This study sought to review the due process appeal cases that came before the Texas State Commissioner of Education from 1970 to 1975 in order to determine the impact of the decision upon school districts' management and operation. Five purposes directed this study and are as follows: (a) to review the cases appealed to the State Commissioner from 1970 to 1975, (b) to develop a cross reference for cataloging these decisions, (c) to develop a handbook on reference materials for local administrative use, (d) to outline a special procedure for orderly due process, and (e) to determine the impact of these decisions rendered to concerning local school district policy. These five purposes were attained through a research design combining historical research methodology with survey research methodology. In conclusion, negligible impact was observed on school districts as a result of due process appeal cases. No school board changed policy as a result of the commissioner's decision. In summary, the five purposes were met. Attaining these five purposes produced the following, which are contained in the report: (a) a Cross-reference Matrix for cataloging decisions, (b) an Administrative Due Process Handbook containing case briefs, (c) a procedure for orderly due process, and (d) data results with interpretation.

Este trabalho busca uma melhor compreensão do princípio do devido processo legal, positivado pelo art. 5º, LIV, da CRFB. A maior parte da literatura jurídica nacional que o aborda concentra seus esforços em proclamar a importância do princípio ou em buscar explicá-lo com base no seu desenvolvimento no direito constitucional norte-americano. Parece-nos, entretanto, que uma compreensão constitucionalmente adequada do princípio exige uma abordagem diversa, coincidente com a usual apenas no primeiro passo, que é a apreensão de seu funcionamento no ambiente jurídico de origem. Em não se tratando de um trabalho de direito comparado, outros passos devem se seguir. Assim, sua continuação consiste na pesquisa dos antecedentes doutrinários que conduziram ao transplante do due process of law para o direito constitucional brasileiro. Depois, é necessário situá-lo no contexto da Constituição analítica de um Estado que se vincula à família do direito romano-germânico. E, por fim, verificar como o princípio tem sido aplicado na prática jurídica, particularmente pelo STF, tribunal que dá a última palavra em matéria de interpretação constitucional. / This thesis aims to reach a better understanding of the due process of law principle established in the Brazilian Federal Constitution, art. 5º, LIV. Most of brazilian juridical literature on the theme concentrates its efforts on proclaiming the importance of the principle or in trying to provide an explanation on the basis of north-american constitutional experience. But we don’t think any of these approaches are able to provide a constitutionally sound understanding of the principle. We propose a different approach, that also starts by investigating the north-american constitutional experience but goes further. It continues by researching the brazilian juridical literature that dealt with due process of law before the framing of Brazilian Federal Constitution. Next step is to set up the principle in the body of the analytical Constitution of a State which follows the roman-germanic law tradition. Last, but not least, the study examines the way due process of law has been used in juridical practice. We draw particular attention to brazilian Supreme Court’s decisions on that matter, because they state the last and highest constitutional interpretation.

Este trabalho busca uma melhor compreensão do princípio do devido processo legal, positivado pelo art. 5º, LIV, da CRFB. A maior parte da literatura jurídica nacional que o aborda concentra seus esforços em proclamar a importância do princípio ou em buscar explicá-lo com base no seu desenvolvimento no direito constitucional norte-americano. Parece-nos, entretanto, que uma compreensão constitucionalmente adequada do princípio exige uma abordagem diversa, coincidente com a usual apenas no primeiro passo, que é a apreensão de seu funcionamento no ambiente jurídico de origem. Em não se tratando de um trabalho de direito comparado, outros passos devem se seguir. Assim, sua continuação consiste na pesquisa dos antecedentes doutrinários que conduziram ao transplante do due process of law para o direito constitucional brasileiro. Depois, é necessário situá-lo no contexto da Constituição analítica de um Estado que se vincula à família do direito romano-germânico. E, por fim, verificar como o princípio tem sido aplicado na prática jurídica, particularmente pelo STF, tribunal que dá a última palavra em matéria de interpretação constitucional. / This thesis aims to reach a better understanding of the due process of law principle established in the Brazilian Federal Constitution, art. 5º, LIV. Most of brazilian juridical literature on the theme concentrates its efforts on proclaiming the importance of the principle or in trying to provide an explanation on the basis of north-american constitutional experience. But we don’t think any of these approaches are able to provide a constitutionally sound understanding of the principle. We propose a different approach, that also starts by investigating the north-american constitutional experience but goes further. It continues by researching the brazilian juridical literature that dealt with due process of law before the framing of Brazilian Federal Constitution. Next step is to set up the principle in the body of the analytical Constitution of a State which follows the roman-germanic law tradition. Last, but not least, the study examines the way due process of law has been used in juridical practice. We draw particular attention to brazilian Supreme Court’s decisions on that matter, because they state the last and highest constitutional interpretation.

