1 |
Human Freedom in a World Full of Providence: An Ockhamist-Molinist Account of the Compatibility of Divine Foreknowledge and Creaturely Free WillKosciuk, Christopher J 01 February 2010 (has links)
I defend the compatibility of the classical theistic doctrine of divine providence, which includes infallible foreknowledge of all future events, with a libertarian understanding of creaturely free will. After setting out the argument for theological determinism, which purports to show the inconsistency of foreknowledge and freedom, I reject several responses as inadequate and then defend the ‚Ockhamist‛ response as successful. I further argue that the theory of middle knowledge or ‚Molinism‛ is crucial to the viability of the Ockhamist response, and proceed to defend Molinism against the most pressing objections. Finally, I argue that a proper understanding of the Creator-creature relationship accounts for why no explanation can be given for how God’s middle knowledge comes about.
|
2 |
God and Human Freedom: A Thomistically Inspired Study and Defense of the Compatibility of Divine Involvement and Human FreedomCamacho, Paul Augustine January 2007 (has links)
Thesis advisor: Peter J. Kreeft / Thesis advisor: Ronald K. Tacelli / This thesis explores and defends the compatibility of divine involvement and human freedom. It argues that, far from determining human actions, divine foreknowledge and providence stand in a unique metaphysical relationship to human free will. This relationship is explored through a creative appropriation of St. Thomas Aquinas' theory of participation. Divine knowledge and causation transcend ordinary models of knowledge and causation, operating on a different metaphysical plane than human speculative knowledge and created causation. Ultimately, the compatibility of God and human freedom rests upon an understanding of divine causality as creative and constitutive. Rather than overpowering genuine human causality, divine involvement grounds the very possibility of free human choice. / Thesis (BA) — Boston College, 2007. / Submitted to: Boston College. College of Arts and Sciences. / Discipline: Philosophy. / Discipline: College Honors Program.
|
3 |
Free Will, Genuine Alternatives and PredictabilityHagen, Laura 01 January 2011 (has links)
Through evaluating Hilary Bok’s argument from her essay Freedom and Practical Reason, I hope to shed light on the overall question of whether we can have free will if determinism is true. In the first two chapters I will fully explain and break down Bok’s argument for genuine epistemic alternatives. In chapter three I will evaluate the success of Bok’s arguments. Specifically, I will offer a variety of intuitive examples to show that epistemic unpredictability is not enough to make our alternatives genuine. I will then use more examples to consider the relative importance of unpredictability and endorsement to free will.
|
4 |
Free Will And Determinism: Are They Even Relevant To Each Other?Cagatay, Hasan 01 February 2012 (has links) (PDF)
Many philosophers tend to defend the view that there is a significant relation between the problem of determinism / indeterminism and the problem of free will. The belief that there exists such a significant relation is supported by our intuitions / however, in this thesis, I defend just the opposite view: free will has no significant dependence on the deterministic or indeterministic character of causal relations. In the same way, I propose that the question, whether or not determinism is true, cannot be answered based on observations about the problem of free will.
I believe that the genuine question whose answer would illuminate the darkness surrounding free will is whether or not will supervenes on anything other than itself. Therefore, in order to decide whether or not we are free, the question we should ask is &ldquo / Does will supervene upon something other than itself?&rdquo / Moreover, I defend the position that no matter whether the world is deterministic or indeterministic, if physicalism is true, i.e. if properties of free will supervene upon physical properties, then we cannot enjoy genuine freedom.
The position of the thesis has some important ethical implications: If we cannot be genuinely free, we cannot be genuinely responsible for our actions either. This implies that retributive and admirative desires towards other persons are rationally untenable. I defend the view that only practical attitudes like reinforcement and punishment or isolation and inclusion are rationally tenable.
|
5 |
Jak čeští spotřebitelé vnímají biopotraviny - výzkum trhu biopotravin / The Attitude of Czech Consumers to the Organic Food -- Market Research of Organic FoodBártová, Lucie January 2008 (has links)
The thesis is engaged in market research of the organic food in the Czech republic. It summarizes basic information about organic food, describes current trends in the ecological agriculture and in the consumption of organic food. The thesis brings results of the consumer audit, which tried to find out consumers' attitude to the organic food and their foreknowledge in this sphere. Part of the thesis is focused on the differences in prices between organic and conventional food.
|
6 |
About free-will : In search for a philosophical and theistic understanding of free-willLi, Oliver January 2013 (has links)
No description available.
