O tema geral desta pesquisa são as tecnologias que permitem o controle de acesso, vigilância, monitoramento e identificação de pessoas, e que se aliam a construção de bancos de dados e perfis sobre a população. Neste amplo universo, a tecnologia biométrica para identificação foi focalizada a partir de um estudo de caso sobre o novo documento biométrico de identidade brasileiro: o Registro de Identidade Civil. Retomando o conceito de dispositivo em Michel Foucault, buscou-se trazer a tona os discursos, as instituições, as leis, o debate legal, as medidas, decisões, e enunciados científicos que configuram o funcionamento do poder na atualidade. No âmbito das ciências, a biometria hoje distancia-se da antropometria e das formas de identificação do século XIX, vinculando-se a um exercício do poder que não é mais aquele para disciplinar os corpos (Michel Foucault), mas para gerir os fluxos de dados, um corpo de dados. As novas tecnologias focalizadas apontam para um exercício do poder mais próximo do que Gilles Deleuze chamou de sociedades de controle. / This research focus on technologies that are enabled to access control, surveillance, monitoring and identification of persons, connected with databases and profiles construction on the population. In this vast universe, the biometric technology for identification has been focused from a case study on the new biometric identity document Brazil: the Civil Identity Register. Based on the Foucaults concept of apparatus, this reasearch aimed to bring out the discourses, institutions, laws, the legal debate, measures, decisions, and scientific statements that configure the operation of power today. Within the sciences, biometrics today area distanced itself from anthropometry and forms of identification of the nineteenth century. This is related with an exercise of power that is no longer that to discipline their bodies (Michel Foucault), but to manage the data flows, or a \"body of data. New technologies are related with an exercise of power closer to what Gilles Deleuze called societies of control.

O tema geral desta pesquisa são as tecnologias que permitem o controle de acesso, vigilância, monitoramento e identificação de pessoas, e que se aliam a construção de bancos de dados e perfis sobre a população. Neste amplo universo, a tecnologia biométrica para identificação foi focalizada a partir de um estudo de caso sobre o novo documento biométrico de identidade brasileiro: o Registro de Identidade Civil. Retomando o conceito de dispositivo em Michel Foucault, buscou-se trazer a tona os discursos, as instituições, as leis, o debate legal, as medidas, decisões, e enunciados científicos que configuram o funcionamento do poder na atualidade. No âmbito das ciências, a biometria hoje distancia-se da antropometria e das formas de identificação do século XIX, vinculando-se a um exercício do poder que não é mais aquele para disciplinar os corpos (Michel Foucault), mas para gerir os fluxos de dados, um corpo de dados. As novas tecnologias focalizadas apontam para um exercício do poder mais próximo do que Gilles Deleuze chamou de sociedades de controle. / This research focus on technologies that are enabled to access control, surveillance, monitoring and identification of persons, connected with databases and profiles construction on the population. In this vast universe, the biometric technology for identification has been focused from a case study on the new biometric identity document Brazil: the Civil Identity Register. Based on the Foucaults concept of apparatus, this reasearch aimed to bring out the discourses, institutions, laws, the legal debate, measures, decisions, and scientific statements that configure the operation of power today. Within the sciences, biometrics today area distanced itself from anthropometry and forms of identification of the nineteenth century. This is related with an exercise of power that is no longer that to discipline their bodies (Michel Foucault), but to manage the data flows, or a \"body of data. New technologies are related with an exercise of power closer to what Gilles Deleuze called societies of control.

In contrast to the integral photograms of cinema, the images of a post-cinematic media regime are dividual, their forms discorrelated from molar subjectivity, their forces molecular, and their agencies of the order of metabolism rather than perception or cognition.1 It is in these terms that I have sought to understand the differences between cinematic and post-cinematic media (Denson 2016), and I have thereby made appeal to a somewhat Deleuzian framework—essentially situating the post-cinematic image as a medium, vector, or agent of the control society, complicit in the dividuation and modulation of subjects and their experiential and agential capacities under post-Fordist or neoliberal capitalism, as suggestively described by Deleuze in his famous “Postscript on the Societies of Control” (1992). But what are the means and mechanisms by which discorrelated, “dividuated” images are supposed to affect us?

