbcL gene. The fast-evolving and well performing matK gene is shown to be nested within the non-coding partitions in this respect. Interestingly, the least constrained spacers displayed considerably less phylogenetic structure than both, the group I intron and the group II introns. Molecular evolution is again shown to follow certain patterns in angiosperms, as indicated by the occurrence of mutational hotspots and their connection to structural and functional constraints. This is especially shown for the group II introns studied where highly dynamic sequence parts were rather found in loops than stems. The aim of chapter 2 was to present a comprehensive reconstruction of the phylogenetic relationships inside the order of Ranunculales, the first-branching clade of the early-diverging eudicots, with an emphasis on the evolution of growth forms within the group. Currently, the order comprises seven families (Ranunculaceae, Berberidaceae, Menispermaceae, Lardizabalaceae, Circaeasteraceae – not included due to lacking plant material, Eupteleaceae, Papaveraceae) containing predominantly herbaceous groups as well as trees and lianescent/shrubby forms. A surprising result that emerged due to the increased use of molecular data within systematics during the last twenty years is the inclusion of the woody Eupteleaceae into Ranunculales. Because of its adaptation to wind pollination it was previously placed next to Hamamelididea. Although phylogenetic hypotheses agreed in the exclusion of Eupteleaceae and the predominantly herbaceous Papaveraceae from a core clade the branching order within early-diverging Ranunculales remained a question to be answered. Thus phylogenetic reconstructions based on molecular data of 50 taxa (including outgroup), applying the well-performing non-coding petD and trnL-F as well as the trnK/matK-psbA region including the coding matK, were carried out. The comprehensive sampling resulted in fully resolved and highly supported phylogenies in both, maximum parsimony and model based approaches, with family relations within the core clade being identical and Euptelea appearing as first branching lineage. However, the relationships among the early-diverging Ranunculales could not be resolved with confidence, a result in line with the finding made in chapter 1. The topology was further resolved as Lardizabalaceae being sister to the remaining members of the order, followed by Menispermaceae, Berberidaceae and Ranunculaceae, the latter sharing a sistergroup relationship. Inside the mainly lianescent Lardizabalaceae the shrubby Decaisnea was clearly depicted as first-branching. The systematic controversial Glaucidium and Hydrastis are shown to be early-diverging members of the Ranunculaceae. A central goal of chapter 3 was to test phylogenetic relationships among the members of the ranunculaceous tribe Anemoneae. Currently it consists of the subtribes Anemoninae including Anemone, Hepatica, Pulsatilla and Knowltonia, and Clematidinae, consisting of Archiclematis, Clematis and Naravelia. Furthermore the position and taxonomic rank of several lineages inside the subtribe Anemoninae were examined. Since recent comprehensive molecular-phylogenetic investigations have been carried out for the members of Clematidinae or Anemoninae, 63 species representing all major lineages of the two subtribes were included into analyses. Calculations were carried out on the basis of molecular data of the nuclear ribosomal ITS1&2 and the plastid atpB-rbcL intergenic spacer region. Phylogenetic reconstructions resulted in the recognition of two distinct clades within the tribe, thus corroborating the formation of the two subtribes. Within the subtribe Anemoninae the traditional genera Knowltonia, Pulsatilla and Hepatica are confidently shown to be nested within the genus Anemone. The preliminary classification of the genus, currently consisting of the two subgenera Anemone and Anemonidium, is complemented by the subgenus Hepatica.

