This thesis analyzes the Czech translations of Karel Havlíček's German family correspondence. The translations are from the turn of the 20th century, from the 1940s, and from the present day. In the introduction, the present-day situation concerning the publication of Havlíček's correspondence is outlined. After that, the thesis focuses on the skopos theory as the main theoretical base for the analysis. Then the thesis turns to the life of Karel Havlíček with a focus on his student years. In the analytical section, the individual translators and the origination of the translations are introduced. Selected translations are then analyzed. The primary objective of the thesis is the evaluation of translation strategies and methods used by the translators of Karel Havlíček's family correspondence with regard to translation conventions and social and historical changes.

Submitted by Caroline Xavier (caroline.xavier@pucrs.br) on 2017-10-24T13:14:04Z No. of bitstreams: 1 TES_MOEMA_VILELA_PEREIRA_PARCIAL.pdf: 9263620 bytes, checksum: 7cdee2140d395b3add7bd1429ffc3285 (MD5) / Made available in DSpace on 2017-10-24T13:14:04Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 TES_MOEMA_VILELA_PEREIRA_PARCIAL.pdf: 9263620 bytes, checksum: 7cdee2140d395b3add7bd1429ffc3285 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2017-01-25 / Coordena??o de Aperfei?oamento de Pessoal de N?vel Superior - CAPES / Conselho Nacional de Pesquisa e Desenvolvimento Cient?fico e Tecnol?gico - CNPq / This Thesis comprehends one book and two booklets of fiction, followed by four essays on and built on Creative Writing. The works investigate forms of short fiction as well as less central issues of literary theory and creation: the fictional works and the essays discuss short-short story and minifiction, gestures and the notes of a writer. The longest essay examines the contemporary theorization about minifiction, relating Hispanic American authors, to trace and problematize options for terminology, genre relations, formal, structural, and pragmatic characteristics. It also observes the consequence produced by the theoretical perspectives chosen to address these mentioned forms. On the other hand, the essays on notes and gestures develop examples for a theoretical-critical proposal within Creative Writing; the first case affiliated to the personal essay, a contemporary descendant of Montaigne, and the latter to the writing manual, teaching aspiring writers technical artifices and analyzing its different effects based on concrete cases. This Thesis presents artistic Creative Writing and theoretical Creative Writing works, for examining different possibilities within this relatively new research area in Brazil at PhD level, and the intersections of theory, criticism and creation. / Esta tese compreende um livro e dois livretos de fic??o, acompanhados de quatro ensaios sobre e a partir da Escrita Criativa, que investigam formas de extens?o curta, bem como problem?ticas menos centrais da teoria liter?ria e da cria??o: a fic??o e os ensaios tratam do miniconto e da minificc?o, dos gestos e das anota??es de um escritor. O ensaio mais longo observa a teoriza??o contempor?nea sobre a minificc?o, relacionando autores hispano?americanos para tra?ar e problematizar op??es de terminologia, rela??es geol?gicas, caracter?sticas formais, estruturais e pragm?ticas, e tamb?m a consequ?ncia das perspectivas te?ricas escolhidas para abordar essas formas, enquanto os ensaios sobre notas e gestos desenvolvem exemplos mais singulares de um material te?rico-cr?tico de Escrita Criativa, sendo o primeiro caso filiado ao ensaio pessoal, descendente contempor?neo de Montaigne, e o ultimo ao manual de escrita, ensinando aos aspirantes a escritores artimanhas t?cnicas e analisando seus diferentes efeitos a partir de casos concretos. Para examinar diferentes possibilidades de trabalho acad?mico em n?vel de doutorado nesta ?rea de concentra??o rec?m-criada no Brasil, a tese apresenta obras de Escrita Criativa art?sticas e te?ricas, no transito entre teoria, critica e cria??o.

