i Sanders (1977:114) contends that “[s]in comes only when man actually disobeys; if he were not to disobey he would not be a sinner.” This thesis was thus motivated to critique Sanders’s contention in relation to sin and human accountability in Second Temple Judaism. Before delving into various understandings of sin and human accountability of Second Temple Judaism, in Chapter 2, I deal with the Weltanschauung of Second Temple Judaism. It was observed that Israel’s covenantal history is far from discontinuous with creation at a time of severe theological, sociological, and political plights in spite of the presence of sin and evil. In Chapters 3, I deal with how the authors of 1 Enoch and Jubilees understood the presence of sin and evil. Even though the Watcher story in these Enochic traditions serves to attribute the origin of sin to the fallen angels, it was observed the Watcher story cannot quench Second Temple Jews’ uneasiness in relation to the presence of sin and evil. In Chapter 4, I deal with Qumran literature. By focusing on the term yetzer ra both in pre-Qumran and in Qumran writings, it is worth noting that Qumran literature shows a tendency to realize the severity of the sinfulness of humanity in a complicated and radicalized manner. When looking at first century Jewish (4 Ezra and 2 Baruch) and early Christian (Romans and James) literature in Chapter 5, it was observed that the authors of 4 Ezra and 2 Baruch came to develop further pessimistic anthropologies distinct from their predecessors in the Second Temple period. However, for them, a possibility is open for the few righteous remnants to obey divine commandments. It can be said that their understandings of sin and human accountability appear to be synergistic. For Paul and James, however, the paradigm of the relationship between divine agency and human agency is shifted from synergism to monergism in terms of the Jesus Christ event. / Thesis (PhD)--University of Pretoria, 2017. / Old Testament Studies / PhD / Unrestricted

<p>I was not sure how to list my committee members on this form. Dr. Schuller is my advisor and Drs. Westerholm and Machiela are committee members. I do not have a "co-supervisor." Please correct this form if needed.</p> / <p>Almost every narrative in Pseudo-Philo’s <em>Liber Antiquitatum Biblicarum </em>(<em>L.A.B.</em>), a late first or early second century C.E. rewriting of scriptural texts and traditions, deals in some way with issues of reward and punishment, a prominent theme in early Jewish literature. In 1917, M. R. James observed that two “truths” were “foremost” among the “great truths” in <em>L.A.B.</em>: (1) “the indestructibility of Israel” and (2) Israel’s “duty of faithfulness to the one God” (<em>Biblical Antiquities</em>, 34). Most studies of reward and punishment in <em>L.A.B.</em> emphasize one of these two “great truths” to the virtual (or complete) exclusion of the other. This has resulted in sharply contrasting conclusions concerning the concepts of reward and punishment within Pseudo-Philo’s ideology.</p> <p>A promising perspective from which to reconsider the concepts of reward and punishment in <em>L.A.B.</em> is the view of reward and punishment, which, according to E. P. Sanders’s theory of covenantal nomism, was pervasive within Judaism of the first centuries of the Common Era (<em>Paul and Palestinian Judaism</em>, 75, 421‒423, 426). Such an investigation will be the focus of this thesis. Scholars such as Heikki Räisänen (<em>Paul and the Law</em>, 180 n. 92), Frederick J. Murphy (<em>Pseudo-Philo: Rewriting the Bible</em>, 233 n. 18), and Sanders (<em>Judaism: Practice and Belief</em>, 263‒275) have contended that <em>L.A.B.</em> exemplifies covenantal nomism but this premise has never been examined thoroughly. In this study, through a side-by-side analysis of <em>L.A.B.</em> and scriptural texts and traditions, we will identify the changes that Pseudo-Philo made to the scriptural account and then extract Pseudo-Philo’s ideology through a careful analysis of these changes. The recognition that <em>L.A.B.</em> is a late Second Temple period rewriting of scriptural texts and traditions is central to this examination.</p> / Doctor of Philosophy (PhD)

