Oregon voters legalized physician-assisted death in 1997 by passing the Oregon Death with Dignity Act. This law allowed terminally ill, mentally competent adult residents of the state to legally obtain a physician's prescription to hasten death under narrow sets of circumstances. The purpose of this study was twofold: to examine contemporary patterns of support for the law in Oregon and to explore how opinions have changed over time on the issue. This study examined patterns of public support among a random sample of registered Oregon voters for the state's death with dignity law, using a mixed mode (mail, online, and phone) cross-sectional survey (n = 442). The findings indicate a pattern of growing support with potential Oregon voters split 80%-20% on the issue, a substantial increase from the 60%-40% approval margin at the ballot box in 1997. Various demographic variables, as well as attitudinal factors, were explored in building a binary logistic regression model predicting probability of support. Frequency of church attendance, views about physician participation in the process, and opinions about Death with Dignity as an individual right were significant predictors of support. Frequent churchgoers, regardless of denomination or religious tradition, were nearly five times more likely to oppose Death with Dignity than support it, holding all other variables constant. While the findings indicate a pattern of growth in support over the past 15 years, they indicate also a stability of opinion, with few individuals indicating they had changed their opinions about the issue since the first time they encountered it.

Background: In 1997 it became legal for patients with a terminal illness to receive assistance to end their lives in Oregon, USA. The same legislative change came into force in the Netherlands in 2002. These changes have not occurred in Sweden, however a debate is ongoing in terms of the option to legalise active and physician assisted suicide and the ethical and moral aspects of this issue. Aim: The aim is to identify factors leading to patients with a diagnosis of cancer or ALS requesting assistance to end their lives. Method: A literature review and analysis was carried out, in combination with an overview of 11 ethically audited scientific articles. Results: The conclusion was divided into four main themes; depression and burden without a sub theme, pain with sub themes suffering and fatigue, existential values with sub theme hope and hopelessness and finally quality of life with the sub theme strength. Discussion: There is an evident interest in the discussion about legalising assisted suicide in Sweden, amongst patients as well as medical professionals. The patient's desire may be overridden as the subject is tabooed, thereby reducing patient autonomy and the patient´s right to self-determination. Patients' attitude towards death assistance has been discussed on the basis of theories of Helga Kuhse, Katie Eriksson and ICN's ethical code. / Bakgrund: År 1997 blev det lagligt för en patient med obotlig sjukdom att få hjälp att avsluta sitt liv i delstaten Oregon i USA. I Nederländerna blev detta ett lagligt alternativ 2002. I Sverige är detta inte lagligt men det pågår en debatt om legaliseringen av aktiv och läkarassisterad dödshjälp ur ett etiskt och moraliskt perspektiv.      Syfte: Syftet är att identifiera faktorer till varför patienter med cancer eller ALS ber om dödshjälp. Metod: En litteraturöversikt gjordes med en analys och en sammanställning av 11 etiskt granskade vetenskapliga artiklar.    Resultat: Resultatet delades in i fyra huvudteman där tre teman hade underteman. Det första huvudtemat depression och börda hade inget undertema. Det andra huvudtemat smärta har följande underteman: lidande och fatigue. Det tredje huvudtemat existentiella värderingar har undertemat: hopp och hopplöshet och slutligen det fjärde huvudtemat livskvalitet har styrka som undertema.        Diskussion: Ett intresse angående en legalisering av dödshjälp finns i Sverige hos både patienter och vårdpersonal. Patientens önskan kan bli åsidosatt då ämnet är tabubelagt och genom detta kan patientens autonomi och rätten till hens självbestämmande sänkas. Patienternas inställning till dödshjälp har diskuterats utifrån teorier av Helga Kuhse, Katie Eriksson och ICN´s etiska kod.