No description available.

A Lei de Responsabilidade Fiscal (LRF) foi criada em 2000, tendo como um de seus objetivos o de controlar e limitar o processo de endividamento dos estados brasileiros. No entanto, em 2016, a União acertou o refinanciamento das dívidas de alguns destes estados. Este trabalho busca analisar esta aparente contradição; a crise dos estados teria como origem fatores exógenos à LRF ou os mecanismos da LRF não foram suficientes para conter o comportamento de endividamento excessivo dos estados? Utilizando a metodologia de Bohn (1998), estimou-se cinco modelos: painel completo, separação regional, separação por critério endógeno, separação por gasto com pessoal em relação a receita corrente líquida e separação pelo critério da Resolução de número 40 do Senado Federal. As estimações contemplam quatro períodos: 2001 a 2015; 2008 a 2015; 2001 a 2020 e 2008 a 2020, e consideram tanto a dívida consolidada líquida quanto a bruta. Os resultados apontam que os instrumentos que foram criados são ineficientes, pois estados que não estão constrangidos por nenhuma punição da LRF não possuem uma trajetória sustentável da dívida. Por consequência, é reforçada a ideia de que há um comportamento de risco moral por parte dos estados, que procuram endividar-se excessivamente por considerarem que a dívida será renegociada pela União, comportamento este que só pode ser combatido a partir de aprimoramentos institucionais. / The \"Fiscal Responsibility Law\" (LRF) was created in 2000, having as one of its pillars the control of the regional states\' indebtedness process. However, in 2016, the federal government approved the refinance of such debts for some states. This paper seeks to analyze this seeming contradiction: the states\' crysis is due to factors that are exogenous to the LRF, or are the LRF mechanisms not sufficient to restrain the excessive indebtness by the states? Using Bohn\'s methodology (1998), five models are estimated: complete pannel, regional separation, separation by an endogenous criteria, separation by LRF\'s resolution to stafe workers expending (wages, pensions, etc) and separation by a Senate resolution\'s criteria. The estimations are made in four time frames: 2001-2015; 2008-2015; 2001-2020; 2008-2020, and both the net debt and the gross debt are considered. Results indicate that the instruments that were created by the LRF are inefficient, in the sense that states that are not punished or affected by said instruments do not follow a sustainable fiscal policy. Consequently, the idea of a moral hazard behaviour is reemforced: the states expect that the federal government will refinance its debt, so they do not follow a sustainable fiscal policy. This behaviour can only be stopped through institucional reforms.

A Lei de Responsabilidade Fiscal (LRF) foi criada em 2000, tendo como um de seus objetivos o de controlar e limitar o processo de endividamento dos estados brasileiros. No entanto, em 2016, a União acertou o refinanciamento das dívidas de alguns destes estados. Este trabalho busca analisar esta aparente contradição; a crise dos estados teria como origem fatores exógenos à LRF ou os mecanismos da LRF não foram suficientes para conter o comportamento de endividamento excessivo dos estados? Utilizando a metodologia de Bohn (1998), estimou-se cinco modelos: painel completo, separação regional, separação por critério endógeno, separação por gasto com pessoal em relação a receita corrente líquida e separação pelo critério da Resolução de número 40 do Senado Federal. As estimações contemplam quatro períodos: 2001 a 2015; 2008 a 2015; 2001 a 2020 e 2008 a 2020, e consideram tanto a dívida consolidada líquida quanto a bruta. Os resultados apontam que os instrumentos que foram criados são ineficientes, pois estados que não estão constrangidos por nenhuma punição da LRF não possuem uma trajetória sustentável da dívida. Por consequência, é reforçada a ideia de que há um comportamento de risco moral por parte dos estados, que procuram endividar-se excessivamente por considerarem que a dívida será renegociada pela União, comportamento este que só pode ser combatido a partir de aprimoramentos institucionais. / The \"Fiscal Responsibility Law\" (LRF) was created in 2000, having as one of its pillars the control of the regional states\' indebtedness process. However, in 2016, the federal government approved the refinance of such debts for some states. This paper seeks to analyze this seeming contradiction: the states\' crysis is due to factors that are exogenous to the LRF, or are the LRF mechanisms not sufficient to restrain the excessive indebtness by the states? Using Bohn\'s methodology (1998), five models are estimated: complete pannel, regional separation, separation by an endogenous criteria, separation by LRF\'s resolution to stafe workers expending (wages, pensions, etc) and separation by a Senate resolution\'s criteria. The estimations are made in four time frames: 2001-2015; 2008-2015; 2001-2020; 2008-2020, and both the net debt and the gross debt are considered. Results indicate that the instruments that were created by the LRF are inefficient, in the sense that states that are not punished or affected by said instruments do not follow a sustainable fiscal policy. Consequently, the idea of a moral hazard behaviour is reemforced: the states expect that the federal government will refinance its debt, so they do not follow a sustainable fiscal policy. This behaviour can only be stopped through institucional reforms.

