Este estudo objetivou avaliar o perfil clínico e epidemiológico de pacientes submetidos à cirurgia de prótese de quadril e que sofreram complicações relacionadas a esta no pós-operatório. A pesquisa foi realizada no período de 2002 a 2006; a amostra inicial foi composta de 398 cirurgias de pacientes submetidos à Artroplastia Primária de Quadril, realizadas em um hospital escola especializado da Cidade de São Paulo. Em 48 destas cirurgias ocorreram complicações pós-operatórias, compondo a amostra final deste estudo. Houve predominância de indivíduos do sexo feminino (66,7%), com média de idade de 59 anos, casados ou em união estável/amasiado (43,4%), provenientes da cidade de São Paulo (55,3%). Referente à escolaridade a maioria (58,1%) tinha fundamental completo. Quanto à ocupação houve predominância de aposentados e pacientes que desenvolvem atividades técnicas e ocupacionais, ambos com 35,1%. Infecção do quadril foi o motivo predominante para revisão da prótese de quadril (33,3%). A Vancomicina e a Ceftazidima, associadas, foram os antibióticos mais utilizados (58,1%). O estudo contribui para a estruturação de um cuidar multidisciplinar e especializado, pois possibilita o conhecimento da clientela, através de um perfil sociodemográfico e clínico, proporcionando mecanismos para intervenções de modo a transformar a assistência de Enfermagem em Ortopedia e Traumatologia e Reabilitação Física / This study was aimed at evaluating the clinical and epidemiological profile of patients submitted to hip prosthesis surgery who had complications related to it in the post-surgery period. The research was conducted between 2002 and 2006; the initial sample was comprised of 398 surgeries of patients submitted to Primary Hip Arthroplasty, performed at a specialized school hospital in the city of São Paulo. In 48 of those surgeries there were post-surgery complications, thus comprising the final sample of this study. There was a predominance of females (66.7%), with average age of 59, married or with a stable union (43.4%), living in the city of São Paulo (55.3%). Regarding education, most (58.1%) had finished primary school. As for occupation, the majority were retirees and patients that perform technical and occupational activities, both with 35.1%. Hip infection was the most common cause for hip prosthesis revision (33.3%). Vancomycin and ceftazydime, used together, were the most used antibiotics (58.1%). The study helps the development of a multidisciplinary, specialized care because it brings information about the clientele through a socio-demographic and clinical profile, thus providing mechanisms for interventions so as to transform care in Orthopedic and Traumatology Nursing and in Physical Rehabilitation Nursing

Este estudo objetivou avaliar o perfil clínico e epidemiológico de pacientes submetidos à cirurgia de prótese de quadril e que sofreram complicações relacionadas a esta no pós-operatório. A pesquisa foi realizada no período de 2002 a 2006; a amostra inicial foi composta de 398 cirurgias de pacientes submetidos à Artroplastia Primária de Quadril, realizadas em um hospital escola especializado da Cidade de São Paulo. Em 48 destas cirurgias ocorreram complicações pós-operatórias, compondo a amostra final deste estudo. Houve predominância de indivíduos do sexo feminino (66,7%), com média de idade de 59 anos, casados ou em união estável/amasiado (43,4%), provenientes da cidade de São Paulo (55,3%). Referente à escolaridade a maioria (58,1%) tinha fundamental completo. Quanto à ocupação houve predominância de aposentados e pacientes que desenvolvem atividades técnicas e ocupacionais, ambos com 35,1%. Infecção do quadril foi o motivo predominante para revisão da prótese de quadril (33,3%). A Vancomicina e a Ceftazidima, associadas, foram os antibióticos mais utilizados (58,1%). O estudo contribui para a estruturação de um cuidar multidisciplinar e especializado, pois possibilita o conhecimento da clientela, através de um perfil sociodemográfico e clínico, proporcionando mecanismos para intervenções de modo a transformar a assistência de Enfermagem em Ortopedia e Traumatologia e Reabilitação Física / This study was aimed at evaluating the clinical and epidemiological profile of patients submitted to hip prosthesis surgery who had complications related to it in the post-surgery period. The research was conducted between 2002 and 2006; the initial sample was comprised of 398 surgeries of patients submitted to Primary Hip Arthroplasty, performed at a specialized school hospital in the city of São Paulo. In 48 of those surgeries there were post-surgery complications, thus comprising the final sample of this study. There was a predominance of females (66.7%), with average age of 59, married or with a stable union (43.4%), living in the city of São Paulo (55.3%). Regarding education, most (58.1%) had finished primary school. As for occupation, the majority were retirees and patients that perform technical and occupational activities, both with 35.1%. Hip infection was the most common cause for hip prosthesis revision (33.3%). Vancomycin and ceftazydime, used together, were the most used antibiotics (58.1%). The study helps the development of a multidisciplinary, specialized care because it brings information about the clientele through a socio-demographic and clinical profile, thus providing mechanisms for interventions so as to transform care in Orthopedic and Traumatology Nursing and in Physical Rehabilitation Nursing

