1 |
An economic analysis of a large scale ashe juniper clearing project in the Leon River watershedFlack, Rebecca Lynn 15 May 2009 (has links)
Ashe Juniper (Juniperus ashei) is native to the Edwards Plateau in central Texas.
In the past 150 years, however, this species has rapidly increased in abundance within its
range. Reduced fire frequency and increased livestock grazing, are two factors attributed
to the rapid rate of juniper encroachment. While the losses associated with brush
encroachment are recognized, many ranchers lack the funds necessary to implement
management practices to reduce juniper densities on their property. The high cost
associated with clearing brush has led to the creation of cost-share programs, which help
offset the expenses incurred by participating landowners.
The Leon River Restoration Project (LRRP), implemented on private lands within
Coryell and Hamilton Counties, Texas, is one such cost-share program. Funding for the
LRRP is received through non-programmatic sources, in the form of grants, from various
state and federal organizations and agencies. The Natural Resources Conservation
Service (NRCS) provides a second source of funding through the Environmental Quality
Incentives Program (EQIP). Participants contracted through LRRP funds receive 85%
cost-share benefits, up to a maximum of $15,000. Landowners participating in the LRRP
under EQIP funds receive 50% cost-share incentives, up to a maximum of $250,000. The purpose of this study was to record changes that occurred on land enrolled in
the LRRP, following juniper removal, and the economic benefits recognized by this
work. Thirty landowners scheduled to participate in the LRRP were interviewed in 2003,
prior to juniper control work. In 2006, 23 of the original 30 landowners participated in a
second interview, following their completion of brush removal work. Changes attributed
to juniper removal were recorded during these post-clearing interviews. Stocking rate
changes were used as the basis for measuring economic benefits recognized by the
clearing efforts. Changes in hunting or grazing lease rates resulting from juniper clearing
were also used to monitor economic benefits of the brushwork. A second component of
the study tested for differences in landowner satisfaction between LRRP participants
enrolled under LRRP funds, and those contracted under EQIP funds. Importanceperformance
matrixes were created to display satisfaction differences.
|
2 |
Evaluation of Cost-share Assistance Programs as an Incentive for Wildlife Habitat Management and Conservation on Private Lands in MississippiWigginton, Corey David 01 May 2010 (has links)
Cost-share programs to improve sustainable land and water use are offered from federal, state, and non-governmental entities to non-industrial private (NIP) landowners. Despite the broad attention given to the ecological benefits of these programs, far less attention has been focused on their social impacts and benefits. To achieve the desired environmental objectives laid out within these programs, natural resource agencies must work to maintain high levels of satisfaction and participation among private landowners. The purpose of the study was to examine the attitudes and motivations of participants enrolled in one of three cost-share programs in Mississippi and compare those with the views of natural resource professionals throughout the state regarding landowner attitudes and motivations. Overall, landowners had positive views of their program experiences and the views of natural resource professionals coincided largely with those of landowners.
|
3 |
PARTICIPATION IN AGRICULTURAL GOVERNMENTAL COST SHARE PROGRAMS IN THE KENTUCKY RIVER WATERSHEDFernandes da Costa, Pedro Miguel 01 January 2011 (has links)
The purpose of this study is to review existing literature of factors that influence farmers’ decision to participate in conservation programs. This study is also intended to collect county data and information on conservation programs and participation in the Kentucky River watershed region, which can be analyzed and used to draw differences in characteristics of the region that would suggest willingness to participate in a trading scheme for improvements in water quality.
The results suggest that more participation in a trading scheme from some counties than others should be expected. Counties with more farms and larger farms will probably have higher rates of participation in conservation programs.
The cost-share amounts being paid by current government programs must be considered as the minimum staring point to negotiate in a trading scheme. To target the impact of watersheds, such as the Kentucky River in the Mississippi system, that discharges significant amounts of pollutants into the Gulf of Mexico, policy makers and program administrators should be advising and stimulating the adoption of practices with the best abatement performance for such pollutants considering technical complementarity between practices.