Desde sua construção no tempo do rei Salomão, o Templo de Jerusalém foi pedra angular do Javismo do Sul e, por conseguinte, do Judaísmo do Segundo Templo. O Pensamento do Templo, baseado nas regras de pureza e impureza dentro do espaço e tempo sagrados com as quais se orientava a vida sacerdotal, expandir-se-á de modo vigoroso nesse período com o crescimento da importância e centralidade do santuário hierosolimita na sociedade pós-exílica. Ao mesmo tempo, a valorização do sacerdócio estava em seu auge. O sumo sacerdote foi, desde o retorno de Babilônia, o chefe religioso e político da nação judaica até a ascensão de Salomé Alexandra ao trono no primeiro século a.C., função que lhe seria restituída com a queda da dinastia herodiana na Judéia. Por volta do século II a.C., uma comunidade fundada e liderada por sacerdotes, conhecida atualmente como Comunidade de Qumran, isolou-se da sociedade circundante, objetivando seguir uma estrita observância das regras sacerdotais de pureza. Em seu centro no deserto da Judéia, na região de Qumran próxima ao Mar Morto, seus membros produziram e guardaram manuscritos através dos quais basearam e constituíram sua organização peculiar. Esses manuscritos são denominados Manuscritos do Mar Morto ou, mais especificamente, Manuscritos de Qumran. Entre eles estão o Rolo (ou Pergaminho) do Templo, a Regra da Comunidade e o Documento de Damasco, fontes de interpretação bíblica e de normas comunitárias que os guiaram, enquanto aguardavam o tempo do fim, quando os sacerdotes da Comunidade seriam finalmente reinvestidos de seu poder no Templo purificado. E é baseando-nos nesses três documentos que elaboramos nossa tese ao analisar os discursos veiculados pela liderança comunal, os quais visavam à constituição de uma sociedade sacerdotal, moldada em uma interpretação radical das Escrituras e do mundo. / Since its construction in the time of king Salomon, the Jerusalem Temple was the corner stone of the Southern Javism and, from then on, of the Second Temple Judaism. The so-called Temple Thought, based on the rules of pure and impure inside the sacred place and time which governed the priestly life, will expand vigorously in this period due to the growth in importance and centrality of the Jerusalemite sanctuary inside the post-exilic society. At the same time, the high value of the priesthood was in its peak. The high priest was, from the return from the Babylonian exile on, the religious and political head of the Jewish nation until Salome Alexandras ascension to the throne in the first century B.C., function that was restituted after the fall of the Herodian dynasty. Around the second century B.C., a community founded and leaded by priests, presently known as the Qumran Community, isolated itself from the surrounding society, aiming at following the strict observance of the priestly rules of purity. In its centre in the Judean desert, in the region of Qumran near the Dead Sea, its members produced and kept manuscripts by which they based and constituted their peculiar organization. Those manuscripts are named Dead Sea Scrolls, or, more specifically, Qumran Scrolls. Among them we can find the Temple Scroll, the Rule of Community and the Damascus Document, sources of biblical interpretation and of community rules that guided them while they expected the end of times, when the priests of the Community would, eventually, be reinvested of their power in the purified Temple. Basing ourselves on these three documents we elaborated our dissertation by analyzing the discourse produced by the communal leadership, whose goal was the constitution of a priestly society, shaped in its radical interpretation of the Scriptures and of the world.

This thesis challenges the position that the serek texts are primarily prescriptive and legal, as they have been customarily defined. It argues that the term serek should be reconceptualized according to descriptive analysis, with the purpose of creating what C. Newsom terms a ‘Gestalt structure.’ In order to achieve this, four serek texts (M, S, Sa, and D) will be analyzed at three literary levels—semantic, textual and hypertextual—explaining how the elements at these levels interact as cohesive wholes, thus serving to create a more complete picture of this group of texts as a literary unity. Thus, while the separate, constituent semantic, textual and hypertextual parts must be analysed as separate elements, the fundamental questions posed regarding these elements will be different in a Gestalt paradigm as compared to a traditional, definitional analysis. Going from the micro to the macro, the first chapter will look at the serek texts through the ‘microscope’ of close philological analysis, examining how the term serek functions atomistically within the Dead Sea Scrolls. Building upon these results, the second chapter will more broadly analyse the structure, themes and narrative apparent in the serek texts, thus creating a fuller understanding of how the serek texts relate to one another and respond to circumstances in community life. Finally, the last chapter seeks yet more broadly to understand the serek texts in the wider literary milieu of the Second Temple Period. Here, a scribal technique present in the serek texts will be compared to a similar technique used in the Book of Isaiah—arguably the most important prophetic work for the Qumran sectarians.

