Proefschrift--Utrecht--Universiteit, 1996. / Bibliogr. p. 268-287. Index. Résumé en anglais.

Proefschrift Erasmus Universiteit Rotterdam. / Bibliogr.: p. [171]-178. - Met een samenvatting in het Nederlands.

This thesis investigates the work of Nikolaas (Niko) Tinbergen and his students, often known as the Tinbergians. Based on extensive archival research, and particularly on intensive study of fieldnotes – a resource largely untouched in previous historical enquiry – I throw new light on the scientific practices both of Tinbergen himself and the practices of individual students of his, including the relationship between research in the field and in the laboratory and the relationship between that research and the Tinbergians representation of their science, both to scientific and lay audiences. Chapter one investigates Tinbergen's own background, and his writings on method and practice. This included a commitment to studying 'natural' behaviour, which led them to be wary of experimental methods that might distort such behaviour. Tinbergen's idea of the 'ethogram' – a complete listing of the behavioural repertoire of a species – is here linked to earlier interest in comparative anatomy as a means of elucidating evolutionary relationships Contrary to the work of Eileen Crist, who argues that ethologist concern to produce mechanomorphic descriptions of behaviour led them to see their animals as machines, I show that the fieldnotes regularly included anthropomorphic description, which only later was excised in writing up scientific publications where mechanistic description and a programmatic rejection of anthropomorphism were the norm. The backgrounds of many of Tinbergen's contemporaries and students was considered in the first half of chapter two, and showed that almost all members of the school had a background in amateur natural history and strong personal and aesthetic affection for the animals they studied. The early fieldwork of the Tinbergians is examined in more detail in the second half of the chapter. This considers the work of two of Tinbergen's students: Robert Hinde and Martin Moynihan. Hinde's work is shown to be transitional between earlier approaches to animal behaviour and the more systematic methodology promoted by Tinbergen, while Moynihan's work instantiated a particularly pure expression of early Tinbergian ideals. Tinbergen's Oxford laboratory is the subject of chapter three, looking in particular at how 'natural' behaviour was studied in an artificial environment. I look at the work of Desmond Morris, Margaret Bastock (later Manning) and J. Michael (Mike) Cullen. Morris's work reproduced field techniques of intensive close observation of behaviour in the laboratory. Bastock's work, largely overlooked by previous historians, showed interest in behaviour genetics. Cullen's work illustrates the difficulties of studying natural behaviour under laboratory conditions, and emphasises the value that Tinbergians placed on direct observation over other possible recording techniques. I then proceed to a more general consideration of the relationship between laboratory and field in the early years of the Tinbergen school. Change over time is the theme of chapter four. Many of the early methodological commitments of the school were subsequently abandoned as the observation-led approach to behaviour gave way to a more explicitly theory-led and interventionist concern with causation, development, evolution and function. This was apparent both in the field and in the laboratory, and even included the occasional adoption of vivisection – a method dramatically at odds with the ethos of the early Tinbergen school. The final chapter investigates how Tinbergen and others of his school communicated their work to amateur audiences, and shows that in some instances the anthropomorphic observations excluded for their scientific writings reappear in these more popular communications. I then link this to the Tinbergen school's longstanding interest in human behaviour. The thesis is supplemented by a conclusion, and two appendices one listing the students studied in the thesis, and the other listing as many of Tinbergen's students as I can identify with surety.

Made available in DSpace on 2016-06-02T19:33:10Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 ALMEIDA_Rafael_Galvao_2014.pdf: 727295 bytes, checksum: 401216b931951eb89ddf300efa7af38d (MD5) Previous issue date: 2014-02-26 / Financiadora de Estudos e Projetos / This work had as its objective, by the means of a historic reconstruction of the history of econometrics, with emphasis on its business cycle models, to introduce the concept of performativity to the analysis of economic doctrines. The performativity argues that the line between theory and practice is thinner than it is thought, i. e., that in certain circumstances, the economic theory do not only describe the world, but it can influence it, it can make the agents change their behavior to conform to its predictions. For this, using the Keynes-Tinbergen debate as a background, we sought for evidence that showed the performative effects of the adoption of econometric methods onto the canon of the economic theory, once that studies showed performative effects with models used in the financial market. We conclude that, by the evaluation of the debate, its conclusion made possible emerge an econometric theory that, consequentially, could have performative effects in the economy. / Este trabalho teve como objetivo, por meio de uma reconstrução da história da econometria, envolvendo modelos do ciclo econômico, introduzir o conceito de performatividade à análise das doutrinas econômicas. A performatividade argumenta que a linha entre teoria e prática é muito mais tênue do que se imagina, isto é, de que em certas circunstâncias, a teoria econômica não apenas descreve o mundo, mas pode influenciá-lo, pode fazer com que os agentes modifiquem seu comportamento para se adequar às previsões da teoria. Para tal, utilizou-se como pano de fundo o debate Keynes-Tinbergen, buscou-se encontrar evidências que houve efeitos de performatividade na adoção de métodos econométricos ao cânone da teoria econômica, uma vez que estudos indicaram que certos níveis de performatividade ocorreram com modelos utilizados no mercado financeiro. Concluiu-se, pela avaliação do debate, que o desfecho possibilitou uma teoria da econometria que viria a se tornar dominante e, consequentemente, uma candidata a ter efeitos performativos na economia.