Esta dissertação analisa a sustentabilidade da dívida pública brasileira utilizando a metodologia proposta por Bohn (1998, 2008), levando em consideração as operações de contabilidade criativa e os empréstimos do governo federal para bancos públicos, principalmente BNDES. Para isso, utilizam-se diversos conceitos de superávit primário (oficial; oficial excluindo as receitas de contabilidade criativa; e permanente) e de endividamento (dívidas líquida, bruta e bruta excluídas reservas internacionais), para o período de 2003 a 2014. Em todos os casos analisados, a hipótese de sustentabilidade não foi satisfeita, logo há a necessidade de se alterar a política fiscal do país. Foram realizados testes de quebra estrutural seguindo a metodologia de Bai e Perron (1998), nos quais se verificou que a alteração no padrão da política fiscal pós-crise de 2008 foi um dos principais responsáveis pelo resultado de não sustentabilidade. Verificou-se também que, para esse período pós-crise, o cumprimento da meta do superávit primário se deveu, em grande parte, às receitas de concessões, refinanciamentos (Refis) e dividendos, com destaque para BNDES e Caixa Econômica Federal. / This dissertation analyses the sustainability of Brazil\'s public debt using the methodology proposed by Bohn (1998, 2008), taking into consideration creative accounting and loans from the federal government to public banks, especially BNDES. To this end, various concepts of primary surplus (official; official excluding revenues from creative accounting; and structural) and debt (net debt; gross debt; and gross debt excluding international reserves) are used, from 2003 to 2014. For all the scenarios the hypothesis of fiscal sustainability was not satisfied, and therefore the government would have to change the fiscal policy in Brazil. Structural break tests were performed following the methodology of Bai and Perron (1998), in which was found that the change in fiscal policy post-crisis of 2008 was one of the major factors on the results of non-sustainability. It was found that, for this post-crisis period, the fulfillment of the primary surplus target was mostly due to concession revenues, refinancing (Refis) and dividends, highlighting BNDES and Caixa Econômica Federal.

Esta dissertação analisa a sustentabilidade da dívida pública brasileira utilizando a metodologia proposta por Bohn (1998, 2008), levando em consideração as operações de contabilidade criativa e os empréstimos do governo federal para bancos públicos, principalmente BNDES. Para isso, utilizam-se diversos conceitos de superávit primário (oficial; oficial excluindo as receitas de contabilidade criativa; e permanente) e de endividamento (dívidas líquida, bruta e bruta excluídas reservas internacionais), para o período de 2003 a 2014. Em todos os casos analisados, a hipótese de sustentabilidade não foi satisfeita, logo há a necessidade de se alterar a política fiscal do país. Foram realizados testes de quebra estrutural seguindo a metodologia de Bai e Perron (1998), nos quais se verificou que a alteração no padrão da política fiscal pós-crise de 2008 foi um dos principais responsáveis pelo resultado de não sustentabilidade. Verificou-se também que, para esse período pós-crise, o cumprimento da meta do superávit primário se deveu, em grande parte, às receitas de concessões, refinanciamentos (Refis) e dividendos, com destaque para BNDES e Caixa Econômica Federal. / This dissertation analyses the sustainability of Brazil\'s public debt using the methodology proposed by Bohn (1998, 2008), taking into consideration creative accounting and loans from the federal government to public banks, especially BNDES. To this end, various concepts of primary surplus (official; official excluding revenues from creative accounting; and structural) and debt (net debt; gross debt; and gross debt excluding international reserves) are used, from 2003 to 2014. For all the scenarios the hypothesis of fiscal sustainability was not satisfied, and therefore the government would have to change the fiscal policy in Brazil. Structural break tests were performed following the methodology of Bai and Perron (1998), in which was found that the change in fiscal policy post-crisis of 2008 was one of the major factors on the results of non-sustainability. It was found that, for this post-crisis period, the fulfillment of the primary surplus target was mostly due to concession revenues, refinancing (Refis) and dividends, highlighting BNDES and Caixa Econômica Federal.