This thesis challenges the position that the serek texts are primarily prescriptive and legal, as they have been customarily defined. It argues that the term serek should be reconceptualized according to descriptive analysis, with the purpose of creating what C. Newsom terms a ‘Gestalt structure.’ In order to achieve this, four serek texts (M, S, Sa, and D) will be analyzed at three literary levels—semantic, textual and hypertextual—explaining how the elements at these levels interact as cohesive wholes, thus serving to create a more complete picture of this group of texts as a literary unity. Thus, while the separate, constituent semantic, textual and hypertextual parts must be analysed as separate elements, the fundamental questions posed regarding these elements will be different in a Gestalt paradigm as compared to a traditional, definitional analysis. Going from the micro to the macro, the first chapter will look at the serek texts through the ‘microscope’ of close philological analysis, examining how the term serek functions atomistically within the Dead Sea Scrolls. Building upon these results, the second chapter will more broadly analyse the structure, themes and narrative apparent in the serek texts, thus creating a fuller understanding of how the serek texts relate to one another and respond to circumstances in community life. Finally, the last chapter seeks yet more broadly to understand the serek texts in the wider literary milieu of the Second Temple Period. Here, a scribal technique present in the serek texts will be compared to a similar technique used in the Book of Isaiah—arguably the most important prophetic work for the Qumran sectarians.

Desde sua construção no tempo do rei Salomão, o Templo de Jerusalém foi pedra angular do Javismo do Sul e, por conseguinte, do Judaísmo do Segundo Templo. O Pensamento do Templo, baseado nas regras de pureza e impureza dentro do espaço e tempo sagrados com as quais se orientava a vida sacerdotal, expandir-se-á de modo vigoroso nesse período com o crescimento da importância e centralidade do santuário hierosolimita na sociedade pós-exílica. Ao mesmo tempo, a valorização do sacerdócio estava em seu auge. O sumo sacerdote foi, desde o retorno de Babilônia, o chefe religioso e político da nação judaica até a ascensão de Salomé Alexandra ao trono no primeiro século a.C., função que lhe seria restituída com a queda da dinastia herodiana na Judéia. Por volta do século II a.C., uma comunidade fundada e liderada por sacerdotes, conhecida atualmente como Comunidade de Qumran, isolou-se da sociedade circundante, objetivando seguir uma estrita observância das regras sacerdotais de pureza. Em seu centro no deserto da Judéia, na região de Qumran próxima ao Mar Morto, seus membros produziram e guardaram manuscritos através dos quais basearam e constituíram sua organização peculiar. Esses manuscritos são denominados Manuscritos do Mar Morto ou, mais especificamente, Manuscritos de Qumran. Entre eles estão o Rolo (ou Pergaminho) do Templo, a Regra da Comunidade e o Documento de Damasco, fontes de interpretação bíblica e de normas comunitárias que os guiaram, enquanto aguardavam o tempo do fim, quando os sacerdotes da Comunidade seriam finalmente reinvestidos de seu poder no Templo purificado. E é baseando-nos nesses três documentos que elaboramos nossa tese ao analisar os discursos veiculados pela liderança comunal, os quais visavam à constituição de uma sociedade sacerdotal, moldada em uma interpretação radical das Escrituras e do mundo. / Since its construction in the time of king Salomon, the Jerusalem Temple was the corner stone of the Southern Javism and, from then on, of the Second Temple Judaism. The so-called Temple Thought, based on the rules of pure and impure inside the sacred place and time which governed the priestly life, will expand vigorously in this period due to the growth in importance and centrality of the Jerusalemite sanctuary inside the post-exilic society. At the same time, the high value of the priesthood was in its peak. The high priest was, from the return from the Babylonian exile on, the religious and political head of the Jewish nation until Salome Alexandras ascension to the throne in the first century B.C., function that was restituted after the fall of the Herodian dynasty. Around the second century B.C., a community founded and leaded by priests, presently known as the Qumran Community, isolated itself from the surrounding society, aiming at following the strict observance of the priestly rules of purity. In its centre in the Judean desert, in the region of Qumran near the Dead Sea, its members produced and kept manuscripts by which they based and constituted their peculiar organization. Those manuscripts are named Dead Sea Scrolls, or, more specifically, Qumran Scrolls. Among them we can find the Temple Scroll, the Rule of Community and the Damascus Document, sources of biblical interpretation and of community rules that guided them while they expected the end of times, when the priests of the Community would, eventually, be reinvested of their power in the purified Temple. Basing ourselves on these three documents we elaborated our dissertation by analyzing the discourse produced by the communal leadership, whose goal was the constitution of a priestly society, shaped in its radical interpretation of the Scriptures and of the world.