|
4 |
Call to the post: an analysis of Montgomery County equine operators’ motivation for adoption of conservation practicesIngram, Shelly V. January 1900 (has links)
Master of Science - Agricultural Education and Communication / Department of Communications and Agricultural Education / Lauri M. Baker / The equine industry is an established part of Maryland Agriculture; the most recent equine census placed 79,100 equines valued at approximately $714 million in the state, with approximately ten percent of those animals housed in Montgomery County. But, equine operators are a unique demographic in the agricultural realm. They are not managing their lands to produce food or fiber and often are employed in other professions unrelated to agriculture. Unlike other agricultural operators, they are often unaware of conservation terms or practices and programs available to help implement these practices on their land. The basic objective of this study was to explore the level of understanding equine operators in Montgomery County, Maryland have of conservation best management practices (BMPs), associated cost-share programs, industry regulations and the aspects and methods of communication that influence them in gaining awareness of and the adoption of these practices on their properties. The study applied the tenets of the decomposed theory of planned behavior (DTPB), which combines the theory of planned behavior (TPB), diffusion of innovation theory (DOI) and economic constraint theory gathered through semi-structured qualitative interviews with participants, selected using purposive and snowball sampling. Utilizing the grounded theory method to discover emerging patterns in the data resulting from these interviews aided in identifying the most effective means of educating equine operators regarding BMPs and increasing the adoption of these practices on equine properties within the County.
Equine operators in the study were found to use a variety of informational sources, had a high level of adaptation of the BMPs they used and overall saw their role as land stewards as an important aspect of their environmental actions.
|
5 |
Factors influencing best management practice implementation in Virginia's Chesapeake Bay drainage basinLowery, James B. 20 January 2010 (has links)
<p>A survey of farmers was conducted to determine the extent of cost-share and non-costshare
BMP implementation and to evaluate the impact of socio-economic variables of the
adoption of BMPs in Virginia's Chesapeake Bay drainage basin. Farmers in 67 counties
in Virginia were randomly selected using VirGIS land use data and GRASS 4.1. All of
the counties included in the study had at least 90 percent of their total land in the
Chesapeake Bay drainage basin. Surveys were mailed to approximately 5,850 farm
operators and 1,377 responses were returned, with approximately 1,099 estimated to farm
in the Chesapeake Bay basin.</p>
<p>
A concern for pollution in the Chesapeake Bay was evident by farmers throughout the
Bay basin, as 80 percent of the respondents indicated being concerned about water
pollution in the Chesapeake Bay. However, only 33 percent believed that their farm
contributed to water quality problems. The most often indicated perceived causes of
pollution were runoff from urban or paved areas, industrial waste or factory discharge,
sewer systems, and litter or garbage.</p> / Master of Science
|
6 |
Cost share payment and willingness to participate in Virginia's Pine Bark Beetle Prevention ProgramWatson, Adam 17 June 2011 (has links)
Forest management practices which reduce southern pine beetle (SPB) risk benefit not only the landowners who perform them, but all those who draw benefits from southern pine forests in Virginia, especially other forest owners within the same region. One such management practice is pre-commercial thinning (PCT), which is particularly unattractive to non-industrial private forest (NIPF) landowners because of the substantial costs and delayed financial returns involved. Since the benefits to society generated by PCT are not fully realized by the individuals who might implement it, there may be a market externality in which PCT is underprovided across the landscape. The Pine Bark Beetle Prevention Program (PBBPP) has the potential to correct this externality by reimbursing a portion of the costs of PCT for landowners who qualify. However, cost share incentives have been criticized for being ineffectual on the basis that landowners substitute publicly funded reimbursement for private investment, without altering their management practices. To investigate the effect of the PBBPP cost share for PCT, a survey was sent to 1,200 NIPF landowners in seven counties across the Piedmont and Coastal Plain physiographic regions of Virginia, where southern pine is prevalent and SPB hazard is a relevant concern. To measure willingness to participate in the program, a referendum style question was used in which the offered cost share ranged from 20% to 90%. Results of discrete choice models estimated from survey data indicate that cost sharing has a significant, positive effect on willingness to participate overall, though increasing reimbursement above 60% is unlikely to affect participation. Some landowners are not responsive or are less responsive to cost sharing due to personal and property characteristics. / Master of Science
|
7 |
Evaluation of Manure Management Systems (MMS) and Cost-Share Programs for Mitigating Livestock Environmental ImpactsHammond, Jillian Brin 15 January 2025 (has links)