Submitted by Automa??o e Estat?stica (sst@bczm.ufrn.br) on 2017-01-13T14:30:49Z No. of bitstreams: 1 EduardoHenriqueOlimpioDeGusmao_DISSERT.pdf: 4470499 bytes, checksum: a3dabf4f96a3cf52dbc83d470d5bdfe2 (MD5) / Approved for entry into archive by Arlan Eloi Leite Silva (eloihistoriador@yahoo.com.br) on 2017-01-26T14:15:10Z (GMT) No. of bitstreams: 1 EduardoHenriqueOlimpioDeGusmao_DISSERT.pdf: 4470499 bytes, checksum: a3dabf4f96a3cf52dbc83d470d5bdfe2 (MD5) / Made available in DSpace on 2017-01-26T14:15:10Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 EduardoHenriqueOlimpioDeGusmao_DISSERT.pdf: 4470499 bytes, checksum: a3dabf4f96a3cf52dbc83d470d5bdfe2 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2016-05-05 / Este trabalho tem como objetivo avaliar a usabilidade e arquitetura da informa??o da interface denominada Moodle Mandacaru, utilizada pelo N?cleo de Estudos em Sa?de Coletiva da Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte (UFRN) no Curso de Especializa??o em Gest?o do Trabalho e da Educa??o na Sa?de (CGTES), e propor melhorias para futuras vers?es. O estudo teve como base os conceitos de avalia??es de usabilidade atrav?s de t?cnicas preditivas, utilizando os crit?rios ergon?micos de inspe??o via checklist do LabUtil, e prospectivas, utilizando a avalia??o cooperativa e question?rio de satisfa??o. A metodologia da pesquisa ? descritiva e sua abordagem mista, na qual s?o utilizadas an?lises quantitativas, coletadas em question?rios de satisfa??o, e an?lises interpretativas, coletados em entrevistas in loco com 5 alunos do curso. Para o auxilio na organiza??o e dire??o da pesquisa foi utilizada um framework denominado DECIDE, na qual foi tra?ada uma sequ?ncia espec?fica de orienta??o, execu??o e an?lises no processo de avalia??o. A coleta de dados foi organizada em tr?s etapas: (1) etapa preparat?ria, na organiza??o das a??es que ir?o nortear as etapas subsequentes; (2) primeira etapa, com a realiza??o de uma an?lise diacr?nica do objeto em estudo e inspe??o ergon?mica; (3) segunda etapa, com a execu??o da avalia??o cooperativa aliada ao question?rio de satisfa??o. A an?lise dos dados na primeira etapa, atrav?s da an?lise diacr?nica do ambiente, apresentou um avan?o significativo no aspecto visual, organiza??o dos conte?dos e uso de novas tecnologias em rela??o ?s vers?es anteriores, em contrapartida a inspe??o via checklist apresentou um percentual de aproximadamente 33% de n?o conformidade com os crit?rios ergon?micos no Ergolist, apresentando a flexibilidade, controle do usu?rio, feedback e a??es m?nimas como um dos maiores problemas da interface. Os resultados da segunda etapa mostraram uma conson?ncia com a maioria dos pontos da etapa anterior, adicionando um toque pessoal do usu?rio em rela??o ? satisfa??o e aspectos relevantes ? usabilidade do ambiente. / This papers objective is to evaluate the usability and the information architecture of the Moodle Mandacaru interface, now being utilized in the Center for Studies in Public Health in the Federal University of Rio Grande do Norte (UFRN). Specifically in the Specialization Course in Labor Management and Health Education (CGTES), and to propose improvements for future versions. The study was based on the concepts of usability evaluations using predictive techniques, using ergonomic criteria for inspection via checklist LabUtil, and prospective, using the cooperative evaluation and satisfaction questionnaire. The research methodology is descriptive and its mixed approach, in which are utilized quantitative analysis, collected in satisfaction questionnaires and interpretative analysis, collected in interviews on site with 5 students of the course. To help in the organization and direction of the research it was used a framework called DECIDE, where a specific sequence of orientation, execution and analysis in the evaluation process was drawn .Data collection was organized in three stages: (1) the preparatory phase, the organization of actions that will guide the subsequent steps; (2) the first stage, with the realization of a diachronic analysis of the object under study and ergonomic inspection; (3) the second stage, with the implementation of cooperative evaluation coupled with the satisfaction questionnaire. Data analysis in the first stage, through environmental diachronic analysis showed a significant improvement in visual appearance, content organization and use of new technologies in previous versions, however the inspection via checklist presented a percentage of approximately 33% non-compliance with the ergonomic criteria in Ergolist, presenting flexibility, user control, feedback and minimal actions as one of the interface problems. The results of the second step showed a consistent with most points of the previous stage, adding a personal touch user satisfaction with regard to usability and aspects relevant to the environment.