Repetition has received a bad press in certain streams of theological tradition; this reception has in part been caused by, and has in turn affected, readings of the Letter to the Hebrews, which speaks about repetition in ways unique in the New Testament. The present study addresses the insufficient critical attention paid to repetition in Hebrews, challenging the assumption that it functions uniformly and negatively throughout the letter, and exploring the variety of ways in which Hebrews presents repetition. The plurality of prophetic speech displays God’s manifold kindness in the old covenant; such speech is not opposed to but is fulfilled in Christ’s coming, and its ongoing repetition in the new covenant through citation and exposition serves to promote and explicate that event. Repeated mutual encouragement is essential to persevering in the Christian life and avoiding apostasy. And the regular entry of the Levitical priests into the outer sanctuary of the tabernacle in Heb 9.6 foreshadows the continual access to God achieved through Christ. Where repetition has a negative or contrastive role in the author’s argumentation, it does not cause inefficacy but rather indicates a weakness whose source is elsewhere – and which, moreover, is revealed fully only in the light of the Christ event. The uniqueness of Christ and of his death construed as a sacrifice, developed from concepts of singularity in Day of Atonement and early Christian crucifixion traditions, forms a unifying strand in the letter’s Christology. Rather than functioning in simple opposition to repetition, this singularity corresponds to continuity and eternity, and is developed at times in contrast to, and at times in correspondence with, repetition. The study thus offers a reappraisal of repetition in Hebrews, laying the foundations for renewed appreciation of the importance of repetition for theological discourse and religious life.

Die vorliegende Arbeit widmet sich der Analyse der Danielrezeption im Markusevangelium. Dabei werden die Text-Text-Bezüge nicht nur punktuell, sondern konzeptionell untersucht und ein Gesamtüberblick über ihre Bedeutung für das gesamte Markusevangelium gegeben. Als methodischer Ansatz kommen dabei die Erkenntnisse aus der Intertextualitätsforschung, besonders des textorientierten Modells, zum Tragen. Die Untersuchung zeigt, dass der Autor des Markusevangeliums die Rezipienten seines Werkes überdeutlich und sehr bewusst auf das Danielbuch verweist. Dies wird besonders an der Endzeitrede in Mk 13 sichtbar. Weil zudem über das gesamte Evangelium hinweg immer wieder mit unterschiedlicher Deutlichkeit auf das Danielbuch angespielt wird, legt sich der Schluss nahe, dass der Autor des Markusevangeliums das Danielbuch prinzipiell als Subtext seinen Hörern bzw. Lesern präsentiert. Die intertextuellen Bezüge zwischen dem Markusevangelium und dem Danielbuch erweisen sich damit als eine wesentliche Perspektive für ein angemessenes Verständnis des Markusevangeliums. Dabei wird das Danielbuch vom Markus aber nicht nur aufgenommen, vielmehr findet eine kritische und korrigierende Auseinandersetzung mit wesentlichen Inhalten statt: Dies betrifft vor allem die im Danielbuch vorhergesagten Zeiten und Zeichen, den endzeitlichen Krieg und die Rolle des Tempels. Das herausgearbeitete Profil, welches in Bezug auf die Danielrezeption als ambivalent beschrieben werden muss, lässt sich dabei am besten in die Zeit nach der Tempelzerstörung durch die Römer im Jahr 70 n.Chr. einordnen. Die vorliegende Arbeit liefert damit nicht nur Erkenntnisse in Bezug auf die inhaltliche Ausrichtung des Markusevangeliums, sondern auch wichtige Impulse für die Frage nach der historischen Einordnung des Markusevangeliums.