The group of pleurocarpous mosses comprises approximately 5000 species, which corresponds to about half of all mosses. The pleurocarpous mosses (i.e. “the Core Pleurocarps”) form a monophylum, which consists typically of perennial mosses with creeping stems and abundant lateral branches. In pleurocarpous mosses the archegonium and thus also sporophyte development is restricted to the apices of short, specialized lateral branches, in contrast to most other mosses, where archegonia and sporophytes develop terminally on the main axis (acrocarpous) or on major branches (cladocarpous). Traditionally, pleurocarpous mosses have been divided into three orders based mainly on their sporophytic characters. Brotherus described the Neckeraceae in 1925 and placed it into the Leucodontales, later the family has alternatively been divided into two or three separate families: the Thamnobryaceae, the Neckeraceae and the Leptodontaceae. These families have been placed even in different orders (Neckeraceae and Leptodontaceae among the leucodontalean mosses and Thamnobryaceae among hypnalean mosses) according to their peristome structure and the grade of peristome reduction. A growing amount of evidence indicates that a grouping based on sporophytic characters is artificial and based on convergent evolution. According to the latest phylogenetic studies of pleurocarpous mosses, based on molecular data, the Neckeraceae belong to the order Hypnales and share a sister group relationship with the Lembophyllaceae. In the most recent comprehensive classification 28 genera were included in the Neckeraceae family. This classification was based on both morphological and molecular data, but done with limited taxon sampling that did not cover all species of the family. Some previous studies based on molecular data have challenged the family concept of the Neckeraceae, indicating the need for a revision of the family. Here the family concept of the Neckeraceae is revisited, the closest relatives of the family are resolved and its position within pleurocarpous mosses is shown. In addition, new insights into the morphological evolution of the family are provided. Previous phylogenetic studies indicated that branch lengths among pleurocarpous mosses are usually extremely short. Therefore we chose to use mainly non-coding DNA sequences from rapidly evolving DNA regions. The phylogenetic reconstructions are based on extensive sequence data from all genomes: plastid trnS-trnF and rpl16, nuclear ITS1 & 2 and mitochondrial nad5. Both parsimony (PAUP and PRAP2) and Bayesian statistics (MrBayes) were employed for phylogenetic reconstructions. In order to use the information provided by length mutations indels were included in the analyses as binary data using a simple indel coding approach. No severe conflicts appeared between the different methods used, but the indel coding affected the support values of the inferred topologies. Therefore, all support values resulting from different methods are shown along the phylogenetic trees. The morphological features are studied and synapomorphies for each clade formed in the phylogenetic analyses are interpreted. A new delimitation of the family makes it necessary to reconsider the relevance of the morphological description and the morphological features characteristic of the family need to be reconsidered. Due to new groupings, some changes in the morphological circumscriptions of the genera are necessary, resulting in two new genera and several new combinations. Chapter 1 gives a broad overview of the relationships of the pleurocarpous mosses and shows the need for changes in the definition of genera, families and the corresponding nomenclature in this group. Chapter 2 is a population genetic study on the genus Thamnobryum. The main aim of this chapter is to test the species concept in Thamnobryum that are endemic to strictly restricted regions showing only minor differences in the morphological features in comparison to some more common species. In Chapter 3 the monophyly of the Neckeraceae is tested. In addition, in this chapter the ancestral character states of some morphological characters within the Neckeraceae are reconstructed. Chapters 4 and 5 resolve the genus composition and the relationships within the family in more detail. The results of this thesis show that the Neckeraceae need re-circumscription; this includes changes in the genus composition. The Lembophyllaceae is confirmed to be the sister group of the Neckeraceae. In addition to the new phylogeny, the potential evolution of several characters as a result of environmental selection pressures is analyzed. From the ancestral state reconstructions made (using BayesTraits) for both the habitat and a selection of morphological characters, character state distributions and habitat shift appear congruent, peristome reduction being a good example. However, some character states do not correlate with the habitat, suggesting very complex evolutionary patterns underlying these morphological characters. Many widely distributed genera that are composed of several species and seem to be morphologically coherent (Echinodium, Homalia, Thamnobryum, partly Neckera), are shown in this thesis to be polyphyletic. They are replaced by smaller, geographically more restricted genera that at least in some cases (e.g. Thamnomalia, Homalia s.str., Neckera s.str.) seem to form morphologically heterogeneous genera. In other words, morphology can be misleading in the family Neckeraceae even at the genus level and convergent evolution in both morphological and sequence level characters are common within the family. Special habitat conditions have been shown to result in similar morphological structures also in several other moss groups. This kind of convergent evolution occurs in aquatic mosses, and seems to have occurred among the neckeraceous species Thamnobryum alopecurum and its allies. However, similar morphological structure in similar aquatic habitats can also be due to true phylogenetic relationships as is the case within the Neckeraceae for Handeliobryum sikkimense and Hydrocryphae wardii, or the members of Touwia. The geographical grouping seems to be more strongly correlated with the phylogenetic grouping than thought before.