Este estudo consiste em uma reflexão sobre as relações e práticas escolares em meio aos modos de subjetivação que vem ganhando ênfase no século XXI. A pesquisa parte da premissa que a subjetividade e os fazeres que a constituem vem deixando de estar vinculados exclusivamente ao poder disciplinar, e passam a obter contornos mais flexíveis, com o advento da sociedade de controle. A instituição escolar foi idealizada com o objetivo de formar os sujeitos através da disciplina, e agora, diante da maior flexibilização nos modos de subjetivação, parece se tornar uma instituição anacrônica, e faz uso de algumas tentativas para flexibilização de suas práticas. O presente trabalho busca promover a reflexão sobre o lugar da escola no século XXI, bem como uma visão contextualizada do modelo educacional formal que vem ganhando destaque no discurso atual. A abordagem utilizada compõe uma pesquisa bibliográfica, que pretende explanar, ao longo da reflexão, autores que se propuseram a analisar, descrever e diagnosticar o panorama em questão. A pesquisa não apresenta algum tipo conclusão fechada, ao contrário, almeja causar inquietações na busca por formas de educação que façam sentido para o aluno do século XXI. / This study consists of a reflection on school and its practices in the context of the modes of subjectivity that emerge in this beginning of XXI century. We start from the premise that subjectivities are no longer exclusively submitted to the disciplinary mechanisms; with the advent of the societies of control, they receive more flexible contours. The school was designed to form subjects through discipline, and, trying not to become an anachronistic institution, makes use of some flexible practices. The present work aims at highlighting the reflexive practice about the school positioning in the XXI century, as well as the contextualized view of the formal educational model that has been emphasized in the current discourse. The present work is a literature research on the work of some contemporary authors - like G. Deleuze, Paula Sibilia and Cristina Corea - that intend to analyze, describe and diagnose the present situation. The research does not intend to presents closed and definite conclusions, but rather to raise relevant questions for todays education.

Este estudo consiste em uma reflexão sobre as relações e práticas escolares em meio aos modos de subjetivação que vem ganhando ênfase no século XXI. A pesquisa parte da premissa que a subjetividade e os fazeres que a constituem vem deixando de estar vinculados exclusivamente ao poder disciplinar, e passam a obter contornos mais flexíveis, com o advento da sociedade de controle. A instituição escolar foi idealizada com o objetivo de formar os sujeitos através da disciplina, e agora, diante da maior flexibilização nos modos de subjetivação, parece se tornar uma instituição anacrônica, e faz uso de algumas tentativas para flexibilização de suas práticas. O presente trabalho busca promover a reflexão sobre o lugar da escola no século XXI, bem como uma visão contextualizada do modelo educacional formal que vem ganhando destaque no discurso atual. A abordagem utilizada compõe uma pesquisa bibliográfica, que pretende explanar, ao longo da reflexão, autores que se propuseram a analisar, descrever e diagnosticar o panorama em questão. A pesquisa não apresenta algum tipo conclusão fechada, ao contrário, almeja causar inquietações na busca por formas de educação que façam sentido para o aluno do século XXI. / This study consists of a reflection on school and its practices in the context of the modes of subjectivity that emerge in this beginning of XXI century. We start from the premise that subjectivities are no longer exclusively submitted to the disciplinary mechanisms; with the advent of the societies of control, they receive more flexible contours. The school was designed to form subjects through discipline, and, trying not to become an anachronistic institution, makes use of some flexible practices. The present work aims at highlighting the reflexive practice about the school positioning in the XXI century, as well as the contextualized view of the formal educational model that has been emphasized in the current discourse. The present work is a literature research on the work of some contemporary authors - like G. Deleuze, Paula Sibilia and Cristina Corea - that intend to analyze, describe and diagnose the present situation. The research does not intend to presents closed and definite conclusions, but rather to raise relevant questions for todays education.

Deleuze’s short essay on the societies of control has, one could say, infected thought on the present. Few serious reflections on today’s media society seem immune against the plausibility and evidence of Deleuze’s deliberations, not least because they use the force of abstraction to draw theoretical concepts from empirical facts, allowing for an anticipation of future developments without getting lost in details. Deleuze argues that a society whose media and technologies provide an apparatus of seamless connectivity and global scope has irreversible effects on the way we perceive, think, and create order. At the same time, the naturalization of these effects progresses via retroaction – making us forget it has ever been different. With his text, Deleuze stands in the midst of this naturalization and neutralization process: This may be why it is inevitably a “postscript” to the societies of control – it takes the artificial position of the “post” in order to be able to look at one’s own contemporary culture from an alienating distance, as Foucault once demanded for every description of the present (1999: 91). This “post,” then, by no means signals a retrospective look at a process already completed; instead, Deleuze gives an exaggerated account of the early digitization age from an artificial retrospective standpoint, which, ironically, will also have been one “after” writing.

