Made available in DSpace on 2016-04-26T20:29:10Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 Monica de Almeida Magalhaes Serrano.pdf: 743335 bytes, checksum: 005ad1b52797ba9888ff448fef5730cc (MD5) Previous issue date: 2009-05-22 / The 1988 Federal Constitution introduced significant changes in the ambit of social rights, especially regarding the right to health. In this sense, it widened the fundamental rights, in whose landmark the social rights are found, generically submitting them to a command of immediate applicability. Therefore, the study was elaborated, based on the premise that the constitutional text, recognizing the social rights, frequently attributed them indubitable feature of subjective public rights, thus, allowing them the possibility of jurisdictional tutelage. Specifically concerning the right to health, besides organizing a unique system, involving all the governmental spheres, the Federal Constitution appointed as its directress the duty of integral assistance. According to the preamble of the pact that created the World Health Organization, health is the state of complete physical, mental and social well-being. Therefore, considering integrity, whatever is necessary to the preservation or recovery of this health state is included in the ambit of the estate obligations towards the citizens. Even in confrontation to the reserve of possible clause, this duty does not disappear, because, once offering activity inherent to the preservation of human dignity, it surpasses the Administration s secondary public interest / A Constituição Federal de 1988 introduziu significativas mudanças no âmbito dos direitos sociais, em especial no tocante ao direito à saúde. Nesse sentido, ampliou os direitos fundamentais, em cujo marco estão situados os direitos sociais, submetendo-os genericamente a um comando de aplicabilidade imediata. Desta feita, o trabalho foi elaborado com base na premissa de que o texto constitucional, ao reconhecer direitos sociais, frequentemente atribuiu-lhes a indubitável feição de direitos públicos subjetivos, viabilizando-lhes, pois, a possibilidade de tutela jurisdicional. No que toca especificamente ao direito à saúde, a Constituição Federal, além de organizar um sistema único, envolvendo todas as esferas de governo, apontou como diretriz deste o dever de assistência integral. Saúde, segundo o preâmbulo do pacto que criou a Organização Mundial de Saúde, é o estado de completo bem-estar físico, mental e social. Logo, cogitando-se de integralidade, tudo que seja necessário à preservação ou recuperação deste estado de saúde está incluído no âmbito de obrigações estatais para com o cidadão. Este dever, mesmo quando em confronto com a denominada cláusula da reserva do possível, não desaparece, uma vez que, prestando atividade intrínseca à preservação da dignidade humana, sobrepõe-se ao interesse público secundário da Administração

Véritable dogme en droit interne et s’imposant comme un standard dans l’ordre juridique international, le concept d’« État de droit » est dépourvu d’une signification clairement déterminée. Différentes conceptions sont admises et dépendent des acceptions de l’État en question, d’une garantie hic et nunc de certains droits ainsi que d’une volonté politique des gouvernants. L’objet de cette recherche s’attache au droit administratif, précisément au rôle du juge administratif, comme vecteur de soumission de l’autorité de l’État afin de promouvoir les droits et libertés fondamentales des administrés en France. Si rien ne présageait une telle évolution au nom de la raison d’État, le Conseil d’État, par une pensée politique (néo)libérale, s’est imposé comme l’institution juridictionnelle majeure dans la construction du concept d’État de droit administratif. Au moyen d’une interprétation formelle et substantielle du principe de légalité, l’État de droit administratif légitime l’action publique des gouvernants tout en garantissant la sécurité juridique des administrés. Cette liaison de l’État et du droit administratif relève d’une construction inépuisable, appréhendée par l’État de contentieux qui s’analyse comme le kaléidoscope des faits sociaux. Ce dernier résulte d’une politique de la force, d’un conflit positif entre les Hommes, les institutions, les normes ou les pouvoirs institués. Ainsi, en conciliant l’Autorité et la Liberté, le concept d’État de droit administratif révèle le degré d’assujettissement de l’administration au droit administratif. Le développement objectif du concept d’État de droit administratif est bâti par l’État de justice et protégé par l’État légal, au profit d’une justice administrative garante des valeurs républicaines de l’État. Le perfectionnement de l’État de droit administratif par l’État de contentieux est agencé par l’État démocratique et régulé par l’État global, en libérant l’administré de toute servitude de la part de l’administration. L’illibéralisme administratif s’estompe au profit d’une société de(s) droit(s), d’une juridicisation et d’un normativisme absolus, au détriment de l’État. / The Rule of law concept is a real domestic law dogma and has established itself as a norm in the international judicial order. It is beneft of a clearly defined signification. Different concepts are accepted and depend on the agreements of the state, on a hic et nunc warranty of some rights as well as the rulers political will. This study aims to consider the administrative law, and more specifically the administrative judge’s role, as a means of control over the authority of the state so as to promote the rights and fundamental freedoms of the constituents in France. Even if nothing could portend such an evolution on the account of the state, the Conseil d’État, through a (neo)liberal political influence, became major judicial institution which builds the concept of domestic rule. The administrative juridiction legitimizes the public action of the governments while ensuring the legal security of the constituents through a formal and substantive interpretation of the principle of legality. This relation on between the state and the administrative law state of litigation which can be analyzed as a kaleidoscope of social facts. This stems from a power policy, of a positive conflict between men, the institutions, the normes or the instituted powers. Therefore, by accommodating authority and freedom, the administrative jurisdiction exposes the extent to which the administration is subjected to the administrative law. The objective construction of the administrative Rule of law allows the setting up of an administrative justice, which guarantees the republican values of the State thanks to legal Justice and Legal State. The upgrading of the administrative Rule of law by the democracy provide some freedom to the people vis-à-vis the state. The lack of liberalism fades away in favour of a litigious society, juridification and normatism to the detriment of the state.