Genealogy reconstruction is widely used in biology when relationships among entities are studied. Phylogenies, or evolutionary trees, show the differences between species. They are of profound importance because they help to obtain better understandings of evolutionary processes. Pedigrees, or family trees, on the other hand visualize the relatedness between individuals in a population. The reconstruction of pedigrees and the inference of parentage in general is now a cornerstone in molecular ecology. Applications include the direct infer- ence of gene flow, estimation of the effective population size and parameters describing the population’s mating behaviour such as rates of inbreeding. In the first part of this thesis, we construct genealogies of various types of cancer. Histopatho- logical classification of human tumors relies in part on the degree of differentiation of the tumor sample. To date, there is no objective systematic method to categorize tumor subtypes by maturation. We introduce a novel algorithm to rank tumor subtypes according to the dis- similarity of their gene expression from that of stem cells and fully differentiated tissue, and thereby construct a phylogenetic tree of cancer. We validate our methodology with expression data of leukemia and liposarcoma subtypes and then apply it to a broader group of sarcomas and of breast cancer subtypes. This ranking of tumor subtypes resulting from the application of our methodology allows the identification of genes correlated with differentiation and may help to identify novel therapeutic targets. Our algorithm represents the first phylogeny-based tool to analyze the differentiation status of human tumors. In contrast to asexually reproducing cancer cell populations, pedigrees of sexually reproduc- ing populations cannot be represented by phylogenetic trees. Pedigrees are directed acyclic graphs (DAGs) and therefore resemble more phylogenetic networks where reticulate events are indicated by vertices with two incoming arcs. We present a software package for pedigree reconstruction in natural populations using co-dominant genomic markers such as microsatel- lites and single nucleotide polymorphism (SNPs) in the second part of the thesis. If available, the algorithm makes use of prior information such as known relationships (sub-pedigrees) or the age and sex of individuals. Statistical confidence is estimated by Markov chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) sampling. The accuracy of the algorithm is demonstrated for simulated data as well as an empirical data set with known pedigree. The parentage inference is robust even in the presence of genotyping errors. We further demonstrate the accuracy of the algorithm on simulated clonal populations. We show that the joint estimation of parameters of inter- est such as the rate of self-fertilization or clonality is possible with high accuracy even with marker panels of moderate power. Classical methods can only assign a very limited number of statistically significant parentages in this case and would therefore fail. The method is implemented in a fast and easy to use open source software that scales to large datasets with many thousand individuals.:Abstract v Acknowledgments vii 1 Introduction 1 2 Cancer Phylogenies 7 2.1 Introduction..................................... 7 2.2 Background..................................... 9 2.2.1 PhylogeneticTrees............................. 9 2.2.2 Microarrays................................. 10 2.3 Methods....................................... 11 2.3.1 Datasetcompilation ............................ 11 2.3.2 Statistical Methods and Analysis..................... 13 2.3.3 Comparison of our methodology to other methods . . . . . . . . . . . 15 2.4 Results........................................ 16 2.4.1 Phylogenetic tree reconstruction method. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 16 2.4.2 Comparison of tree reconstruction methods to other algorithms . . . . 28 2.4.3 Systematic analysis of methods and parameters . . . . . . . . . . . . . 30 2.5 Discussion...................................... 32 3 Wild Pedigrees 35 3.1 Introduction..................................... 35 3.2 The molecular ecologist’s tools of the trade ................... 36 3.2.1 3.2.2 3.2.3 3.2.1 Sibship inference and parental reconstruction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 37 3.2.2 Parentage and paternity inference .................... 39 3.2.3 Multigenerational pedigree reconstruction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 40 3.3 Background..................................... 40 3.3.1 Pedigrees .................................. 40 3.3.2 Genotypes.................................. 41 3.3.3 Mendelian segregation probability .................... 41 3.3.4 LOD Scores................................. 43 3.3.5 Genotyping Errors ............................. 43 3.3.6 IBD coefficients............................... 45 3.3.7 Bayesian MCMC.............................. 46 3.4 Methods....................................... 47 3.4.1 Likelihood Model.............................. 47 3.4.2 Efficient Likelihood Calculation...................... 49 3.4.3 Maximum Likelihood Pedigree ...................... 