The main aim of this dissertation is to understand the function of the text The Parables of Enoch (PE) in its ancient context. Despite the complicated and composite nature of this text, I have tried to explain the internal logic of this text, especially with an emphasis on understanding the different timelines with which the author of the text works. A critical evaluation of the limits of working with the preserved Ethiopian translations, as well as with the composite nature of the extant form of the text is the essential prerequisite for the interpretation of PE. In the exegetical part, I seek to demonstrate the main thesis that the purpose of PE is to offer a complex symbolic universe through ancient authoritative visions of the ancestor Enoch that serves to legitimize the shared social reality, which is in danger due to the difficult situation of persecution and oppression. I take the theoretical framework for this research over from the sociological constructivism. While the shared social reality is often in crisis, the symbolic universe as a complex level of legitimation intends to explain this discrepancy between the assumed social reality and the reality of the everyday experience. In the case of PE, it is a discrepancy between the experience of oppression and persecution of the addressees...

Die vorliegende Arbeit widmet sich der Analyse der Danielrezeption im Markusevangelium. Dabei werden die Text-Text-Bezüge nicht nur punktuell, sondern konzeptionell untersucht und ein Gesamtüberblick über ihre Bedeutung für das gesamte Markusevangelium gegeben. Als methodischer Ansatz kommen dabei die Erkenntnisse aus der Intertextualitätsforschung, besonders des textorientierten Modells, zum Tragen. Die Untersuchung zeigt, dass der Autor des Markusevangeliums die Rezipienten seines Werkes überdeutlich und sehr bewusst auf das Danielbuch verweist. Dies wird besonders an der Endzeitrede in Mk 13 sichtbar. Weil zudem über das gesamte Evangelium hinweg immer wieder mit unterschiedlicher Deutlichkeit auf das Danielbuch angespielt wird, legt sich der Schluss nahe, dass der Autor des Markusevangeliums das Danielbuch prinzipiell als Subtext seinen Hörern bzw. Lesern präsentiert. Die intertextuellen Bezüge zwischen dem Markusevangelium und dem Danielbuch erweisen sich damit als eine wesentliche Perspektive für ein angemessenes Verständnis des Markusevangeliums. Dabei wird das Danielbuch vom Markus aber nicht nur aufgenommen, vielmehr findet eine kritische und korrigierende Auseinandersetzung mit wesentlichen Inhalten statt: Dies betrifft vor allem die im Danielbuch vorhergesagten Zeiten und Zeichen, den endzeitlichen Krieg und die Rolle des Tempels. Das herausgearbeitete Profil, welches in Bezug auf die Danielrezeption als ambivalent beschrieben werden muss, lässt sich dabei am besten in die Zeit nach der Tempelzerstörung durch die Römer im Jahr 70 n.Chr. einordnen. Die vorliegende Arbeit liefert damit nicht nur Erkenntnisse in Bezug auf die inhaltliche Ausrichtung des Markusevangeliums, sondern auch wichtige Impulse für die Frage nach der historischen Einordnung des Markusevangeliums.