The aim of this thesis was to evaluate the situation and development of the indebtedness of self-governing units with regard to the sustainability of individual budgets and also with regard to sustainability of consolidated public budgets in the Czech Republic, and therefore assess the conception of fiscal regulations for self-governing units in the Czech Republic. Based on the aim of the thesis a research question needed to be proposed: Are budgets of self-governing units one of the factors leading to the deterioration or improvement of sustainability of public finance? At first there are defined terms related to the indebtedness and debt regulation of local governments. Part of thesis is to analyze the indebtedness of all municipal and regions. The calculations of this work were divided into two parts: macro and micro point of view. On the basic of calculations it is possible to summarize that in 2014 the debt of municipalities was developing favorably in comparison to the debt of regions. The most problematic categories are municipalities with a population of 200 and cities with more than 100 001 people. The debt of self-governing units makes just under 7 % of the public debt. Based on the thesis, it is possible to reach the conclusion and answer the research question that budgets of the self-governing units are really one of the factors leading to the improvement of sustainability of public finance. Generally speaking, the public finance in the Czech Republic is considered as sustainable. The ratio of public debt to GDP is decreasing and is way under 60 %. The only possible problem is the debt of the regions. Their debt is constantly rising, however in comparison to the total public debt, it is still insignificant.

Made available in DSpace on 2016-04-26T20:48:56Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 Javier Ignacio Toro Gonzalez.pdf: 864358 bytes, checksum: d7676ee8793227ea2f982b836f3be573 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2009-04-30 / Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior / This paper analyzes the assumption and refinancing agreement of the internal public debt held by the Municipality of Sao Paulo with the brazilian Federal Government as signed in May 2000. The first chapter presents the theoretical basis of the economic policy, especially the fiscal policy, adopted by Brazil in the 1990 s and also presents the context that led to the refinancing agreement and to the Law of Fiscal Responsibility. In the second chapter the strategic role of the city of Sao Paulo in Brazil s national economy is discussed as well as the behavior of its public finances since 1995. In the third and final chapter the terms and conditions of the agreement itself as well as its sustainability are analyzed. The results point to the unsustainability of the agreement under the two approaches adopted: the Accounting and the Present Value. It is evident that the agreement - which forbids new indebtedness - harms the ability of the Municipality of Sao Paulo to perform as an entrepreneur of new projects in infrastructure, essential for a modern metropolis like Sao Paulo to meet the challenges it faces, and preventing it from fully exercising its role as a Global City in the greater context of the national Brazilian economy / Esta dissertação analisa o acordo de assunção e refinanciamento da dívida pública interna do Município de São Paulo junto ao Governo Federal assinado em maio de 2000. O primeiro capítulo apresenta a fundamentação teórica da política econômica, em especial da política fiscal, adotada no Brasil na década de 1990 e também o contexto interno que deu origem ao acordo de refinanciamento da dívida interna dos governos subnacionais e à Lei de Responsabilidade Fiscal. No segundo capítulo discute-se o papel estratégico da cidade de São Paulo para a economia brasileira e o comportamento das finanças do Município desde 1995. O terceiro e último capítulo, apresenta a análise dos termos e condições do acordo e da sua sustentabilidade. Os resultados apontam para a insustentabilidade do acordo nas duas abordagens adotadas: a Contábil e do Valor Presente. Fica evidente que o acordo, ao proibir novos endividamentos, prejudica o desempenho do Município como empreendedor de novos projetos de infra-estrutura, essenciais para fazer frente aos desafios de uma metrópole moderna como São Paulo, impedindo-a de exercer plenamente o papel de Cidade Global dentro da economia brasileira

The public debt is considered as an important indicator of the macroeconomic and financial stability of the domestic economy. It reflects a quality of the fiscal policy and the sustainability of the public finances. The public debt has been recently paid more attention in the context of the last financial and debt crisis initiated in 2008. A considerable amount of literature has been published on the topic of interconnections between budget balances and macroeconomic environment. However, the budget deficit is only a consequence of higher public expenditures than public revenues. Therefore, the debt is only an alternative source of financing the budget deficit. One of the main ideas of the doctoral thesis is that the macroeconomic effects of the fiscal policy represented by the budget deficits and effects of the public debt should differ. While activities of the fiscal policy effect the real economic indicators such as the GDP, an increase in the public debt effects the monetary indicators such as the exchange rate, the market interest rate and the money supply. The main object of the doctoral thesis is the analysis of the public debt development including the changes in the public debt structure broken down by debt instruments, currency, maturity and the holder profile. Besides, other main object is to analyse the macroeconomic effects of various forms of a public debt; firstly the attention is paid to different monetary effects of the domestic and the external public debt. The doctoral thesis suggests a new point of view to the analysis of the macroeconomic effects and sustainability of a public debt. The findings can be used in the decision making process; If a public deficit is supposed to be domestic debt or external debt financed. Apart from the effects of the changes in the outstanding debt, the effects of the changes in the public debt structure are examined.