Animal agriculture is a climate-exposed industry, creating the need to implement climate-smart manure management practices to alleviate manure's pollutive potential through greenhouse gas emissions (GHGe) and excess nutrient management. Manure management systems (MMS) require high initial investment for implementation and are often incentivized by cost-share programs that assume part of the implementation cost. The objective of Chapter 3 was to quantitatively summarize the literature on GHGe and manure nutrient composition in response to MMS use. Included studies provided data on the following: system size (L), species type, days stored, manure type (i.e. whole slurry, digestate, fractions, etc.), MMS type (anaerobic digestion, solid-liquid separation, covered and uncovered storage, composting systems, or mixed MMS use), and manure emissions and nutrient composition pre- and -post MMS use. The data were used to derive emissions coefficients and explore pollution reduction correlations between MMS with different pollution targets. A key takeaway is that there is inadequate data for MMS efficacy when used across species and location. This limits the accuracy of predictions made with the derived coefficients and limits the accuracy of which cost-share programs can be designed to achieve pollution reductions. Chapter 2 had the objective of exploring the strengths and weaknesses of cost-share programs. The complimentary analysis of historical cost-share data coupled with a stated-preference survey identified prioritization of MMS targeting GHGe as the most efficient and effective use of cost-share funding. The analysis also revealed that producer willingness to pay (WTP) has not changed over the decade, but that cost-share program structure should be equipped to account for higher pollution reduction prices while promoting MMS longevity. The pursuit of sustainability relies on the continuation of cost-share programs and MMS that focus on all facets of pollution reduction. / Master of Science / Livestock contribute to climate change by emitting greenhouse gas emissions (GHGe) and excess nutrients from their manure, impacting air and water quality. Manure management systems (MMS) further process manure for alternative uses while minimizing environmental harm. These systems are expensive and often require incentives for farmers to integrate them into their operations. Cost-share programs provide incentive by sharing a portion of MMS implementation cost. To ensure these programs utilize funding efficiently, agencies must be informed on the efficacy of each MMS and understand the influence different species manure and location can have on its performance. In response, our work aimed to identify the strengths and gaps within MMS literature and determine MMS ability to reduce pollution. Furthermore, we explored opportunities to improve existing cost-share programs, gauged the ability of MMS to maintain co-benefits between air and water quality reductions, and used current farmer perspectives to inform cost-share program structure. Towards that goal, a literature search of MMS efficacy was conducted, and studies were included if they provided data regarding MMS type (anaerobic digester, solid-liquid separation, composting, covered/uncovered storage, and mixed-system use), system size (L), species type, manure type (i.e. manure consistency and state), days stored, and the emissions or nutrient composition of manure before and after MMS use. A key finding from this work was that there is not enough data on MMS as they are used across species and location to accurately inform cost-share programs. Additionally, an analysis of historical cost-share data from the Department of Conservation and Recreation (DCR) and a survey gauging producer attitude about cost-share programs was also conducted. This work highlighted that MMS targeting GHGe or both pollution types should be implemented, and incentivizing those MMS may require more funding than before. To continue to combat climate change, current and accurate estimates of MMS capabilities are needed, and cost-share programs need to reorient focus towards implementing GHGe focused MMS or those addressing all areas of manure pollution.
|
8 |
Two analyses of costs of agricultural NPS pollution: Transactions costs of expanding nutrient trading to agricultural working lands and Impacts of TCs and differential BMP adoption rates on the cost of reducing agricultural NPS pollution in VirginiaRees, Gwendolen Jayne 12 June 2015 (has links)
For over 30 years, federal and state governments have been engaged in a collective effort to improve the water quality and living resources in the Chesapeake Bay (CB), focusing particularly on reducing delivered nitrogen and phosphorus loads. However, achievement of water quality objectives remains elusive. In Virginia, agriculture represents the single largest source of nutrient loads to the Chesapeake Bay. Despite aggressive regulatory efforts in other nutrient source sectors, state authorities rely on educational programs and voluntary financial assistance programs to induce landowners to adopt best management practices (BMPs) that reduce agricultural nutrient loads. This study explores two economic aspects of efforts to reduce agricultural nonpoint source (NPS) pollution in the Virginia portion of the CB watershed.
Firstly, current and possible future transactions costs associated with specific aspects of agricultural NPS participation in water quality trading (WQT) programs are examined in Chapter 1. A case study approach is used to consider the possible cost consequences of expanding the use of NPS credits from agricultural 'working lands' BMPs in Virginia. Findings indicate that overall transactions costs for nutrient trades involving agricultural NPS in Virginia are currently relatively low, due to the type of activities being credited: simple land conversions. Based on best available evidence, the administrative transactions costs of creating credits on agricultural 'working lands' using management and structural BMPs will be 2 to 5 times more costly on a per project basis than for credits generated from land conversions. Compliance monitoring protocols were found to be a significant driver of costs for credits generated from working agricultural lands. These results suggest an important cost/risk tradeoff between verification cost and compliance certainty for program designers to consider.
