De senaste åren har bra kvalitet blivit allt mer viktigt för kunder, leverantörer och konsumenter. Kraven för bra kvalitet blir allt högre på produkter och tjänster. På grund av detta är det många företag som väljer att certifiera sig enligt kvalitetsledningssystemet ISO 9001. Även Corporate social responsibility har många företag infört. Syftet med det är att ta ett större ansvar mot befolkningen och för miljön. Syftet med detta arbete är att undersöka hur små företag kan implementera ISO 9001 med hjälp av Corporate Social Responsibility på ett effektivt sätt i företaget. Det har genomförts en enkätundersökning i syfte att undersöka hur många små företag i Gävleborgs-. Dalarnas- och Uppsalalän som är certifierade enligt ISO 9001 samt vad de har för syn på kvalitet och Corporate social responsibility. Det har genomförts intervjuer på Gefle kartong & Display. De som deltog i intervjun är operatörer ifrån produktionen i Karlstad och två stycken personer ifrån ledningen. Detta gjordes för att se hur de i nuläget arbetar med kvaliteten inom företaget och för att se vad de har för inställning till att i framtiden införa och certifiera sig enligt ISO 9001. ISO 9001 är ett kvalitetsledningssystem som reglerar hur ett företag ska jobba med kvaliteten inom verksamheten. De företag som väljer att certifiera sig enligt ISO 9001 måste uppfylla de krav som finns inom ISO 9001 standarden för att kunna certifiera sig. Av de företag som svarade på enkäten var det inte många som var certifierade enligt ISO 9001. Det var många av företagen som hade ledningssystem som de hade utformat själva. Utifrån intervjuerna upptäcktes det att företaget inte har något standardiserat arbetssätt för hur de jobbar med kvaliteten inom företaget. När ett kvalitetsledningssystem ska införas är det viktigt att alla i verksamheten är involverade i arbetet. Detta för att alla ska känna sig delaktiga och för att förstå varför arbetet genomförts. Det finns starka tendenser till att Corporate social responsibility är lättare att införa i en verksamhet som redan har ett fungerande kvalitetsledningssystem. / In the last years good quality has become increasingly important for customers, suppliers and consumers. Quality requirements are becoming higher on products and services. Because of this, many companies choose to obtain certification under the quality management system ISO 9001. Many enterprises have introduced Corporate social responsibility in the organization. The purpose of it is to take a greater responsibility toward people and the environment. The purpose of this work is to investigate how small businesses can implement ISO 9001 with help of Corporate Social Responsibility in an efficient way in the company. In this study I identify how many small businesses in Gävleborg- Dalarnas- Uppsala County are certified according to ISO 9001 and what their approach to quality and Corporate Social Responsibility are. Interviews have been done at Gefle Kartong & Display. Those who participated in the interview are operators and management from production in Karlstad. This was done to see how they are currently working on the quality of the company and to see what their attitude to the future introduction and certification under ISO 9001. ISO 9001 is a quality management system that regulates how a company should work with the quality of operations. Companies that choose to become certified according to ISO 9001 must meet the requirements of the ISO 9001 standard to be certified. Of the companies that responded to the survey were not many who were certified according to ISO 9001. It was many of the companies that had management that they had designed themselves. From the interviews, it was discovered that the company does not have a standardized approach to how they work with the quality of the company. When a quality management system to be introduced, it is important that all the activities involved in the work. This is for everyone to feel involved and to understand why the work carried out. There are strong tendencies to Corporate social responsibility is easier to implement in a business that already have a quality management system.

