本研究以2000年至2006年中國大陸上市公司之財務資料及股價資料，探討中國上市公司是否因租稅優惠而負擔隱含稅，及其負擔之隱含稅與有效稅率、股東權益稅前報酬率、市場結構及產業別之關係。實證結果顯示，中國大陸上市公司有效稅率之平均值遠低於其稅法上之名目稅率，顯示上市公司整體而言因稅法而享有租稅優惠，其中以農林漁牧業與信息技術業之有效稅率最低，反映中國扶植農業以及獎勵高科技產業之租稅政策。上市公司隱含稅率之平均值約為17.91%，顯示在中國大陸經濟成長率高之市場下，其上市公司仍須負擔隱含稅，且實證結果發現中國上市公司之有效稅率與隱含稅率呈顯著正向關係，即當有效稅率下降時，隱含稅率將會相對提高，呈現如Scholes and Wolfson(1992)所提出之隱含稅理論。 本研究實證結果亦發現，中國上市公司之股東權益稅前報酬率與隱含稅負間呈現顯著負向關係，即享受租稅優惠較多的公司，因負擔隱含稅成本，故整體報酬率未必高於享有較少租稅優惠的公司。非製造業公司之市場結構變數與隱含稅率間具有顯著關係性，即市場集中度越高時，廠商的市場支配力越大，也就越接近壟斷市場，造成該產業租稅優惠隱含稅負之負擔者多為消費者，而公司負擔之隱含稅則相對較低。 / This study uses financial and stock price data of the listed companies in China from 2000 to 2006, to examine if the listed companies have to bear implicit taxes because of tax preferential treatments, and to examine the relationship between implicit taxes and effective tax rates. The empirical results indicate that the average of ETRs of listed companies in China is lower than the statutory tax rate, indicating that overall listed Chinese companies have enjoyed substantial preferential tax treatments. The ETRs of the companies of agriculture and information technological industries are the lowest ones of all industries, reflecting China's tax policy aimed at developing agriculture and hi-tech industries. The average of implicit tax rates of listed companies in China is about 17.91%, indicating that listed companies in a high economics growth market, such as China, still have to bear implicit taxes. The empirical results show that implicit taxes are negatively related to ETRs, and the results support the implicit tax theory by Scholes and Wolfson(1992).The empirical results indicate the relationship between implicit tax and PEROEs is negatively, meaning the returns of tax-favored companies are less than tax-disfavored ones. The variables of market structures are significantly related to implicit tax, meaning the more market power the companies have, the less implicit tax they will bear. The empirical results of this study have implications for the government to further use tax incentives as a vehicle to stimulate economic development.

Made available in DSpace on 2016-04-26T20:23:32Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 Guilherme Frederico de Figueiredo Castro.pdf: 2130003 bytes, checksum: 8a5e4b6cc985c50aed5585baff0f800b (MD5) Previous issue date: 2015-03-02 / The purpose of this study is to know a little about the proper tax treatment of cooperative societies, pursuant to article 146, III, c, of the 1988 Federal Constitution. But this only becomes possible to understand before the organizational structure of positive law, its language, the importance of Semiotics studies, the construction of meaning to the prescriptive statements, among other issues that will be necessary to address. Then an immersion within societies will be made as provided for by civil legislation, to make it clear to the reader the legal classification that is judged appropriate for cooperatives. It will also be made legal analysis of the cooperative act and its impact in the tax system. Finally, we will deal on some taxes that we understand to be the most relevant in the daily lives of cooperative societies, including on the fulfillment of the instrumental duties / A proposta deste trabalho é conhecer sobre o adequado tratamento tributário das sociedades cooperativas, conforme disposto no artigo 146, III, c, da Constituição Federal de 1988. Mas isso somente se torna possível se antes compreendermos a estrutura organizacional do Direito Positivo, sua linguagem, a importância dos estudos da Semiótica, a construção de sentido para os enunciados prescritivos, entre outros assuntos que se farão necessários abordar. Em seguida, será feita uma imersão no âmbito das sociedades, tal como prevista pela legislação civil, para que fique claro ao leitor a classificação jurídica que se julga adequada para as cooperativas. Também, será feita a análise jurídica do ato cooperativo e a sua repercussão no âmbito do sistema tributário. Finalmente, trataremos acerca de alguns tributos que compreendemos ser os mais relevantes no cotidiano das sociedades cooperativas, inclusive acerca do cumprimento dos deveres instrumentais

The role of the Court of Justice of the European Union in the process of direct tax integration in the European Union (EU) has been widely discussed in the academic literature, while another important actor, the European Commission, has attracted much less attention. The Commission’s input is commonly perceived to be limited to the right of legislative initiative. This study questions such an oversimplified interpretation and draws a more nuanced picture of EU tax harmonisation by integrating an analysis of the complex regulatory approaches adopted by the Commission for the establishment and smooth functioning of the Internal Market. It is argued that the past decade brought a notable change in the Court-dominated pattern of direct tax integration. This change is apparent first in the evolution of enforcement strategies under Articles 258 and 260 TFEU; and second, in the increased reliance upon non-binding regulatory measures. Both developments have strengthened the role of the Commission, supplying it with more possibilities for influencing national direct tax systems, despite the reluctance of Member States to agree upon legislative harmonisation. Against this background, the procedural and substantive problems associated with these instruments require closer examination. The normative scope of this research covers the key procedural problems related to the infringement procedure and non-binding regulatory measures. The empirical component explores the Commission’s enforcement and coordination practices, drawing particular attention to two case studies: the tax treatment of losses in cross-border situations and exit taxation. Following the analysis of enforcement and coordination in the field of direct taxation, the study argues the need and proposes potential solutions for (i) the developing of a more comprehensive procedural framework for the infringement procedure and non-binding regulatory acts; (ii) the strengthening of accountability mechanisms; and (iii) the enhancing of the effectiveness of their application.