No description available.

In his discussion of the transition from the cinema of the movement-image to the cinema of the time-image, Deleuze famously makes way for the traumatic intrusion of history. This transition, he writes, is not purely internal to cinema, but the result of the emergence of '‘any spaces whatever’, deserted but inhabited, disused warehouses, waste ground, cities in the course of demolition or reconstruction. And in these any-spaceswhatever a new race of characters was stirring, kind of mutant: they saw rather than acted, they were seers. (1989: xi) ' These spaces are the result of the destruction caused by the Second World War, creating new forms of anonymous or empty space: bombed cities, abandoned villages, the chaos of what Thomas Pynchon, in Gravity’s Rainbow, called “the zone” (1975: 281-616).1 It is these spaces, especially in Italian neo-realism, which will break up the movement-image and release “a little time in a pure state” (Deleuze 1989: xi). Due to the stark emptiness of these spaces and their anonymity, characters or images will no longer be embedded in movement but instead become detached into time.

In his “Postscript on the Societies of Control”, which was written 30 years ago in 2020, Gilles Deleuze leaves us with the diagnosis that a profound transformation of society and capitalism has taken place: having left behind the disciplinary societies, which Foucault analysed (cf. Foucault 1975), after World War II, we are now living in societies of control that are inseparably connected to a new form of capitalism (cf. Deleuze 1992: 3-4, 6). This transformation of society has led to a “generalized crisis in relation to all the environments of enclosure” (Deleuze 1992: 3-4) which were being reshaped through various reforms, resulting in “the installation of the new forces” (1992: 4), that is, the “progressive and dispersed installation of a new system of domination” (1992: 7). Apparently, Deleuze’s clairvoyant idea of the society of control seems to have come true: we no longer need to imagine science fiction, since contemporary reality is already structured by digitised control mechanisms of multiple sorts and characters. Many of our social, economic, and political actions in both public and private everyday life are at least influenced or even caused by algorithms. Several of these algorithms may make our lives more convenient, especially in terms of the possibilities of the Internet, such as deterritorialised connection, access to information, and shared technological knowledge. However, in the “age of algorithm” (Sunstein 2017: 3), most areas of digitised reality based on ‘big data’, like social media, financial markets, smart technologies, or artificial intelligence systems are characterised by anonymity, non-transparency, and undemocratic structures which appear like asymmetrical mechanisms for controlling individuals. The function of algorithms enables all kinds of political and private organisations, like companies and governments, to evaluate patterns of individual behaviour and actions and to handle them as impersonal, general, and – in the Deleuzean idiom – dividualised facets of reality (cf. Baranzoni 2016: 45-46): a reality that is rather to be calculated in capitalistic terms than to be created and to be designed by human beings themselves (e.g. as political actors).

Made available in DSpace on 2016-04-26T14:53:23Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 Joao Medeiros Barata.pdf: 815867 bytes, checksum: f1a3f6a33332183310d0d21357f906a2 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2011-11-18 / Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico / This dissertation aims to identify and analyze power relations passing through the coverage of police actions in the Brazilian television, more specifically on the Brasil Urgente program, aired by Bandeirantes TV Station since 2001. In order to do that, the theoretical contributions of Michel Foucault regarding the construction of abnormals, security practices, and dispositifs, as well as those by Gilles Deleuze and Félix Guattari related to the agencements and the societies of control were used. For doing this, thirty editions aired between 05/10/2010 and 07/01/2010 were collected and their reports were analyzed in order to portray how this program promotes meetings with power, how abnormals are created, which practices of security are disseminated through this discourse, and, finally, how this kind of coverage presents practices from the societies of discipline and control / Esta dissertação tem como objetivo identificar e analisar relações de poder que atravessam a cobertura das ações policiais na televisão brasileira, mais especificamente no programa Brasil Urgente, exibido pela Rede Bandeirantes de Televisão desde 2001. Para que isso fosse feito, foram utilizadas principalmente as contribuições teóricas de Michel Foucault acerca da construção de anormais, práticas de segurança e dispositivos e de Gilles Deleuze e Félix Guattari sobre os agenciamentos e as sociedades de controle. Para isso, foram coletadas trinta edições, apresentadas entre 10/05/2010 e 1º/07/2010, que tiveram suas reportagens analisadas para ilustrar como esse programa promove encontros com o poder, como são criados anormais, que práticas de segurança são propagadas por esse discurso, e, finalmente, como esse tipo de cobertura apresenta práticas das sociedades disciplinares e de controle