A research report submitted to the Faculty of Commerce, Law and Management, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the degree in Master of Commerce (50% course work) / A growing number of institutional investors that are adopting corporate social responsibility (CSR) philosophy are playing a crucial role in influencing listed companies to adopt and address CSR issues. CSR is defined as “…a concept whereby companies integrate social and environmental concerns in their business operations…” (European Commission, 2010). CSR is now widely accepted as a way of doing business in the contemporary environment. It is evident in companies that are spending large sums of money, time and effort on satisfying various stakeholders’ requirements for responsible behaviour. Despite the growing pressure on companies to become socially responsible, the direct benefits of CSR contribution to firm performance remain questionable. From existing literature the relationship between CSR and firm performance have pointed to mixed results (Gladysek & Chipeta, 2012; Aggarwal, 2013). This study examines the relationship between CSR performance and firm performance using the CSRHub sustainability indexes as proxy for CSR performance. The firm performance measures of firm value (Tobin’s Q) and financial accounting performance (return on assets) were used. Annual data of firms from the Johannesburg Stock Exchange (JSE) from year 2009 to 2012 was analysed using the Multiple Regression Analysis techniques. The study revealed that significant and positive relationship exists between CSR/environmental performance and firm value of listed South African companies. The study concluded that there is no significant relationship between firm performance and the other components of CSR such as community relations, employment relations, and governance. The relatively small sample size of the listed companies, some missing values on the sample data and the shorter time period on the study are the main limitations acknowledged in this report. In the overall, the study provides important insights for understanding the contribution of CSR and its disaggregated components to firm performance.

Corporate social responsibility (CSR) is an expanding trend as more organizations have adopted various CSR policies. Due to this, CSR has been a growing topic in Business and Psychology research, especially on the micro-level of CSR’s effects on individual employee outcomes. In this study, we proposed a new sub-dimension of Person-Organization (P-O) fit, such that there’s a Person-CSR (P-CSR) fit: the perceived congruence between an individuals’ values with an organization’s CSR initiatives. We predicted that P-CSR fit would explain additional variance over and beyond P-O fit for organizational outcomes: organizational commitment, organizational identity, job satisfaction, and organizational citizenship behaviors. Further, we predicted the relationship between P-CSR fit and these organizational outcomes would be moderated by the individual’s social responsibility values. Using a sample of 230 participants, who worked for their current organization for an average of 2.92 years and an average of 35.10 hours per week, results of this study consistently found P-CSR fit to capture additional variance over and beyond P-O fit. However, this study did not find the predicted moderating relationships. This study provides important implications for organizations that do not have CSR established, organizations that have CSR but do not make it known, and organizations that have CSR that are not proactive nor reflective of their industry.

Bakgrund: E-handeln inom modebranschen fortsätter att öka och bidrar till att konkurrensen hårdnar. Även mängden returer ökar och samtidigt ökar kraven på en hög leveransservice hos kunderna, vilket belastar returprocessen samt bidrar till en sämre miljö med ökade transporter och mer materialförbrukning. Det här blir således både en kostnadsfråga och en hållbarhetsfråga som företag verksamma inom e-handeln behöver beakta för att fortsatt profilera sig som hållbara. Syfte: Syftet med studien är att öka förståelsen för hur Corparate Social Responsibility kan användas inom E-handelns frakt- och returneringspolicys inom modebranschen. Genomförande: Den här studie har en kvalitativ forskningsdesign. Genom en flerfallsstudie med fyra fallföretag och en branschorganisation har det empiriska materialet bidragit till uppfyllelse av studiens syfte. Slutsats: För att företagen ska fortsätta vara lönsamma och profilera sig som hållbara behöver dem vägleda konsumenterna till bättre beslut genom att kommunicera returprocessens påverkan. Företagen behöver därmed ta ett ytterligare ansvar för den påverkan som deras verksamhet ger upphov till. På så sätt kan CSR användas inom frakt- och returneringspolicyn, där företagen driver en hållbar utveckling samt visar på deras ansvarstagande. / Background: E-commerce in the fashion industry continues to increase and contributes to a higher degree of competition. The amount of returns is also increasing and at the same time the demands for a high delivery service among customers increases. This is burdening the return process and contributing to a poorer environment with increased transports and more material consumption. Eventually, this becomes both a question about cost issue and a sustainability issue that the companies in E-commerce needs to consider in order to continue profile themselves as sustainable. Aim: The purpose of the study is to increase the understanding of how Corporate Social Responsibility can be used in the E-commerce delivery- and return policies, in the fashion industry. Design: This study has a qualitative research design. Through a multiple case study with four case companies and one organization the empirical material has contributed to fulfilling the purpose of the study. Conclusion: In order for the companies to continue to be profitable and to be able to profile themselves as sustainable they need to communicate the impact of the return process. This in order to guide the consumers to make better decisions. The companies therefore need to take additional responsibility for the impact that their business gives rise to. In this way CSR can be used within the delivery- and return policy, where the companies drive sustainable development and demonstrate their responsibility.