Adaptive governance must work "on the ground," that is, it must operate through structures and procedures that the people it governs perceive to be legitimate and fair, as well as incorporating processes and substantive goals that are effective in allowing social-ecological systems (SESs) to adapt to climate change and other impacts. To address the continuing and accelerating alterations that climate change is bringing to SESs, adaptive governance generally will require more flexibility than prior governance institutions have often allowed. However, to function as good governance, adaptive governance must pay real attention to the problem of how to balance this increased need for flexibility with continuing governance stability so that it can foster adaptation to change without being perceived or experienced as perpetually destabilizing, disruptive, and unfair. Flexibility and stability serve different purposes in governance, and a variety of tools exist to strike different balances between them while still preserving the governance institution's legitimacy among the people governed. After reviewing those purposes and the implications of climate change for environmental governance, we examine psychological insights into the structuring of adaptive governance and the variety of legal tools available to incorporate those insights into adaptive governance regimes. Because the substantive goals of governance systems will differ among specific systems, we do not purport to comment on what the normative or substantive goals of law should be. Instead, we conclude that attention to process and procedure (including participation), as well as increased use of substantive standards (instead of rules), may allow an increased level of substantive flexibility to operate with legitimacy and fairness, providing the requisite levels of psychological, social, and economic stability needed for communities to adapt successfully to the Anthropocene.

Iura novit curia in international arbitration Abstract The thesis deals with the application of the iura novit curia principle in international arbitration. At the outset, it explains the function of the principle in the civil law tradition of court procedure and the potential issues arising out of its application in arbitration, in particular with regards to the limits of arbitral power and due process. Since the rules on conduct of arbitral proceedings provide no specific guidance in this respect, the ultimate limits of the use of the principle in arbitration are set by the national courts in proceedings on annulment and recognition of arbitral awards. The thesis attempts to delineate these limits on the case law of a few chosen countries and observe the potential similarities with their civil procedure. Despite the differences in the legal traditions in the respective countries, the analysis of the case law finds a number of common features in the approaches to the application of the iura novit curia principle in international arbitration across the chosen countries. When assessing the powers of the arbitrator to apply the law as he deems appropriate, the courts seem to share similar concerns about the observation of the parties right to be heard. Despite its somewhatʼ firmer standing in investment...

In late 19th century America, new schools of criminological thinking asserted that crime had its origins in a complex blend of environmental and social factors rather than in the moral deficiencies of the offender. Partly as a result of this new attitude the handling of offenses by juveniles became differentiated from adult cases, first through the construction of separate penal institutions and, beginning in 1899, through the establishment of courts specializing in juvenile cases. This study was undertaken to examine the attitudes of juvenile probation officers toward the Supreme Court’s Kent, Gault and Winship decisions which made a number of due process procedures mandatory in juvenile cases. Hypotheses were examined which asserted that (1) juvenile probation officers have a generally negative attitude toward due process, (2) probation officers with backgrounds in social work have more negative attitudes toward due process than do their colleagues with other types of backgrounds, and (3) within juvenile probation departments supervisors have more positive attitudes toward due process than do their subordinates.