|
7 |
Analýza informovanosti pracovníkov o organizačnej zmene v podniku / Staff foreknowledge analysis about actual organizational change in companyKordischová, Jitka January 2008 (has links)
Graduation thesis deals with sense and importance of staff foreknowledge by board of management in time of actual organizational change. Theoretical knowledge and defined hypotheses are checked in practical part. There is questionnaire investigation in concrete Czech company.
|
8 |
Podniková kultura jako faktor úspěšnosti podniku / Business culture as a factor of business successMARKOVÁ, Vladimíra January 2009 (has links)
Business culture is represented by ordinary staff, their relationship to each other and their relationship to their bosses and it is also represented by the amount of company{\crq}s goals they identify themselves with. This thesis aims to analyze the business culture of a particular company and to make suggestions to improve the existing state-of-the-art. The partial aim of the thesis is to compare the level of business culture of a chosen company with another competing company{\crq}s level of business culture and to define the key domains that enable us to implement higher level of business culture in the company more effectively. The company to get analyzed is a building company that specializes in power industry devices building-up. The deep staff and business culture survey that took place among the staff and was evaluated afterwards was the basis of information for making matter-of-fact conclusions which was the final objective of the thesis.
|
9 |
Divine providence as risk-takingSanders, John Ernest 06 1900 (has links)
This study seeks to examine the precise way it may be said that God takes risks in creating and governing this world. In order to articulate this model of providence various texts of scripture are studied which have either been overlooked or interpreted differently in discussions of divine providence. These texts reveal a deity who enters into genuine give-and-take relations with creatures, a God who is genuinely responsive and who may be said to take risks in that God does not get everything he desires in these relationships.
Furthermore, the traditional texts used to defend the no-risk view of providence are examined and shown that they do not, in fact, teach the idea that God is the cause of everything which happens in the world such that the divine will is never thwarted in the leas detail. The biblical teaching of God in reciprocal relations with his creatures is then discussed in theological and philosophical terms. The nature of God is here understood as loving, wise, faithful yet free, almighty, competent and resourceful. These ideas are explicated in light of the
more traditional theological/philosophical understanding of God. Finally, some of the implications of this relational model of God are examined to see the ways in which it may be said that God takes risks and whose will may be thwarted. The crucial watershed in this regard is whether or not there is any conditionality in the godhead. The no-risk view denies, while the risk model affirms, that some aspects of God's will, knowledge, and actions are contingent. In order to grasp
the differences between the two models the doctrines and practices involved in salvation, the problem of evil, prayer and guidance are examined to see what each model says about them. It is claimed that· .the relational or risk model is superior to the no-risk model both in terms of theoretical coherence and the
practice of the Christian life. / Philosophy, Practical & Systematic Theology / Th. D. (Sytematic Theology)
|
10 |
Divine providence as risk-takingSanders, John Ernest 06 1900 (has links)
This study seeks to examine the precise way it may be said that God takes risks in creating and governing this world. In order to articulate this model of providence various texts of scripture are studied which have either been overlooked or interpreted differently in discussions of divine providence. These texts reveal a deity who enters into genuine give-and-take relations with creatures, a God who is genuinely responsive and who may be said to take risks in that God does not get everything he desires in these relationships.
Furthermore, the traditional texts used to defend the no-risk view of providence are examined and shown that they do not, in fact, teach the idea that God is the cause of everything which happens in the world such that the divine will is never thwarted in the leas detail. The biblical teaching of God in reciprocal relations with his creatures is then discussed in theological and philosophical terms. The nature of God is here understood as loving, wise, faithful yet free, almighty, competent and resourceful. These ideas are explicated in light of the
more traditional theological/philosophical understanding of God. Finally, some of the implications of this relational model of God are examined to see the ways in which it may be said that God takes risks and whose will may be thwarted. The crucial watershed in this regard is whether or not there is any conditionality in the godhead. The no-risk view denies, while the risk model affirms, that some aspects of God's will, knowledge, and actions are contingent. In order to grasp
the differences between the two models the doctrines and practices involved in salvation, the problem of evil, prayer and guidance are examined to see what each model says about them. It is claimed that· .the relational or risk model is superior to the no-risk model both in terms of theoretical coherence and the
practice of the Christian life. / Philosophy, Practical and Systematic Theology / Th. D. (Sytematic Theology)
|
Page generated in 0.0388 seconds