This study investigates the relationship between profit-making corporations and the not-for-profit sector within Australia. The broad field of corporate social responsibility, or CSR, is discussed, narrowing to the activity of corporate philanthropy and corporate social investment. The latter is defined as being philanthropy with strategic intent, in order to build capacity within the recipient organisation which in most cases will produce beneficial outcomes for the donor as well (Tracey, 2003). The title of this study has used the term ‘philanthropic contract’ (Broadbent, 2001; Kouzmin, 2007) to describe the relationship between commercial organisations and charitable ones and the unwritten societal expectation, that the corporate sector will support the work of members of the not-for-profit sector. This study also uses the term ‘social capital’ (Putnam, 1995) to describe one of the principle areas of benefit for companies who participate.The aspect of the relationship between the two sectors that formed the focus of this study is defined as being the interaction between the two that involves financial contributions and those of goods and services as well as expertise, information and influence flowing from profit-making companies to not-for-profit organisations.The direction of the research is to advance toward an understanding of why corporations engage in this practice and toward a conclusion as to whether corporate social investing is a mutually beneficial exchange. Finally, the study highlights examples of engagement processes, and advice from those participating. The inclusion of these in the study is designed to provide valuable learning for other corporations, and not-for-profit organisations, contemplating entering into their own philanthropic partnerships.Through ten qualitative interviews this inquiry investigated the attitudes toward this relationship of various stakeholders including the management of not-for-profit organisations, representatives of relevant associations and social commentators. It became apparent that the previously well-publicised opposition to publicly listed companies supporting the not-for-profit sector, proffered by organisations such as the Australian Shareholders’ Association, had largely evaporated.Case studies involving five profit-making corporations, operating within Australia, were then undertaken and the views of their senior management sought as regards their motivations, aims, and outcomes. Overwhelmingly their experiences were positive for the corporation, the organisations they were funding, and the members of the community that the recipients were in turn supporting.Corporate benefits reported included increased ability to attract quality staff, enhanced ability to retain staff, significant development for staff that actively participated, improved corporate culture and the building of social capital leading to enhanced reputation which supported the corporations licence to operate, future objectives and long term sustainability.It is hoped that these insights along with the advice offered up by those individuals and organisations that participated in the study will benefit others and promote greater participation in corporate philanthropy and social investment within Australia. vii

<p>During the last years, the moral and ethics in companies has been a growing subject in media. Large multinational companies are to a bigger extent using workforce in developing countries and the working conditions at the workplaces in those countries, are more or less controlled. Even if a company carefully controls its own business, it can be using subcontractors that for instance use child labour or forced labour, or in some other way makes human rights abuses. When the world gets more globalized and the market where the companies act gets bigger, there will be new issues for companies to handle. The companies have to satisfy not only the interests of the costumers and the shareholders, but also the environment around it, containing many different stakeholders. Many companies do this by implementing "Codes of Conduct" and by working with what is often named <em>Corporate Social Responsibility</em> (CSR).</p><p>The purpose of this thesis is to interrogate how a company can adapt its work with CSR towards its stakeholders. The company chosen is Electrolux, since they have been praised by Globe Forum for their work with CSR in the category <em>Business Operation</em> and <em>Reporting. </em>To evaluate the performance of Electrolux, we have used the ten principles of the UN Global Compact. The ten principles states what can be done by companies in four different areas: human rights; working conditions; environment and anticorruption.</p><p>To do the evaluation we have been studying theories that explain a company's relations to its stakeholders (stakeholder theory) as well as a theory of CSR (Carrols four step pyramid). The data collection has been made mainly from reports from Electrolux, but also other documents and newspaper articles have been used.</p><p>The results indicate that Electrolux have managed to do such a successful job with CSR because they listen to all of its stakeholders and also shows them that they actually implement specific operations to take responsibility.</p>