The Institute of Medicine report "To Err is Human," released in late 1999, raised the issue of human error in medicine to a new level of attention. This study examines the frequency, severity, and type (FST) of errors associated with postoperative surgical complications at a tertiary care, university-based medical center, addressing the intersection of three domains: patient safety, graduate medical education, and simulation-based training. The study develops and validates a classification system for medical error that is specific to surgery, affirming reliability internally and externally. Baseline data on the FST of errors is collected over a 12-month period. A hybrid, simulation based training session is developed, validated, and applied to a cohort of surgical residents, focusing on the three most common types of errors identified from pilot data, namely judgment error, incomplete understanding of the problem, and inattention to detail, all human factor errors. The impact of the training is evaluated by measuring the FST of errors occurring during the 6-month period following the training sessions. The study demonstrates that there is a continuous decrement in the incidence of postoperative complications and a proportional decrease in error, which starts at the beginning of the baseline data collection and continues linearly throughout the 12 baseline months and subsequent 6 post-training months. There is no additional decrement in the rate of change following training, and no change in the rate of the index errors following the training. This study suggests that surgical error is frequent (>2%) and principally due to human factors rather than systems or communication. This study demonstrates that creating an environment where residents are continuously involved in identifying and characterizing errors results in a significant and sustained decrease in postoperative complications and the errors specifically associated with them. Contrary to expectations, a validated, well-designed, active-learning training module does not result in an additional identifiable improvement in patient outcome or in the incidence of index errors. These results are at variance with many recent studies addressing medical error and, if verified by additional studies, challenge several strongly held ideas related to patient safety training.

<p>Colorectal cancer is one of the most common malignancies in Sweden, with more than 5000 new cases annually. Median age at time of diagnosis is approximately 75 years. Owing to the ageing population, the incidence of colorectal cancer is increasing. The improvement in surgical technique and the introduction of adjuvant radio- and chemotherapy increased the 5-year survival rate from approximately 30-40% in the early 1960s to almost 60% in the late 1990s. The cost of public health care has risen considerably, and case-costing systems are increasingly demanded. Linked to clinical guidelines and quality registers, such control systems form a proper basis for quality assurance projects and improvement. The aim of this thesis is to describe the efficiency and cost effectiveness of colorectal cancer treatment in a defined Swedish population. Emergency surgery for colon cancer, constituting 25% of the cases, increased both mortality and cost. Among emergency cases there was not only an increase in postoperative mortality but also a stage specific decrease in long-term survival rate. Correct staging is decisive for further treatment of patients after colon cancer surgery and influences long-term survival. The number of lymph nodes examined varied between different pathology departments and could be used as a quality measurement. The proportion of tumour stage III increased the more nodes examined. A prognostic estimation of stage III cases that is less sensitive to the number of nodes examined is proposed. A case-control study aimed at identifying risk factors for anastomotic leakage after rectal cancer surgery confirmed previously known risk factors but failed to identify further steps during the perioperative course that were amenable to improvement. This research has confirmed that population-based quality and case-costing registers, linked to clinical guidelines, constitute a proper source for projects of quality improvement and decisions about distribution of resources in health care.</p>

Colorectal cancer is one of the most common malignancies in Sweden, with more than 5000 new cases annually. Median age at time of diagnosis is approximately 75 years. Owing to the ageing population, the incidence of colorectal cancer is increasing. The improvement in surgical technique and the introduction of adjuvant radio- and chemotherapy increased the 5-year survival rate from approximately 30-40% in the early 1960s to almost 60% in the late 1990s. The cost of public health care has risen considerably, and case-costing systems are increasingly demanded. Linked to clinical guidelines and quality registers, such control systems form a proper basis for quality assurance projects and improvement. The aim of this thesis is to describe the efficiency and cost effectiveness of colorectal cancer treatment in a defined Swedish population. Emergency surgery for colon cancer, constituting 25% of the cases, increased both mortality and cost. Among emergency cases there was not only an increase in postoperative mortality but also a stage specific decrease in long-term survival rate. Correct staging is decisive for further treatment of patients after colon cancer surgery and influences long-term survival. The number of lymph nodes examined varied between different pathology departments and could be used as a quality measurement. The proportion of tumour stage III increased the more nodes examined. A prognostic estimation of stage III cases that is less sensitive to the number of nodes examined is proposed. A case-control study aimed at identifying risk factors for anastomotic leakage after rectal cancer surgery confirmed previously known risk factors but failed to identify further steps during the perioperative course that were amenable to improvement. This research has confirmed that population-based quality and case-costing registers, linked to clinical guidelines, constitute a proper source for projects of quality improvement and decisions about distribution of resources in health care.