The second study (Chapter 2) considers the economic cost of meeting pollution reduction targets for the Virginia portion of the CB Watershed. Existing cost models are based on simplifying behavioral assumptions about public transactions costs, conservation adoption rates, and implementation costs of agricultural BMPs. This study builds on the existing literature and uses the estimates of transactions costs from Chapter 1 together with information on producer BMP adoption rates to examine the implications of including transactions costs and differential BMP costs and adoption rates when estimating the minimum costs of achieving specified nutrient reduction goals in Virginia. The paper uses a cost-minimizing mathematical programming approach and models a number of different cost scenarios. Results indicate that inclusion of transactions costs substantially affects estimates of total costs of meeting nutrient reduction goals; on average total costs increased by 44 percent, but ranged between 19 and 81 percent depending on the scenario analyzed. Analysis of the modelled scenarios shows that those BMPs that account for the most implementation costs do not necessarily account for the most transactions costs (and vice versa). This suggests that transactions costs should be acknowledged to vary with the type of practices being implemented, rather than being approximated as either a fixed amount or a fixed proportion of implementation costs. In addition, the analysis highlights the disproportionate costs associated with achieving nutrient reductions via high-cost adopters, and suggests there may be a role for education or extension to assist landholders to lower opportunity costs of participating in conservation. / Master of Science
|
9 |
Influence of three-tier cost sharing on patient compliance with and switching of cardiovascular medicationsDowell, Margaret Anne January 2002 (has links)
No description available.
|
10 |
<b>REGIONAL DISTRIBUTION OF WOODY INVASIVES AND THE RESPONSE OF PLANT COMMUNITIES TO INVASIVE CONTROL THROUGH GOVERNMENT COST SHARE PROGRAMS</b>Aubrey W Franks (18429756) 24 April 2024 (has links)
<p dir="ltr">Non-native biological invasions are one of the leading concerns for global biodiversity. The establishment of invasive species reduces local biodiversity, shifts species composition, changes successional trajectories, and alters ecosystem functions. This thesis examines two aspects of invasive plants: (1) the distribution and the most important climatic and anthropogenic drivers of invasive trees across the eastern United States, and (2) an evaluation of invasive plant removal and herbaceous recovery from a government cost-share program that provides financial support for invasive plant management by private landowners.</p><p><br></p><p dir="ltr">Our first study focused on identifying the distribution of invasive trees, and the factors associated with their distribution. This is essential to predicting spread and planning subsequent management. Using USDA Forest Inventory Analysis (FIA) data and random forest modeling, we examined the distribution, and variables associated with the distribution, of invasive tree species. Invasive trees were found in 10,511 out of 299,387 FIA plots. Invasive species basal area and density (trees per ha; TPH) were highest within the central and southern Appalachian Mountains, Michigan, the Northeast, and the southern Coastal Plain of the United States. A random forest model of invasive species basal area (R<sup>2 </sup>= 0.47, RMSE = 0.47) and density (R<sup>2</sup>=0.46, RMSE=0.50) vs. environmental variables found that both invasive basal area and density were most strongly associated with human footprint, followed by various climatic variables. An equivalent model of native tree basal (R<sup>2</sup>=0.53, RMSE=9.25) and TPH (R<sup>2</sup>=0.47, RMSE=8.64) found that native tree basal area and density were most strongly associated with aridity followed by various climatic variables. As human footprint increased, invasive tree basal area and density increased. These results suggest that the distribution of invasive trees is reliant on human alterations to forests.</p><p><br></p><p dir="ltr">Our second study focused on Environmental Quality Incentives Program (EQIP), a federal cost-share program that has provided $25 billion of financial assistance to farmers and non-industrial private forest owners. Few studies have examined whether this program facilitates the recovery of the herbaceous layer while decreasing the dominance of invasive plant species. We surveyed the herbaceous layer of EQIP-treated and untreated (reference) forests across three physiographic regions of Indiana. Using non-metric multidimensional scaling (NMDS) ordination and linear mixed effects models, we evaluated the species composition, richness, diversity, evenness, floristic quality index, and herbaceous-layer cover of EQIP and reference sites. We also used linear mixed models to evaluate how EQIP site treatment affected the diversity of native plant species. Sites treated with EQIP contracts typically had significantly higher native species richness, Shannon’s diversity, and floristic quality than reference sites. There were significant separations in species composition between EQIP treated and reference forests state-wide and in the southern non-glaciated region of Indiana, although composition overlapped between EQIP and reference forests. Our study suggests that EQIP-funded treatments promote increased species richness and diversity. However, the persistent overlap in species composition we observed may signify biotic homogenization due to a long-shared history of anthropogenic disturbances between EQIP and reference sites. Therefore, active restoration of the herbaceous layer might be needed to allow a full recovery after invasive removal.</p>
|
Page generated in 0.0577 seconds