51 3.4.4 Full siblings................................. 52 3.4.5 Algorithm.................................. 53 3.4.6 Missing Values ............................... 56 3.4.7 Allelefrequencies.............................. 58 3.4.8 Rates of Self-fertilization.......................... 60 3.4.9 Rates of Clonality ............................. 60 3.5 Results........................................ 61 3.5.1 Real Microsatellite Data.......................... 61 3.5.2 Simulated Human Population....................... 62 3.5.3 SimulatedClonalPlantPopulation.................... 64 3.6 Discussion...................................... 71 4 Conclusions 77 A FRANz 79 A.1 Availability ..................................... 79 A.2 Input files...................................... 79 A.2.1 Maininputfile ............................... 79 A.2.2 Knownrelationships ............................ 80 A.2.3 Allele frequencies.............................. 81 A.2.4 Sampling locations............................. 82 A.3 Output files..................................... 83 A.4 Web 2.0 Interface.................................. 86 List of Figures 87 List of Tables 88 List Abbreviations 90 Bibliography 92 Curriculum Vitae I

The taxonomy of the Mediterranean Aristolochia pallida complex has been under debate since several decades with the following species currently recognized: A. pallida, A. lutea, A. nardiana, A. microstoma, A. merxmuelleri, A. croatica, and A. castellana. These taxa are distributed from Iberia to Turkey. To reconstruct phylogenetic and biogeographic patterns, we employed cpDNA sequence variation using both noncoding (intron and spacer) and protein-coding regions (i.e., trnK intron, matK gene, and trnK-psbA spacer). Our results show that the morphology-based traditional taxonomy was not corroborated by our phylogenetic analyses. Aristolochia pallida, A. lutea, A. nardiana, and A. microstoma were not monophyletic. Instead, strong geographic signals were detected. Two major clades, one exclusively occurring in Greece and a second one of pan-Mediterranean distribution, were found. Several subclades distributed in Greece, NW Turkey, Italy, as well as amphi-Adriatic subclades, and a subgroup of southern France and Spain, were revealed. The distribution areas of these groups are in close vicinity to hypothesized glacial refugia areas in the Mediterranean. According to molecular clock analyses the diversification of this complex started around 3–3.3 my, before the onset of glaciation cycles, and the further evolution of and within major lineages falls into the Pleistocene. Based on these data, we conclude that the Aristolochia pallida alliance survived in different Mediterranean refugia rarely with low, but often with a high potential for range extension, and a high degree of morphological diversity.

No description available.

Die Familie der Physciaceen (lichenisierte Ascomyceten) und deren kompatible Photobionten wurden mit Hilfe von nrITS-Sequenzierungen untersucht. Es wurde Frisch- oder Herbarmaterial bearbeitet, das weltweit gesammelt worden war und 23 der 27 Physciaceengattngen repräsentierte. Die Sequenzdaten erlaubten eine differenzierte taxonomische Bearbeitung beider Biontengruppen. Basale Linien der Physciaceenphylogenie waren eng korreliert mit der Verteilung mehrerer phänotypischer Merkmale. Es konnte gezeigt werden, daß die Caliciaceen, eine andere Flechtenfamilie, die Schwestergruppe zu einer der vier Hauptlinien der Physciaceen bilden. Alle Proben der Physciaceen waren mit Algen aus der Gattung Trebouxia assoziiert. Ein Datensatz von über 300 Trebouxia nrITS-Sequenzen wurde zusammengestellt, der eine zuvor ungekannte Diversität innerhalb der Gattung Trebouxia repräsentiert. Die Taxonomie dieser Gattung wurde revidiert und ein System zur Abgrenzung und Zuordnung von nrITS-Varianten vorgeschlagen, das eine Strukturierung der gefundenen Diversität erlaubt. Viele der untersuchten Physciaceenarten erschienen hoch selektiv in Bezug auf ihre kompatiblen Photobionten. Im Gegensatz dazu konnte bei keinem der Photobionten eine Beschränkung auf nur eine Mycobiontenlinie gezeigt werden. Die Beschränkung vieler Mycobionten auf einen bestimmten Photobionten wurde als eine ökologische Abhängigkeit des Mycobionten von seinem kompatiblen Photobionten interpretiert. Daher wurde untersucht, ob Artbildungsereignisse in Trebouxia, Artbildungsereignisse in den assoziierten Physciaceen auslösen können. In einem Vergleich der Trebouxia- mit der Physciaceenphylogenie konnten jedoch keine korrelierten Verzweigungsmuster festgestellt werden. Hauptlinien der Trebouxien waren allerdings mit Umweltparametern, wie z.B. Substrat-pH und Makroklima korreliert. Die Evolution der Physciaceen war von diesen Faktoren offensichtlich deutlich weniger abhängig.Die nrSSU-Gene der Physciaceen enthielten mehr Introns als die aller anderen bekannter Organismengruppen. Der einzigartige Datensatz konnte genutzt werden, um konservierte Regionen innerhalb dieser Introns zu identifizieren. Auf diese konservierten Regionen konnten Primer konstruiert werden, die mit allen Introns einer Insertionsstelle kompatibel waren. Mit Hilfe dieser Primer konnten Introns detektiert werden, die bei der nrSSU-Sequenzierung unerkannt geblieben waren.