• Refine Query
  • Source
  • Publication year
  • to
  • Language
  • 4
  • Tagged with
  • 4
  • 3
  • 2
  • 2
  • 1
  • 1
  • 1
  • 1
  • 1
  • 1
  • 1
  • 1
  • 1
  • 1
  • 1
  • About
  • The Global ETD Search service is a free service for researchers to find electronic theses and dissertations. This service is provided by the Networked Digital Library of Theses and Dissertations.
    Our metadata is collected from universities around the world. If you manage a university/consortium/country archive and want to be added, details can be found on the NDLTD website.
1

Lagen om straff för terroristbrott : Särskilt om de kvalificerande rekvisiten

Kleman, Susanne January 2013 (has links)
No description available.
2

Självstudier i terrorism / The criminal offence of self-studies with the intent to commit a terrorist offence

Östros, Anton January 2018 (has links)
No description available.
3

Återkallande av Medborgarskap : Finns det rättsliga hinder för att bekämpa terrorism genom denaturalisering i Sverige? / Citizenship Deprivation : Are there legal obstacles to tackle terrorism through denationalisation in Sweden?

Fakih, Mariana January 2020 (has links)
The revival of citizenship deprivation raises numerous normative, legal and practical concerns. Although citizenship deprivation is not new, it has become crucial to further discuss this with regards to recent law amendments and practices on citizenship deprivation by many democratic states. Sweden is still one of few countries where citizenship is an absolute right protected by constitutional law. Nonetheless, politicians in Sweden have, over the last years, discussed the possibilities to enact the constitution to legalise denationalisation based on national security grounds. Several motions have been submitted to investigate these possibilities, but no amendments have yet been proposed.  The thesis aims, therefore, to examine whether there are legal obstacles that limit the possibilities to introduce a new provision on citizenship deprivation in Sweden. The main research question is: Are there legal obstacles to tackle terrorism through denationalisation in Sweden? To answer this question, the legal dogmatic methodology is used. The study analyses legislative sources, case law and doctrinal literature. It also reviews national regulations on citizenship deprivation in five European countries that have reformed their Citizenship Acts.  The study concludes that there are several legal obstacles in both international and EU law that limit the possibilities to denationalise citizens. However, it is not entirely illegal to deprive individuals of their citizenship. To introduce the possibility of citizenship deprivation in Sweden, the provision should fulfil the following criteria: a) denationalisation should not render a person stateless, b) the provision should not be discriminatory and apply to all citizens with dual citizenship, regardless of how they became citizen, c) prior to making the decision on denationalisation, a proportionality assessment between the individual's interest and the state's interest should be applied, d) denationalisation should have a legitimate purpose and it should be the least burdensome procedure to achieve this purpose, e) Swedish law should identify the crimes that can lead to denaturalisation, f) the decision on denaturalisation should be made at the same trial as the person in question is convicted, g) the individual should have the possibility to appeal the decision and his right to a fair trial is granted.  To conclude, the thesis emphasises that the collective development in national laws and practices on citizenship deprivation will potentially lead to a new interpretation of both EU and international law on human rights.
4

Försäkring och terrorism / Insurance and terrorism

Albinsson, Andreas January 2016 (has links)
Sammanfattning I Europa samt i vår övriga omvärld har hotet från terrorister under de senaste åren ökat. Därför är det av betydelse att försäkringsskydd finns att tillgå när eller om vi drabbas av terroristers våldshandlingar, för att åtminstone mildra vårt ekonomiska lidande. I denna masteruppsats får läsaren bland annat bekanta sig med vilka försäkringsmöjligheter som de större försäkringsgivarna har att erbjuda privatpersoner samt företag, avseende skada som har orsakats av terrorism. I uppsatsen behandlas försäkringar där skydd mot terrorism undantas helt eller till vissa delar. Detta gör det betydelsefullt att analysera i vilken utsträckning försäkringsbolag har rätt att undanta terrorrisker samt vilket rörelseutrymme försäkringsbolag har beträffande att inte uppställa undantag för nämnda risker. Vidare framförs resonemang om hur samhället påverkas av att försäkringsskydd, i vissa fall, saknas på området samt hur rimligt det är att försäkringsbranschen saknar en gemensam definition av terrorism. Terrorism kan ibland klassificeras som krigsliknande händelse. I uppsatsen behandlas därför också frågor om hur klassificeringen teoretiskt sett kan komma att påverka försäkringsersättningen vid ett eventuellt terrorscenario.

Page generated in 0.047 seconds