No período de 2005 a 2012, os programas de urbanização de favelas do Município de São Paulo promoveram conjuntos habitacionais populares com qualidade arquitetônica e urbanística. Por outro lado, a produção habitacional recente, atribuída ao setor privado, no âmbito do Programa Minha Casa Minha Vida (PMCMV), tal como a produção pública em favelas de Belo Horizonte, perpetuam uma trajetória de produção em que a habitação popular é tida como um produto de baixa qualidade, padronizado e segregado. Buscando vislumbrar possibilidades de superação desse impasse, esta dissertação compreende um estudo sobre a produção de habitação popular pelos programas de urbanização de favelas e pelo PMCMV, nos dois municípios citados, com ênfase na abordagem dos projetos habitacionais e na atuação do profissional arquiteto e urbanista na gestão pública. Como resultado, o trabalho caracteriza e interpreta a boa arquitetura dos conjuntos habitacionais populares de São Paulo, bem como identifica fatores determinantes e entraves à produção de habitação popular pelo Estado com acesso à arquitetura e à cidade. / During the period from 2005 to 2012, the slum upgrading programs in São Paulo promoted popular housing with architectural and urbanistic quality. On the other hand, the recent housing production, attributed to the private sector under the Minha Casa Minha Vida Program (PMCMV), as the public production in Belo Horizonte slums, perpetuates a history of production in which the housing is seen as a product of low quality, standardized and segregated. Seeking possibilities to overcome this impasse, this dissertation includes a study about the popular housing production by slums upgrading and MCMV programs, in the two mentioned cities, emphasizing the project approach and the professional architect and urbanist performance in public administration. As a result, this work interprets the \"good architecture\" of the slum production in São Paulo, and identifies some determinants and barriers to the public housing production with access to architecture and to the city.

No período de 2005 a 2012, os programas de urbanização de favelas do Município de São Paulo promoveram conjuntos habitacionais populares com qualidade arquitetônica e urbanística. Por outro lado, a produção habitacional recente, atribuída ao setor privado, no âmbito do Programa Minha Casa Minha Vida (PMCMV), tal como a produção pública em favelas de Belo Horizonte, perpetuam uma trajetória de produção em que a habitação popular é tida como um produto de baixa qualidade, padronizado e segregado. Buscando vislumbrar possibilidades de superação desse impasse, esta dissertação compreende um estudo sobre a produção de habitação popular pelos programas de urbanização de favelas e pelo PMCMV, nos dois municípios citados, com ênfase na abordagem dos projetos habitacionais e na atuação do profissional arquiteto e urbanista na gestão pública. Como resultado, o trabalho caracteriza e interpreta a boa arquitetura dos conjuntos habitacionais populares de São Paulo, bem como identifica fatores determinantes e entraves à produção de habitação popular pelo Estado com acesso à arquitetura e à cidade. / During the period from 2005 to 2012, the slum upgrading programs in São Paulo promoted popular housing with architectural and urbanistic quality. On the other hand, the recent housing production, attributed to the private sector under the Minha Casa Minha Vida Program (PMCMV), as the public production in Belo Horizonte slums, perpetuates a history of production in which the housing is seen as a product of low quality, standardized and segregated. Seeking possibilities to overcome this impasse, this dissertation includes a study about the popular housing production by slums upgrading and MCMV programs, in the two mentioned cities, emphasizing the project approach and the professional architect and urbanist performance in public administration. As a result, this work interprets the \"good architecture\" of the slum production in São Paulo, and identifies some determinants and barriers to the public housing production with access to architecture and to the city.

The thesis "Economic utilization of industrial structures with focus on railway stations" analyses all possibilities of sustainable use of industrial buildings with a focus on specific example of the Ţiţkov freight station. Based on the general characteristics of both industrial heritage and brownfields are defined steps which are necessary for the protection of valuable locations without present use. The whole process is described in the context of positive and negative externalities. The most important problem is financing the revitalization of problematic objects. The practical part of the thesis describes the previous issues connected to the Ţiţkov freight station including major studies of its potential utilization.

Dans un contexte où les problématiques urbaines, les formes de l'action publique et les systèmes d'acteurs ont bouleversé ces dernières décennies les façons de fabriquer la ville, il s'agit de saisir les logiques d'action qui participent de la dynamique de transformation des espaces et des territoires contemporains. Elaboré sous l'angle de la sociologie urbaine, le modèle d'analyse repose sur trois grands processus interactifs. Un processus de cadrage dont le référentiel donne la mesure en termes de socle de représentations partagées. Un processus d'organisation complexe de ressources et d'hommes dont il faut coordonner et réguler les actions et les interventions au sein de dispositifs techniques , réglementaires et organisationnels spécifiques.Un processus de traduction spatiale, matérielle et formelle visant à la réalisation concrète sur des territoires privilégiés d'opérations, combinant sur la base des intentions initiales et dans le cadre d'un espace d'activités spécifique, autant d'objectifs économiques, sociaux, politiques et symboliques. La notion de projet urbain traduit le chaînage de ces trois processus qui à partir d'un enjeu défini en commun à l'échelle de la ville ou de l'agglomération génère en continuum sur une donnée donnée une activité collective, mobilisant et enrôlant à chaque étape et niveaux de responsabilité, une pluralité d'acteurs autour d'une série d'opérations urbaines et architecturales. Le cas de l'agglomération bordelaise et de ses transformations sur la période 1995-2007 sert de terrain de référence. / In a context where urban problems forms of public action and systems of actors drastically change the ways to build the city these last decades, we must understand the logics of action that influence the dynamics of spatial and territorial changes. The analysis model is developed from the point of view of the urban sociology and is based on three important intercative processes. A strategic framing process whose reference system gives the standart in terms of a base of shared representations. A complicated organizational process (networking), involving ressources and persons whose actions and interventions need to be coordonated and controlled within a specifical technical, legal and organisatinal system (urban contracting owner). A process, of a precise, material and spatial translation aiming the concrete realization, on privileged territories of operations which on the basis of the initial intentions and within the framework of a space of specific activities, combine economic, political and symbolic objectives. The concept of urban project is the expression of the chaining of these three processes. Starting from a jointly defined issue on the scale of the city of agglomeration, it generates during a given time period a collective activity, mobilizes and recruits in each stage of all levels of responsabilities a plurality of actors around a serie of urban and architectural operations. The agglomeration of Bordeaux and its transformation over the period 1995-2006 is used as reference base.