Projet réalisé dans le cadre d'une cotutelle avec l'Université de Bourgogne (Dijon, France) / Dans cette enquête nous entreprenons d’explorer la notion de comportement animal telle que l’exprime une discipline contemporaine, l’écologie comportementale. Afin de procéder à l’examen d’une notion aussi complexe, positionnée dans un contexte étroit, nous développons et utilisons un outil d’investigation : l’épistémologie historique. De façon générale, cet outil consiste à intégrer en une seule démarche les perspectives d’investigation diachronique et synchronique sur un même thème. Ainsi, pour procéder à l’examen de la notion de comportement animal, nous puisons d’abord dans l’histoire récente de l’écologie comportementale. Nous nous intéressons plus particulièrement à sa filiation avec l’éthologie classique et, après avoir reconstitué la trame historique qui unit les deux disciplines, nous procédons à leur comparaison. Cette seconde étape de notre épistémologie contribue à mettre en évidence plusieurs différences critiques dans la conception du comportement animal qu’endosse chacune des disciplines. Ces distinctions, en faisant ressortir la spécificité de l’écologie comportementale, nous permettent ensuite de nous intéresser à la notion de comportement animal à travers les approches principales que cette discipline mobilise. Ultimement, nous élaborons deux définitions de la notion de comportement animal. La première reflète le statut ontologique du comportement dans la discipline, alors que la seconde correspond à la conception qui se dégage de la pratique des écologues. / In this inquiry I undertake to explore the notion of animal behaviour as it is expounded in a contemporary field of inquiry: behavioural ecology. In order to carry out an analysis of such a complex notion, localized in a very narrow context, I design and use a specific tool of investigation called “historical epistemology”. Simply understood, this tool consists in the integration of diachronic and synchronic perspectives of investigation into a single approach to investigate a circumscribed theme. So, in order to proceed to the analysis of the notion of animal behaviour, I first draw into the recent history of behavioural ecology. I take special interest in its filiation with classical ethology and, after having reconstructed the historical frame that links the two fields together, I proceed to compare them. This comparison, the second step of my epistemology, is used to highlight the characteristics of the animal behaviour conceptions put forward by the two scientific disciplines. These distinctions, bringing to the fore the specificity of behavioural ecology, then allow me to scrutinize the notion of animal behaviour as it is instantiated in the main approaches mobilized by the discipline (especially what I identifies as the “phenotypic adaptationist”, the “phenotypic structural”, the “comparative” and the “by reduction” approaches). Last, I design two definitions of the notion of animal behaviour. The first one reflects the ontological status of the notion in this field of investigation, whereas the second corresponds to the conception underlying behavioural ecologist practices.

Dans cette enquête nous entreprenons d’explorer la notion de comportement animal telle que l’exprime une discipline contemporaine, l’écologie comportementale. Afin de procéder à l’examen d’une notion aussi complexe, positionnée dans un contexte étroit, nous développons et utilisons un outil d’investigation : l’épistémologie historique. De façon générale, cet outil consiste à intégrer en une seule démarche les perspectives d’investigation diachronique et synchronique sur un même thème. Ainsi, pour procéder à l’examen de la notion de comportement animal, nous puisons d’abord dans l’histoire récente de l’écologie comportementale. Nous nous intéressons plus particulièrement à sa filiation avec l’éthologie classique et, après avoir reconstitué la trame historique qui unit les deux disciplines, nous procédons à leur comparaison. Cette seconde étape de notre épistémologie contribue à mettre en évidence plusieurs différences critiques dans la conception du comportement animal qu’endosse chacune des disciplines. Ces distinctions, en faisant ressortir la spécificité de l’écologie comportementale, nous permettent ensuite de nous intéresser à la notion de comportement animal à travers les approches principales que cette discipline mobilise. Ultimement, nous élaborons deux définitions de la notion de comportement animal. La première reflète le statut ontologique du comportement dans la discipline, alors que la seconde correspond à la conception qui se dégage de la pratique des écologues. / In this inquiry I undertake to explore the notion of animal behaviour as it is expounded in a contemporary field of inquiry: behavioural ecology. In order to carry out an analysis of such a complex notion, localized in a very narrow context, I design and use a specific tool of investigation called “historical epistemology”. Simply understood, this tool consists in the integration of diachronic and synchronic perspectives of investigation into a single approach to investigate a circumscribed theme. So, in order to proceed to the analysis of the notion of animal behaviour, I first draw into the recent history of behavioural ecology. I take special interest in its filiation with classical ethology and, after having reconstructed the historical frame that links the two fields together, I proceed to compare them. This comparison, the second step of my epistemology, is used to highlight the characteristics of the animal behaviour conceptions put forward by the two scientific disciplines. These distinctions, bringing to the fore the specificity of behavioural ecology, then allow me to scrutinize the notion of animal behaviour as it is instantiated in the main approaches mobilized by the discipline (especially what I identifies as the “phenotypic adaptationist”, the “phenotypic structural”, the “comparative” and the “by reduction” approaches). Last, I design two definitions of the notion of animal behaviour. The first one reflects the ontological status of the notion in this field of investigation, whereas the second corresponds to the conception underlying behavioural ecologist practices. / Projet réalisé dans le cadre d'une cotutelle avec l'Université de Bourgogne (Dijon, France)