During the last years, the moral and ethics in companies has been a growing subject in media. Large multinational companies are to a bigger extent using workforce in developing countries and the working conditions at the workplaces in those countries, are more or less controlled. Even if a company carefully controls its own business, it can be using subcontractors that for instance use child labour or forced labour, or in some other way makes human rights abuses. When the world gets more globalized and the market where the companies act gets bigger, there will be new issues for companies to handle. The companies have to satisfy not only the interests of the costumers and the shareholders, but also the environment around it, containing many different stakeholders. Many companies do this by implementing "Codes of Conduct" and by working with what is often named Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR). The purpose of this thesis is to interrogate how a company can adapt its work with CSR towards its stakeholders. The company chosen is Electrolux, since they have been praised by Globe Forum for their work with CSR in the category Business Operation and Reporting. To evaluate the performance of Electrolux, we have used the ten principles of the UN Global Compact. The ten principles states what can be done by companies in four different areas: human rights; working conditions; environment and anticorruption. To do the evaluation we have been studying theories that explain a company's relations to its stakeholders (stakeholder theory) as well as a theory of CSR (Carrols four step pyramid). The data collection has been made mainly from reports from Electrolux, but also other documents and newspaper articles have been used. The results indicate that Electrolux have managed to do such a successful job with CSR because they listen to all of its stakeholders and also shows them that they actually implement specific operations to take responsibility.

Die Dissertation beschäftigt sich mit der Definition von Corporate Social Performance im ersten Teil. Hierbei wird zuerst geklärt, weshalb eine Definition notwendig ist und ob in empirischen Studien verwendete Maße die verwendeten Definitionen abbilden. Nachfolgend wird ein Definitionsvorschlag aus bekannten Definitionen entwickelt. Im zweiten Teil der Arbeit wird geklärt, welche Faktoren dazu führen, dass Unternehmen eine soziale Berichterstattung haben und ob diese Art der Berichterstattung auch zur finanziellen Leistung von Unternehmen beitragen kann.

SAMMANFATTNING                                                                                       Titel: Corporate Social Responsibility, CSR, som del av företagens varumärke – Påverkar CSR kundernas val vid butik? Nivå: C-uppsats i ämnet företagsekonomi Författare: Emmelie Ahlin och Sandra Skog Handledare: Agneta Sundström Datum: 2013 – Maj Syfte: Syftet är att beskriva och analysera hur företag arbetar med CSR som del av varumärket och hur det inverkar på konsumenter vid val av butik. Metod: Studien har tillämpat kvantitativ metod och som stöd för datainsamling har en enkätundersökning genomförts. Data som samlats in har bearbetas och presenteras i arbetet med hjälp av cirkel- och stapeldiagram. Vi har utgått från kvalitativ metod genom att genomföra två e-mail intervjuer med Coop och ICA. Sekundär data har samlats in genom Internet och företagens hemsida. För att få teoretiskt stöd i analysen har vi använt vetenskapliga artiklar och böcker. Resultatet har analyserats genom att sammanställa och koda insamlat material. Resultat &amp; slutsats: Resultatet visar att företagen i studien presenterar sig som mycket ansvarsfulla på respektive hemsida. Intervjuerna visar att båda företagen, som representeras av Coop och ICA, anser att de lägger ner mycket arbete inom CSR. De har ett nära samarbete med olika organisationer samt har miljömärka produkter som konsumenterna genom köp kan bidra till en bättre miljö och ett bättre samhälle. Från analysen framgår att företagen arbetar på ett liknande sätt när det gäller CSR. Skillnaden är att Coop arbetar mer med kommunikationen i relation till kunderna än vad ICA gör. När det gäller konsumenterna anser de att Coop är mer ansvarstagande än ICA. En slutsats är att kunderna anser att CSR är viktigt men att när de kommer till faktiska val väljer de utifrån andra kriterier.  Förslag till fortsatt forskning: Det vi ser som intressant att forska vidare om är hur konsumenter prioriterar och väljer butiker i andra branscher. Ett annat förslag är att studera hur företagen i vår studie kan påverka konsumenterna att göra mer ansvarsfulla val. Uppsatsens bidrag: Studiens bidrag är att vi kunnat visa att majoriteten av konsumenterna anser det viktigt att den butik de handlar i tar ett socialt och miljömässigt ansvar för de produkter de säljer. Vi har sett att de trots att de säger att det är viktigt med socialt och miljömässigt ansvarstagande så har det låg betydelse när de väljer butik. Konsumenterna säger att det är viktigt med socialt och miljömässigt ansvar men att när de sedan ska välja själva så är det närhet som är det viktigaste. / ABSTRACT Title: Corporate Social Responsibility, CSR, as part of the corporate brand – Affects CSR costumers´choice at the store? Level: Final assignment for Bachelor Degree in Business Administration Author: Emmelie Ahlin &amp; Sandra Skog Supervisor: Agneta Sundström Date: 2013 – May Aim: The aim is to describe and analyze how companies work with CSR as part of the brand and how it affects consumers when choosing store. Method: The study applied quantitative methodology and supporting data collection is survey carried out. The data collected is processed and presented in the report by the use of pie charts and bar charts. We have also used qualitative method by carrying out two e-mail interviews with Coop and ICA. Secondary data was collected through the Internet and from corporate websites. To obtain theoretical support, we have used scientific articles and books. The results were analyzed by compiling and encoding the material that we collected.  esult &amp; Conclusions: The results show that companies in the study present itself as very responsible on the website. The interviews show that both companies, represented by Coop and ICA, that they put a lot of work in CSR. They work closely with various organizations and the environmental label products as consumers through to purchase can contribute to a better environment and a better society. From analysis shows that firms operating in a similar way when it comes to CSR. The difference is that Coop is working more with communication in relation to customers than what ICA does. With regard to consumers, they believe that Coop is more responsible than ICA. One conclusion is that customers believe that CSR is important but when they get to the actual choices they choose based on other criteria.  Suggestions for future research: What we see as interesting to further research is how consumers prioritize and select retailers in other industries. Another proposal is to study how the companies in our study may influence consumers to make more responsible choices. Contribution of the thesis: The study grant is that we have been able to show that the majority of consumers believe it is important that the store they shop in taking social and environmental responsibility for the products they sell. We have seen that even though they say that it is essential to social and environmental responsibility, it has low importance when choosing store. Consumers say it's important to social and environmental responsibility, but then when they choose themselves, it's proximity to the most important thing.