L'expansion de l'intervention des personnes publiques dans le domaine économique et du nombre d'activités de service public confiées à des entités privées a profondément modifié le droit administratif général. La question du traitement fiscal de ces activités s'est alors posée. Or, le législateur fiscal ne tient pas compte du fait que l'activité est de service public pour y répondre; d'ailleurs, lorsque la notion de service public est employée dans les textes fiscaux, elle renvoie à une définition différente de celle retenue en droit administratif général. Le législateur fiscal ne se réfère pas non plus à la distinction entre services publics administratifs et services publics industriels et commerciaux. Cependant, cela ne signifie pas qu'il ne prend pas la mesure de la multiplication des activités de service public : en effet, le régime légal d'imposition, pour appréhender le traitement fiscal d'une activité, la compare avec ce qui existe sur le marché concurrentiel, comme le fait également le droit administratif général lorsqu'il s'agit de déterminer le visage d'un service public. Ainsi, si la nature de service public d'une activité -au sens du droit administratif général -n'influence pas son traitement fiscal, son visage -administratif ou industriel et commercial -pourrait, au contraire, permettre son identification. En cela, le droit fiscal rejoint la logique du droit administratif général : accordant peu d'importance à la nature de service public d'une activité, il pourrait être amené à se servir du visage pour obtenir la solution fiscale. / The growing intervention of public figures in the economic field as well as the increasing number of public service activities entrusted to private entities has deeply changed the public law. The question thus arose as to which tax treatment should be applied to these activities. The tax legislator has not yet taken into account the nature of the activity, a public service, to respond to the question. In addition, when the concept of public service is used in tax regulations, it refers to a different definition to the one used in public law. The tax legislator does not refer to the distinction between pure public services and industrial and commercial public services. However, this does not mean that the tax legislator does not take into consideration the increase of public service activities. Indeed, in order to apprehend the tax treatment of an activity, the legal tax regime, just like public law, compares it with the activities existing in the competitive market. Thus, if the nature of the public service in the view of public law does not have any influence on its tax treatment, its administrative or industrial and commercial tainting may, on the contrary, allow its identification. As such, tax law joins the logic of public law: by granting little importance to the public service nature of an activity, it might be required to use the tainting to reach the tax solution.

The main objective of the master's thesis is the development of measures to improve the taxation of small business in the Russian Federation. The first chapter deals with the theoretical aspects of the development of small business in the Russian Federation. The second chapter analyzes the specifics of taxation of small business in the Russian Federation. The third chapter presents a program of measures to improve the taxation of small business in the Russian Federation. The calculation of events and conclusions throughout the work as a whole. / Основной целью магистерской диссертации является разработка мероприятий по совершенствованию налогообложения малого бизнеса в Российской Федерации. В первой главе рассмотрены теоретические аспекты развития малого предпринимательства в Российской Федерации. Во второй главе проведен анализ специфики налогообложения малого бизнеса в Российской Федерации. В третьей главе представлена программа мероприятий по совершенствованию налогообложения малого бизнеса в Российской Федерации. Произведен расчет мероприятий и сделаны выводы по всей работе в целом.

Made available in DSpace on 2016-04-26T20:20:58Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 Priscilla Okamoto.pdf: 566646 bytes, checksum: 457a8c75c7c44548c851a4446443b007 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2012-05-29 / The purpose of this study is to explore the possibility to apply the principle of the retrocession prohibition to some constitutional rules that deal with limitations on the taxing power. In order to accomplish this, first, the principle of retrocession prohibition was explored. Second, the research studied concepts related to the non cumulativity of ICMS, IPI, PIS/Pasep and Cofins, the ability to pay principle, the selectivity of the ICMS and IPI, the tax exemption, the immunity and the suitable tax treatment for the cooperative act. Based on each limitation, this work evaluated if it is possible to use the principle of retrocession prohibition to prevent the repeal of legislation that gives efficacy to these constitutional restrictions. The results have presented evidences that it is appropriate to apply this principle in some situations / Este trabalho tem como objetivo verificar a possibilidade de aplicação do princípio da vedação do retrocesso a algumas normas constitucionais que tratam de limitações ao poder de tributar. Para tanto, em primeiro lugar, foi estudado o princípio da vedação do retrocesso. Em seguida, foram apresentadas noções sobre a não cumulatividade do ICMS, IPI, PIS/Pasep e Cofins, o princípio da capacidade contributiva, a seletividade do ICMS e do IPI, a isenção, a imunidade e o adequado tratamento tributário ao ato cooperativo. Após o estudo de cada uma dessas limitações, foi averiguado se é possível invocar o princípio da vedação do retrocesso para impedir a revogação de legislação que confere eficácia a essas limitações constitucionais. Chegou-se à conclusão que é cabível a aplicação desse princípio em algumas situações