L’arbitrage commercial international est le mode alternatif de règlement de différends le plus utilisé dans le monde. Ce qui contribue notamment à en faire l’acteur principal de la diffusion des règles anationales telles que les principes généraux du droit, les usages du commerce international, ou encore la "lex mercatoria" qui sont souvent choisies par les arbitres en tant que droit applicable au fond du litige. Ce choix s’est étendu aux nouvelles règles élaborées par des institutions internationales privées telles que les Principes d’UNIDROIT relatifs aux contrats du commerce international. Une codification doctrinale conçue comme un instrument de "soft law" et qui trouve de plus en plus application dans la pratique arbitrale. Notre étude cependant montre que peu de sentences arbitrales rendues dans des affaires dont l’une des parties est arabe ont fait référence aux Principes Unidroit. L’explication n’est pas à rechercher dans une incompatibilité entre ceux-ci et le droit des contrats des pays arabes mais dans la méconnaissance de cette codification doctrinale par les juristes arabes. À cela s’ajoute un sentiment de méfiance à l’égard d’une manifestation de la soft law. Il convient dès lors de s’interroger sur les moyens qui permettraient aux Principes Unidroit de trouver leur place dans le droit et la pratique des pays arabes. / International commercial arbitration is the Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR) the most used in the world. Which contributes in particular to make the main actor of the diffusion of a-national rules as the general principles of law, usages of international trade, or the lex mercatoria, often chosen by the arbitrators as the law applicable to the substantive of the dispute. This choice was extended to the new rules developed by private international institutions such as the UNIDROIT Principles of International Commercial Contracts. A doctrinal codification conceived as a soft law instrument, which is increasingly applied in arbitration practice. Our study shows, however, that few awards rendered in cases in which one of the parties is Arabic made a reference to UNIDROIT Principles. The explanation is not to look for in an incompatibility between them and contract law in Arab countries but in the ignorance of this doctrinal codification by Arab jurists and lawyers. Added to this, a feeling of distrust a manifestation of soft law. It is therefore necessary to consider the ways in which the UNIDROIT Principles to find their place in the law and practice of the Arab countries.

Made available in DSpace on 2016-04-26T20:27:31Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 Jose Hamilton Bueno.pdf: 595457 bytes, checksum: 45022edc4640245125a830c744d5d5ba (MD5) Previous issue date: 2008-06-13 / This paper aims to compare the effectiveness of Law n. 4,886/65, with the alterations introduced by Law n. 8,420/92, that regulates the commercial agent profession and commercial contracts. The main difficulty that this paper identifies is commonly known as gray area or cinereous, an uncertainty space between the typical legal figures of the employee, selfemployed (independent) worker and entrepreneur. After research on innumerable authors who deal with the subject and hundreds of sentences, we verified the possible causes of such gray areas, taking as background the legal principles and juridical nature of the special law. For the proposal of exculpatory pointers of the legal subordination, the work illustrates, of not terminative form, an excellent series of facts that can disclose to an employment contract or an independent contract. This paper, to determine such pointers, considers a factual analysis' method and also the recognition of the hybrid character of law n. 4,886/65, whose legal nature surpasses the borders of the common law (and of the commercial law, in the terminology adopted before the Brazilian Civil Law of 2002). The aim, thus, is to offer objective criteria to minimize that gray zone , to reduce the degree of legal uncertainty to those under such jurisdiction, as well to roll out, in a justified manner, the best instruments for Magistrate's motivated persuasion when judging deals of such nature / O estudo propõe-se a cotejar a eficácia da Lei n. 4886/65, com as alterações introduzidas pela Lei n. 8420/92, que regulamentou a profissão e o contrato de representação comercial. A principal dificuldade que o trabalho identifica é o que se convencionou chamar de zona grise ou cinzenta, um espaço de incerteza entre as figuras jurídicas típicas do empregado, autônomo ou empresário. Após estudo de inúmeros autores que tratam do tema e de centenas de acórdãos trabalhistas e da Justiça Comum, busca-se verificar as possíveis causas da referida zona grígea tendo, como pano de fundo, os princípios de direito e a natureza jurídica da lei especial. Para a proposição de indicadores excludentes da subordinação jurídica, o trabalho ilustra, de forma não terminativa, uma série relevante de fatos que podem revelar um contrato de trabalho ou um contrato autônomo. O trabalho, para chegar aos indicadores, propõe um método de análise dos fatos e o reconhecimento do caráter híbrido da lei n. 4.886/65, cuja natureza jurídica extrapola as fronteiras do direito comum (e do direito comercial, na terminologia adotada antes do Código Civil de 2002). Objetiva-se, assim, oferecer critérios objetivos para minimizar a zona cinzenta , reduzir o grau de insegurança jurídica dos jurisdicionados, bem como elencar, de forma justificada, instrumentos melhor estruturados para o convencimento motivado do magistrado ao decidir lides desta natureza

This examination of the common law obligation of good faith in the performance and enforcement of commercial contracts in Australia seeks to achieve a number of objectives. First, to chart the historical development of the implied good faith obligation. Secondly, to identify a number of issues that remain unresolved at Australian lower court level. Thirdly, to consider five doctrinal approaches that could be adopted by the High Court when ultimately confronted by the competing claims and tensions that have proven divisive in the courts below. Fourthly, to assess each approach against three identified benchmarks. The essential thesis is that good faith should be implied, as a matter of law, in commercial contracts that are relational in nature with an additional call being made for the High Court to explicitly recognise that the underlying basis of the implied good faith obligation is the reasonable expectations of the contractual parties. This approach is the one approach that satisfies all three benchmarks and provides the most satisfactory resolution of the issues that presently bedevil the commercial good faith debate in Australia.

No description available.