Abstract The purpose of our thesis was to comprehend how organizations approach the Corporate Social Contract that exists between them and society. The empirical data was gathered to reflect a comprehension of the Corporate Social Contract as a whole and as the product of its components, i.e.: Corporate Social Responsibility and Reciprocity. Other concepts interconnected with our main topic were also used in order to better comprehend the concept of Corporate Social Contract as well as our interpretations of the collected empirical data. These interconnected concepts were Corporate Sustainability, Corporate Citizenship, Shared Value, and Willingness to Pay.   The research work was approached from the qualitative standpoint. Considering that the perspective of our thesis was an organizational one, we approached 5 organizations within which to conduct interviews on the stated topic. Our aim was merely to understand the organizational perspective and approach to the concept of Corporate Social Contract, not to compare these perspectives and approaches.   Each of the chosen organizations met certain basic criteria mentioned in our work that permitted us to include them in our sample. The thesis’ conclusion reflected various organizational approaches towards Corporate Social Contract from the angle of Corporate Social Responsibility as well as varying perspectives on, and expectations of, society’s reciprocity. The study has shown that our view of the equal importance of the concepts of CSR and Reciprocity, within the framework of CSC fulfillment, is an under investigated area in both academics and in the practical business world. This has also been supported by our interviewees’ view on expectations, placed on society, as an implicit area in their organizations’ policies. Through our study we have uncovered practical reasons as to why CSC cannot be fulfilled all the time, how expectations between both organizations and society differ from project to project, and the importance of societal reciprocity in the aim of CSC fulfillment. And thus, through our study, we endeavor to comprehend how organizations fulfill the CSC and how they view society’s attempts to fulfill its end of the contract.   As a result of our work, future students and researchers stand to gain insights into the mentalities of organizations that hail from different industries and are based in different parts of the world. Future students and researchers could also derive their own interpretations of our respondents words based on the culture prevalent in the country in which the respondents are based. Apart from this, one can note that the respondents were also from a range of departments and their professionally skewed perspective on our topic makes for an interesting contribution to those seeking insights into our topic and those interlinked.   Key Words: Corporate Social Contract, Corporate Social Responsibility, Reciprocity, Corporate Sustainability, Corporate Citizenship, Shared Value, and Willingness to Pay.