Indiana University-Purdue University Indianapolis (IUPUI) / Organizations continuously look to improve the implementation and ultimate success of organizational change. One way to facilitate organizational change is to effectively manage employee reactions to that change. Previous research has examined the use of a due process approach, specifically in relation to the performance appraisal systems. Past results have indicated that meeting the due process criteria for adequate notice, fair hearing and judgment based on evidence positively influences employee perceptions of the performance appraisal system, organizational justice, and other key variables. The current study expands on these findings by applying the due process approach to the implementation of a merit pay system. With the main goals of a merit pay system being to retain and motivate employees, successful implementation is key. The current study measured perceptions of due process over three measurement periods during the implementation of a new merit pay system. Results demonstrated that the due process components are meaningful in the implementation of a merit pay system. Perceptions of due process predicted system satisfaction and organizational justice perceptions both within and across measurement time periods.

Since the acknowledgement of the entrapment defense by the Supreme Court in the case of Sorrells v. United States 287 U.S. 435 (1932) there have been discussions on how it should be applied. There are two schools of thought for the application of the entrapment defense. One is the objective test and the other is the subjective test for entrapment. The subjective test focuses on the defendant's predisposition while the objective test focuses on the activity of the government. The federal courts and thirty eight states use the subjective test for entrapment. Florida is one of the states that use the subjective test for entrapment. The majority of this study is focused on the history and application of the entrapment defense, with a focus on the state of Florida. The study will aim to examine the ramifications of applying a subjective test for entrapment. Furthermore, this study will shed some light on problems with the way the entrapment defense is applied in Florida. This study has led to new ideas about how and why a new test for entrapment should be embraced by the courts in Florida.

Substantive due process has been of great importance to the decision of many Supreme Court cases since its beginning. Since its inception in Lochner v. New York,[1] the Supreme Court has used the theory of substantive due process in order to grant numerous rights to individuals and this theory has been interpreted differently by each Justice that has crossed its path. This thesis will explain how recent changes in the composition of the United States Supreme Court make it likely that judicial opinions involving substantive due process will be decided differently. The United States Supreme Court’s future substantive due process jurisprudence will narrow the reach of Substantive Due Process. Justices and their past opinions as well as statements on their analysis of substantive due process will be scrutinized in order to come to this conclusion. This thesis will examine the evolution of substantive due process as well as how each Justice’s distinct views affect it within the Supreme Court’s composition. By determining how the Supreme Court is most likely to proceed and examining the rights already granted through substantive due process this thesis will come to a determination on whether the protection of the rights granted to individuals would be maintained. [1] Lochner v. New York, 198 U.S. 45, 25 S. Ct. 539, 49 L. Ed. 937 (1905)

Although the U.S. Supreme Court reached the correct result in Obergefell v. Hodges, its substantive due process and equal protection analyses were wrong. First, the majority opinion discusses the concept of equal dignity, which has no legal definition nor has it been used in prior Supreme Court jurisprudence. The majority made another mistake in using substantive due process when Obergefell could have been decided on the basis of equal protection alone. Despite these mistakes, there were parts of the opinion the Court did decide correctly. The end result -- that same-sex couples have the right to marry -- was the correct outcome. This is based on the fact that the Supreme Court has defined marriage as a fundamental right and banning marriage to same sex couples would be discrimination on the part of the government. While the majority was also correct in overruling the prior method of defining fundamental rights set forth by Glucksberg, the Court should not have made defining fundamental rights so unlimited in scope. Justice Kennedy removed the prior standard for defining fundamental rights without creating a new standard for judges to follow in the future, leaving the future of substantive due process cases uncertain. This neglect to implement a new standard to replace Glucksberg’s standard leaves substantive due process open to judicial interpretation. The Court also came close, but still neglected, to create a quasi-suspect class on the basis of sexual orientation. The Court should have created standards that were not so overly broad for future decisions regarding substantive due process, and it should have classified sexual orientation as a quasi-suspect class