No description available.

WHO tog 2009 fram en checklista för att öka patientsäkerheten i samband med operationer, SafeSurgery Checklist [SSC] eller på svenska: Checklista för säker kirurgi. Syftet med checklistan är attförebygga de risker som kan leda till vårdskador vid operationer och att förbättra operationsteametskommunikation. Detta via ett antal säkerhetsfrågor samt att alla på operationssalen presenterar sig mednamn och profession.En rad studier visar på att checklistan om den är rätt använd reducerar operationskomplikationerna.Dessvärre finns det också studier som menar att följsamheten till checklista för säker kirurgi brister.I en kartläggning på författarens arbetsplats så identifierades flera förbättringsgap. Det framkom blandannat att det i operationsteamen brister i följsamhet på flera punkter i checklistan och att det var storaskillnader i hur den genomfördes. Det visade sig också att flera professioner i mikrosystemet inte kändesig delaktiga och inkluderade när checklistan genomfördes.Författaren valde därför att genomföra ett förbättringsarbete för att få bättre följsamhet till checklistaför säker kirurgi. Förbättringsarbetet genomfördes i samband med att den ursprungliga checklistanskulle ersättas med en uppdaterad version, Checklista 2.0 framtagen av Landstingens ömsesidigaförsäkringsbolag.Med Nolans förbättringsmodell som stöd så genomfördes utbildningsdagar, workshops och dialogerunder 2020–2021. Därefter infördes Checklista 2.0 på en operationssal som ett pilottest.En majoritet av medarbetarna upplevde att de nya rutinerna förbättrat delaktigheten. Sedan november2021 så är de nya rutinerna implementerade på hela avdelningen.Under 2022 genomfördes en kvalitativ intervjustudie som undersökte operationsteamets uppfattningav vilka faktorer som påverkat följsamheten under tiden förbättringsarbetet pågick. Resultatet mynnadeut i tre teman; motivation, ledarskapets betydelse och känsla av tillhörighet.Resultatet kan användas som vägledning för framtida förbättringsarbeten och förändringar i rutiner.Det kan ge en ökad förståelse för att operationsteamets professioner har olika utgångslägen. Därförbehöver förändringar som berör flera professioner ta hänsyn till dessa utgångslägen för att bliframgångsrika.Mer forskning kring vad som påverkar patientsäkerhetskulturen inom hälso- och sjukvården behövs ochden behöver ta hänsyn till samtliga professioner som verkar inom kontexten. / In 2009, WHO introduced a checklist to increase patient safety during surgery, Safe Surgery Checklist[SSC]. The purpose of the checklist is to prevent risks that can lead to medical injuries during surgeryand to improve team communication.A number of studies show that the checklist, if used correctly, reduces surgical complications.Unfortunately, there are also studies that suggest that compliance with the checklist for safe surgery isinaccurate.In a survey at the author's workplace, several improvement gaps were identified. It emerged, amongother things, that there was a lack of compliance in surgery teams and there were major differences inhow the checklist was carried out. It also turned out that several professionals in the microsystem didnot feel involved and included when the checklists were conducted.The author therefore chose to carry out an improvement work to get better compliance to the SSC. Theimprovement work was carried out in connection with the original checklist being replaced with anupdated version, Checklist 2.0, developed by the County Council's mutual insurance company.With Nolan's improvement model as support, training days, workshops and dialogues were heldbetween 2020–2021. Then Checklist 2.0 was introduced in one theatre as a pilot test.A majority of the employees felt that the new routines improved participation. Since November 2021,the new routine have been implemented throughout the department.In 2022, a qualitative interview study was conducted that examined the surgical team's perception ofthe factors that affected compliance during the improvement work. The result resulted in three themes.Motivation, the importance of leadership and sense of belonging. The perception differed somewhatdepending on one's professional affiliation.The results can be used as a guide for future implementations and changes in routines. It can provide anincreased understanding that the surgical team's professions have different starting points and thereforechanges that affect several professions need to take these starting points into account in order to besuccessful.More research on what affects the patient safety culture in health care is needed and it needs to take intoaccount all professions that operate in the context.