<p>Sverige har förändrats som land från en hög immigrationsvåg till ett invandringsland. Den svenska industristillväxten gjorde det möjligt för Sverige att importera extra arbetskraft från andra länder. Arbetarna kom främst från Sydeuropa på grund av att det var brist på arbete i hemlandet. Så småningom förändrades arbetskraftsinvandring till flyktinginvandring, att människor lämnade sitt hemland av olika skäl, till exempel krig. De etablerade sig runt om i Sverige i miljonprogrammets områden. När invandrarna översteg 50 % av majoritetsbefolkningen lämnar de som har ekonomiska resurser invandrartäta områden. Framför allt är det svenskar som lämnar området, på grund av att de inte känner sig hemma. Det skapar etnisk boendesegregation och effekterna av det blir att invandrarna missgynnas, och de får allt svårare att komma in i samhället.</p>

Sverige har förändrats som land från en hög immigrationsvåg till ett invandringsland. Den svenska industristillväxten gjorde det möjligt för Sverige att importera extra arbetskraft från andra länder. Arbetarna kom främst från Sydeuropa på grund av att det var brist på arbete i hemlandet. Så småningom förändrades arbetskraftsinvandring till flyktinginvandring, att människor lämnade sitt hemland av olika skäl, till exempel krig. De etablerade sig runt om i Sverige i miljonprogrammets områden. När invandrarna översteg 50 % av majoritetsbefolkningen lämnar de som har ekonomiska resurser invandrartäta områden. Framför allt är det svenskar som lämnar området, på grund av att de inte känner sig hemma. Det skapar etnisk boendesegregation och effekterna av det blir att invandrarna missgynnas, och de får allt svårare att komma in i samhället.

<p>70 percent of Sweden´s municipalities say they do not have vacant rental flats and a shortage is emerging, during the same time are 1.1 million young people ready to enter the housing market. In order to curb the housing shortage, have the Swedish politicians since the postwar period chosen to stimulate the market with subsidies to increase new production and to control that what is built is in the right direction. The construction industry is perceived as conservative, and many argue that the state keeps it under their wings, which has led to that the development not has progressed in the same way as other, non-subsidy regulated industries.</p><p>The purpose of ours bachelor thesis is to provide an overall picture and describe the underlying problems of the housing shortage at the rental market. In addition, we want to present theories about where possible actions could take place in the market, by illuminate the problem from the differente actors perspective.</p><p>To fulfill our purpose and provide a deeper understanding of the problem we have chosen a qualitative approach. We interviewed nine different actors on the Swedish housing market, two managers, two to representatives of Halmstad Municipality, a representative for the construction operators and four different interest groups. Respondents represent BI, Building Owners, HFAB, Jagvillhabostad.nu, Property and Real Estate Board, Halmstad municipality Riksbyggen, SABO and Tenants' Association. We have not found any previous study that has captured the whole picture of the market as we have done by allowing all market participants to express themselves and thereby give their views on the problem. With our theoretical framework as a basis, we designed the questions that were asked during the interviews.</p><p>We have accordingly concluded that actors already have made up with subsidies. The industry need not be dependent on subsidy, however, the needed housing policy that provides long-term thinking by cross-collaborations. The stimulus is not necessary for creating variation between the different tenure because municipalities through planning determines what and how it should be built. Thus, there will be housing for the entire market.</p>

70 percent of Sweden´s municipalities say they do not have vacant rental flats and a shortage is emerging, during the same time are 1.1 million young people ready to enter the housing market. In order to curb the housing shortage, have the Swedish politicians since the postwar period chosen to stimulate the market with subsidies to increase new production and to control that what is built is in the right direction. The construction industry is perceived as conservative, and many argue that the state keeps it under their wings, which has led to that the development not has progressed in the same way as other, non-subsidy regulated industries. The purpose of ours bachelor thesis is to provide an overall picture and describe the underlying problems of the housing shortage at the rental market. In addition, we want to present theories about where possible actions could take place in the market, by illuminate the problem from the differente actors perspective. To fulfill our purpose and provide a deeper understanding of the problem we have chosen a qualitative approach. We interviewed nine different actors on the Swedish housing market, two managers, two to representatives of Halmstad Municipality, a representative for the construction operators and four different interest groups. Respondents represent BI, Building Owners, HFAB, Jagvillhabostad.nu, Property and Real Estate Board, Halmstad municipality Riksbyggen, SABO and Tenants' Association. We have not found any previous study that has captured the whole picture of the market as we have done by allowing all market participants to express themselves and thereby give their views on the problem. With our theoretical framework as a basis, we designed the questions that were asked during the interviews. We have accordingly concluded that actors already have made up with subsidies. The industry need not be dependent on subsidy, however, the needed housing policy that provides long-term thinking by cross-collaborations. The stimulus is not necessary for creating variation between the different tenure because municipalities through planning determines what and how it should be built. Thus, there will be housing for the entire market.

No description available.

No description available.

Diss., Linköping : Univ., 2002.

Diss. (sammanfattning) Stockholm : Tekniska högskolan, 2005. / Härtill 7 uppsatser.

During the mid-1960s, the Swedish government decided to build one million dwellings over the ten following years. This was a political project that later on became known as the million program, even though no real program ever existed. The basis for the decision was housing shortages and increasing housing queues. In previous research, mainly individual residential areas built during the million program have been objects of study. These areas and also the million program as a political project, were early critized and have since it’s creation undergone a stigmatization process, concerning both the design of the areas, its buildings and also their inhabitants. Since the 1960s, the development of the society has moved towards a greater faith in market forces, which is a process that has affected both housing policies and planning. The view of the dwelling has altered from a social right to a commodity, while the citi-zen has become a consumer. The aim of the study is to identify how the concept the million program is being described on the editorial pages in Swedish daily press today, and how it is being used as an argument in the debate concerning housing policy due to the housing shortages of today. The central analytical concept in this study is the million program. The study explores, through a content analysis, how the million program is represented and how it is used in the debate concerning housing policies in the editorial pages in Swedish daily press. Study results show that the million program is pictured in mainly negative terms, and that it is used as an example of one of the failures in the de-bate concerning Swedish housing and planning policies.

Den svenska regeringens bostadspolitiska mål innebär en långsiktigt fungerande bostadsmarknad där konsumenternas efterfrågan blir bemötta med ett utbud som möter behoven. Boverket räknar med att det behövs 700 000 nya lägenheter för att komma till bukt med bostadsbristen. Frågan har varit en het diskussion under ett bra tag, men ingen verkar vilja ta tag i frågan och lösa den. Val av ämne för fallstudien blev enkelt, med den ständigt återkommande frågan om vem som bär ansvaret över bostadsbristen. Med hjälp av intervjuer från politiker och byggherrar blev bilden klarare och man förstod att frågan är för komplex för att kunna skylla på en viss aktör. Alla aktörer har sin roll i spelet men det som fattas är ett samspel mellan alla aktörer för att lösa bostadsbristen. Drar en aktör ut på processen drabbas hela processen och tillslut faller korthuset och lösningen läggs på is. Resultatet i vår studie visar på att politiker från vänsterblocket vill se fler subventioner medan politikerna från högerblocket menar att lösningen är regelförenklingar, samtidigt som byggherrarna också vill se regelförenklingar så vill de även att kommunerna förbättrar sin planberedskap. En representant från Karlstad kommun menar däremot att de har en god planberedskap och pekar istället ut att staten borde prioritera bostäder mycket mer.